Your Inappropriate Testimonal Of The Day

10:09 am January 31, 2013 Karl Monaghan

Will bigger boys/hackers be blamed?

Accident Claims

H/T DirtyDog

22 thoughts on “Your Inappropriate Testimonal Of The Day”

ffintii on January 31, 2013 at 10:11 am said:

A clever ploy to increase traffic
Jonjo on January 31, 2013 at 10:12 am said:

Was that before or after they went into Spar?
- Zynks on January 31, 2013 at 10:37 am said:
  
  Jonjo, mommy is calling you, it is time for your bath.
  - Jonjo on January 31, 2013 at 10:56 am said:
    
    My mommy is dead :-(
    - Clampers Outside! on January 31, 2013 at 3:05 pm said:
      
      Isn’t she lucky!
  - Johnjo on January 31, 2013 at 11:08 am said:
    
    Zynks, shove it up yer candleja-
Paidi on January 31, 2013 at 10:18 am said:

You sure that wasn’t a Spar on Georges St?
- Zackersetu on January 31, 2013 at 10:31 am said:
  
  inappropriate and not funny!
  - Johnny Cashmachine on January 31, 2013 at 10:36 am said:
    
    Oh grow a sense of humour!
  - Rumpleforeskin on January 31, 2013 at 10:40 am said:
    
    I thought it was the opposite actually…
  - Paidi on January 31, 2013 at 10:47 am said:
    
    I am the funniest person I know. You are wrong.
  - Am I Still on This Island on January 31, 2013 at 11:23 am said:
    
    So are all public displays of affection
    - Zackersetu on January 31, 2013 at 12:03 pm said:
      
      Grow a sense of humour? … so you think that its funny?
      
      I shall file you under this particular form of scum of the earth so.
      http://sparhomophobes.tumblr.com/
      
      What ever about the spar incident’s circumstances and PDAs, it is comments from people like you (and others on here) that promote and propagate this.
      
      I have a sense of humour. I accept you might also have a sense of humour. Clearly we don’t agree on what constitutes funny however.
      - Paidi on January 31, 2013 at 12:50 pm said:
        
        *Makes a fart noise*
Jack Ascinine on January 31, 2013 at 10:36 am said:

Don’t believe it was a ploy to increase traffic as the site is down now.
- ffintii on January 31, 2013 at 10:39 am said:
  
  Disagree, the increased traffic has caused it to be down
cgarvey on January 31, 2013 at 10:41 am said:

Private WHOIS, cheap templated design, no contact details (would a solicitor/lawyer really OK that?), and hosted on cheap US hosting; sure signs of a dodgy site, so it’s not too surprising to see a fake testimonial like that.
Cappo on January 31, 2013 at 11:22 am said:

Better call Saul!
- murphy on January 31, 2013 at 11:28 am said:
  
  +1,000,000,000,000
  - Captain Obvious on January 31, 2013 at 12:08 pm said:
    
    + 1000000
    
    The legend that is Saul!
Humans Eh! on January 31, 2013 at 11:30 am said:

Maybe Google Ads do user relevant testimonial placements now.

Eh Karl ?

Eh?
MrMessy on January 31, 2013 at 11:56 am said:

Thats genius…. fair play!