Stonewalling

at

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 10.21.33 Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 10.22.22

From top: Tánaiste and Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald and RTÉ’s Miriam O’Callaghan; Ms Fitzgerald

Like a boss.

Last night, Tánaiste and Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald appeared on RTÉ’s Prime Time.

Presenter Miriam O’Callaghan repeatedly asked Ms Fitzgerald was she either surprised or concerned by Garda Commissioner Nóirín O’Sullivan’s attempts – via senior counsel Colm Smyth – to undermine Sgt Maurice McCabe’s credibility during the commission of investigation by Justice Kevin O’Higgins into Sgt McCabe’s complaints of malpractice.

Ms Fitzgerald’s appearance came after journalist Katie Hannon revealed transcripts of the exchanges between Mr Smyth and Mr O’Higgins which can be read here.

Grab a tay.

Miriam O’Callaghan: “Were you taken aback to discover the approach that the Commissioner and her legal team took in the O’Higgins’ investigation which was to challenge the motivation and credibility of the whistleblower Maurice McCabe? Were you taken aback by that?”

Frances Fitzgerald: “Well, let’s put this into context. What we’re hearing about tonight is partial evidence, apparently, a transcript that was given at a Commission of Inquiry that interviewed 97 witnesses, took over 34 days of hearings, was held in private – nobody asked for it to be held in public – and a couple of weeks ago we had the report given to me and then published after certain legal actions, 360 pages of a report, making a lot of recommendations, having examined the issues that Sean Guerin had examined in a preliminary way two years ago.”

O’Callaghan: “Ok.”

Fitzgerald: “Now it’s illegal to publish these transcripts. For me to comment on them, I don’t know whether their partial, whether they’re full and I think it is undermining of the overall commissioned report when we select out certain transcripts. So I do have to make that point…”

O’Callaghan: “Let me come back in there. OK. But let me come back in on my  original question..”

Fitzgerald: “Yes, can I…”

O’Callaghan: “…which was: are you taken aback by the approach that the Commissioner and her legal team took at the O’Higgins investigation in relation to the whistleblower Maurice McCabe? Because, in public, the Commissioner was talking about valuing his role as a whistleblower and yet, in private, in these sessions – and they’re now public –  she was actually actively challenging the motivation and his credibility.”

Fitzgerald:I don’t think it’s appropriate for me, as minister for justice, to go into the details of the instructions that were or weren’t given to a particular legal team…”

O’Callaghan: “But they’re in the public domain now minister.”

Fitzgerald:Illegally and one doesn’t know how comprehensive they are, but the point I want to make…”

O’Callaghan: “But they’re true, that’s the point…”

Fitzgerald: “Well…”

O’Callaghan: “That’s the role and the approach that the Commissioner adopted. And I’m just asking you: are you surprised at that approach?”

Fitzgerald: “What I have to say to you is that you’re asking me to second guess the commission effectively by your question. Because what we have is a Justice O’Higgins who heard all of the evidence, who was in the unique position to hear everything, to see the approach of all the different legal teams, to interview witnesses and in his final report he does not include the particular points that you’ve made.”

O’Callaghan: “Are you happy that this was excluded?”

Fitzgerald: “But what I have to say…”

O’Callaghan: “No, no, actually, that’s an important point minister.”

Fitzgerald: “It is an important point.”

O’Callaghan:Are you happy that that exchange was excluded from the final report?

Fitzgerald: “But what you’re asking me to do and I want to go on and answer your point in relation to the Commissioner but you’re asking me to actually second guess  a commission of..”

O’Callaghan: “I’m not.”

Fitzgerald: “You are..”

O’Callaghan: “You just said it wasn’t in the final report…”

Fitzgerald: “Yes.”

O’Callaghan: “And I’m asking you are you surprised that exchange isn’t in the final report?”

Fitzgerald: “But I have to accept what Justice O’Higgins who we gave the statutory responsibility to do: to do this investigation, this Commission of Investigation. This is a methodology that’s, if you like, well tried and tested. I accept fully, as does the Government, the findings in the report and I believe we should be focusing on those now and the role of victims particularly and the changes that are needed to be made in An Garda Siochana in relation to investigations but in relation to the Commissioner, can I say that, what I have to go by, is what she said in her statement last night where she says that ‘Sgt Maurice McCabe’s contribution is valued and the service is changed for the better in response to the issues about which he complained’.”

O’Callaghan:But minister, that is totally at variance with what her lawyers, acting on her instructions, were doing and saying about Maurice McCabe…”

Later

Fitzgerald: “For me to start commenting on that, is to take partial transcript that I don’t know the context, what happened before it, what happened after it. I have to go on what the Commission of Investigation said. What they, what Justice O’Higgins said in the 370 pages and I go on what the Commissioner said in relation to her approach..”

Watch Prime Time back in full here

Earlier: Clarifying Matters

‘We Shouldn’t Lose Sight Of The Victims’

Sponsored Link

9 thoughts on “Stonewalling

  1. moroccan rug dealer

    How could we ever believe Commissioner again? It opens eyes to other cases like Ian Bailey. Who would a juror believe…a Chief Supt or a suspect.? The fact Maurice mc Cabe taped meetings is evidence alone that he suspected he would be framed. What about muppet senior officers? A taxi driver assaulted, a child kidnapped ( parents would be suspects today if child was “missing”) and a woman murdered. Did we have any senior officer to see glaring cracks in the system and try to repair it? No. They went after the whistleblower garda instead. And that should frighten us.

  2. kellma

    This all stinks to high heaven. And the amount of smoke and mirrors tactics going on would give any Duran Duran concert a run for its money… IMO, those guards that effectively attempted to obstruct justice should be named and shamed. I can’t even imagine the pile of cr*p Mr. Mc Cabe has been put through…

    1. Anne

      IMO, those guards that effectively attempted to obstruct justice should be named and shamed. I can’t even imagine the pile of cr*p Mr. Mc Cabe has been put through…

      In my opinion they were probably urged to make these claims and provide the fabricated evidence… what motive would they have had personally like?

      It goes all the way to the top this level of corruption and I doubt they can be made scapegoats of as they’d bring the lot of them down with them….Karma is a b*tch though. Rotten disgusting criminality..

  3. Eoin

    Francis Fitzgerald should be, at the very least, using language that at even just appears critical of this whole mess. But no, instead she’s there gatekeeping, toeing the illogical party line. And attacking whistleblowers is such a dangerous and reckless act. What an establishment witch. I can’t wait for the next election this summer so I can deal out some justice to these people who no longer represent the people of Ireland and are incapable/unwilling to change anything for the betterment of the people.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link
Broadsheet.ie