President Hillary Clinton is a woman and a democrat she will be the greatest president in US history this magazine is dangerously misogynistic and needs to be banned.
The Internet Is For Cats
Hilary Clinton would make a great president. What’s the story with this mag anyways? – it used to be vaguely lefty, but now I note it publishes John Waters (not the nice American one)- what’s next Ronan Mullen and Breda
rory
At last night’s debate Hillary Clinton reiterated her support for imposing a No Fly Zone in Syria, despite saying in a speech to a Golman Sachs conference in 2013 that to do so would “kill a lot of Syrians,” much of them civilian.
On Sept 22nd, during a testimony before the Senate Comittee on Armed Services, the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford stated that to impose a ‘no fly zone’ would result in a war with Syria and Russia.
I’m guessing this will sound dramatic in this day and age, but the last time people were discussing war between America and Russia was during the Cold War, and the term ‘World War 3’ would be mentioned.
rory
CLARIFICATION: While it is worth noting the very real dangers in implementing a no fly zone in Syria, it should be clarified that I have taken Joseph Dunfords comments out of context.
While the question asked of Joseph Dunford was in relation to ‘no fly zones’, it becomes apparent in the clip below that Dunford has misinterpreted the question, instead saying what it would take for the U.S. to control Syria’s airspace in it’s entirety, (rather than saying what it would take to implement ‘no fly zones’ in Northern Syria, which is what Hillary is suggesting.)
Apologies for any confusion caused. https://youtu.be/8mNgElVy7eQ
It is still very much worth stressing the riskiness of implementing no fly zones, as Russia has control of Syrian airspace and is likely to veto implementation of no fly zones in the UN, even on humanitarian grounds, because such zones would be a boost to anti-Assad fighters. If the U.S. were to enforce no fly zones anyway, and Russian fighter planes decided to enter said zones, the clash could have very negative repercussions.
Frilly Keane
But sur’ no ones got it right in Syria
Why name and shame Hillary
Or is it
Ya know
Your thing
To pick on the nearest woman
rory
No, I don’t consider it to be my thing.
I would be pointing this out if she was a different gender.
Because if Russia doesn’t agree to a no fly zone, and if the U.S. implemented it anyway, such a policy could trigger a war between the U.S. and Russia. I think the world would consider that to be a significant escalation.
Just because Trump is a monstrosity doesn’t mean Hillary’s a good candidate for president. Her speeches may be daubed in progressive leanings, but The Left consider Hillary to be right wing/hawkish. Any left wing publication worth their salt would be critical of her.
President Hillary Clinton is a woman and a democrat she will be the greatest president in US history this magazine is dangerously misogynistic and needs to be banned.
Hilary Clinton would make a great president. What’s the story with this mag anyways? – it used to be vaguely lefty, but now I note it publishes John Waters (not the nice American one)- what’s next Ronan Mullen and Breda
At last night’s debate Hillary Clinton reiterated her support for imposing a No Fly Zone in Syria, despite saying in a speech to a Golman Sachs conference in 2013 that to do so would “kill a lot of Syrians,” much of them civilian.
On Sept 22nd, during a testimony before the Senate Comittee on Armed Services, the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Dunford stated that to impose a ‘no fly zone’ would result in a war with Syria and Russia.
I’m guessing this will sound dramatic in this day and age, but the last time people were discussing war between America and Russia was during the Cold War, and the term ‘World War 3’ would be mentioned.
CLARIFICATION: While it is worth noting the very real dangers in implementing a no fly zone in Syria, it should be clarified that I have taken Joseph Dunfords comments out of context.
While the question asked of Joseph Dunford was in relation to ‘no fly zones’, it becomes apparent in the clip below that Dunford has misinterpreted the question, instead saying what it would take for the U.S. to control Syria’s airspace in it’s entirety, (rather than saying what it would take to implement ‘no fly zones’ in Northern Syria, which is what Hillary is suggesting.)
Apologies for any confusion caused.
https://youtu.be/8mNgElVy7eQ
It is still very much worth stressing the riskiness of implementing no fly zones, as Russia has control of Syrian airspace and is likely to veto implementation of no fly zones in the UN, even on humanitarian grounds, because such zones would be a boost to anti-Assad fighters. If the U.S. were to enforce no fly zones anyway, and Russian fighter planes decided to enter said zones, the clash could have very negative repercussions.
But sur’ no ones got it right in Syria
Why name and shame Hillary
Or is it
Ya know
Your thing
To pick on the nearest woman
No, I don’t consider it to be my thing.
I would be pointing this out if she was a different gender.
Because if Russia doesn’t agree to a no fly zone, and if the U.S. implemented it anyway, such a policy could trigger a war between the U.S. and Russia. I think the world would consider that to be a significant escalation.
Just because Trump is a monstrosity doesn’t mean Hillary’s a good candidate for president. Her speeches may be daubed in progressive leanings, but The Left consider Hillary to be right wing/hawkish. Any left wing publication worth their salt would be critical of her.