Spotting The Woods For The Trees

at

15/9/2009. FF Day 2. L to R. Taoiseach and Leader of Fianna Fail, Brian Cowen and Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheal Martin are joined by Dr Michael Woods TD after the family photo, on the second day of the Summer 09 FF Think-In at the Hodson Bay Hotel outside Athlone. Photo: Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

Dr Michael Woods (Right) with Former Taoiseach Brian Cowen (left) and Micheál Martín at an FF Think-In in 2009

The June 2002 deal between Fianna Fáil and 18 religious orders, brokered by Michael Woods while serving as Minister for Education, awarded indemnity against all legal claims if the orders paid €128m in cash and property.

The agreement was made by Mr Woods, a devout Catholic, on behalf of Fianna Fail, before the 2002 General Election and cabinet approval was never sought. It was also never run past the Attorney General of the day [Michael McDowell].

At the time total liability to survivors was estimated at €300m even though no detailed analysis was carried out by any government department. Total liability is currently estimated at €1.5bn

On this morning’s Today with Sean O’Rourke on RTÉ Radio One, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martín was asked about the deal.

Seán O’Rourke: “Should the Government now, given what was revealed in Tuam, revisit the deal that was done in 2002 between the church and the then Fianna Fáil government? You were part of it. There was the minister [for justice], Michael Woods giving the religious orders a €128million or 128million pound/punt indemnity. And, since then, the State has paid €1.5billion in restitution for the abuse. I’m not sure if the €128million, such as it was, has actually ever been delivered?

Micheál Martín: “Well, first of all, there’s two elements of that. There’s the payments to victims of industrial schools at the time. And the redress board that was established – that would have had to be established irrespective of any deal with the church, Sean. The church would never had been coming up with €1.5billion and the legal advice at the time, and I remember speaking to the late Rory Brady who was the Attorney General [Editor’s note: Mr Brady was appointed Attorney General after the indemnity deal was struck], he was adamant that the State would always, because of its involvement, from the inspectorial regime at the time in industrial schools – it was culpable. And so the choice was: does one, would you leave the victims waiting and those who were in, the survivors, sorry, of industrial schools, would you leave them waiting or would you allow them have to go through the courts for years to get their justified compensation. Or would you do…”

O’Rourke: “Are you saying that was the best deal that could be done at the time?

Martin: “No I’m saying it was the most humane thing that could have been done in terms of the redress scheme. In terms of the Church in my view a better deal could be done. and, for example, I think all the hospitals in the state should be given over by the churches to the state. I think the state has invested hugely in them anyway but I think issues like that could occur but in terms of actual pure cash I don’t think you were ever going to get to a situation the where the church would be coming up with the  1.5 billion. I would respectfully suggest the state was culpable, we were told the state was culpable. Demonstrably so. The state inspected these schools.”

O Rourke: “Of course the church is not neatly identifiable entity. it has different if you like manifestations a lot of which are independent of one another. Dioceses are different from religious orders…so how do you actually tie it all down?”

Martin” Well I think you engage with all the various orders one by one, you engage with those who have particular responsibilities, some more than others it has to be said. And of course religious orders are very much in decline in terms of nuns and brothers and that who would have been running industrial schools way back then and indeed the mother and baby homes..there’s a limit to what actually can be achieved in this field if one is honest, But on the other hand, there’s properties and land. and so on like that which should be there for the common good. The orders have responded in that regard by the way in relation to the provision of some services in health and education…”

O’Rourke: “…and a plan for social housing has been provided aswell. This idea that you have with the hospitals. The ones that would be obvious and immediately come to mind would be some of the big ones in Dublin like St Vincent’s, The Mater are you saying they should be handed over effectively to the state?”

Martin: “I do actually.And given now the state is now funding all of these hospitals my own view is that it’s time if there any properties still retained by the church they should hand them over.”

O’Rourke:
“And without any religious if you will lingering influence in regard to ethical committees and things of that nature?”

Martin: “There are ethical committees that owe more to medicine than religious ethos and in my view that should always be the preeminent.”

O’Rourke: “And is this your alternative to re-opening the Michael Woods deal?”

Martin: “Well when you say re-open…I think we need to cut to chase fairly quickly here and that’s why I made that particular suggestion as an example of what could be done.”

Listen back here.

Previous: Indemnity And The Religious

Rollingnews

23 thoughts on “Spotting The Woods For The Trees

  1. Daniel Sullivan

    “The church would never had been coming up with €1.5billion and the legal advice at the time, and I remember speaking to the late Rory Brady who was the Attorney General [Editor’s note: Mr Brady was appointed Attorney General after the indemnity deal was struck], he was adamant that the State would always, because of its involvement, from the inspectorial regime at the time in industrial schools – it was culpable. ”

    The state and wider society were culpable but was it more even more like 90% plus culpable than the church and the religious orders that ran the various institutions and repeatedly told the state from the pulpit and elsewhere to back off from providing social care. This was a FF deal and while Michael might like to pretend otherwise it was always a deal that suited FF. Don’t spook the church goers and let the ordinary punter pick up the uncosted open ended tab

    I’d note that Michael Woods daughter is repeated talked of a prospective Dail candidate.

    1. Rob_G

      I think that the church should definitely be on the hook for more money, but at the end of the day, the buck stops with the state in the protection of its citizens; I think maybe it should be more like 50/50.

      “This was a FF deal … “ – most definitely.

      “I’d note that Michael Woods daughter is repeated talked of a prospective Dail candidate.”
      – not sure what this has to do with anything(?)

        1. Rob_G

          agree with the first part, but it’s a bit sh|tty to judge a person based on actions she had no control over; maybe she would have been really against the redress scheme.

          (or maybe not, but still…)

          1. bisted

            …bound to happen someday…but I agree. Sure just look at the Flanagan dynasty…daddy Oliver J was a rabid anti-semite and even used his inaugural address to the Dail to deliver a textbook racist address…son Charlie couldn’t be more different…he is even part of the ‘friends of israel’ group…

  2. :-Joe

    Fine To FAIL party involved with (just when you think they had done it all) even more dodgy dealings…

    Well.. what else is there to say… ?

    – “I’m not surprised tinky winkers…!!”

    :-J

  3. Donal

    I think any building/land/institution which is used to provide a service to the people of this country paid for by the people of this country should belong to the people of this country. Let the religious orders keep their churches and their residences etc, make them hand over the schools and hospitals

    1. Deluded

      One of the points I noted from the redress scheme was that claimants could not then pursue a legal case, they gave their testimoney but not in court; I wonder does the church now have some legal deniability?

    1. Sheik Yahbouti

      Many thanks, justsayin. A question I proposed in another thread has been answered in full by you. I had been unaware of this treachery.

  4. The Bottler

    Meanwhile in the Law Society……Tuam Babies, Grace, Traveller Ethnicity, Religious Orders…….whom shall we sue next?
    Lets get the media to focus on the GAA and the Artane Boys Band……plenty of material there!

  5. GiggidyGoo

    Is it credible that a long-serving Galway TD never heard of Tuam until recently? Really? No-one would have brought it to his attention? And that long-serving TD is now our President. Is it credible?

    1. Sheik Yahbouti

      Is that you, Mr McBride? Would that guy be one of those lefties you and the Pope are so frightened of?

  6. Truth in the News

    The 2002 Indemmity agreement was prepared by a well known legal firm Author
    Cox, was it ever inquired by anybody in Fianna Fail was there Opus Dei connections
    to any of this, what due diligence was carried out to establish if any of the property
    offered was hindered by Trusts and did the Church get paid for providing services
    under the agreement, it also worth noting that the Minister for Finance never signed
    the Agreement, In the last 20 years the Catholic Religous Orders Plus the Church
    have disposed of property, where has the proceeds ended up, there have been
    body exhumations in property cleared, who signed the orders in the Dept of Justice
    There are also the State records in the General Register Office, have they being
    investigated, to do all this it dosen’t take some one from the Law Library, to borrow
    the FF 2007 election slogan “A lot done, more to do”.
    Its well past time that the collusion that has existed in the running of this Nation
    between Church and State needs exposing, even the British did it before 1922
    they paid for Maynooth in 1796, indeed one Bishop was better than a Regimnent

  7. Lord Muck

    I wonder will Woods let his daughter borrow his navy working mans anorak, the one he used to keep in the garden shed until canvassing time came round again.

Comments are closed.