Leo Actually

at

From top: David McCullagh, of RTE; Taoiseach Leo Varadkar

Tonight.

RTÉ’s Prime Time broadcast a pre-recorded interview with Taoiseach Leo Varadkar.

They discussed the Jobstown trial, Regina Doherty, abortion, women in politics and that Love Actually quote.

From the interview…

David McCullagh: “The reality of it was that Paul Murphy was actually helping the situation by getting her out of there?”

Leo Varadkar: “I don’t think, I think that’s one interpretation, you cause a protest, you harass someone, treat them badly shout at them, then after that help them get out. So that’s one perhaps interpretation of what happened.”

“But there is one thing that I would say and I have no difficulty saying it, people need to trust what the Gardai say on the stand, and I can understand that perhaps in a scenario whereby lots of things are happening quickly and people are caught up in the heat of the moment they may have a recollection that isn’t exactly as things happened but I would be very concerned if it’s the case that we would ever have Gardai on a stand in the court giving evidence that is not in line with the facts, that is not in line with the video evidence and I think that there is something there that needs to be looked at both by the Garda Commissioner and senior Garda management. We need to be able to trust that when the Gardai stand up in court and they say something happened that it did happen and it shouldn’t conflict with video evidence and if it does then that is a problem.

McCullagh: “Well should there be an inquiry into it?”

Varadkar: “I don’t think a public inquiry would actually serve any purpose, you know we’ve had a trial. There’s been a trial, went on for nine weeks, the jury heard the evidence from both sides, and they decided to acquit and nobody is disputing that. As has been the case with other things, you know for example the trial of Sean Fitzpatrick, I do think we need to consider why the prosecutions weren’t successful. I don’t think this necessarily requires a public inquiry but we do need to obviously examine these things.”

McCullagh: “I don’t know whether you’ve seen claims by a blogger that she was approached by Gardai and warned against posting criticisms of Regina Doherty on social media but if that turns out to have been true would you be concerned about that?

Varadkar: “I actually don’t know the facts of that case and I saw something in the paper but I haven’t had a chance to talk to Minister Doherty about it. I would imagine that if anyone was cautioned by the Gardai it would be done for legitimate reason. You know, Gardai don’t caution people because of interpersonal disputes or a civil offence. If somebody is cautioned my understanding is that it has to be related to some sort of criminal offence but I actually don’t know the details of that.”

David McCullagh: “Taoiseach, one area where hard choices will have to be made is in relation to abortion. The Citizens’ Convention by a two-thirds majority recommended unlimited access to abortion. Were you surprised by that?”

Varadkar: “I was a little bit surprised. I wasn’t surprised at all that they proposed that we should repeal and replace the eighth amendment and liberalise our abortion laws. I think that’s very much in line with what we’ve seen in public opinion polls. But the recommendation that they made to allow abortion by choice up to 12 or 22 weeks, that wouldn’t be in line with public opinion polls, that did surprise me a little bit. On the other hand I appreciate that they did a lot of work and they heard a lot of evidence, a lot of personal stories, and they came to that conclusion as a considered conclusion. and it is of course possible that the Oireachtas Committee and subsequently the Irish people may yet come to the same conclusion once we have a debate about it.”

McCullagh: “What’s your view?”

Varadkar: “What I don’t want to do at this stage is to be seen in anyway to be preempting or directing the Oireachtas committee to come out with any particular wording or legislation, but it is my view that our abortion laws are too restrictive. I have said that in the past and that is my view. What we will have now next year is a referendum which will give people the option if they wish to liberalise them, and there will be a free vote on them in parliament.”

McCullagh: “You donated €200 to Women for Election at the weekend, they might have been happier if you had kept the cash and appointed more women to cabinet?”

Varadkar: “They may have been, I think it’s important though to look at the facts, we have a parliamentary system and you elect and select the ministers from members of parliament. There are 12 female TDs who support the government, seven of those 12 are ministers, including the Tanaiste and five at the Cabinet table, and three chair Oireachtas Commitees, so 10 out of the 12 women who support the government are in paid promotional positions.”

“So I don’t think anyone can argue we don’t promote women… we’ve, 10 out of the 12 are in paid promotional positions. The difficulty is we don’t have enough women members of parliament, TDs in the Dail. My party has more than any other party, we have 11, and we are the party that brought in the quotas that made that possible. But we have a long way to go. I am determined that we should do that, that we should ensure that we increase representation in the next Dail and therefore many more women to select from and make a more diverse cabinet. I am a real believer in diversity, I think diversity is good in its own right and you get better decisions if you have a diverse parliament and a diverse government.”

McCullagh: “The Love Actually reference in Downing Street, the socks for Justin Trudeau, why do you do that sort of thing – does it distract from policy?”

Varadkar: “No that’s just me, that’s just my personality. And you know every politician is different, every Taoiseach is different, we all have our own personalities and our ways of doing thing, our own style and own little quirks. I don’t think any of that distracts from policy at all. You know, of the other meetings I’ve had, needless to say, with prime ministers of other countries, presidents, have been very serious meetings, but I don’t think that means that you can’t be a human being as well.”

Watch back in full here

Sponsored Link

19 thoughts on “Leo Actually

  1. missred

    “Why do you do that sort of thing – does it ditract from policy?” – in the international media it certainly does, that’s all they ever see from him.
    Good on David for at least asking, other journos wouldn’t bother.

  2. frank

    I find nothing to engender our Taoiseach to me and I believe he is absolutely not a nice guy. He is determined I believe to do great harm and he will insist he is doing his best.
    Not a one I’d have in for a drink or anything else.
    Ever.
    I put it out there already; ‘a bad yoke’ him.

  3. Truth in the News

    The political reality is that none of political elite will take on the Guards at senior level, as they all have
    being appointed to their positions by what ever Government rules the roost, and in turn the Guards do
    and carry out political favour’s to their benefactors and its merely supplying tit bits on Jerry and Co or
    Mick Wallace
    The Jobstown Criminal Case should have been stopped by the Judge before it even got going, the who
    purpose was to use the Guards to criminalise the leading elements of water protest movement.
    What has happened is the reputation of the Guards has been destroyed, why has the Commissioner not
    being removed, what does she know about setting up operation “Mizen” and who did she put in charge
    of it, if this happened in any other democracy, they would have been fired and investigated long ago

  4. JIMMYJAMES

    Well done dave, you really pushed him hard there. I can tell because of how you positioned your index on your lip, or maybe your slipping into a coma, its hard to tell.

    1. GiggidyGoo

      At the slightest look of agitation on Varadkars part, the camera quickly goes to the interviewer. Not normal editing to have someone speak for 20/30 seconds and the camera not on him. Oh the joys of the edit.
      And of course the ‘how about a re take’ can be edited out. Same as Mrs. Varadkar ‘s RTE interview.

  5. Steve

    No pleasing the broadcast commentary.

    Fair play leo.

    Only way to make the hard left elitists irrelevant – agree with them – yeah we will look at jobstown, yeah we’ll look at yer one, the Twitter spammer .

    Hard Left elitists feed off a sense of inferiority, everyone is against them, the MSM, the guards,the establishment blah blah blah

    Noel whelan sums it up nicely this morning.

    1. Kolmo

      Enough with the ‘hard-left elitist’ nonsense – it debases and reduces any nuance in a descussion to a niveau of lumpen cretinousness – these people you regard as ‘hard-left’ would be regarded as social democrats or even christian democrats 10 years ago – how the well has been poisoned.

      1. Owen C

        AAA-PBP-Whatevertheyarecallingthemselvesnow would be called christian democrats 10 years ago? Complete and utter nonsense. Do you think Joe Higgins, who is the starting point for much of the current hard left movement in terms of high level elected representation, was ever considered to be a christian democrat?

        1. Kolmo

          Granted, christian democrat was a stretch for Mr. Higgins, fair point – but this new ‘hard-left’ title is too much, they are not anarcho-communists, or even in anyway militant, their views are not radical, just like Corbyn in the UK, he is also not a radical – the majority of the talking heads had him dimissed as unelectable, ‘hard-leftist’, the debate has reduced to the right ‘clearly, it’s all self-evident tone’ vs ‘hard-left slacker leeches’ – and nothing gets sorted out. Shouty reductionist retardation of discourse.

          1. Steve

            Granted I purposely use the term hard left “elitists” to annoy. I think it’s a clever play on words.

            Reductionism. Hmm.

            In the same way that all “establishment” politicians are traitors and can’t be trusted because they propagate a deeply unfair system that steps on the rights of the ordinary person?

  6. Joxer

    you would think that given the current situation with the Garda (alleged fund shenanigans, Jobstown trial, Disclosures tribunal) that when Leo heard/read of the allegations about bloggers being cautioned by Gardai over tweets that he would be straight on the phone looking for the real story? i would assume that he has had access to the questions that would be posed to him prior to the interview and therefore knew that it would be put to him to comment on this topic.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link
Broadsheet.ie