Tony Groves

Language can be a lot like the Leaving Cert Geography lifecycle of a river. Words start out vibrant and energising; soon they’re meandering along corporate corridors and through bankers’ boardrooms only to slow to a crawl in the mouths of politicians.

Around 2006 the word granularity came into the military lexicon. General David Petraeus, while discussing the situation then in Iraq, told the Armed Services Committee that “it is hard at this distance…to get the real granularity of what’s going on”.

Two years later, as Irish Banks were preparing to close their doors, I was listening to a Chief Strategist explaining the “granularity of the crisis”.

Sometime around 2013, I saw a tweet from a Fine Gael TD in response to the (even back then) housing crisis saying those calling for immediate action “needed to familiarise themselves with the granularity of the situation”.

Granularity, like so many once militarily sexy words, had passed from the mouth of a 4 Star General to the tweet of a free market apologist.

Granularity used to mean the finer details, in political speak it was used as smug way of trying to sound clever. The granularity of the word had been ground away.

It is waffle like this that results in the Taoiseach appointing his own Strategic Communications Unit.

This “good news” department, as it has been dubbed, is to help the Taoiseach effectively communicate (dare I say propagandise) the workings and achievements of his government.

It is telling that the rank and file members of Fine Gael aren’t uncomfortable with this new development. No one is questioning the value of the unit, nor the cost to the state.

When members of Sinn Féin similarly stay on message they are routinely called a cult. When Fine Gael do it, crickets…

Nor does the language devolution stop with the politicians.

In his weekly address the Taoiseach, first patting himself on the back for “taking more people out of homelessness this year than any year in the past”, then said the problem was that “more people BECOME homeless every week”. It’s as if these people simply decided to get up, leave their homes and start camping in the Phoenix Park.

People don’t become homeless; they are MADE homeless.

Imagine my disappointment then when the media then went on to parrot the “people become homeless” line. Across the airwaves our inability to address this national shame was sanitised away with the lie of the ‘accidental’ inference of a simple word like BECOME.

There are 14,367 Buy to Let Mortgages in arrears of over 720 days, these homes contain rent paying tenants who risk losing their homes through no fault of their own. The vulture funds are closing in for the kill on these loans and these families will be MADE homeless.

I’m not sure how the “good news” unit will spin this, but one thing is for certain, another housing summit is not the answer.We’ll have had three emergency housing summits since 2014,  one more and we get the 5th one for free.

The Taoiseach has said that he “believes communication is a virtue”. It is not. It is simply an exchange of information. Virtues are things like honesty, integrity and trustworthiness. There’s no virtue if the information you are exchanging is dishonest, unbelievable and untrustworthy.

The “good news” unit isn’t about virtues. It’s about putting a verbiage plaster on an open wound.

When you really get down to the finer details (the granularity), the purpose of the “good new” unit is to give the appearance of substance to plans made on foundations of sand and worn out words.

Tony Groves is a full-time financial consultant and part-time commentator. With over 18 years experience in the financial industry and a keen interest in politics, history and “being ornery”, he has published one book and writes regularly aTrickstersworld

27 thoughts on “The Good News Unit

  1. Cian

    “There are 14,367 Buy to Let Mortgages in arrears of over 720 days, these homes contain rent paying tenants who risk losing their homes through no fault of their own. The vulture funds are closing in for the kill on these loans and these families will be MADE homeless.”

    Unless the vulture funds physically demolish the houses, or leave them empty, then the ownership is irrelevant. 14,367 families currently live in these homes. In 12 months there will still be 14,367 families living in these homes (albeit some of these will be different families).

    Secondly, vulture funds aren’t investing in Ireland as much any more – the prices are too high.

    Reply
    1. Jocky

      Exactly. So many debt dodgers wilfully ignored this obvious point in the past ten years. The houses will be occupied by paying people regardless.

      Reply
    2. MKG985

      Look it Cian,
      Yer application for the good news unit was unsuccessful. Ye can stop shilling for them. Go on, go on, go on.

      Reply
    3. Barry the Hatchet

      Well, yes, people will still be living there. But the change in ownership is not irrelevant. The fact that the properties are being sold will be used to evict people and then to bring in new tenants, paying a higher rent. Which underscores the precariousness of life as a tenant here.

      Reply
    4. Eamonn Moran

      That would have been a good comeback except you are leaving out a very important point. There are thousands of people that are becoming new tenants every month. Young people cant afford to buy so once they get a job they need to rent. So because demand is increasing faster than supply prices go up and those that could afford to rent at the bottom rungs of the tenancy ladder are kicked off the bottom.
      Their choices are now either go back to living on the couches of friends/family or if you don’t have friend/family willing to take you in, become homeless. The number of persons per household actually went up in the last census. This virtually never happens in the industrialised world and is an indication that people who would not otherwise want to are having to live with family/friends.

      Reply
      1. Rob_G

        Their choices are now either go back to living on the couches of friends/family or if you don’t have friend/family willing to take you in, become homeless.

        – or live somewhere cheaper. Or live in a flatshare. Or stay living in the folks’ place for a while longer.

        Which sucks, and the govt need to get their finger out and figure out the best way to get more units on the market, fast, but your zero sum game between ‘tenancy/owning’ and ‘becoming homeless’ is a bit overstated.

        Reply
      1. Cian

        not defending. Pointing out that ownership it is irreverent.

        To help alleviate the rental crisis (and indirectly, homelessness) we need more homes[1]. A mix of building new and refurbishment of empty stock. It’s that simple.

        [1] or remove demand. If we make the rest of the country more attractive, then in Dublin we would reduce the demand.

        Reply
    5. Percival

      Cian. The vulture funds ALREADY own the mortgages. They bought them cheap, remember?

      And to say that a different 14,367 families will be living in these homes just goes to show your lack of humanity.

      You probably work in some ‘disruptive’ digital start-up nonsense that put 1000s out of work and replaced them with an ‘app’ while you sit on your bean bags, hold meetings on pogo sticks and drink cocktails on the roof, overlooking all the misery and division people like you bring to society.

      Reply
  2. Padraig

    An entire revamping of how Government is run is overdue. Employed to do a task, each department accountable for progress, targets and outcomes just like the private sector. Simplistic hire and fire methodology need to be brought into the spotlight, of politics.

    Reply
  3. Percival

    I’d say it really grates on the nerves of Blueshirts that a Financial Consultant like Tony, could have a social conscience and not be all serving of profit and greed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *