Former Irish Times sports journalist Tom Humphries outside the Dublin Circuit Criminal Court this morning
RTE reports:
A teenage girl who was sexually exploited and abused by former sports journalist Tom Humphries has said she was left depressed and suicidal by the ordeal.
The Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard the former Irish Times journalist began texting the girl when she was 14 and eventually engaged in sexual acts with her when she was 16.
He had made contact with her through his work with camogie teams.
The text messages continued for more than two years.
At one point, 16,000 text messages were exchanged during a three-month period.
Humphries and victim exchanged 16,000 text messages, court hears (RTE)
Tom Humphries exchanged more than 16,000 texts with young girl, court told (Irish Times)
Rollingnews
Dirtbag
+1
dirty old man
I hope that poor unfortunate girl is getting all the help & support she needs
He’s not a “dirty old man” , he’s a sexual predator who preyed on a 14 year old girl.
I don’t see why that absolves him from being a dirty old man!!
He’s saying that ‘dirty old man’ is a relatively light hearted handle to give him. Wolf whistling young girls passing by your house is enough for the ‘dirty old man’ label. The term is often used in an almost joking fashion. ‘Sexual predator’ is a little harded to jokingly call someone. He preyed on a 14 year old child. It’s beyond ‘dirty old man’.
That’s it exactly Moyest, I wouldn’t have thought it really needed any explanation but you never know what you’re going to get with Harry.
it definitely wasn’t clear but sure we’re only throwing around small comments from our phones, sometimes my comments lack clarity too.
“it definitely wasn’t clear”
It definitely was clear. It’s your fault you didn’t understand, not his/
ah it wasn’t really, and I’d be very perceptive
I hope so too.
For context: 16,000 texts would be enough to send the entire text of the first 3 Harry Potter books and half the 4th.
…or most of the Lord of the Rings.
Or just one of this polemics on Saipan.
how many times to the moon and back is that?
73 double-decker busses stacked on top of each other.
Dirtbag, dirty old man etc. doesn’t cut it. He’s a paedophile. Important to name it. Let’s just hope a long prison sentence awaits.
I agree
The folks @ BS towers inexplicably removed a polite & carefully crafted sentence I wrote above where I explained what would happen next if it had been my daughter
why would you send all those texts to your daughter?
an’ting to do with boiling till its spitting sugary caramel Mart
yes Frilly, now you have it, LAVA
he isn’t a paedophile – the girl was a teen not a child.
teenagers are children. legally, physiologically, and psychologically.
He’s a paedo.
13-years olds – yes, yes, and yes;
19-year olds – no, no, and probably no.
Depends on the jurisdiction
Is a Peado isn’t a Peado? Sigh. Can we just agree that this story is nothing like Beauty and the Beast, which is a lighthearted tale with a healthy message.
you really seem to have a vested interest in defending adults having sex with teenagers, Cian. anything you’d like to tell us?
The word you’re looking for is pederast I think.
I think YOU should look that word up.
The word you’re all looking for is rapist.
Like this one ?
https://www.google.ie/amp/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4816136/amp/Student-seduced-teacher-awarded-750-000-damages.html
Yep, he was underage and she knew that. Statutory rape.
So long as we can agree there are plenty female rapists out there potentially preying on our kids
Time served and three years’ probation would be my best guess.
16,000 texts over 3 months is 177 texts per day on average. Jaysus.
Tom not playing it cool.
That’s one text every 5 minutes and 25 seconds during hours that ones awake. It takes me that long to write a text and I’m 2 decades younger than this auld fart.
“Tell my wife I love her very much
She knows”
I know it is not a popular viewpoint but I look at stories like this and I think of my own daughter and feel a massive rage. This because I am afraid that such evil will attempt to manipulate them too and I won’t be able to do anything about it. I know, I should be angry for anyone who is targeted by one of these sickos but empathy starts at home.
We can watch and educate and warn our children but the onus should not be on the child to defend themselves from these people or the parent to prepare them to be able to do so. So the question arises whose responsibility is it to protect our children? Not arrest after the fact, not provide counselling after the crime is committed, how do we prevent this happening?
Encourage your daughter to say “no”. Children (esp girls) are taught from an early age not to cause trouble, not to be bossy, not to displease the grownups. It even comes down to little things like when a kid doesn’t want to kiss gross Auntie Gertude goodbye and we make them do it anyway — that teaches them a lot about what they should accept from other people.
I’m 100% not saying this girl asked for it, deserved it, didn’t resist hard enough – I’m saying girls are taught a lot of little things about bodily autonomy and trusting adults — and maybe they’d be less psychologically overwhelmed by pedophiles like this absolute creeper if we gave them the right set of emotional and psychological tools.
This. times 100;
I’d apply it to sons too.
I agree and we are very mindful of encouraging our children to insist on their bodily autonomy being respected. They don’t have to kiss or cuddle anyone if they do not want to. What makes this approach really lovely is that when they show physical affection, we know it is the real deal and not something they feel they have to do out of some sort of social pressure.
But that is not enough….. if it were there would be no preying on children and teens by these despicable excuses for pond scum. It still happens. More worryingly, the conversation changes from how to prevent these manipulative monsters from inflicting themselves on children to how the children/parents are to blame because we never taught our children how to exert themselves.
The onus should always be on how to stop the perpetrator from carrying out crimes rather than finding new ways to blame the victims or restricting children from living their lives because of what might happen to them.
Here’s a lesson in child safety: Presume sport coaches are all perverts. Especially if they are overweight wrecks. I mean come on!! “I like to coach girls camogie” , “I coach little boys” (!!!!!) you may as well be saying ” I DJ at school discos ” . It doesn’t mean all coaches are creeps but tell your kids not to be left alone with them. Car lifts , last one to leave the locker room etc. Use a buddy system. There are perverts everywhere! I was almost enrolled in swimming lessons when I was a kid through a guy my dad knew but my overprotective mother thought I was too young. A few years after there was all these allegations made against the dirty animals running the swim club and one guy fled the country. I was one decision away from a very different life. It happened in the early eighties. My ma told me years later. Thanks ma!
Yes but did you ever learn to swim???
” Presume sport coaches are all perverts. Especially if they are overweight wrecks. I mean come on!! “I like to coach girls camogie” , “I coach little boys” (!!!!!) you may as well be saying ” I DJ at school discos ” ”
That’s a really sad way to look at the world.
Agreed – dreadful
postmanpat’s comment reads like a longer version of a Donald Trump Tweet – ignorant, insulting comments with an anecdote thrown in for good measure.
Do you presume that all teachers & childminders are perverts too? Especially the overweight ones (and whoever you consider a wreck)?
If you have kids pat, make sure you let the coaches of your local clubs know what you are presuming about them – I doubt they’ll be long telling you where to go and giving you a copy of their child protection clearance which you can read while coaching your kids in your back garden.
my god! You really cant disparage sports with the plebs, its like criticizing the priests in the 1950s here!. Child protection clearance. From the guards? Because they are so trustworthy!!!. I don’t care if my kids don’t excel at sports. Its just a game. Most of the kids that want to go professional don’t even make it. Personally, I don’t see the point in being yelled at by a fat man who is unfit himself when just wanting a kick about. I wasn’t saying I would point at my kids coach accusingly saying “I’m on to you”. I would just let my kid know that there is absolutely no reason why she needs to be left alone with a coach behind closed doors, or have a coach lay a finger on her. absolutely none. And if they were ever asked or put in that situation for whatever reason they should tell me. All good parent would tell there kids the same thing. Predators like Fatso Texto Identify the one kid who seems to have not gotten that advice from disinterested parents.
Ask the sports club for their child safety policy and procedures.
If they don’t have any, walk away.
“presume all sport coaches are all perverts”… “I mean come on “I like to coach girl’s camogie”
How ridiculous. My boyfriend coaches teenage girl’s camogie. He’s great with them IMO and he’s well liked by the girls.
By the way coaches these days are not allowed to be left alone with kids.. the buddy system is in place.
You can’t give girls or boys a lift home after a match for instance unless there’s more than 1. You can’t be left in the car with 1..you have to drop 2 or more off at the same place.
teachers aren’t even allowed to be alone in a room with a child without the door open
Teacher aren’t allowed to have sex with students either but guess what? That’s no good it you don’t tell your kid that too. A pervert will disobey those rules and its one persons word against the other. As I said above, good parents let there kids know what is appropriate or not and can do so without explicitly saying what might happen to them. Predators will single out the one kid that they know has disinterested parents/guardians. A dedicated predator has plenty of resources to suss this out. Seeing which parents show up to practice plus level of interest the parent is showing. Single parent? Mother? widowed? divorced?. age, health, number of siblings? What is the educational level & intelligence of the parents ? What is their employment situation? Is the single parent distracted by work, romantic relations? etc. The clues are all around. Gossip and a little detective work can go a long way. Jesus , priests used to have a confession boxes ,ran the schools and where able to profile entire towns and look what happened! These guys are highly intelligent but also cowards. The Lion doesn’t catch the unluckiest gazelle, it catches the weakest one.
Can BS report who the 2 people that wrote letters of support for him? A chief sports Sunday Times writer and a well known sports star?
Why?
It’s in the public interest.
One was David Walsh
http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/call-to-sack-writer-over-court-letter-supporting-paedophile-tom-humphries-36208433.html
Why is the other person – a GAA former star being protected? Ghost protection?
Didn’t Humph ghost write or the GAA? Bio please..
I really admire these brave victims that come forward. Its quite an ordeal but their courage is inspiring and no doubt they save further victims from the clutches of evil.l
The manner in which he was caught (his teenage daughter discovered the texts to her friend on his old phone) must have caused unimaginable distress to his family. They’re often forgotten in these cases. I truly hope all his victims find peace.
The number of texts: It’s all relative. How many did he send to others by comparison.
The content and the reason: That is not relative and the crux of the issue.
But 16,0000 is a lot. It’s almost like you’re need to be paid by the word to keep going. Assume each text is 12 wrods…
Let’s assume 90 characters per message. 16K X 90 = 1,440,000 characters. Assuming 10 characters make up each word (dems big words) , that’s 144,000 words.
Dems awful big words
You wrote 438 characters above; 82 words = 5.3 characters per word (including spaces). this is more normal for English. If u use txt speech it’ll b a lot less.
You seem to be having difficulty with the word ‘exchanged’?
He didn’t write all 16,000 texts.
And before I get jumped on , I’m not excusing anything here, merely pointing out that he wasn’t texting an inanimate object. The 16000 refers to the number of texts both parties sent.
That’s still a lot of “nice weather isn’t it?” banter…
He was first arrested in 2012. Why did it take five years to this? And he still has to be sentenced?
He checked himself into a mental hospital, Gardai couldn’t touch him there
He’s spent a long time in the interim in psychiatric care, presume that delayed things somewhat.
he tried to do himself in and spent a long time in hospital , he (when unnamed) was unfit to stand trial
Massive admiration to the wife who, when alerted, grabbed his other two mobiles and handed them over to the Guards.
Absolutely, and for believing the victim, not blaming her. The day of “Stand By Your Man” is over. Let the cheating, raping, baxtard swing in the wind.
Not much compassion being shown here
“People Dislike Rapists” Shocka! News at Ten
I didn’t know he had already been convicted
He admitted it. He’s a rapist.
Why the need to defend an admitted rapist?
Why the need to convict someone before a court finds them guilty?
Except when it’s in Dirty Dancing.
he is a horrible person, I’m not sure what redemption there can be and has damaged (hopefully not ruined) the lives of his victims and both families. No doubt his wife and kids have suffered too.
also through his actions (and others sadly) cast a shadow on the many lovely people who volunteer with kids sports..
16,000 texts, imagine, I’m so lonely.
I am glad your mum looked out for you but we cannot keep children tied to the idea of something happening to them if they are in the company of an adult. That will destroy their faith in other people for life.
Also, they would never learn to swim.
Not really, I can swim like a fish. My dad taught me in the end.
+1
file this under ‘how the media protect their own’
how have the media protected him?
Agree, a predatory paedo that caused so much distress to that girl and her family. Over to justice now.
Something I noted here during this (largely hushed) story of the past five years was the high esteem his work was held amongst sports-lovers. I wasn’t a reader but I gathered his journalism was damn good. I know of a similar guy who was brilliant and inspiring at his job but engaged in dark, illegal practices in his spare time that eventually exposed him for being a sick *****. Same conversation only this weekend with friends about artists of the past who’s work we love but who’s personality traits, attitudes and actions make us guilty for admitting to like the work. I’m not talking about Saville here by the way. I just thought it an interesting point; can you like the work and not the creator?
*cough* *cough* Micheal Jackson *cough*
*cough* *cough* Bowie *cough* *cough* Stephen Tyler *cough* *cough* Led Zeppelin *cough* *cough**cough* *cough*The Who*cough* *cough**cough* *cough*
I never really liked his writing either , though I did read some of it, I often found it cloy and unpenetrating
I didn’t read him much but some of his stuff on Rugby was really odd and bitter. He hated rugby and rugby people. Generalised a lot. Which for an ‘esteemed’ journalist seemed a little off
Yes if they have been dead for at least one hundred years. No if they have a twitter account.
I’m not your mate.
You are acting like one who has lost the run etc with your unproven guess that the girl sent most of the texts because, women eh?
The point about the sports coaches and the viability of keeping children away from sports
(and lone adults) was well refuted by multiple posters.
You used to be a steady hand for calling out inconsistencies and BS. Now you’re just contrary without substance.
was it not part & parcel of what Saville did during the day job tho, self fulfilling i.e. the job provided him with his access to his potential victims, the better he got at the day job = more targets simple as that
I have the unfortunate personal trivia tidbit of having met Saville personally. Thankfully only vague memories, my sis used to attend the CRC, he’d was over to raise £££ for them
I assume that’s to my comment. Yes, the job facilitated the crimes. As does priesting, sports-coaching and scouting to name but three. I am exploring a notion, not condoning these criminals by any means. I am just curious of the attitudes of our sports-redeaders here who acclaimed the man’s work.
unfortunately I can’t say I’ve any particular recollection of any of his writings, not mad keen GAA fan.
but for me if I was a fan of an artist like a guitarist for example & it emerged proven that he’d been doing something dark & harmful to others it would be a sickener & I would want to erase him.
It’s the Michael Jackson question isn’t it?
Didn’t Lestrade just write a column that nicely intersected this?
He was a great sportswriter, he probably still is if he got a chance to be published which is highly unlikely. He’s also about to be a convicted paedophile. That doesn’t erase the fact he was a good sportswriter.
John Lennon is still a great musician. Floyd Mayweather is still the greatest boxer of his generation. Their transgressions and crimes don’t lessen their talents.
yes but I think what Spag is getting at is how would you yourself personally react
could & would one personally remain a fan of the work after the proof/fact emerges? I personally would not love it anymore
if X turned out to be a paedo then I would def drop any songs or any riffs belonging to X consciously as best as possible from my repertoire & dump albums. but that’s me.
I certainly haven’t overly missed his writing since he’s been replaced by journos who are as good (Mary Hannigan fills that space really well I think) and superceded to a certain extent by the sports shows and podcasts.
It’s an interesting one alright. Elvis, Jerry Lee Lewis don’t seem to have suffered too badly considering they did more or less the same thing as Humphries. I’d guess that a lot of rock bands from the 70’s to the present aren’t quite blameless in this regard also.
rotide. True, so he’s a “talented” peadophile.
I have to admit I was a fan of Arthur C. Clark until I heard about his shenanigans and then I did go off rereading his books
Wait what? Clarke?
What were his shenanigans? His wiki page mentions that he was gay. Was there other stuff?
He holidayed on his private pedophile island in Sri Lanka. The changing Sri Lankan government quashed any ongoing investigations into his activities because of his celebrity status. Its not on Wikipedia because it “never happened”.
Yeer all mad.
Age of consent in Germany, Portugal and Italy is 14. Why all the faux outrage?
Because he didn’t rape her in Germany or Portugal. He raped her in Ireland.
The GAA have Form in this area
http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/tyrone-boss-harte-gives-reference-for-sex-attacker-29078997.html
Who is protecting the GAA this time and why? Gary Sliothar..
Who benefitted from the artists tax exemption for Donal Og Cusack’s book. Wasn’t this written by Tom Humphries?
http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/artists-tax-deal-faces-review-over-50k-loophole-34907177.html