Another Budget, Another Failure On Housing

at

From top: Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government Eoghan Murphy at press briefing in Government Buildings in relation to Budget 2018; Dr Rory Hearne

Last Tuesday I was left shaking my head in disappointment again. I know many others across the country felt the same.

The annual Budget might be a bit of a charade but it does provide a once a year focus on the direction of our economy and society, providing the overriding vision, policies and essential public spending and tax decisions that indicate our priorities as a country.

So the Budget was an ideal opportunity for the government to address the nation, declare the housing crisis an emergency and outline a series of radical and bold initiatives that would finally address the crisis. But instead we got another budget that will benefit the private developers, landlords and wealthy financial vulture investors.

Paschal Donohoe, the Minister for Finance, backed up by his Fine Gael, Independent and Fianna Fail TD colleagues in government, provided more of the same policies that will be inadequate to address the crisis and will continue to make it worse.

In order to get a full picture of the Budget announcements on housing you have to wade through a fair amount of spin, half-truths and misleading figures in order to see the reality – that there was in fact no major increase in the provision of affordable or social housing by the Fine-Gael/Fianna Fail Government in Budget 2018.

Budget 2018 was another opportunity lost. Another budget that will make the housing crisis even worse as it continues the policies that have caused the housing crisis (in particular the low level of building of social and affordable housing by the state).

The building of affordable housing, for rent and sale, by local authorities and housing associations is the one thing the government can actually guarantee will happen, unlike relying on the private sector.

The government just has to increase direct funding to these state bodies or support them to borrow and they can build.

But the increase in funding for direct state building of affordable housing was nothing short of disgraceful. An additional €160 million per year providing 3,000 extra social homes by 2021. That increase won’t even house the additional families who become homeless in the next three years.

They claim that they will build 3,800 social housing units next year, but again we know this is just not true. On the basis of the figures for the first quarter of this year – where the state built just 235 social housing units it suggests the state will build around 1000 units this year which is just a third of the Rebuilding Ireland target.

What is even more misleading is the headline claim that the government will provide a total of 25,500 new “social housing” next year. The overwhelming majority, 19,600, is to come in the form of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) for low-income tenants in the private rented sector. Another 1,200 are to come from Part V – where the state buys 10% of private developments.

So we can see why we are in such a crisis. The government has essentially privatised the delivery of social housing onto a private housing market that is in complete crisis.

So when the government states it is spending €1.9 billion next year on providing social housing – that is a completely misleading figure. Just over a quarter of it –around €500million will be on direct building housing by the state, the largest chunk (around €800million) will be going to private landlords.

One of the main measures of ‘success’ in the Budget is the increase in private sector housing provision. Again we have misleading figures here (Mel Reynolds and Lorcan Sirr have done excellent research on this showing the actual number of builds are much lower than headline figures).

The Minister for Finance stated, in the Budget:

“Our actions to support the sector, though, are bearing fruit. Commencement notices for new housing are up by 47%. Planning permissions are up by 49%.”

But these figures tell us nothing of when they will actually be built, and even more importantly at what price they will be sold. The only private building going on is for houses that are going for sale at well above actually affordable prices.

So what is the government doing to provide affordable housing?

Their first announcement on affordable housing was an extra €60 million for the Local Infrastructure Housing Activation Fund (LIHAF) which “provides enabling infrastructure on key sites to open up lands for early development”, this pays for the roads, drainage etc for private developers to encourage them to start building.

But there is no clear mechanism for how this funding will ensure the building of affordable housing on these sites. Cherrywood, for example, has received €15 million from LIHAF, yet the state looks like it will be paying €350,000 for social housing there and an ‘affordable’ 2 bed room apartment could be in the region of €400,000.

There is a major issue here over what is defined as affordable housing. The government defines it as in the region of €320,000.

Yet if we take the Central Bank definition of affordable housing as 3½ times your gross income, and two thirds of households have a gross income less than €60,000. This means an affordable house for two-thirds of households should be in the region of €210,000, a long way from €320,000 or €400,000.

And these figures show up the major flaw in the government’s big affordable housing announcement of the budget – the setting up of the Home Building Finance Ireland fund, with €750 million (coming from the former Pension Reserve Fund – state funding in the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund, ISIF) available “for commercial investment in housing finance”.

Developers claim they can’t build a house for less than €320,000 in Dublin, so the only housing that will be built by developers financed from this fund will be well in excess of that price i.e. will not be affordable for most people.

The interest rate being charged by this fund to developers will be 8%, significantly higher than the 1 per cent rate the government can borrow and fund building at. This is another expense that house buyers will have to pay for. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that builders will take up the fund – it relies on their profitability assessments and land prices etc.

They could also use it for buying land and thus inflating land prices further – like where ISIF already funded the private developer Cairn to pay the inflated price for the recent RTE land sale.

It is worth contrasting this €750 million fund for private developer provided unaffordable housing with the miserly €12 million being made available “to unlock Local Authority owned land specifically to deliver affordable housing on those sites using models like co-operative housing”.

This is despite the Cooperative housing approaches like O Cualann Cooperative in Ballymun building housing for sale at €170,000 on which the housing Minister has said “have already proven to be successful but are now needed at scale”. So why not actually fund affordable housing construction?

The other strategy is the ‘increase’ in the vacant site levy from 3% to 7%. Again the devil is in the detail. The increased rate of 7% will only apply in 2020. Is this a joke? No seriously, any owner of a vacant site who does not develop their land pays a 3% levy in 2019 and then, if they continue to hoard their land in 2019, they will not pay the 7% rate until 2020.

Given the major problem of land hoarding that is taking place. Nama for example has stated that it has sold land sites with the capacity to deliver 50,000 housing units but the majority of it is being hoarded as to date only 3,700 units had been built or were under construction.

Why is the levy not being put in place from January 1, 2018? This is an emergency. And, for every 10 per cent increase in house prices it is estimated that land values increase by 35 per cent. So the vacant site levy should, if it was to incentivise land sales and building, should be put at least at the annual increase in land value i.e. in the range of 35%.

While I am on the subject of NAMA, there was more nonsense during the week from the Finance Minister, claiming NAMA had done a great job. NAMA sold half of its land to vultures and international investors who are now hoarding that land and playing a major factor in the house price increases and lack of supply.

Furthermore NAMA claimed it was going to build 20,000 affordable homes by 2020. But just 2000 are under construction. NAMA has 1000 hectares in Dublin that could build 25,000 homes. So NAMA could be doing a lot more to address the crisis if the government wanted it to do so.

But instead it wants to show the global investors and the IMF and Europe – NAMA is being wound up and will have a cash surplus – a great ‘success’ for Ireland Inc. even if it is playing a major role in worsening our housing crisis. And the new House Building Finance Ireland that is providing the loans to developers will be staffed with personnel from NAMA. I guess we won’t see much affordable housing be financed there then.

Back to the lost opportunity of this budget. The government could have made bold, imaginative and radical proposals and actioned policies that would address the crisis – such as forgoing the tax cuts it gave out (what most people gained from them was miserly anyway so why not put it all together and do something significant and meaningful with the money?).

Instead it could have used the hundreds of millions given away in tax cuts and the €1.3bn allocated to a ‘rainy day’ fund (again – WTF is with this– there is a f***ing flood going on right now in housing. People are drowning in unaffordable rents and house prices, mortgage arrears and homelessness).

It could have used this funding and invested it in local authorities to build affordable homes that people need badly. And instead of allocating the €750 million to finance private developers it should have used it to seed fund the setting up a of new semi-state affordable homes building company that would actually build affordable homes.

The state through local authorities, and state agencies and NAMA has significant land banks that it could build affordable housing on now – and not be waiting for the private sector to build ( what will be unaffordable) housing in a year, or two years or ten years time when it sees it can make sufficient profit worth its while to build housing.

Of course, the longer the lack of supply goes on the higher the prices for the vulture land hoarders, the higher the rents for the Real Estate Investment Trusts, the more state subsidies to private landlords – so its suits the private developers and landowners to sit back and wait – as the crisis worsens their profits rise.

The government knows this. They know the private speculative building sector will never build ‘affordable housing’. So be very clear about in who’s interests government housing policy is working. And if they don’t realise it that is because they are blinded by their ideological faith in the private market. As it is only the state, and not-for-profit housing companies that will build affordable housing on a sufficient scale to meet housing need.

In announcing a radical housing plan the government could have asked for the solidarity and support of the Irish people in embarking on such a historic effort to address the humanitarian and economic disaster that is our housing crisis.

I believe people would have supported that if it was put in the context of a new national housing plan to provide affordable housing – to provide the human right of an affordable and secure home – for all those excluded from the housing market – from people looking to buy an affordable home, renters looking for security of tenure and affordable rents, those on social housing waiting lists needing a public house and the homeless who most urgently need a secure home.

I spoke to a homeless mother in one of the Family Hubs (which are supposed to be an improvement on hotels for homeless families but in reality are a political strategy to effectively hide the homeless crisis) the other day and she told me that her son, who has suffered major anxiety since they became homeless and went into a hub, is “asking Santa for a house for Christmas”.

This is what the housing disaster is doing to our citizens. Where a child’s dream is replaced by a living nightmare.

Dr Rory Hearne is a policy analyst, academic, social justice campaigner. He writes here in a personal capacity. Follow Rory on Twitter: @roryhearne

Rollingnews

32 thoughts on “Another Budget, Another Failure On Housing

  1. Fact Checker

    Dear Rory

    Local authorities in Ireland are usually small organisations with a range of quite humdrum tasks (culture, planning approval, maintenance of local roads, etc).

    A mid-sized county council like Laois has just under 400 staff, many of whom are librarians and litter pickers.

    There is no evidence that local authorities have the capacity in complicated things like procurement, finance and project management that is needed for LARGE-SCALE build of new housing.

    (Maybe they should be be given these functions, but that is a different debate).

    In the meantime, the message of ‘just-give-local-authorities-more-funding’ is quite disingenuous. Getting more housing (social AND private) should indeed be a huge policy priority. But is also a very tricky one to solve – and magic wand solutions are no help.

    1. Warden of the Snort

      I have to laugh at the minions who scurried in yesterday to acclaim this Professor Fact Checker and pander to his Olympian intellect and powerhouse of knowledge.

      We should do nothing as that is clearly working so well – he says in response to worst homeless crisis on record

      1. Fact Checker

        Actually I would so something like what is suggested in this article: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/semi-state-body-proposed-to-drive-house-building-1.3203953

        Specifically, centralise the procurement and financing of new social housing in Ireland. Local authorities can be (just about) trusted with allocation and maintenance of the stock, but they seem to have very little capacity to build them at scale like they used to.

        This central solution – however – would take half a decade to implement and would be a considerable task.

        1. Warden of the Snort

          In reality what you’re proposing is the creation of another useless state quango
          staffed by political appointees and favoured political buddies
          with nothing done for another decade

          Why not remove the red tape entirely and remove the government FROM the planning side, concentrating more on enforcement?

          1. Warden of the Snort

            What’s well reasoned about them?

            The local authorities AND central government are dreadful at this.

            They should consider privatising the provisions of so-called public housing

            That and make the losers go out and work to earn a living rather than provide cheap rental housing at below market rates making a large incentive for scroungers

        2. :-Joe

          Sounds like more of the same bad logic…. a half-assed solution to another on-going Irish problem….

          If there’s money to be made particularly relating to property lets privatise it and manage it centrally because you know… that’s what works best with everything else.. i.e. Irish water really worked out well. Sure, why not just hand over the problem to NAMA, it’ll probably end up the same way so lets save a few quid on new stationary.

          If it will end up being the only solution that works in the short to medium term it may have to be done but ultimately in the long term the problem lies with incentivising the regular output of social housing by the construction industry or alternatively creating an efficiant state run housing development system to do it on our behalf and the heart of the real problem is accountability.

          Why not introduce a privatised-style system within the public sector where the brightest independent minds meet together, make a plan, the plan is carried out and people get fired if they fail to deliver on set targets and get rewarded handsomely for over achieving. Make it a bi-partisan system under law so the good cop, bad cop 60%ish backed FF/FG party and their stupifying finance ministers can’t mess with it over successive terms in government.

          More transparancy and more accountability in policy making and subsequent implimentation of a real plan that is based on research, facts and the sciences that is made a legal and constitutional basic standard for the future.

          :-J

      2. Pluto

        +1

        – So Fact Checker, keep doing what we’re doing because it’s working so wonderfully well??

        – It will take several governments to realise that the Irish State MUST build social housing and stop relying on the private market – a market whose only interest is profit and rising prices.

        – Also Broadsheet please keep Rory’s stuff coming and maybe reconsider publishing Listrade’s articles.

    2. Jake38

      Spot on Fact Checker.

      “…… maintenance of local roads, etc…..”

      And we all know how wonderful local authorities are at that most demanding talsk

  2. GoddessDurga

    Ssshhh! We can pretend the economy is on the up while house prices are fuelling inflation, even if there isn’t any real work.

  3. b

    To some commentators there’s always a quick and easy solution that hasn’t been chosen by the government

    The reason this method has not been chosen is always portrayed as a conspiracy laden theory that the idealogical government has been lining the pockets of vested interests rather than the possibility that the alternative plan is unworkable

    Has anyone set out a detailed plan of how the government could build a significant amount of houses quickly themselves. Who would manage it, who would build it, how long it would take? This is not a party political issue it’s about what is realistic

    1. Pluto

      So in your opinion the last 20 – 30 years of State housing policy have been a roaring success? Government policy doesn’t favour private interests over those of the people, those who have no home, no where to go?

      Rory’s article and possible options that the government could have pursued, but chose not to, are ”quick and easy options”?

      1. b

        State housing policy has been bad over the last 20-30 years has been terrible – and that’s the point

        you are asking the structures of the state to suddenly get good at this when they have been proven incapable

        Rory’s suggestion they we could give tons of money to the local authorities just doesn’t hold water

      2. Fact Checker

        Actually policy was REALLY GOOD at getting houses built a few years back. In 2006 there were basically 8 dwellings in Ireland for every 7 that were standing in 2002.

        Would anyone care to repeat the policy mix of the mid-2000s?

        1. :-Joe

          If you had to make a snap call under pressure on the source of the problem and the best solution, what’s your overall analysis of the necessary short, medium and long term action that needs to be taken?…

          I appreciate your posting of facts and evidence but i’d be interested in your opinin on this too…

          :-J

    2. :-Joe

      I would have thought, bringing the best knowledge, experience and planning expertise together and building on that year on year as a specific government department would have worked by now….

      Oh, wait, they didn’t even try yo do that did they?…

      Both FG/FF, the same party privately, are guilty of neglect, irresponsible behaviour.. akin to absentee landlords.

      Funny that, most of them in actual fact are landlords… including our recent minister for housing turned, so ironically, into minister for foreign affairs….

      ….He literally went abroad to get away from the problem.

      You’re deluded if you think the problem is some strange, conspiracy, mystery theory that successive government policies could not oin any way be responsible for.

      :-J

      1. Amorphous Kerry Blob

        Please please please please please stop signing off with that :-J symbol.
        I’m a fool but please.

  4. MKG985

    It’s a decent article, but Rory, get a little show biz. You’re too boring for the Strategic Communications Unit!

    1. :-Joe

      Nope, it’ll be the norm eventually, and it clearly, can’t come fast enough in Ireland at the moment…

      … with all the clowns we have running this banana-shaped racket of a republic, milking it for everything possible.

      :-J

  5. Cian

    Does anyone know how the social housing was build in the 50s and 60s?
    Was it done centrally through the department? or through each local authority?
    Was the building outsourced? or were architects/brickies/plumbers employed by the State?

Comments are closed.