114 thoughts on “De Friday Papers

      1. Amy Band

        We really need to call Bodger out on why this guy is allowed to post such excruciating nonsense on this blog

      1. Nigel

        You’re no better than the lowlives who post fake missing persons pictures or fake shooter info after these attacks.

        1. Sentient Won

          Why does anybody exploring the veracity of official narratives give Nigel so much butt-hurt?

          Professional Keener?
          Distraction Agent?
          Indoctrinated Hit-man?
          Useful Idiot?

          1. Nigel

            It’s my bullpoo allergy. Ghouls blithely posting obvious disinfo after school massacres really brings it on.

          2. Andyourpointiswhatexactly?

            I didn’t think “future use” would mean quite so soon, but I think you found the perfect opportunity to use it.

          3. Sentient Won

            Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.

          4. Nigel

            You’re literally claiming, absent any proof other than wild speculation based on at best circumstantial evidence at worst outright fraud, that mysterious forces are massacring kids for the purposes of driving hazily defined political agendas, but I’m the fearmonger?

          5. Nigel

            Long sentences. Not your thing. Sorry. Forgot. Declarative statements. Unclear meanings. Ambiguous phrases. Coded assertions. Non-sequitur allegations. More your style. Between naps.

          6. Nigel

            I dunno, did they? What does that have to do with your exploitation the idea of abused children to promote pizzagate and your spitting in the faces of dead children for whatever this conspiracy theory is, all to promote your political agenda, which seems to amount to hating Hilary Clinton.

          7. Nigel

            Oh so you’re pretending to believe the children didn’t die to trigger snowflakes. For the lulz. That’ll do it alright.

          8. Nigel

            Who wouldn’t be triggered by someone baselessly claiming dead kids aren’t dead just to feed their dreary internet hobby of hating a woman? All it takes is common human decency.

          9. jusayinlike

            LOL, triggered by my opinion, jaysus Nigel I hope that’s just an argumentative technique otherwise the only word that comes to mind is..


          10. Nigel

            It’s a repulsive opinion and you don’t even retend to try to substantiate or defend it. You do seem to get off on people being repulsed by your repulsive opinion, which goes to motivation I suppose.

          11. Nigel

            Oh I’m sure someone like you will let them know that they’re lying about their dead children. It’s what people like you do.

          12. jusayinlike

            Pulling on my heart strings with your empathy extortion LOL..

            I’m laughing at how triggered you are..

            My opinion hurts you

          13. realPolithicks

            “Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.”

            As the saying goes: “you’re entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts”. You guys are paid up members of the “alternative facts” brigade, the rest of us try to live in the real world.

        2. Nigel

          Thinking you’re hurting people validates your opinions, which explains a lot about your opinions. You’re indistinguishable from alt-right.

          1. jusayinlike

            No just you, and I’m warranted by the insults you throw around due to your frustration, bathe in irony..

          2. Nigel

            Just me? Well, I am flattered that you decided to embrace a heaving mess of disgusting and stupid paranoid conspiracies hatched as agitprop or disinformation or 4Chan hoaxes just for me, but you really need to take some personal responsibility for it, too.

          3. Nigel

            It’s easy! All you have to do is jettison any sense of basic human decency and turn dead children into little puppets for your trollifications! Anyone can do it if they can just overcome the automatic gag-reflex and the endless self-loathing!

          4. jusayinlike

            Yup easy, and all you can do is attempt to empathy extort, laughable, my advice would be to stick to teaching kids english, take a break from the internet, that way I can’t troll you..

          5. Nigel

            Is that what it is when someone points out how morally reprehensible and sociopathic your behaviour is? ‘Empathy extortion?’ At this point you have long stopped even pretending to be conveying any sort of truth.

          6. Nigel

            I think they’re actually rather mild names for someone who sees human tragedies as opportunities to promulgate baseless conspiracy theories in order to troll people, don’t you?

          7. jusayinlike

            That’s what you’re currently reduced to.. justifying childish insults, and trying not to come across as a self righteous numpty..

            I win the internet

          8. Nigel

            Anyway, well done on making such a clear and persuasive case for whatever vile theory you have about this massacre.

          9. Nigel

            No, here. Take your internet. You won it. It’s all yours. You are King Of The Internet now. All the internet. You won it. It’s yours. Put it in your pocket like a good boy, you don’t want to lose it.

    1. ReproBertie

      Did you read the follow up where the same website says “Cruz told investigators that as students began to flee, he decided to discard his AR-15 rifle and a vest he was wearing so he could blend in with the crowd.” and “This appears to confirm Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School senior Alexa Miednik’s claims she talked to the shooter while they were evacuating the school and he was not armed. She assumed there “had to be two shooters” but it’s possible he just ran from one part of the building to another.”


      No big conspiracy. Just a coward trying to get away with mass murder.

        1. ReproBertie

          Well it is the preferred firearm of the school shooter and we know school shooters take inspiration from previous school shootings.

          Doesn’t change the fact that your source for conspiracy baloney disproved your conspiracy baloney.

          1. jusayinlike

            The link you’re talking about says it’s possible, therefore offering opinion rather than fact, that’s not disproving anything, try again Bertie..

          2. ReproBertie

            The one you linked to, on the same site and written before they gathered the extra information to write the one I linked to, also offered opinion, not fact. Sauce for the goose.

          3. ReproBertie

            A witness stating her opinion, versus a revised opinion of the events based on further information.

          4. jusayinlike

            A witness stating her account, versus an opinion based on that account, one is first hand information, one is derivative hearsay and only reflects the authors opinion

          5. ReproBertie

            “there definitely had to be two shooters involved, I believe.”

            A witness stating an opinion based on her account.

          6. jusayinlike

            ..from the scene, she forms an opinion from her account of the scene, this is normal and still stands as first hand information.

            Your link is 100% opinion.

          7. ReproBertie

            At least you accept that it’s an opinion. She’s not an eyewitness to a second shooter though. That’s pure opinion based on the witness’ speculation following the realisation that the guy arrested for the shooting was beside her when he was attempting to make his escape.

            Ever witnessed a shooting? I have. Within minutes the witnesses were disagreeing with each other about what happened. This witness gave an opinion. Others will have given different opinions but of course those seeking evidence of a conspiracy will cling to the opinion of this witness because it differs from the official account. The shooting is fake. The shooter is fake. The victims are fake. This witness to the fake shooting is real and her speculative opinion is the only truth.

          8. ReproBertie

            Well thanks for proving my point by posting an eye witness who disagrees with the opinion of the first eye witness.

          9. ReproBertie

            You don’t have a point. You have two contradictory witness statements, both of which turned out to be incorrect.

          10. ReproBertie

            Two witnesses giving an opinion of more than one shooter but neither claiming to have seen multiple shooters.

      1. mildred st. meadowlark

        I love playing Express Bingo.

        If you win, they send you out a free diabetes cure in the post.

        1. Andyourpointiswhatexactly?

          Stick half an onion in your sock. CURED.
          Next illness? I’m a kind of shaman. Part wiccan, part wicked. But wicked like the young people say, not, like, the opposite of good, you know?

  1. Malta

    I thought media outlets were not supposed to give lots of attention of to the perpetrators of mass shootings? For example, don’t put a big picture of him on the front of your paper, Times Ire edition?

    1. ReproBertie

      If they are going to show these impotent losers then it’s better to show them in an orange jumpsuit and shackles than in a “posing with a gun” picture they chose for themselves.

  2. Amy Band

    Thanks everyone

    Really enjoyed the dribbling idiot posting some conspiracy nonsense and other gibtards trying to “disprove” him

  3. david

    Meanwhile across the water in brexit land they can do what we cannot
    So broadband is a pipe dream is it
    In the UK according to sky news they have solved the village and rural problem regarding rapid broadband and limited mobile coverage by placing masts on village churches
    These receivers whatever you call the in techno gobbledygook provide all the infrastructure
    The telecom company pay a rent to he church to place the mast
    The whole area suddenly have rapid broad band and full mobile service
    So why can we not do it and why is the government not putting forward this solution?
    And even better why has this not been raised in the media?
    Its time this government was thrown out of office and a government who can work on behalf of the people put in charge

Comments are closed.