Dead children are just fuel to your conspiracy boo boos, right? God.
Amy Band
We really need to call Bodger out on why this guy is allowed to post such excruciating nonsense on this blog
Dylad.
It’s ok, I already can go to the Mail online for my daily load of bat-poo prejudice.
Nigel
In other news I finally found out what ‘boo boo’ is a replacement for.
mildred st. meadowlark
Unrelenting cocknugget?
Nigel
*files that one away for future use*
jusayinlike
Russia hacking the DNC conspiracies?
Nigel
You’re no better than the lowlives who post fake missing persons pictures or fake shooter info after these attacks.
Sentient Won
Why does anybody exploring the veracity of official narratives give Nigel so much butt-hurt?
Professional Keener?
Distraction Agent?
Indoctrinated Hit-man?
Useful Idiot?
Nigel
It’s my bullpoo allergy. Ghouls blithely posting obvious disinfo after school massacres really brings it on.
Bodger
+ 1
Andyourpointiswhatexactly?
Just to clarify: you’re plus 1ing Nigel, right?
Nigel
Course he is. There’s no way Bodger would +1 a *checks notes* unrelenting cocknugget.
mildred st. meadowlark
Excellently done Nige.
Andyourpointiswhatexactly?
I didn’t think “future use” would mean quite so soon, but I think you found the perfect opportunity to use it.
Sentient Won
Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.
jusayinlike
gun control hoax
Nigel
Undiscriminating turdspitter.
jusayinlike
Blinkered fearmonger
Nigel
You’re literally claiming, absent any proof other than wild speculation based on at best circumstantial evidence at worst outright fraud, that mysterious forces are massacring kids for the purposes of driving hazily defined political agendas, but I’m the fearmonger?
jusayinlike
“you’re literally..”
snore..
Nigel
Long sentences. Not your thing. Sorry. Forgot. Declarative statements. Unclear meanings. Ambiguous phrases. Coded assertions. Non-sequitur allegations. More your style. Between naps.
jusayinlike
snnnnooooorrrreee…
Nigel
If dead kids aren’t fueling your conspiracy fantasies they’re just a snooze, right?
jusayinlike
Russia hacked the DNC right..?
Nigel
I dunno, did they? What does that have to do with your exploitation the idea of abused children to promote pizzagate and your spitting in the faces of dead children for whatever this conspiracy theory is, all to promote your political agenda, which seems to amount to hating Hilary Clinton.
jusayinlike
Spitting in the face of the illusion of dead kids..
Nigel
Prove it or STFU, cockwomble.
jusayinlike
Triggered petal
Nigel
Oh so you’re pretending to believe the children didn’t die to trigger snowflakes. For the lulz. That’ll do it alright.
jusayinlike
Naive little petals be triggered by the illusion of dead kids, eh cockwomble..?
Nigel
Who wouldn’t be triggered by someone baselessly claiming dead kids aren’t dead just to feed their dreary internet hobby of hating a woman? All it takes is common human decency.
jusayinlike
LOL, triggered by my opinion, jaysus Nigel I hope that’s just an argumentative technique otherwise the only word that comes to mind is..
snowflake
Nigel
It’s a repulsive opinion and you don’t even retend to try to substantiate or defend it. You do seem to get off on people being repulsed by your repulsive opinion, which goes to motivation I suppose.
It’s kicking dead children and their bereaved families.
jusayinlike
They don’t know about my opinion, you do.. and you really don’t like it..
Nigel
Oh I’m sure someone like you will let them know that they’re lying about their dead children. It’s what people like you do.
jusayinlike
blah blah snore..
petal triggered by illusions
Nigel
Repeating yourself. No proof or even argument that kids aren’t dead, just the assumption.
jusayinlike
Pulling on my heart strings with your empathy extortion LOL..
I’m laughing at how triggered you are..
My opinion hurts you
realPolithicks
“Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.”
As the saying goes: “you’re entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts”. You guys are paid up members of the “alternative facts” brigade, the rest of us try to live in the real world.
jusayinlike
By that sentiment, I can also say that you are a paid up member of the msm petal press..
Amy Band
What a pair of freaks
Nigel
Thinking you’re hurting people validates your opinions, which explains a lot about your opinions. You’re indistinguishable from alt-right.
jusayinlike
No just you, and I’m warranted by the insults you throw around due to your frustration, bathe in irony..
Nigel
Just me? Well, I am flattered that you decided to embrace a heaving mess of disgusting and stupid paranoid conspiracies hatched as agitprop or disinformation or 4Chan hoaxes just for me, but you really need to take some personal responsibility for it, too.
jusayinlike
just you, I’m trolling you and it’s easy..
Nigel
It’s easy! All you have to do is jettison any sense of basic human decency and turn dead children into little puppets for your trollifications! Anyone can do it if they can just overcome the automatic gag-reflex and the endless self-loathing!
jusayinlike
Yup easy, and all you can do is attempt to empathy extort, laughable, my advice would be to stick to teaching kids english, take a break from the internet, that way I can’t troll you..
Nigel
Is that what it is when someone points out how morally reprehensible and sociopathic your behaviour is? ‘Empathy extortion?’ At this point you have long stopped even pretending to be conveying any sort of truth.
jusayinlike
cockwomble, cock nugget
I’m pretty sure that ship has sailed for you too buddy..
Nigel
I think they’re actually rather mild names for someone who sees human tragedies as opportunities to promulgate baseless conspiracy theories in order to troll people, don’t you?
jusayinlike
That’s what you’re currently reduced to.. justifying childish insults, and trying not to come across as a self righteous numpty..
I win the internet
Nigel
I can justify my childish insults, you can’t justify your childish conspiracies.
jusayinlike
Like I said, self righteous, coupled with pathetic excuses to justify it..
Nigel
Anyway, well done on making such a clear and persuasive case for whatever vile theory you have about this massacre.
jusayinlike
The white flag
I win the internet
Everyone
You have both so lost the internet you sad neurotic pair of muffins.
jusayinlike
Everyone is Pat Kenny’s wife
Amy Band
Thanks for the erudition and insight lads
Nigel
I did not expect to end up feeling sorry for you, jusayinlike. ‘I win the internet.’ You poor thing.
jusayinlike
I enjoy trolling you Nigel, it’s easy to set you off
jusayinlike
Fair play Amy, I see I’m still in your thoughts too, that pleases me
Nigel
No, here. Take your internet. You won it. It’s all yours. You are King Of The Internet now. All the internet. You won it. It’s yours. Put it in your pocket like a good boy, you don’t want to lose it.
jusayinlike
It’s on a plaque, no second place..
Amy is my cheerleader/mascot
dylad
What a load of old poo
ReproBertie
Did you read the follow up where the same website says “Cruz told investigators that as students began to flee, he decided to discard his AR-15 rifle and a vest he was wearing so he could blend in with the crowd.” and “This appears to confirm Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School senior Alexa Miednik’s claims she talked to the shooter while they were evacuating the school and he was not armed. She assumed there “had to be two shooters” but it’s possible he just ran from one part of the building to another.”
No big conspiracy. Just a coward trying to get away with mass murder.
jusayinlike
AR -15
AR -15
AR -15
AR -15
ReproBertie
Well it is the preferred firearm of the school shooter and we know school shooters take inspiration from previous school shootings.
Doesn’t change the fact that your source for conspiracy baloney disproved your conspiracy baloney.
jusayinlike
The link you’re talking about says it’s possible, therefore offering opinion rather than fact, that’s not disproving anything, try again Bertie..
ReproBertie
The one you linked to, on the same site and written before they gathered the extra information to write the one I linked to, also offered opinion, not fact. Sauce for the goose.
jusayinlike
My link has a witness, your link has opinion..
ReproBertie
Your link has a witness giving an opinion, hence the last two words being “I believe”.
jusayinlike
My link has a witness your link is opinion..
ReproBertie
Your link has a witness giving an opinion.
10 Print Hello World
20 Goto 10
jusayinlike
A witness giving her account, versus an opinion based on her account..
ReproBertie
A witness stating her opinion, versus a revised opinion of the events based on further information.
jusayinlike
A witness stating her account, versus an opinion based on that account, one is first hand information, one is derivative hearsay and only reflects the authors opinion
ReproBertie
“there definitely had to be two shooters involved, I believe.”
A witness stating an opinion based on her account.
jusayinlike
A first hand eyewitness account..
jusayinlike
..from the scene, she forms an opinion from her account of the scene, this is normal and still stands as first hand information.
At least you accept that it’s an opinion. She’s not an eyewitness to a second shooter though. That’s pure opinion based on the witness’ speculation following the realisation that the guy arrested for the shooting was beside her when he was attempting to make his escape.
Ever witnessed a shooting? I have. Within minutes the witnesses were disagreeing with each other about what happened. This witness gave an opinion. Others will have given different opinions but of course those seeking evidence of a conspiracy will cling to the opinion of this witness because it differs from the official account. The shooting is fake. The shooter is fake. The victims are fake. This witness to the fake shooting is real and her speculative opinion is the only truth.
jusayinlike
It’s a first hand witness account just like this one..
LOL he had guns.. like all of USA, try again Bertie..
gorugeen
That headline about Joanne Lee is crass and insensitive.
Shankillfalls
And in other shock news the Express has a Diana story on the front page.
Malta
And a health story relevant to the elderly. It’s a Express special Friday double bill…
mildred st. meadowlark
I love playing Express Bingo.
If you win, they send you out a free diabetes cure in the post.
Andyourpointiswhatexactly?
Stick half an onion in your sock. CURED.
Next illness? I’m a kind of shaman. Part wiccan, part wicked. But wicked like the young people say, not, like, the opposite of good, you know?
Janet, I ate my Avatar
the flu ?
Andyourpointiswhatexactly?
Aubergine up the bumhole.
Janet, I ate my Avatar
Thanks Doc !
Amy Band
Why an Aubergine? Seems very cruel
Malta
I thought media outlets were not supposed to give lots of attention of to the perpetrators of mass shootings? For example, don’t put a big picture of him on the front of your paper, Times Ire edition?
ReproBertie
If they are going to show these impotent losers then it’s better to show them in an orange jumpsuit and shackles than in a “posing with a gun” picture they chose for themselves.
Meanwhile across the water in brexit land they can do what we cannot
So broadband is a pipe dream is it
In the UK according to sky news they have solved the village and rural problem regarding rapid broadband and limited mobile coverage by placing masts on village churches
These receivers whatever you call the in techno gobbledygook provide all the infrastructure
The telecom company pay a rent to he church to place the mast
The whole area suddenly have rapid broad band and full mobile service
So why can we not do it and why is the government not putting forward this solution?
And even better why has this not been raised in the media?
Its time this government was thrown out of office and a government who can work on behalf of the people put in charge
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=57963
Dead children are just fuel to your conspiracy boo boos, right? God.
We really need to call Bodger out on why this guy is allowed to post such excruciating nonsense on this blog
It’s ok, I already can go to the Mail online for my daily load of bat-poo prejudice.
In other news I finally found out what ‘boo boo’ is a replacement for.
Unrelenting cocknugget?
*files that one away for future use*
Russia hacking the DNC conspiracies?
You’re no better than the lowlives who post fake missing persons pictures or fake shooter info after these attacks.
Why does anybody exploring the veracity of official narratives give Nigel so much butt-hurt?
Professional Keener?
Distraction Agent?
Indoctrinated Hit-man?
Useful Idiot?
It’s my bullpoo allergy. Ghouls blithely posting obvious disinfo after school massacres really brings it on.
+ 1
Just to clarify: you’re plus 1ing Nigel, right?
Course he is. There’s no way Bodger would +1 a *checks notes* unrelenting cocknugget.
Excellently done Nige.
I didn’t think “future use” would mean quite so soon, but I think you found the perfect opportunity to use it.
Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.
gun control hoax
Undiscriminating turdspitter.
Blinkered fearmonger
You’re literally claiming, absent any proof other than wild speculation based on at best circumstantial evidence at worst outright fraud, that mysterious forces are massacring kids for the purposes of driving hazily defined political agendas, but I’m the fearmonger?
“you’re literally..”
snore..
Long sentences. Not your thing. Sorry. Forgot. Declarative statements. Unclear meanings. Ambiguous phrases. Coded assertions. Non-sequitur allegations. More your style. Between naps.
snnnnooooorrrreee…
If dead kids aren’t fueling your conspiracy fantasies they’re just a snooze, right?
Russia hacked the DNC right..?
I dunno, did they? What does that have to do with your exploitation the idea of abused children to promote pizzagate and your spitting in the faces of dead children for whatever this conspiracy theory is, all to promote your political agenda, which seems to amount to hating Hilary Clinton.
Spitting in the face of the illusion of dead kids..
Prove it or STFU, cockwomble.
Triggered petal
Oh so you’re pretending to believe the children didn’t die to trigger snowflakes. For the lulz. That’ll do it alright.
Naive little petals be triggered by the illusion of dead kids, eh cockwomble..?
Who wouldn’t be triggered by someone baselessly claiming dead kids aren’t dead just to feed their dreary internet hobby of hating a woman? All it takes is common human decency.
LOL, triggered by my opinion, jaysus Nigel I hope that’s just an argumentative technique otherwise the only word that comes to mind is..
snowflake
It’s a repulsive opinion and you don’t even retend to try to substantiate or defend it. You do seem to get off on people being repulsed by your repulsive opinion, which goes to motivation I suppose.
LOL my opinion is kicking you around..
https://youtu.be/I8EQhayUWVA
It’s kicking dead children and their bereaved families.
They don’t know about my opinion, you do.. and you really don’t like it..
Oh I’m sure someone like you will let them know that they’re lying about their dead children. It’s what people like you do.
blah blah snore..
petal triggered by illusions
Repeating yourself. No proof or even argument that kids aren’t dead, just the assumption.
Pulling on my heart strings with your empathy extortion LOL..
I’m laughing at how triggered you are..
My opinion hurts you
“Except it’s not just this news event Nigel, it’s every day in almost every way: any independent thought must extinguished with extreme prejudice.”
As the saying goes: “you’re entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts”. You guys are paid up members of the “alternative facts” brigade, the rest of us try to live in the real world.
By that sentiment, I can also say that you are a paid up member of the msm petal press..
What a pair of freaks
Thinking you’re hurting people validates your opinions, which explains a lot about your opinions. You’re indistinguishable from alt-right.
No just you, and I’m warranted by the insults you throw around due to your frustration, bathe in irony..
Just me? Well, I am flattered that you decided to embrace a heaving mess of disgusting and stupid paranoid conspiracies hatched as agitprop or disinformation or 4Chan hoaxes just for me, but you really need to take some personal responsibility for it, too.
just you, I’m trolling you and it’s easy..
It’s easy! All you have to do is jettison any sense of basic human decency and turn dead children into little puppets for your trollifications! Anyone can do it if they can just overcome the automatic gag-reflex and the endless self-loathing!
Yup easy, and all you can do is attempt to empathy extort, laughable, my advice would be to stick to teaching kids english, take a break from the internet, that way I can’t troll you..
Is that what it is when someone points out how morally reprehensible and sociopathic your behaviour is? ‘Empathy extortion?’ At this point you have long stopped even pretending to be conveying any sort of truth.
cockwomble, cock nugget
I’m pretty sure that ship has sailed for you too buddy..
I think they’re actually rather mild names for someone who sees human tragedies as opportunities to promulgate baseless conspiracy theories in order to troll people, don’t you?
That’s what you’re currently reduced to.. justifying childish insults, and trying not to come across as a self righteous numpty..
I win the internet
I can justify my childish insults, you can’t justify your childish conspiracies.
Like I said, self righteous, coupled with pathetic excuses to justify it..
Anyway, well done on making such a clear and persuasive case for whatever vile theory you have about this massacre.
The white flag
I win the internet
You have both so lost the internet you sad neurotic pair of muffins.
Everyone is Pat Kenny’s wife
Thanks for the erudition and insight lads
I did not expect to end up feeling sorry for you, jusayinlike. ‘I win the internet.’ You poor thing.
I enjoy trolling you Nigel, it’s easy to set you off
Fair play Amy, I see I’m still in your thoughts too, that pleases me
No, here. Take your internet. You won it. It’s all yours. You are King Of The Internet now. All the internet. You won it. It’s yours. Put it in your pocket like a good boy, you don’t want to lose it.
It’s on a plaque, no second place..
Amy is my cheerleader/mascot
What a load of old poo
Did you read the follow up where the same website says “Cruz told investigators that as students began to flee, he decided to discard his AR-15 rifle and a vest he was wearing so he could blend in with the crowd.” and “This appears to confirm Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School senior Alexa Miednik’s claims she talked to the shooter while they were evacuating the school and he was not armed. She assumed there “had to be two shooters” but it’s possible he just ran from one part of the building to another.”
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=57968
No big conspiracy. Just a coward trying to get away with mass murder.
AR -15
AR -15
AR -15
AR -15
Well it is the preferred firearm of the school shooter and we know school shooters take inspiration from previous school shootings.
Doesn’t change the fact that your source for conspiracy baloney disproved your conspiracy baloney.
The link you’re talking about says it’s possible, therefore offering opinion rather than fact, that’s not disproving anything, try again Bertie..
The one you linked to, on the same site and written before they gathered the extra information to write the one I linked to, also offered opinion, not fact. Sauce for the goose.
My link has a witness, your link has opinion..
Your link has a witness giving an opinion, hence the last two words being “I believe”.
My link has a witness your link is opinion..
Your link has a witness giving an opinion.
10 Print Hello World
20 Goto 10
A witness giving her account, versus an opinion based on her account..
A witness stating her opinion, versus a revised opinion of the events based on further information.
A witness stating her account, versus an opinion based on that account, one is first hand information, one is derivative hearsay and only reflects the authors opinion
“there definitely had to be two shooters involved, I believe.”
A witness stating an opinion based on her account.
A first hand eyewitness account..
..from the scene, she forms an opinion from her account of the scene, this is normal and still stands as first hand information.
Your link is 100% opinion.
https://youtu.be/I8EQhayUWVA
At least you accept that it’s an opinion. She’s not an eyewitness to a second shooter though. That’s pure opinion based on the witness’ speculation following the realisation that the guy arrested for the shooting was beside her when he was attempting to make his escape.
Ever witnessed a shooting? I have. Within minutes the witnesses were disagreeing with each other about what happened. This witness gave an opinion. Others will have given different opinions but of course those seeking evidence of a conspiracy will cling to the opinion of this witness because it differs from the official account. The shooting is fake. The shooter is fake. The victims are fake. This witness to the fake shooting is real and her speculative opinion is the only truth.
It’s a first hand witness account just like this one..
https://youtu.be/I8EQhayUWVA
Well thanks for proving my point by posting an eye witness who disagrees with the opinion of the first eye witness.
My point was there was more than one shooter, thus disproving official narrative..
You don’t have a point. You have two contradictory witness statements, both of which turned out to be incorrect.
Two witness statements purporting more than one shooter..
Two witnesses giving an opinion of more than one shooter but neither claiming to have seen multiple shooters.
https://youtu.be/7XrVALXrkZA
LOL he had guns.. like all of USA, try again Bertie..
That headline about Joanne Lee is crass and insensitive.
And in other shock news the Express has a Diana story on the front page.
And a health story relevant to the elderly. It’s a Express special Friday double bill…
I love playing Express Bingo.
If you win, they send you out a free diabetes cure in the post.
Stick half an onion in your sock. CURED.
Next illness? I’m a kind of shaman. Part wiccan, part wicked. But wicked like the young people say, not, like, the opposite of good, you know?
the flu ?
Aubergine up the bumhole.
Thanks Doc !
Why an Aubergine? Seems very cruel
I thought media outlets were not supposed to give lots of attention of to the perpetrators of mass shootings? For example, don’t put a big picture of him on the front of your paper, Times Ire edition?
If they are going to show these impotent losers then it’s better to show them in an orange jumpsuit and shackles than in a “posing with a gun” picture they chose for themselves.
The Irish border now has a twitter account it appears. https://twitter.com/borderirish
why do white supremacists always look like their parents are closely related?!
I think you’ve answered your own question there Starina
And medicated to the hilt.
Thanks everyone
Really enjoyed the dribbling idiot posting some conspiracy nonsense and other gibtards trying to “disprove” him
I’m sorry you’re so triggered
I was on a day off.
climb back on that horse!!
Meanwhile across the water in brexit land they can do what we cannot
So broadband is a pipe dream is it
In the UK according to sky news they have solved the village and rural problem regarding rapid broadband and limited mobile coverage by placing masts on village churches
These receivers whatever you call the in techno gobbledygook provide all the infrastructure
The telecom company pay a rent to he church to place the mast
The whole area suddenly have rapid broad band and full mobile service
So why can we not do it and why is the government not putting forward this solution?
And even better why has this not been raised in the media?
Its time this government was thrown out of office and a government who can work on behalf of the people put in charge