My Taxi Driver Was A Former Mossad Agent

at

From top: Denis O’Brien; Social Democrat-co-leader Catherine Murphy outside the High Court in 2015; Anne Marie McNally

Anne Marie McNally writes:

Last Tuesday night [March 20] RTÉ One;s  Prime Time aired a segment about the curious case of Denis O’Brien and the PR firm Red Flag.

This long-running saga between determined adversaries has captured the minds of…well very few actually.

Primarily because it is a convoluted tale of unusual events and powerful men (in the main) and telling the story is not always an easy web to untangle in a way that makes it accessible to those with limited knowledge of the various backgrounds or history of the main protagonists.

If you watched the Prime Time piece you’ll have seen yours truly here being interviewed as part of the package.

Not because of any involvement in the legal battle between  Red Flag CEO Karl Brophy and Denis O’Brien, but because I happened to be one of the key researchers on the Siteserv transaction and wider IBRC issues that Deputy Catherine Murphy first began raising back in 2014 – long before it came to national prominence or indeed was of interest to anyone outside the office of Catherine Murphy.

The research began to pay dividends when after six months of asking Parliamentary Questions and submitting FOI requests, the Department of Finance released internal documents to us under FOI which showed that they had raised significant concerns about how the management of IBRC had handled the Siteserv transaction as well as a number of other large transactions.

These revelations shot the issue into the limelight and suddenly the months and months of methodical research, and Catherine’s tenacity, began to pay off.

The question which formed the base of all the research was always, at its most basic, did the taxpayer get the best deal possible from a bank that had already cost them billions of euros?

If it could be proven that the best deal had been achieved then great, but if not, that deserved scrutiny. For us, it really was and continues to be, as simple as that.

But suddenly we found ourselves in a world of intrigue and curious events. Many of these events went publicly unremarked upon by us as we felt there was an element of a distraction about them and we made decisions about whether or not they these curious incidences were worth making a song and dance about.

We generally decided they weren’t.

Now, almost three years later and with some of the incredible elements of this saga now out in the open I find myself looking back and almost pinching myself at some of the experiences both Catherine and I encountered as the Siteserv issue rumbled through the Spring and Summer of 2015.

The Prime Time piece focused in on the curious case of Mark Hollingsworth – a journalist of some significant professional standing – and his unusual role in the saga. Upon first being contacted by him in July 2015 I ran a rudimentary background check and found he’d written extensively for major publications and was recognised as an investigative reporter, including on some high profile cases such as the Madeline McCann case.

He’d also written several books on corruption and Russian oligarchies. I spoke to journalist friends who vouched for his credentials. Basically, his bio stood up. Yet once I agreed to speak to him – over the phone initially, my Spidey senses immediately tingled. I refused to answer his questions (although he preferred incorrect statements of fact that he wanted me to confirm rather than asking actual questions).

Two months later when he arrived at a scheduled meeting in Leinster House with Catherine and I, he had done nothing to indicate my initial sense had been wrong and everything to confirm I was right.

When I described on Prime Time the type of clothing he showed up to the meeting in, it wasn’t because I’m fashion conscious. It was because it stood out to both of us as being highly unusual given the warm weather of the time and it appeared designed to conceal something.

The way he insisted on positioning himself in the room further cemented this belief and within minutes of commencing the meeting,

Catherine’s Spidey senses had also kicked in and she decided to cut the meeting short. It wasn’t long before he’d raised the Spidey senses of other journalists he met on his trip to Dublin and it soon became apparent there was, for all intents and purposes, a spy in our midst!

Things went from weird to weirder in the next instalment of my involvement in just one small part of this gripping international mystery.

Following our interactions with Hollingsworth, Catherine and I were advised (by people who know about these kind of things) to send a formal request for any files held on either of us from a number of secret intelligence agencies based in the UK – some of whom had MI5 connections and other such reputations which up until that point I had assumed was only true of movies with Daniel Craig in them.

It seemed things couldn’t get more surreal until the day that I, apparently randomly, hailed a taxi outside the Four Courts only to be greeted by a drive, who once I was in and started my journey, described himself to me as a former Mossad agent who was here to give me some ‘friendly advice’.

When he got agitated that I wasn’t taking him seriously enough, I began to realise this wasn’t a random taxi driver.

There I was, in a taxi, while a man with dark wraparound glasses gave me a ‘friendly’ warning that I was ‘likely’ under surveillance and that my phone, car and home were ‘probably’ bugged.

When he offered to use his former Mossad connections or his claim that he previously held a senior ranking position in Mr O’Brien’s personal security detail in Papau New Guinea to help sweep my car, home and devices, I politely declined.

When he proffered the names of other intelligence officers of various military backgrounds operating in the city who had myself and Catherine in their midst, I took note of them.

When he told me about the men purporting to be Sky Agents who had called to my home to install bugging devices, or how a simple exercise could ensure every key tap of my phone was traced, I snapped a picture of his licence and calmly asked him to unlock the doors and let me out.

We parted with a final warning from him that I would regret not taking him seriously.

I made a judgement call that the move had been designed to intimidate me and so I chose to ignore it and not make a song and dance about it. I did however speak to people in our security services that were able to confirm his identity and his background and the same for the individuals he had named – his claims stood up – this was no ordinary Taxi driver.

It was a frightening experience. However, we yet again decided not to make a fuss about it and apart from taking advice regarding precautions, I continued on with my work as normal – albeit using a few different phones!

In the months after I had these experiences I had a newspaper outlet scan my phone to check for bugging devices, I spoke to Roy Greenslade in The Guardian and we joked about how ludicrous this whole thing was as if we were old mates. The New York Times were in touch and Alex Thompson in Channel 4 took to calling me to keep up with developments. The Washington Post even popped a call onto me late one night.

It was a surreal experience that seemed like it couldn’t get any weirder and then Peter Murtagh blew that out of the water with an expose in the Irish Times last year that told the tale of a mystery USB, a trail across the globe that Jason Bourne would be proud of and of course, the now infamous Mark Hollingsworth.

So if last Tuesday’s Prime Time seemed slightly confusing to you, rest assured it is only the tip of a very large and hidden iceberg which still has plenty of story left to tell.

Anne Marie McNally is Social Democrats Political Director and General Election candidate for Dublin Mid-West.

Rollignnews

Meanwhile…

There you go now.

46 thoughts on “My Taxi Driver Was A Former Mossad Agent

  1. Owen C

    And to think, Amo accused me of mansplaining to her in the past, when little did i know she could have been getting Mossad agents to double tap me in the back of my head as i slept. Lucky escape for me.

    1. david

      Between the Israelis and the Russians paddy sees to be fixated
      Poor old Dennis O’Brien
      Did everything in his power to avoid paying tax on his profit from selling esat
      He wants to be painted a philanthropic man a saint a man who uses every legal tax dodge in the book
      He made his money fair play he wanted to limit his taxes fair play but he used every legal loophole available to do so
      But he now wants the respect of a man who pays all his taxes without availing of schemes
      He will never gain that respect the truly craves
      His connection with the Clinton foundation brought him the ownership of a Hyatt regency hotel funded by the Clinton foundation in a land of poverty and the sale of thousands of digicel phones his company for the victims paid for by the Clinton foundation as leaked by wiki leaks
      I call a spade a spade and he dose not have my respect

      1. Johnny

        Digicel owns the hotel,after a exhaustive and extensive search,Marriot picked some surplus land next door to Digi headquarters.Which incidentally is probably the last place you’d build a hotel on the island,which just happens to charge the maximum per diem daily rate for USAID workers !

        1. david

          Yep and O’Brien owns edifice’
          Maybe Oxfam needs to show the ads about little asha walking miles to top up his digicel mobile
          Such is the Clinton foundation

  2. realPolithicks

    Remarkable stuff, there is a whole other world out there that most of us ordinary people know nothing about, it seems that being very wealthy allows you to operate outside the law with impunity.

  3. b

    if Catherine Murphy obtained the details of private transactions that she disclosed under privilage through painstaking research and doggedness, why won’t she help the commission trying to verify the claims?

      1. david

        If it was not for her this matter would not of come to light
        We all know denis O’Brien has the power and the money to pursue anyone to the ends of the earth
        She I assume is protecting her source

        1. b

          ah I don’t know about that. Colm Keavney also seemed to have been doing some great research as was pearse Doherty. probably would have come to light eventually

        2. Ryan

          Anyone with two brain cells know who her source was. What concerns the general public is the cost of the Cregan Inquiry.

        3. Andy

          Her source told her redacted was getting a 1.25% interest rate (May 2015)
          Pearse Doherty’s source told him redacted was getting a 3% interest rate (June 2015).

          I’m suspecting one of them might not really know what they’re talking about.

          I’d have more faith in Doherty (not actual faith as SF are repulsive but they (he) seem more competent).

        1. GiggidyGoo

          Then give us actuals – have you any actuals? As to why she doesn’t do as you want?

          1. GiggidyGoo

            She obviously has reasons – who were you actually questioning then, as i doubt she posts here? Maybe ask her in an email?

    1. bisted

      …Ann-Marie…a former Tanaiste used to go up and brief the yanks/zionists,,,I think you might be safe…

  4. Ray O'Neill

    Good to see Anne-Maire back on Broadsheet.ie. While I don’t agree with her politics she is certainly someone who is not afraid to hold power to account. The Cregan Commission into the SiteServ debacle is being hampered by a chairman who seems more interested in doubling fees than finding the truth. I understand that Deputy Murphy has furnished the commission with a huge volume of documentation that can easily get us to the truth of what went on at IBRC. But will those in power ever allow that truth to come out? We cannot continue to allow people walk all over our society because they yield influence.

  5. some old queen

    Always wondered why these sorts are described as ‘former’. The same thing with the CA scandal. I mean if they are former then why mention it at all?

      1. some old queen

        To be discussed tomorrow in HP as an emergency debate. Possible criminal offences. Very hysterical all together.

        1. jusayinlike

          There won’t be any indictments, there will be regulation and censorship offered up, exactly what I said this whole contrived POS would result in..

          1. Nigel

            ‘Contrived.’
            It’s not about being worried that bad restrictive regulations might result from this. It’s the infantile insistence, absent all proof, that it is all manufactured for that purpose. The only REAL things that happen are the ones that suit you. Everything else is some vague value if ‘fake ‘

  6. andy moore

    Ah well , it’s all out in wash now ! Stay strong , many have/had suspicions also about all comers & interfering strangers !!

  7. Matt Lucozade: The Only Reader of the Village

    #BS

    This is just barstool gossip.

    “Just the Facts, Ma’am” will do.

    Anybody who says they were in the Mossad, was in all probability not. A) They’d keep their gob shut and B) they’d be able to refer to the actual agency they were in.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Intelligence_Community

    Like you need to extra clothes to conceal surveillance or recording devices these days. Spidey sense, indeed.

    What was he hiding? A gramophone?

    1. b

      he does seem like the shittest agent ever.

      I wonder if he was wearing a large ten gallon hat with a camera in it too

    2. realPolithicks

      Apparently you missed the bit where she stated that she was later able to verify his identity, or does that not suit your agenda.

  8. Matt Lucozade: The Only Reader of the Village

    She could have at least cracked a joke:

    What did Seán Connery 007 say to the INM Board?

    “Sho. Anyone for Denish?”

    Skyfall, indeed.

  9. Lilly

    Can anyone give me the A,B,Cs on how to make a FOI request?

    Have no idea what to make of this except to say Denis has a reputation for being fond of surveillance that goes as far back as his UCD days.

Comments are closed.