Why There Haven’t Been Housing Protests Like The Water Movement…Yet

at

Irish Water protest on O’Connell Street, Dublin in August 2015; Dr Rory Hearne

The focus in recent weeks on the Taoiseach’s self-imploding spin machine (from his spinning of yarns to impress Trump and the exposure of the Strategic Spin Unit) hasn’t been all bad news, however, for Varadkar and his band of merry Ministerels.

It has served to distract attention from the Government’s consistent failure to address the biggest crisis this country faces – the housing crisis – or as it should be called – the affordable homes emergency.

The latest reports show that rents and house prices continue to rise, making housing even more unaffordable for the average worker.

Tens of thousands of home owners in arrears still face repossession and eviction, and over 3,000 children and their families remain in homelessness emergency accommodation.

But the reality is that this crisis is likely to worsen further in the coming months and years.

There is no reason (aside from public and political concern) why the numbers of children and families in homelessness couldn’t rise from 3000 to reach 6,000 or 10,000 in the coming decade.

The authorities can keep building more ‘Family Hub’ emergency accommodation and ignore the evidence of the damage being done to children and families.

There is no reason why rents won’t keep rising faster than wages, that overcrowding won’t continue, and people will be stuck living at home with parents or in the private rental sector.

Just look at the US and the extent of housing inequality and suffering that is tolerated there.

That is the ‘dystopian’ housing system we are heading towards in Ireland. But it is not inevitable.

It depends on who wins the battle for housing that is underway at the moment. We are in the midst of a ‘moment of reckoning’ in the Irish housing system – a type of war –and the winners are determining its future for decades to come.

On the one hand, there are the current ‘winners’ – the vulture funds, the banks, the financial and property investors (investing on behalf of the global and Irish wealthy), Real Estate Investment Trusts, landlords, estate agents, and property developers.

And, within these, are many of our politicians (a quarter of the current cabinet are landlords) and media (who benefit from property advertisements).

This class, or even cabal, I call the property-finance complex – are in the process of converting more and more of our homes into commodities (investment assets to be profited from) through which renters and students can be exploited and mortgage holders fleeced.

The property-finance cabal has no interest in building affordable rental properties or homes for purchase. And they have government working on their behalf – implementing policies of tax breaks, selling off NAMA and bank assets, privatising public land and social housing facilitating a huge profit and wealth transfer to the property-finance cabal in order to ‘incentivise private sector ‘supply’ (and boost the profits of the banks).

The table below shows that in December 2017 property investors – (household buyers-non occupiers and non-household Buyers) – bought over a third (37%) of homes that month, 2,379 homes.

In contrast, first-time buyers bought much less – just a fifth (21%) of homes purchased – 1,358 homes. So the property-finance cabal are clearly winning, backed by current government policy.

But, on the other side, there is a growing population of people losing out – and they range from our most vulnerable homeless families to average and professional workers, from guards and teachers to university academics who cannot afford to buy a home.

The extent of people affected by the housing crisis is reflected in the shift in attitudes amongst the Irish public towards housing.

Housing has moved from being a relatively marginal issue in public and political debate to becoming the issue of single most concern.

The most recent Eurobarometer poll (undertaken in December 2017) shows that, for Irish people, they think housing is the most important issue facing the country. 57% of respondents cited it as the most important issue.

The second most important was health and social security (cited by 33% as the most important), followed by rising prices/cost of living (cited by 22%).

We can see the dramatic rise in importance of housing as an issue (as the crisis worsened) from the Eurobarometer November 2013 poll when just 4% cited it as the most important issue to November 2014 when it was cited by 13%. But then in November 2015 housing jumped to being the first issue of concern at 34% and in November 2016 it was again first with 42% citing it as most important.

Alongside this, there has been a growing movement of citizen action (most notably the Apollo House occupation), civil society groups and political parties asserting that housing should be provided as a home – as a human right and that everyone should have access to affordable secure accommodation.

These have been putting forward alternative solutions such as setting up a new semi-state housing agency to build affordable ‘cost-rental’ housing for a mix of incomes, co-operative affordable purchase homes, putting in place tenant protections from eviction, funding local authorities to build social housing on a much greater scale, putting the right to housing in the constitution and new initiatives to support Housing Associations not vulture funds to buy the mortgages in arrears.

But many are asking why there hasn’t been more citizen action on housing – why have there not been housing protests like the water movement?

There are a myriad of explanatory factors, including the active undermining of society-wide solidarity on the issue by government and state agencies blaming the victims like the homeless and those in mortgage arrears.

It has been a real challenge to convince people why they should partake in such protests and public action and motivate them to get involved.

At the MyName protest concert we organised outside the Dail before Christmas, for example, there was a good turnout – possibly close to a thousand people there at one point. However, we thought there would be more there.

But there are also two other important interlinked explanations.

Firstly, the various housing action campaigns and NGOs and trade unions representing the diverse groups affected by housing exclusion have been ploughing their own furrows – doing great work – but not coming together to create a sufficient mass of united impact.

Secondly, and this is linked to that issue, is that many of those affected – from private rental tenants to those on housing waiting lists to aspirant home owners – have not been convinced that the campaigns and protests are relevant to them and can make a difference.

Next Saturday, April 7, in Dublin the National Homeless and Housing is organising a protest calling on the government to make housing a constitutional right, to end evictions, to build public housing and legislate for real security of tenure for tenants, amongst other issues.

The coalition is now one of the largest civic alliances created on the housing issue to date in Ireland involving trade unions, tenant’s groups, community groups, artists, musicians, NGOs, charities and political parties.

This is an important attempt to bring together the diverse groups affected by the crisis.

There are many reasons why it is worthwhile attending housing protests such as the one on April 7.

Firstly, if you want to ensure everyone has access to an affordable and secure home then you are going to have support public action to make that happen. The Government has shown that it is not going to do it willingly.

But, as with water, or medical cards, and many other issues – the evidence shows that public protest and a public outcry on an issue can change government policy. But it has to be big enough that politicians can’t ignore it.

So each additional person that is there on April 7 will make it more likely that it is a big enough protest to have an impact on politicians.

Politicians don’t like negative publicity and people pointing out what they are doing wrong.

They prefer citizens to be passive and to leave their democratic ‘involvement’ to voting every four or five years. Large protests shatter the cosy consensus that government decision makers have an inalienable legitimacy to govern.

Large protests also challenge societal tolerance of the present crisis. They challenge the idea that the crisis is acceptable and it is the only possibility.

Public action disrupts this fallacy and points to alternative solutions and pathways. Importantly, it raises the aspiration and expectations of people affected to not have to just accept their current difficult housing circumstances.

Being part of the protest is a way to shatter the silence around housing victims who are being stigmatised and attacked on a constant basis by politicians, on social media and elsewhere. This is probably the essential reason to join the protest on April 7.

Joining the public protest is an act of true citizenship – an act of solidarity with your fellow country people who are really suffering.

Homeless families I have worked with have told me how their children have asked them ‘how can we be left like this without a home’.

The children asked them ‘does nobody care about us? Why does nobody care about us?’.

Thousands marching through Dublin calling for action on this affordable homes emergency and demanding the right to a home for everyone, will show these children that there are people – genuine citizens – who care and are not going to tolerate this crisis continuing.

Dr Rory Hearne is a policy analyst, academic, social justice campaigner. He writes here in a personal capacity. Follow Rory on Twitter: @roryhearne

Rollingnews

Previously: Ireland’s Home Truths

35 thoughts on “Why There Haven’t Been Housing Protests Like The Water Movement…Yet

      1. Neilo

        I hear he’s the Occasionally Visiting Professor of Applied Narcotics at the University of Please Yourself, California.

  1. Neilo

    Who had ‘cabal’ and ‘Trump’ on their Rory Aherne scratch card for this week? First prize: 1 year’s subscription to The Guardian. Second prize: 2 years’ subscription etc. Also, soz to all that I can’t make the protest – too busy breaking out in hives at the prospect of seeing B To Tha Ogle.

  2. steve white

    because it doesn’t directly affect as many people, there isn’t charge they don’t want to pay, there’s no physical street by street interaction involved that there was with the installation programme, so just stop comparing water protests with housing protests.

    1. david

      Its more than that
      Water should or must be belonging to the people not the state enshrined into our constitution so it cannot be sold off to any utility company ,company or any entity.
      This would stop any government which is the state from disposing of it for a few bob.
      Water is the single most important resource in the world and the world is short of it.
      We on the other hand have an abundance and plenty of rain that causes severe flooding
      Notice all the red flags put up after a couple of days rain warning of mass flooding
      Only this week it was reported about towing icebergs, to supply cities with water.
      We have so much water we take it for granted while in places like India they harvest the water from the monsoons to use in the dry periods
      We do not, but we should.
      If we harvested by digging massive trenches along the major rivers like the Shannon to alleviate the rivers overflowing and bursting their banks and channel it to ports where it can be processed treated then put on massive tankers to be exported ,imagine the wealth that could be generated, selling that commodity to countries crying out for water.
      And imagine two birds by one stone.
      We are talking about the years to come.
      If we allow water to be the property of a utility company like Irish water we will regret in decades to come of what we as a nation gave away
      As for the housing ,people do not give a rats arse ,until they are directly effected by this issue
      I see post brexit a property crash and of course those who sat their and tolerated this horrendous situation ,silent and uncaring,will be hopping demanding state aid to save their homes.
      And when that happens they should be left to deal with their own stupidity of paying for inflated property.
      Remember there is no such thing as a free lunch in ireland

  3. Diddy

    Sadly and selfishly if you OWN a house all this inflation etc is good news. Water was a tax on everyone. That’s why it got people mobilized. Everyone who’s renting needs to turn out. Everyone who’s adult children are living at home needs to turn out and everyone who has a house but sees the need for. Hangs needs to turn out. I’ll be there

    1. $hifty

      Incorrect.

      The people who this housing shortage most affects are people who are looking to buy a house. The vast majority of those people are working during the week.

      The “can’t pay won’t pay” crowd were otherwise unengaged during the hours of 9 to 5 and took to the streets

      1. david

        NO ITS PEOPLE WHO CANNOT EVEN DREAM IN HAVING A HOME
        That is the low paid that make your latté prepare your meals clean your offices

    2. david

      And diddy you are correct but the water issue, is we are already paying for it ,and successive governments, have channelled off this money from general taxation, because it was from general taxation as in the 2%of the23%VAT it was intended for.
      I call it misappropriation of funds.
      That money if invested and put into what the tax was collected for, would of replaced the pipes that are now over 100 years old, and the treatment of waste and water.
      This criminal fraud by successive governments has placed us where we are
      Maybe its time for accountability ,time to bring those faceless and ministers to book for the fraud committed.
      By setting up a private company they are effectively stealing what belongs to the people and charging us twice for it

  4. Rob_G

    There is no reason (aside from public and political concern) why the numbers of children and families in homelessness couldn’t rise from 3000 to reach 6,000 or 10,000 in the coming decade.”

    I mean, why stop there – it could even be 1,000,000. Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria.

    1. david

      I would correct that
      There is no political concern over the homeless except who wants to replace who is in charge now
      Overnight it could be solved by councils buying the property the likes of NAMA sold off to vulture funds or instead of building projects that will take years
      Overnight the homes could be provided and the councils then are the biggest landlord and the rents then fund the building project

  5. Declan

    How about raising the local property tax and using that to help kick start public housing building programmes – simplistic I know but you’ve got to start somewhere

    1. Andy

      Or how about just a building programme?

      Any building programme. Any at all.

      Money is cheap right now. Maybe the councils need to get off their ar5es and get building.

      Anyone remember how RBB and others were complaining about how the rules from Dept of Envir meant it would take 2 years for LA’s from conception to actually getting funding and started on site? Well, they were saying that in 2014 & 2015. So add 2 year to that and it would be 2016 & 2017 yet no building. Did they just not bother? Meanwhile we’ve morons in FG, FF, Independents and Labor happily objecting to anything and everything being built in their constituencies.

      1. Otis Blue

        It’s interesting how little scrutiny there is on Local Authorities. Not just in housing but in general. Lots of staff, big budgets and precious little to show for it.

        It’s as if our expectations are so low that they just get a free pass.

    1. Neilo

      @Andy – if they were the houses would be built by now. Sorry, I meant to say Zionist…bloodsucker…vampire squid…that Curb Your Enthusiasm’s gone right off the boil…bagels, eh? Not really a fan et cetera ad nauseam

    2. david

      No but lets blame them
      As Sachs baron Conan said in the dictator the titanic was sunk by the illegal Zionist state of israel

  6. hugh sheehy

    The government has never had any interest in solving the housing crisis. Nor have most of the people in the country. Both like high housing costs. They’re popular. Any measure to reduce housing costs is hugely unpopular. And the social and economic consequences be damned.

  7. steve white

    “But it has to be big enough that politicians can’t ignore it. ” ~ 100,000 2003 anti-war protest was ignored

  8. anne

    I think the blueshirts are trying to emulate the US here. Even Inda said it.

    The biggest poo hole in the world in terms of inequality, where the middle class is rapidly becoming non existent. People go into bankruptcy if they get sick & worse are left to die.

    1. david

      Anne No its not america its India
      for little Leo’s family is from India and its in his cultures psyche
      Before not to long we will have slums occupied by the low paid like in Bombay with families put to work sorting out the trash
      They might even be able like in India send their children to college out of what they make just like in India from recycling plastics etc

        1. david

          I doubt you actually know any Indian people
          I do
          Its the indian psyche just like our psyche we often hear about.you know the drink sodden Irish.
          Its your culture its the way you think its how you are brought up.
          You are very keen to believe this of America, but not of India
          Anne thinks America is the biggest poo hole
          India is worse
          Ever been there smelt the rancid filth on the street and count the homeless and the untouchables
          Many die on the streets ,and its true a bout their slums

      1. realPolithicks

        Extraordinary stuff from you again. The other day you were claiming that as a jew you couldn’t be anti-semetic does that also mean you can’t be a racist because I have news for you, you are a racist.

Comments are closed.