From top: Social Democrats TD Catherine Murphy and People Before Profit TD Bríd Smyth in the Dáil this afternoon
This afternoon.
And further to reports that, in November 2016, the Minister for Communications Denis Naughten informed Eoghan Ó Neachtáin, of Heneghan PR which represented Independent News and Media, that he planned to refer INM’s proposed takeover of Celtic Media Group to the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland…
…Two months before it was publicly announced…
During Topical Issues – taken by the Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan and ahead of Minister Naughten’s statement to the Dáil in relation to the matter which is now thought to take place around 4.30pm – Ms Murphy said the following:
“Minister, when I submitted the topical, I referred to the implications of recent and escalating developments regarding INM based on the ODCE investigation into the company.
“At the time, of course, I was referring to significant concerns regarding what can only be considered as a hacking of emails which potentially compromised huge numbers of journalists and their sources and the major implications for damage, such inaction poses the independence of media and the protection of journalism.
“But as of today, I cannot ignore the most obvious escalating development which is the involvement of the Minister for Communications Denis Naughten.
“On the 6th of December 2016, he stood in this chamber and told me in response to a priority question, he had only commenced the phase one assessment on the 24th of November 2016, his officials had not yet made any decision and that he had 30 days to make a decision on three options -one of which was a potential referral to the BAI [Broadcasting Authority of Ireland].
“He said, and I’m quoting, that he ‘hadn’t received a report from his officials yet’.
“The director of corporate enforcement’s affidavit states that a month earlier on the afternoon of the 11th of November, he personally told representative from Heneghan PR that he would be referring the proposal, proposed merger, to the BAI, based on the advice of his officials.
“I note that Heneghan PR, headed by Nigel Heneghan, advisory to Leslie Buckley and spokesman for INM and also member of the compliance committee of the BAI.
“So here was a PR firm employed by INM and with close ties to all the close protagonists in INM making a direct contact with a minister and being made privy to a decision which I, as a parliamentarian, weeks later, was told the decision had not been made yet.
“The repercussions for this, I believe, are stunning – not least in relation to the implications it has for the potential market manipulation and inside dealing but also for the questions it raises in regards to corporate governance and INM and the axis of power between major shareholders of INM and his department.”
Ms Murphy went on to say that Minister Naughten should recuse himself for any role in media regulation.
She added:
“I also take exception, yet again, to being misled in this Dáil when I ask a parliamentary question and I believe I was mislead in respect of those replies on the 6th of December.”
Later
Ms Smyth said:
“If the media was free, why does Ireland have a higher concentration of media ownership than most other countries with one key individual whose name can never be mentioned whether in a committee or in this chamber, owns Sunday Independent, Sunday World, Evening Herald, has a stake in the Daily Star, The Kerryman, the Drogheda Independent, the Wicklow People, the Exford People, the Waterford People, and many radio stations such as Newstalk, Today FM.
“That is power, that is control, and that is a very, very wealthy individual whose name cannot be mentioned in these chambers, who has strong links with the Irish state, so much so that every time a very important function happening like Davos, or the New York Stock Exchange, he appears with key members of this government.
“And that friendly relationship has helped him to secure influence and has continued to help it exist. That is what needs to be challenged.”
Follow the Dáil proceedings live here
Earlier: Denis Denis
So, the question now needs to be asked – Broadband – has he who cannot be named in the Dail any connections to whoever or whatever Naughton is trying to put in place – you know, the last tenderer standing after the others pulled out? Will we have another tribunal in a few years?
Yes and yes..
We need to demand why hundreds of millions is being spent on rapid broadband which apparently cannot be delivered, while other options costing far less are available.
The UK announced they have now signed a deal that will deliver rapid broadband throughout every village nook and cranny
The deal is masts on churches with the technology to give rapid broadband to all
And the mobile companies are the ones providing it
So what is going on naughton?
The UK can do it but why can we not?
Is it corruption ,or plain stupidity?
Yep, and why would two bidders pull out?
“We all Take Exception, Yet Again, To Being overcharged for free drink in the our Dail bar’”
etc,etc.
Comical Ali must bitterly regret not applying for a role, in helping run this country alongside Dinny O’B. Micky Lowry and the rest of the usual suspects in the Dail ‘Snug’.
blushirt corruption.. again
That fella in the third photo looks wild angry