One of a series of documents released by the Department of An Taoiseach last week
Last Friday.
On – the day of the referendum on the Eighth Amendment – the Department of An Taoiseach released to a number of journalists records they had requested under Freedom of Information laws in relation to the Strategic Communications Unit advertorial controversy.
Further to this…
In The Sunday Times, Mark Tighe reports:
The head of the advertising agency promoting the government’s national development plan (NDP) said he did not want promotions for the project on radio to appear as advertising for “legal” reasons.
In correspondence released after a freedom of information request, Jason Nebenzahl, managing director of PHD Media, told ad bookers it was “key” that the scripts used in radio promotions for the Project Ireland 2040 plan came from the radio stations, “but [are] labelled in partnership with the government of Ireland”.
“We do not want ads, nor are we legally able to have ads on radio, so nothing produced can be misconstrued as an ad as this is not our intention,” wrote Nebenzahl in an email on February 16 to Urban Media, which was arranging the promotions with local stations. “It is simply sharing content that is relevant and important to a given area.”
The radio spots were pulled after it was revealed by The Times Ireland edition that Mediaforce, an agency retained by PHD to book local-newspaper adverts, had told them not to label the Project Ireland 2040 adverts as “advertorial”. Mediaforce also instructed that the adverts should fit in with the “tone” of normal coverage.
…The department did not respond to questions about how broadcasting promotions for Project Ireland 2040 could ever be illegal.
…Other documents released show that a sentiment analysis was carried out by PHD. It said when the emotion of users who interacted with the online content promoting the national plan was examined, “an overwhelming sense of joy was perceived”.
Project Ireland ads had ‘legal issues’ (Mark Tighe, The Sunday Times)
Pic: Steve White
I don’t know what particular about radio ads considering all the other native advertising they did. Does he think local radio ads might be perceived as benefiting local government politicans even more so then national and regional print ads?
Why would that be, remember the gov had already done similar with Creative Ireland in 2017 and spent 171k on radio ads https://creative.ireland.ie/sites/default/files/media/file-uploads/2018-01/Creative%20Ireland%20Programme%20End%20of%20Year%20Report%20%202017.pdf ..
I know thre is ban on broadcasting political advertising but it wasn’t political advertising according to the gov so why would it be a problem http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2009/act/18/section/41/enacted/en/html just perception?
So they released the information on the day of the referendum, what a coincidence I’m sure this was not an attempt to bury it..not at all.
Yanks call that dumping the trash
How did they examine the emotions of the readers of the online ads? ‘Overwhelming sense of joy’?
I love you Long time
all the foi files are here, its from record 30 https://wetransfer.com/downloads/355ed94aa789722d01b1fdacf430cd0820180525160729/fa2206baa8b421668f44aba6f728690020180525160729/d87dde foi doc actually overriding sentiment was of neutrality but when they were deseclected it was creating an overwhleming sense of joy.