Tag Archives: Fintan O’Toole

OToolee

Fintan O’Toole writes in today’s Irish Times about why he feels libel actions taken by columnists should be an “absolute last resort”.

He tells how the Sunday Times, in 2010, reported that he drove home from an Irish Congress of Trade Unions rally in his series 5 BMW, therefore depicting him as something of a hypocrite.

Only he doesn’t have a series 5 BMV, or any other kind of car, because he cannot drive.

He writes:

I am a national newspaper columnist. I occupy a position of enormous privilege. I’m allowed to take part in what we might call the semi-official national discourse. I’m allowed to be robustly critical of all sorts of people. I’m allowed to enrage some of those people and (though I don’t set out to do so) to upset others. I’m given those freedoms because there is a working assumption that free and open and robust debate is not just permissible in, but essential to, a democracy.

So instead of hiring a lawyer and suing the Sunday Times, I talked to the paper’s Irish editor. He agreed pretty quickly that the article was inaccurate and indefensible. It was taken off the paper’s website and a retraction was published the following week. And that was the end of it.

..there’s a price to be paid for the considerable privilege of being granted an especially loud voice in the national conversation. With the megaphone comes a duty to protect freedom of expression and a vested interest in keeping it as open as possible.

A columnist’s job confers some privileges, and obligations (Irish Times)

Gareth Chaney/Photocall Ireland

OToole
[Fintan O'Toole at the Irish Small and Medium Enterprises Association (ISME) Annual Conference in the RDS last November]

It’s good that most of those who oppose gay marriage love and respect and cherish individual gay people, though they should hardly expect a pat on the back for not hating their fellow citizens. But they need to recognise that that’s not enough.

The whole point of the law is that it’s not about giving people equal status because you like them. It’s about freeing people from subjection to the arbitrariness of other people’s benevolence. Gay men and lesbians shouldn’t have to care one way or the other whether the members of the Iona Institute love them or not. Just as the rest of us shouldn’t measure the rights of our fellow citizens by what they get up to in bed.

Full equality often has to wait while mainstream opinion catches up (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)

Earlier: Miss Panti Goes To Europe

Leon Farrell/Photocall Ireland

000852af-642

[Pat Cox, Chairman of Limerick City of Culture with former CEO Patricia Ryan]

Fintan O’Toole writes:

The City of Culture process has been casually insulting to artists. The 10-person board has just one professional artist – and, incidentally, just one woman – on it.
I can think offhand of a long list of really interesting artists who are either from Limerick or have worked in the city – Mícheál Ó Súilleabháin, Mary Nunan, Mel Mercier, Michael Curtin, Clairr O’Connor, Gerard Stembridge, Darren Shan, Gabriel Rosenstock, John Liddy, Marian Keyes, Mary Coll, Amanda Coogan and many more. If some time had been spent talking to them, they might have pointed out that they do not wish to be called (as the official City of Culture “vision” calls artists) “cultural providers” who “export Limerick Cultural Product” as if it were bacon.
“…we now have a perfect warning of what happens when politicians and bureaucrats try to use the arts without respecting them. Irish artists are much better at doing their jobs than Irish politicians and administrators are at doing theirs. If they spent more time with books, music and performances, politicians might learn something about rigorous thinking.”

The idea that art and culture are about rebranding is an insult to artists (Fintan O’Toole, irish Times)

Previously: Cultured Question

(RTE)

90254886 (From top: Dermot Desmond at the Change Nation event in Dublin Castle last year)

You may write me down in history
With your bitter, twisted lies,
You may trod me in the very dirt
But still, like dust, I’ll rise.

Does my sassiness upset you?
Why are you beset with gloom?
‘Cause I walk like I’ve got oil wells
Pumping in my living room.

Does my sexiness upset you?
Does it come as a surprise
That I dance like I’ve got diamonds
At the meeting of my thighs?

Gulp.

Part of a poem ‘Still I Rise’ by Maya Angelou sent by Dermot Desmond to Fintan O’Toole after being questioned about the Telecom scandal of 1990.

25 years of Irish life through the columns of Fintan O’Toole (Irish Times)

Dermot Desmond to up stake in INM to 15 per cent (Irish Times)

(Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland)

fot

 

The Irish Times biblical-sized Fintan O’Toole supplement containing the best of his back catalogue in today’s paper AND online.

25 years of Irish life through the columns of Fintan O’Toole (Irish Times)

12/1/2012. Mary Rafterys Funeral ScenesfotIrish Times journalist and writer Fintan O’Toole suggests writing the word ‘Reform’ on the voting slip in tomorrow’s Seanad referendum.

All fine and dandy but the Returning Officer for Galway Marian Chambers Higgins has said there “is a strong possibility” that the vote will be rejected.

Anyone?

Say No to Seanad abolition and the Coalition’s reform charade (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)

‘Strong possibility’ extra writing will spoil vote (Hilary Martyn, Galway Independent)

Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland

H/t Adrian Devane

 

Perhaps most importantly, the Government has incurred in this deal a huge hidden cost – the loss of the sense of justice, dignity and national self respect that is crucial to the building of a successful society. A nation taught to be grateful for such small mercies is not one that can imagine big things for its future.

 

Debt Deal Is Normalising The Irish Freak Show (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)

(Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland)

 

Fintan O’Toole (above) has proposed a ‘citizens’ petition’.

With the following wording:

“As citizens of Ireland, we believe that the payment of €3.1 billion a year, every year until 2023, for Anglo Irish Bank and Irish Nationwide is reckless, immoral and unjust. These ‘promissory notes’ have imposed the debts of now-defunct private institutions on Irish citizens as a whole. These are debts which we cannot, should not and will not pay.

“We therefore instruct our Government: (a) to declare by March 17th, 2013, that it will not make the payment of €3.1 billion due on March 31st, 2013, and to inform the European Central Bank that it will no longer co-operate with this unjust imposition of private debts on the Irish people.

“(b) not to enter into any arrangement with the European Central Bank that involves any acceptance of a duty to pay these debts and/or any substantial payment of Irish public money on foot of the promissory notes.

“We further declare that unless the Government makes this declaration by March 17th, 2013, we will engage in peaceful and dignified mass protest in a form to be decided by ourselves collectively.”

The non-affiliated/sponsored, volunteer-run petition site – OurIreland.ie – goes live within the next few days and will be open to “verified individuals who declare themselves as Irish citizens”.

Will YOU sign?

We Need A Citizens’ Petition On Debt Deal (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)

(Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland)

 

Aha.

The point is that much of what the Taoiseach had to say was inarticulate drivel and all of it was waffle.

He was starting sentences without knowing where they were going to end. He was using random verbs with no relationship to their objects. (In what language can “progress” be “put” or “grown on”?)

He was making claims, such as low interest rates being a sign of Irish confidence, that it is terrifying to think he might actually believe. He was half speak-your-weight machine, half Alan Partridge.

We pay this man €200,000 a year plus a €3.2 million pension pot.

The inner eejit.

Outed.

Kenny’s Dead Words Fail To Convince (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)

(Mark Stedman/Photocall Ireland)

The (now rather lonely) liberal conscience of the Irish Times writes:

A majority of voters, I would guess, are actually in one of two camps: (a) Yes, because there is no choice; (b) No, but ask us again when you’ve got the growth strategy worked out.

The first of these – we have to do it – is actually not a reason to vote Yes, it’s a reason to spoil one’s vote.

If there is no choice, a referendum is a charade. It is a parody of democracy.

The second option is “No, but . . .” It acknowledges there might be a context in which the fiscal treaty actually makes sense.

…A No vote with an implied invitation to come back when the bigger picture is visible may be the most honest response to the demand that we make a decision in ignorance.

And the kisser?

” new protocols require a new vote when the people have voted No, but not when they’ve voted Yes”

 

Treaty A Mere Clause In Contract Yet Unseen (Fintan O’Toole, Irish Times)