Tag Archives: Youth Defence

 

From top: Eric Locke; Dr Seán Ó Domhnail

This afternoon, Erick Locke was  found guilty  at the Central Criminal Court of murdering Sonia Blount at a room in the Plaza Hotel, Tallaght, Dublin 24  on February 16, 2014.

Further to this…

Sam M writes:

Man uses fake Facebook profile to lure ex. girlfriend  to a hotel room.

Brings along with him a “pellet gun, Stanley knife and cable ties”. But only to “frighten her” he claims. When she screams, the mother-of-one is “strangled and suffocated”.

His psychiatrist testifies in court “that he had intended tying her to a chair and forcing her to listen to an account of his suffering, but didn’t intend to kill her.”

Locke is suffering from Pervasive Developmental Disorder, he says.

Prosecuting barrister Remy Farrell describes the psychiatrist as “wholly unreliable” adding that “his lack of familiarly with the evidence is simply stunning.”

Defence barrister Patrick Gageby agrees that the psychiatrist appears poorly prepared but said he was ‘not so sure’ that the diagnosis of PDD was challenged.

Well today it was.  Locke will receive a mandatory life sentence.

Who is the psychiatrist? Dr Seán Ó Domhnaill, leading member Youth Defence since its foundation and spokesperson for the group in the 1990s and 2000s.

Eric Locke found guilty of murder of Sonia Blount in hotel room (RTÉ)

Defence insists Eric Locke had mental disorder at time of killing (Irish Times, May 19, 2017)

Screen Shot 2015-09-30 at 16.46.08

 

To the people of Ireland…

A satirical swipe at Amnesty International by Youth Defence.

Destiny Herndon-DeLaRosa writes:

“When Amnesty International isn’t busy fighting for the rights of pimps and johns by trying to legalise prostitution, they’re working tirelessly to stop the very worst terrorists among us and the greatest threat to all human rights: babies. Little tiny babies. Specifically, by lobbying to legalize abortion, or “abertion” as they call it, in Ireland.”

Gulp.

Jim

“Over the years, we’ve learned at an enormous cost that many organisations, including our own – the political class, the church – many organisations that there was too much deference to, over time. And the charity sector’s no more. We cannot assume that because it’s charitable that it’s holier than thou and that it’s good.
There are many organisations that I have many concerns about and I want to mention one on the record here which is Family and Life. And I’ve the letters that they’ve sent out to, what I think, are a very targeted audience, primarily elderly, vulnerable people, soliciting donations up to, and including, €7,000, in the name of charity. I think it deserves a more strong light to shone in on that particular organisation.
But there are many, numerous organisations and I think we have to encourage, we have to be brave and we have to continue on our quest to shine that light.”

West Cork Fine Gael TD, Jim Daly [top] speaking in the Dáil last night about Family and Life.

Earlier this month, Stephen O’Brien of The Sunday Times reported how Family and Life has refused to register with the Standards in Public Office Commission (SIPO) even though it was warned it was breaking the law by paying for a ‘fact finding’ mission to America for Fine Gael TDs Fidelma Healy Eames and Paul Bradford.

Thanks Oireachtas Retort

youth_defence_noxious_billboard10006aaf7-642FIGHT!

John Gallen writes:

I thought you may be interested in this very good response from the Standards In Public Office Commission SIPO regarding Youth Defence funding and SIPOs lack of power of enforcement to comply. It is pretty comprehensive and I get the feeling when reading it that they, SIPO, are frustrated with Youth Defence’s refusal to co-operate. But that is my interpretation. I think the response makes for interesting reading and is a good summary, I believe, of what has been done to date.

It appears SIPO still have no powers to force YD to respond to any of their requests. This needs to change. And just to throw it out there, would any of your readers have any suggestions on how Joe Voter might act to get these powers given to SIPO?

 

Anyone?

Dear Mr Gallen,

By way of explanation, third parties are those individuals or groups that accepts donations for political purposes and which must register with the Standards in Public Office Commission. Here is a link to our website containing an Explanatory Note on third parties

You will see that the definition of ‘political purposes’ is quite broad and while the Standards Commission is firmly of the view that the activities of Youth Defence are captured by this definition, it has not registered as a third party.
The Standards Commission has been in correspondence with Youth Defence and asked it to consider whether it should register as a third party. Youth Defence responded and stated that it does not need to register as a third party.

We wrote again to Youth Defence and asked it to reconsider its decision. We also wrote to Youth Defence in accordance with section 4(4) of the Electoral Act 1997, as amended, which provides that the Standards Commission may make such inquiries as it considers appropriate and may require any person to furnish any information, document or thing in the possession or procurement of the person which the Commission may require for the purposes of its duties under the Act.
We await its response. There is no penalty for failure to comply with this provision of the Act.

We wrote to the Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government on a number of occasions during the past and alerted him to the absence of a sanction for failure to comply with a request for information under section 4(4).
We also highlight this issue, along with other recommendations for changes to the legislation, in our annual reports. To date the legislation has not been amended to take into account the concerns of the Standards Commission.

However, a recent response from the Minister confirms that consideration will be given to our recommendations for changes to the legislation in the Electoral (Amendment) (Referendum Spending and Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, which is on the Government’s legislation programme.

Also, there is no sanction for failure to register as a third party.

…third parties are not required to disclose from whom it receives donations. In this regard your complaint is ” … non declaration of donations.” by Youth Defence. Registered political parties are obliged to furnish the Standards Commission with a Donation Statement annually, but registered third parties are not. As stated above, Youth Defence is not registered as a third party.

The activities of a group that is not registered as a third party are outside the legislative supervision of the Standards Commission. Section 25 of the Electoral Act 1997, as amended, sets out the offences and penalties for various categories of individuals and groups, in relation to donations etc., and unregistered third parties is not one of those categories listed in section 25.

In essence, without legislative support, the Standards Commission is not in a position to act on your complaint.

Thank you for contacting us.

Yours sincerely,

Standards in Public Office Commission
18 Lower Leeson Street
Dublin 2

(RTE/Photocall ireland)