There once was an X from Place B
Who satisfied Predicate P
Then X did thing A
In a specified way
Resulting in Circumstance C
ZeligIsJaded
Or, The Limerick Algorithim:
Llareggub
Na na na na na na na na
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da
Na na na na na na na na
Ka ka ka ka ka ka kack kack
God, I bloody hate Limericks.
Kieran NYC
“There once was an X from Place B
Who satisfied Predicate P
Then X did thing A
In a specified way
Resulting in (additional word that completely throws off the rhythm) Circumstance C”
Fixed that for you.
Rob_G
Good pun from the Sun, in fairness – well done.
Jimmee
Feminists 2 weeks ago: Je Suis Charlie!
Feminists this week: No Page 3!
Soundings
Je suis Page 3 – now, that’s deep.
Nigel
Everything is free speech, except criticism.
Don Pidgeoni
Yes. Because campaigning to remove Page 3 is the same as shooting people
Soundings
But, is defending Page 3 any different to defending cartoons which insult some Muslims (and satire which was apparently homophobic and anti-religion).
The Sun sells 2.1m copies per day, CH sold 60,000 a week. Which publication has more legitimacy?
Don Pidgeoni
IMO, both of them are stupid and add little if nothing to the world.
sickofallthisbs
Speaking as a Frenchman how dare you sheet on our culture.
Don Pidgeoni
Insult about garlic or something
jeremy kyle
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”.
etc. etc.
Cr
Comment is about hypocracy of only campaigning for free press when it doesn’t conflict with your agenda. You’ve shot off in the wrong direction there.
Don Pidgeoni
Maybe but tbf, most of me feminists buddies weren’t necessarily supportive of those cartoons either
Atlas
There’s a difference between not being supportive of something and trying to have it suppressed outright.
Don Pidgeoni
But its not suppressing t*ts, just t*ts in one instance and for reasons which seem fairly clear. You will still be able to see them if you want so it is different, at least to me
Atlas
If Page 3 offended you, then you were free not to buy it. Nobody forced anyone to buy the Sun.
I don’t understand the reasoning behind this daft movement nor the distinction between it and support for CH. All it says is that feminists will stand up for the right of the press to publish material which may offend without fear – except when it offends their puritan sensibilities.
It’s telling that you refuse to see the hypocrisy in this.
Don Pidgeoni
Its telling you use “puritan” – telling me that I’m wasting my time
Don Pidgeoni
Also telling you assume all feminists think the same thing…
Sham Bob
People who changed their social media name/profile pic to Je Suis Charlie didn’t turn into Ron Paul overnight.
Jimmee
Ah ok, that explains their inconsistency so.
Don Pidgeoni
Is it inconsistent? Defending the right to ‘satire’ is one thing, a picture of a topless woman is not satirical. Topless women aren’t being banned, just one particular picture of a topless women is being campaigned against.
Parp
What one particular picture is that?
Sounds saucy. Link?
Mr. T.
A outdated page 3 pair of knockers in front and a world of internet hegemony behind.
The John Moynes Limerick Algorithim:
There once was an X from Place B
Who satisfied Predicate P
Then X did thing A
In a specified way
Resulting in Circumstance C
Or, The Limerick Algorithim:
Na na na na na na na na
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Da
Na na na na na na na na
Ka ka ka ka ka ka kack kack
God, I bloody hate Limericks.
“There once was an X from Place B
Who satisfied Predicate P
Then X did thing A
In a specified way
Resulting in (additional word that completely throws off the rhythm) Circumstance C”
Fixed that for you.
Good pun from the Sun, in fairness – well done.
Feminists 2 weeks ago: Je Suis Charlie!
Feminists this week: No Page 3!
Je suis Page 3 – now, that’s deep.
Everything is free speech, except criticism.
Yes. Because campaigning to remove Page 3 is the same as shooting people
But, is defending Page 3 any different to defending cartoons which insult some Muslims (and satire which was apparently homophobic and anti-religion).
The Sun sells 2.1m copies per day, CH sold 60,000 a week. Which publication has more legitimacy?
IMO, both of them are stupid and add little if nothing to the world.
Speaking as a Frenchman how dare you sheet on our culture.
Insult about garlic or something
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”.
etc. etc.
Comment is about hypocracy of only campaigning for free press when it doesn’t conflict with your agenda. You’ve shot off in the wrong direction there.
Maybe but tbf, most of me feminists buddies weren’t necessarily supportive of those cartoons either
There’s a difference between not being supportive of something and trying to have it suppressed outright.
But its not suppressing t*ts, just t*ts in one instance and for reasons which seem fairly clear. You will still be able to see them if you want so it is different, at least to me
If Page 3 offended you, then you were free not to buy it. Nobody forced anyone to buy the Sun.
I don’t understand the reasoning behind this daft movement nor the distinction between it and support for CH. All it says is that feminists will stand up for the right of the press to publish material which may offend without fear – except when it offends their puritan sensibilities.
It’s telling that you refuse to see the hypocrisy in this.
Its telling you use “puritan” – telling me that I’m wasting my time
Also telling you assume all feminists think the same thing…
People who changed their social media name/profile pic to Je Suis Charlie didn’t turn into Ron Paul overnight.
Ah ok, that explains their inconsistency so.
Is it inconsistent? Defending the right to ‘satire’ is one thing, a picture of a topless woman is not satirical. Topless women aren’t being banned, just one particular picture of a topless women is being campaigned against.
What one particular picture is that?
Sounds saucy. Link?
A outdated page 3 pair of knockers in front and a world of internet hegemony behind.
It’s a strange world.
Put ’em away love.