This [REDACTED] USB stick…
They say that data on it was ‘altered’, giving the impression that it was changed.
Yet the rest of the article only refers to data being deleted. (I’m presuming that if data had been modified it would be on page 1, not hidden on page 4.)
It’s a simple process to retrieve deleted data from a memory stick,
This is a smoke screen, nothing more.
Careful now, you said ‘data’… the report says ‘usb stick’…. ‘was altered’
sǝɯǝɯʇɐpɐq
Oh dear…
I do my best to be clear.
-You’re just repeating the misleading elements of the article.
I give up..
Tom
As clear as mud and thick as two poos.
Tom
“- someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff”
Like when it was copied and accessed Clampers. All that irrelevant stuff.
He’s better at sh*tin’ on about nothing, than any news matters. The rambles about nothing make more sense.
sǝɯǝɯʇɐpɐq
Juggle these two quotes in your head;
‘Stroz Friedberg claimed that DATA, which consists of 339 digital files…on the memory sticjk had been deliberately altered.’
-That doesn’t mean that 339 files were tampered with. That assertion would still hold up to scrutiny if ONE file had been deleted from the memory stick. An irrelevant file perhaps, and most likely too.
The Report said ”key forensic atefacts may have been destroyed”, and that blah-di-blah...
Nothing was altered, Stuff was deleted.
-So what?
-Should we dismiss everything else on the memory stick because someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff?
sǝɯǝɯʇɐpɐq
This ‘Anonymous’ lad who delivered it to [REDACTED]’S desk and then disappeared into the night…
-He’s the lad I’d want to know more about.
-Does he wear a mask?
-Or a cloak?
-Is he mental?
-What the Hell is he playing at?
-Does he know he’s doing it wrong?
So many questions…
Tom
The information on a USB was stolen from Red Flag offices.
“On October 15, Red Flag filed a complaint at Pearse Street Garda station in Dublin that the information on the stick has been stolen from its office”
The USB stick that DOB claims was sent to him anomalously, was tampered with. As in forensic artifacts were destroyed on it.
Why are you sh*ting on about one filed deleted?
Dope.
“-Should we dismiss everything else on the memory stick because someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff?” lol Christ above. go away and learn to read.
Paddy
If you remove a wheel or two from a car, you’ve altered the vehicle. Try it when you bring your car for a NCT and see will it pass.
sǝɯǝɯʇɐpɐq
Let’s change the subject…
One of the things wrong with Hitler was that his hair was too long.
It was ridiculous.
This [REDACTED] USB stick…
They say that data on it was ‘altered’, giving the impression that it was changed.
Yet the rest of the article only refers to data being deleted.
(I’m presuming that if data had been modified it would be on page 1, not hidden on page 4.)
It’s a simple process to retrieve deleted data from a memory stick,
This is a smoke screen, nothing more.
PS
Sunday Times, of course.
Careful now, you said ‘data’… the report says ‘usb stick’…. ‘was altered’
Oh dear…
I do my best to be clear.
-You’re just repeating the misleading elements of the article.
I give up..
As clear as mud and thick as two poos.
“- someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff”
Like when it was copied and accessed Clampers. All that irrelevant stuff.
He’s better at sh*tin’ on about nothing, than any news matters. The rambles about nothing make more sense.
Juggle these two quotes in your head;
‘Stroz Friedberg claimed that DATA, which consists of 339 digital files…on the memory sticjk had been deliberately altered.’
-That doesn’t mean that 339 files were tampered with. That assertion would still hold up to scrutiny if ONE file had been deleted from the memory stick. An irrelevant file perhaps, and most likely too.
The Report said ”key forensic atefacts may have been destroyed”, and that blah-di-blah...
Nothing was altered, Stuff was deleted.
-So what?
-Should we dismiss everything else on the memory stick because someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff?
This ‘Anonymous’ lad who delivered it to [REDACTED]’S desk and then disappeared into the night…
-He’s the lad I’d want to know more about.
-Does he wear a mask?
-Or a cloak?
-Is he mental?
-What the Hell is he playing at?
-Does he know he’s doing it wrong?
So many questions…
The information on a USB was stolen from Red Flag offices.
“On October 15, Red Flag filed a complaint at Pearse Street Garda station in Dublin that the information on the stick has been stolen from its office”
The USB stick that DOB claims was sent to him anomalously, was tampered with. As in forensic artifacts were destroyed on it.
Why are you sh*ting on about one filed deleted?
Dope.
“-Should we dismiss everything else on the memory stick because someone had the foresight to remove the irrelevant stuff?” lol Christ above. go away and learn to read.
If you remove a wheel or two from a car, you’ve altered the vehicle. Try it when you bring your car for a NCT and see will it pass.
Let’s change the subject…
One of the things wrong with Hitler was that his hair was too long.
It was ridiculous.
Sorry, I mean Donald Trump.
Hitler had good hair.
What year is it?
Killer Floods now
The point here is that Denis O’Brien’s legal representation were given the memory stick with the instruction that it was not to be accessed. (Why was it given to them anyway? Why not to an independent (no – not THAT one) party?
So the point is whether Eames Solicitors have a problem now as regards confidentiality (Aidan Eames….? Anglo? http://www.politics.ie/forum/current-affairs/131252-former-fianna-fail-crony-fundraiser-appointed-anglo-board.html)
irish government in dinny’s pocket….ah come on!!! you don’t know what’s going on?????
The Siteserve probe halted until after the election? That’s a pretty handy turn of events for Inda, innit?