Vicky Phelan and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ mandate in respect of the CervicalCheck programme

Last night.

Vicky Phelan briefly returned to Twitter after closing her account last week following tweets by cancer researcher Dr Robert Grimes and an article by Dr Ciara Kelly in the Sunday Independent.

Her return came in the wake of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ review of CervicalCheck slides on Tuesday which found that in 159 cases there were missed opportunities to prevent or diagnose cancer earlier.

It also followed Lorraine Walsh’s announcement that she had resigned from the CervicalCheck steering committee.

Vicky tweeted:

“I have decided to reactivate my Twitter account for a very brief period in order to express my views on the RCOG Review process.

I fully support Lorraine Walsh’s decision to step down from the Cervical Check steering committee.

I share Lorraine’s concerns about the RCOG review process. I would like to state, for the record, that I do not have confidence in the RCOG review process.

The RCOG review was established to examine the individual histories of women who had been through the CervicalCheck screening system and who had developed cervical cancer and to determine, in cases where results were discordant, what was the impact on treatment, prognosis and outcome.

It is notable that the focus yesterday by Government was on RCOG’s endorsement of the screening programme RATHER than on the impact of the findings for those women and families, which was ACTUALLY the purpose of the review. Lorraine bravely outlined her experience on RTÉ’s Prime Time.

To reiterate: Lorraine’s experience of the RCOG Review was, as follows Lorraine was first told that her slides could not be traced, she was then given a set of results even though her slides supposedly didn’t exist and, 24 hours later, was presented with a new report with entirely different results.

On further investigation, she found that labelling had been removed from both her slides and mine and our slides were subsequently mislabelled.

These events do NOT instil confidence in the RCOG process. Lorraine stood down from the CervicalCheck Steering Committee accordingly, a decision I wholeheartedly agree with.

Lorraine’s decision was based on an unwavering commitment to the women and families of the 221+ group, a group that Lorraine helped found and which she has dedicated the past 12 months of her life helping women and families caught up in this debacle.

Lorraine has requested that each woman be given the option of getting individual independent reviews of their smear screening, cytological and clinical history. This is the only way to conclusively give peace of mind to the women and families affected.

This is an essential step to ensure that lingering concerns about past failures in CervicalCheck do NOT undermine future confidence in the screening programme, a programme we both want to restore trust in.”

Vicky was diagnosed with terminal cancer following a cervical smear test error.

She settled a case against Clinical Pathology Laboratories Inc, Austin, Texas, for €2.5million in April of last year.

Ms Phelan’s refusal to sign a gagging order about her case led to the knowledge that more than 200 women diagnosed with cancer were not informed of an audit which revised their earlier, negative smear tests.

Via Vicky Phelan

Yesterday: “We’re Behind You 100%, Vicky”

Earlier: ‘Where Is The Future For Cervical Screening?’

Rollingnews

5 thoughts on “A Trust Issue

    1. Cú Chulainn

      What a cess pit we live in. The most horrible and mean people who consistently sign off report after report that just lie.

      Reply
  1. Itchysays

    3 posts within 40 mins of each other between 4 and 5pm….reaction to each as of 12.50.

    Vicky Phelans statement regards the resignation of Lorraine Walshe from the 221 group regards the ongoing cervical smear debacle and the ‘royal college of just as incompetent as the hse’s ‘ findings.
    2 comments.
    The late lates usual pathetic friday night lineup
    15 comments.
    A dog with a vague Christmas connotation.
    12 comments.
    An unobtainable classic car.
    6 comments.

    Well done BS commentaters, good to know you have your priorities right.

    Reply
  2. Slightly Bemused

    I see the film Ordinary Love is out this weekend, dealing with a couple and how they deal with her diagnosis of breast cancer. I must admit that a few years ago the film would not have interested me, but the testimonies of Vicky and her friends has changed how I view this.
    Thank you for your strength, Vicky!

    Reply
  3. GiggidyGoo

    I wonder if any of our politicians have learned any lessons from Vicky’s consistency and purposeful seeking of the truth.
    In typical sleeveen manner, FG sets out to hoodwink by establishing a system to answer questions that weren’t asked.
    Diversion – Very noticeable by the little FGers here.
    Doesn’t work.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Itchysays Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *