This morning.
Via The Guardian:
Kevin Fallon at the Daily Beast is not the first to ask some critical questions, though he does seem to become increasingly distressed about the film’s baffling incongruities:
“Is there a rhyme or reason to when the cats crawl on all fours versus when they walk on two feet like humans? How is it that nearly every character makes a reference to their private parts, yet there were no private parts to speak of? Will I make it to this end of this paragraph with my sanity intact?”
The Gizmodo review by Alex Cranz is titled simply: “I have seen sights no human eyes should see.”
Arf.
‘A furry orgy in a dumpster’: what the reviews say about Cats (The Guardian)
“The CGI Fur is The Best Thing About It” (BBC)
Sponsored Link
Alan Corr at the RTE Guide made me chuckle with this one:
“First off, full disclosure – I am not a cat person. Second off – after watching this frankly mortifying film adaptation of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Cats, I’m not altogether sure I am a movie person anymore either.”
Chuckle +1
Arahahahahahahaa!
Even the trailer was cat, in fairness.
Hehehehehe
Makes me want to scratch my eyes out
semi related but this is well worth having a look at: https://twitter.com/i/events/1065107539036057600?s=13
The guardian 1 star review is written entirely in verse. It’s very good.
The film looks bizzarre. I kind of want to watch it now for some reason.
Its the perfect season for musicals
In fairness
You can be forgiven for nodding off ⊙﹏⊙
Gets
popcornSelection Box.