“I’ve Seen Some Misleading Information On Social Media”

at | 24 Replies


From top: One room shared by seven asylum-seeking men in a newly opened direct provision centre in Ennis, Co Clare; Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan and Minister of State for Equality, Immigration and Integration David Stanton

This morning.

RTÉ’s Seán O’Rourke interviewed the Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan about direct provision and Covid-19.

Mr O’Rourke started the interview by telling listeners that the Department of Justice has made more than 650 new direct provision beds available for the Covid-19 emergency.

The group Movement of Asylum Seekers in Ireland [MASI] last night tweeted pictures of some of these new beds which would appear to show the same crowded conditions as ‘old’ direct provision centres.

Asked about this, and MASI’s claim that seven asylum-seeking men were forced to share a bedroom that would suit one person in Ennis, Co Clare (pic above), Mr Flanagan mentioned that he had seen “misleading information on social media”.

Mr Flanagan wasn’t asked to specify to what he was referring.

From the interview:

Seán O’Rourke: “Are asylum seekers in a position to follow the social distancing [two metres] guidelines put in place by your own Government and its health advisors.”

Charlie Flanagan: “Good morning, Seán. And this is one of the many challenges that we’re facing as a society. Obviously myself and Minister [David] Stanton, and indeed everybody across the Department of Justice and our agencies, we’re very concerned at the situation and, indeed, the vulnerability of people in direct provision.

“People who are awaiting their applications to be dealt with as to whether or not they may be in a position, legally, to remain for he foreseeable future in our state. And I believe it’s important that the concerns that you mentioned that were met. That’s why we managed, after considerable amount of work, to procure a further 650 new beds which are now coming on stream.

“That will alleviate something of the pressure that’s on many of our centres in terms of complying with the Government and public health guidelines.”

Seán O’Rourke: “Yeah, well I see a statement responding to your announcement from the Movement of Asylum Seekers in Ireland [MASI] saying they’re deeply troubled because, for instance, new direct provision centres, have the same congregated settings where asylum seekers, they share intimate living spaces like bedrooms, communal bathrooms, dining areas, often in large numbers.”

Flanagan: “Yeah, and that’s why we’re moving to mitigate the problems and deal with the issues. Obviously, we’re dealing with people here who are in a congregated setting, some of the centres are big. Some of the centres are not so big. But I have to say we are working very positively with all of the management in the centres, right across the country and there are just about 40 centres.

“They are all of different dimensions but I’m satisfied that the new regulations are now taking place right across the direct provision stage.

“We have, for example, the provision of gels and soaps advices, often times required in different language and translators. I’m not underestimating this challenge but what I’m saying is that what Minister Stanton, myself and my officials are working very hard in order to ensure that the vulnerable are dealt with in a way that’s right and proper in the circumstances.”

O’Rourke: “These 650 beds that have been announced. Are they just being made available on a temporary basis or what is the plan?”

Flanagan: “Well, obviously, direct provision is changing. It’s a challenge that we’ve had in terms of its organisation and management even before the crisis. What we have done now is acquired hotel accommodation in Dublin, in Galway, in Cork and, at the same time, however, we are engaged in procuring new centres in Cahircaveen, for example, in Rosslare Harbour, in Tullamore, in my own constituency. So this is an ever-changing scenario because we want to ensure that our centres meet our own national standards and…”

O’Rourke: “I’m just wondering who gets these 650 beds? Are they all being put to use or are some of them being held back for use, for instance, for isolation purposes?”

Flanagan: “Oh, no. I expect that they would all be brought into use at the earliest opportunity. Obviously when we speak about vulnerable people in society, we talk about people over 65, we talk about people who have underlying or pre-existing medical conditions. In Direct Provision, for example, we have a mere 57 people of the entire 5,600 over the age of 65.

“I’m assuming that these will be the prime candidates for relocation. Similarly people who are vulnerable and obviously looking at areas, for example, where there may be small rooms in centres, that they would be smaller…”

O’Rourke: “Yeah because, I don’t know if you’ve seen the statement form MASI…”

Flanagan: “Yeah, I see them on a daily basis Seán. And…”

O’Rourke: “Yeah, they’re talking, for instance, about the centre in Ennis. A new direct provision centre in Ennis where seven asylum-seeking men were forced to share a bedroom that would suit one person?”

Flanagan: “Yeah, well, I don’t know the size or dimensions of the room. I have seen some, some misleading information on social media. What I am saying, however, and what both Minister Stanton and myself are really keen to ensure is that, for example, social distancing, which obviously is a vital tool in protecting good health, ensuring that we save lives, ensuring that we stop the spread is if we can have our rooms in our centres confirm to these particular standards. And that’s what we’re working towards. And that’s what we will achieve.”

O’Rourke: “And what about health workers who have been living in direct provision. We’ve come across cases of that as well.”

Flanagan:Many of these are working. Many of their talents have been put to good use. And I believe again that is one of the advantages of…”

O’Rourke: “So why didn’t you prioritise for this new accommodation for instance?”

Flanagan: “Yes, well, well, there will be people who are vulnerable, there will be people who are in centres where we are not in a position to comply with the social distancing and I would expect over the next few days you will see a relocation. Firstly, the more vulnerable and then people who are in conditions that might require attention.”

This morning’s interview with the minister follows hundreds of academics in health, law, human rights and migration yesterday publishing an open letter in which they called for own-door accommodation and individualised access to sanitation and eating facilities to every family unit and single person in the international protection system.

They say the the necessary accommodation is available to provide for this and, to not do so, could see the State falling foul of its legal requirements.

It also follows a campaign by refugee and asylum seeker support groups calling on the Government to move out “at risk” residents from the crowded centres where social distancing is, they say, impossible.

Listen back to the interview in full here.

Previously: “Public Health Measures Must Apply To All”

No Room To Isolate

24 thoughts on ““I’ve Seen Some Misleading Information On Social Media”

    1. Otis Blue

      … whose Press Advisor happens to be Caroline Murphy aka Mrs Sean O”Rourke.

      ‘Tis a small world.

      Reply
  1. Kate

    The sooner we put a stop to Project Ireland the better….growing the population by a million in next 20 years is a disaster before my eyes. We treat cattle better than those in direct provision and our politicians should hang their head in shame.

    Reply
  2. Eamonn Clancy

    When you consider that everything in that photo is free, Direct Provision must be applauded in terms of what it offers for shelter and charity.

    Reply
    1. scottser

      anyone who’s had to share a room with a couple of brothers would know that is one hell of a stinky room.

      Reply
  3. Ringsend Incinerator

    The Stasi at it again.

    Pick on a few Direct Provision craturs while Paddy Corrosive pumps out his “misleading information” from the WebSummit bunker unhindered.

    Reply
    1. GiggidyGoo

      I think you’ll find that it was the Irish Times that reported a death of a nurse first. Doesn’t excuse Cosgrove mind you, but the IT should be brought to book too.

      Reply
  4. alphasully

    Sure isn’t it one lovely cosy cartel between our established main political parties and the media. They all married to each other

    Reply
    1. Daisy Chainsaw

      They’re full of people who decided to go on holiday to the beach at the start of the lockdown.

      Reply
    2. George

      why put them in the shittiest accommodation you can think of? No shortage of hotels with proper indoor showers and heating.

      Reply
  5. Liam Deliverance

    “I think”, “I assume,” “I’m not sure” , “Myself and Minister Stanton . . . ” – This fella is a liar, he doesn’t know, he doesn’t care and is only making these press releases because groups like MASI rolled on the pressure and forced him out of his bunker. What is the point of creating more centers where the same crowding problems persists. Would it not have made more sense to test them all and isolate the healthy from the infected. This crisis is almost 5 weeks old now and Charlie Flanagan is only now looking at this problem. He does not care and pretending to care will cause more harm.

    Reply
    1. Cian

      Would it not have made more sense to test them all and isolate the healthy from the infected.

      Priorities?
      Why should 5,600 asylum seekers all get tested when there are healthcare workers, (+5 million others) waiting on tests?

      Reply
      1. Matt Pilates

        Priorities? If the median age of those dying is 81 and the average life expectancy is about that anyway – then why are scarce ventilators and ICU beds not allocated to younger, healthier people? Could it be everyone – including asylum seekers – might be equal? Gosh.

        Reply
      2. Liam Deliverance

        Because the state has a direct responsibility for these people.

        Because 5600 is not a massive number to test relatively speaking, especially when the people are located together like in Mosney for example.

        How much is it going to cost the state for all these extra rooms to allow social distancing and isolation when they already have accommodation, how much for transporting these people to new locations, how much for all the services they need, what will be the longer term effect of breaking up the social units that these people belong to.

        I never said prioritize them Cian, yes front-line workers should get priority in sampling and testing and results, something some of them they are not getting as it is.

        They are throwing money at this to address the problem when the new solution suffers from the drawbacks of the current solution.

        Reply
        1. Cian

          It is when we are only testing 1500 per day. it is four day’s worth of testing.

          You implied they should be prioritised. At the moment only people with symptoms are being tested. By saying ” Would it not have made more sense to test them all and isolate the healthy from the infected.” you are suggesting that people in DP are prioritised.

          Reply
          1. Liam Deliverance

            I never implied prioritizing DP people at all and you know that, I said they should be tested considering their precarious accommodation situation and the fact that the state has responsibility for them. They should be tested but over days and weeks, as capacity allows, so that they then know the most efficient and economical way to address the problem. I see you had no other opinion on the rest of my comment, just the prioritizing part, love an aul argument don’t you Cian. I suspect we would not have heard a peep out of you if the Min Justice was not a FGer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *