Another thought provoking gem from Cassandra Voices. There is still a place for thoughtful journalism in Ireland.
Please consider retweet & supporting them. Otherwise RTE will continue to keep minds locked down.https://t.co/Bdjs99I6eF— Dr. Marcus De Brun (@indepdubnrth) June 17, 2020
The Devil works in mysterious ways.
— Dr. Marcus De Brun (@indepdubnrth) June 17, 2020
Good times.
Previously: Throwing Off Shade
Sponsored Link
please go away, bodger and take yer alt-right nonsense with ya
Wow. Nice words. Open your mind. And learn.
His tweets read like a Gemma O Doherty dinner conversation
If you click on his account name it reads at the side: “You may like…. Jim Corr” among others. That’s all you need to know
That happened for me as well lol!
Of course, instead of making comparisons with another person that has been hounded after making revelations about organs of the state, and jumping on the bandwagon, maybe consider what he has been and is saying?
If yer anti Vax
Be anti Vax – in the privacy of your own homes, within your own families
And behind closed doors in the confines of your own Medical needs and care
Your reach extents to yourself and your own family
That’s it
Why the need to impose it on everyone else
Right to choose lads
Maybe learn to mind your own business
Each to their own after all
And if a Medical Professional seeks to run the gauntlet of running an anti-vaccination practice
Then that’s their own professional judgement and they themselves are responsible for carrying the risks that may be associated with that practice policy
isn’t the problem that anti vax put everyone else at risk, are they going to home school too ?
Citizens put fellow citizens at risk everyday Janie
Be it drunk drivers
Illegal drugs
Breaking and entering
Assault
Animal cruelty
Even what might be considered victimless and simple disregard for your community and the wider society, like flytipping, not paying their taxes, knowingly sending your child into school with nits, or not washing their hands
Basic meféin’ism
People are responsible for their own actions and the life they choose to live
We don’t have to like them, or agree with them or their lifestyle
Or imitate them, or understand them
And thankfully they are in the minority
But that’s more that just the price of living in a free speech Democracy
Its a natural byproduct of humanity
yeah but those things are illegal because they put others in harm’s way ?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6657116/
unacceptable to allow dangerous diseases who’s misery we have on the whole forgotten loose again ?
@janet, that podcast I mentioned can be found on Spotify. I’d recommend skipping the live episode at the start with the Táin retelling, and starting with the pre-recorded ones, just because the quality is so much better.
You can also listen on youtube.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLITE_KbQOl7kWlnbS4UHnNaqJCOh2wSYo
All the things you listed as “risks to other people” (except the nits) are illegal. The State tends to prioritise one person’s right “not to be harmed” over another’s right “to do what they want”.
…
which should lead to the State making (certain) vaccines mandatory (in certain circumstances). e.g. If you want to go to a public school – you need a set of vaccines; if you don’t want to vaccinate your child then you need to home-school them.
I’d tend to agree with that Cian
And again
All that goes back to the choices people make
I accept there is legal sanction for most of what I listed above
But it still doesn’t deny the protagonist from carrying on
And it’s blatantly clear none of them are a deterrent
All it does it promise repercussions, and penalties in the event of being caught, and proved guilty
If certain individuals choose that way of life for themselves
Then let them carry the risks
Like getting the mumps
Totally agree with you Cian. Having had to live with an immuno-compromised child, and the kind of risks you have to be aware of because of that, my feelings on people who refuse to vaccinate their children when there is absolutely no evidence for not doing it, absolutely no medical need to not vaccinate them, are very strong.
I’ve been very lucky in that the little lady’s immune system has now fully recovered, but we had multiple years of immune boosters and issues having her vaccinated. And because of that, I think that by and large anti vaxxers are among the most selfish individuals on the planet. Why should my child – through no fault or choice of her own – be put at risk from an entirely preventable illness because they think they know better? Because their child is healthy and doesn’t suffer from the same drawbacks as people without a functioning immune system?
But Vanessa, serious question, in response to your statement ‘If certain individuals choose that way of life for themselves Then let them carry the risks Like getting the mumps’: if you choose not to be vaccinated (or not to have your child vaccinated) and that results in a case of mumps, (or measles, or rubella) then that infectee can cause others to become infected. For example, people who cannot take a vaccine (‘live’ vaccines counterindicated in various types of immune disorder) or who are immunosuppressed (classic example, those undergoing chemo). There are various reasons not to make vaccination a legal obligation, but I don’t buy this ‘my body my choice’ argument when it comes to infectious diseases (and no, I’m not going to flame you if you don’t agree, I’m curious if I’ve missed something).
No you haven’t missed anything
I think
As I said at the top
Be an anti vaxxer all you like – just shut up about it
It like these people have nothing else to talk about but vaccinations
Grand you didn’t get them
Your choice to put yourself at risk
But don’t go about trying to convince other people to do the same
Unless you are prepared to carry the liability of that advice
if Big Pharma get it wrong, they can get sued, and there is remedy there for the Plaintiff
Same if the Doctor dishes out bad advice to their patients
Sue them, and complain to their governming body, get them struck off
The problem is these shouty antivaxers are only liable to themselves
and they should keep it that way
He’s not anti-vaxx, he specifically stated that his own children are vaccinated and that he vaccinates his patients as per the recommended schedule. He merely suggested that there is no need for 100% of the world population to receive a Covid-19 vaccine, given the risks involved with a rushed through vaccine as in the case of the swine flu vaccine and narcolepsy.
thanks for clarifying, I was too lazy to read/ won’t read twitter
Ah, ok, interesting, I just asked that question below in a response to f_lawless, too lazy to dive into de Brun today…
Damn you and your ‘facts’
Can’t you see there are people here with opinions.
Oh. Pin. Yons.
Marcus de Brun is not in the least bit anti-vax. He give out vaccinations and has had his own children vaccinated. He just doesn’t believe that the entire population needs to be vaccinated against Covid-19 if or when a vaccine is produced.
According to this tool, he’s not shadowbanned: https://shadowban.eu/indepdubnrth
I read the link and it was pretty good. It was about climate change mostly. Whats everyone else on about with anti vax and jim corr? There was none of that in there?
Ciaran, that is when you click on his twitter bio, rather than the article. The algorithm recommends similar accounts to his
Ah the old ‘Playing the man and not the ball’. Got it.
Yeah, the article itself is fine, lays out the state of play in a straighforward manner.
+1 Ciaran…. I thought I was in the wrong comment section :)
A quick segue from me…
Reading the piece reminded me of this underrated, imo, scifi from 2014 with Michael Shannon… :)
https://youtu.be/bI2c77x7xY8
I guess if you criticise the profit-driven healthcare corporations for unethical practices it means you’re automatically “anti-vax” for some – regardless of if you believe in the principle of vaccinations?
I think you can and should criticise profit-driven healthcare, and keep close tabs on the practices of the pharma corporations. However, (and I’m generalising) when I’ve heard arguments that blend anti-corp and anti-vax (‘I’m not taking x-vaccine because that company did y’), it generally comes from someone who just doesn’t believe in vaccination, or thinks it’s some kind of plot. In contrast, Medecins Sans Frontieres and some similarly minded organisations have done a good job of being pro-vax and driving down vaccine price.
I don’t have the energy to do a dive on de Brun, do you think his apparent anti-vax stance is anti-corp or anti-vaccination?
Ah lads would ye ever stop giving him a platform for his nonsense?
…which one aria…loads of flat-earther’s and quacks on here…having a ‘conversation’ apparently is the latest euphemism for what the creationists used to call ‘preach the controversy ‘…