In The Fall

at

Anyone?

Meanwhile, in the UK:

Vaccination experts are not planning to recommend Covid-19 jabs for children, a cabinet minister has said, while prominent academics have suggested that existing doses should be used to immunise vulnerable people around the world before those in the UK who are relatively safe…

Vaccine advisers not planning to back Covid jabs for children, says UK minister (The Guardian)

Top pic: Moderna

Meanwhile…

Things that never happened, part 27.

Um.

Sponsored Link

11 thoughts on “In The Fall

  1. Bitnboxy

    Whatever the merits or not of vaccinating children, this is yet another post highlighting the slide of Broadsheet into conspiracy level bull. Maia Dunphy must be lying according to Bodger- John Ryan BUT “freedom loving” David Thunder with strong links to the Iona “Institute” and an academic in the only Opus Dei university in Spain is a source worth quoting and absolutely does not have a hidden agenda.

    1. Joe

      +10000999999999

      BS continues to bring itself into serious disrepute and to advertise some really vile Individuals in these types of posts.

      It must be a strange place to be in your head to reject the entire worlds scientific orthodoxy and understanding of the coronavirus pandemic while promoting absurd conspiracy theories and dangerous garbage.

    2. eoin

      Common sense should be enough to stop any use on children (and adults too for that matter). The lack of basic common sense is disturbing. No studies have been done on the long term effect on children (for example) starting into puberty. That would take years to complete. There are no long term studies on any of these drugs. That’s a fact. There are therapeutic, safe drugs available that have been peer reviewed and field tested and they work. The truth about drugs, like Ivermectin, is slowly emerging. A smart response would be to, at least, put all vaccination programs on hold until we know whether or not drugs like Ivermectin can be used to treat the sick. There is no need to risk lives on a vaccine program that has no long term safety data. All of this is fact. The only people disputing any of this are politically motivated bad actors or useful idiots like you. Thankfully most smart people stop listening to imbeciles who use terms like ‘conspiracy theory’. Level up your rhetoric or shut up. And if you rush out and get your child jabbed with an experimental drug out of fear of a disease with a 1% fatality rate and a near zero rate for children…..then you are a dangerously stupid person and probably shouldn’t be raising a child.

      1. Fergalito

        Classy as always – never waste an opportunity to put your “foes” down as useful idiots or imbeciles.

        “There are therapeutic, safe drugs available that have been peer reviewed and field tested and they work.”

        versus

        “A smart response would be to, at least, put all vaccination programs on hold until we know whether or not drugs like Ivermectin can be used to treat the sick.”

        So there are safe drugs available to treat the sick but we don’t know whether they’re safe or not?

        I don’t think kids should get the vaccine by the way.

        1. Micko

          There’s WAY too much of people calling other people idiots or stupid on this site.

          On both sides of every argument.

          It’s just opinions lads…

        2. SOQ

          Ivermectin is a very safe drug- its not 100% but neither is certain medications you can buy over the counter. As pointed out by John Campbell in the last Ivermectin link I posted- why must it be an either or? And the answer to that is in a comment below his video-

          “The US emergency legislation for the vaccine specifically states that there be no alternative treatment. The legislation shortcuts the normal thorough testing of a vaccine before it is widely launched. The admission of an alternative to the vaccine is impossible simply because it undermines the basis on which the vaccination programme can continue. The politicians cant walk it back now. Nor will big pharma allow it. This is regulatory capture in action.”

          https://youtu.be/R0-90kvoQac?t=610

  2. Micko

    “a lot of anti-vaxxers are taking appointments purely so they can show up and then “not consent””

    So what’s “a lot” there Maia?

    Out of the ton of vaccines given in Ireland, how many anti vaxxers turned up to not consent?

    Sweet FA I’d say

    Barely an inconvenience…

  3. SOQ

    Apart from my own views which are hardly a secret, I have had conversations with a number of parents who have stated variances of ‘over my dead body’ and there is a lot of other people who think this is a line crossed.

    Everybody should be doing a personal cost / benefit analysis and for several friends who have under lying conditions, I fully understand why they have taken it. But, where the benefit to children is practically zero and the risks are unknown, it is absolutely reckless and defies the most basic common sense, especially as they can still be infectious afterwards.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link
Broadsheet.ie