I will not click your link thank you. Your words were enough.
Mani
To be fair, I can’t imagine Keef will pursue them for damages, given the general ‘It was the 60’s, maaaaaaaaan’ attitude regarding sexy times.
ivan
my favourite Keefism, and there are quite a few, was his reponse to the question as to whether he’d ever slept with Mick Jagger. I’m paraphrasing slightly, but the ‘sliocht’ from the magazine (Q, if i recall correctly) went along the lines of
“he grins slyly and says ‘what, well, yeah, I mean, we’d have all kipped in the back of a van in the early days…but no, not like what you’re thinking I suppose. …second hole from the back of the neck is the one you want, man….*wheezey cough/cackle”
Conor
That’s odd now.
Broadsheet put up a post yesterday twisting Cliff Richards’ words from a 20-year old interview to make him sound like a monster. I posted a comment here criticising their approach to this story and it has now been deleted.
The hypocrisy of these punters is unbelievable.
Ronan
I had a comment deleted on the ‘No Molesten’ post where I criticised Lars Biscuits’s kack handed paedo posts. In fairness I probably went too far in my description of him but still – consider yourself called out for hypocrsy Broadsheet. And take Biscuits off the paedo desk. Which you shouldn’t even have in the first place ffs. MOAR CAT VIDEOS!!111!!
Tom Stewart
I saw those comments. Disgraceful that they’re being deleted.
Lars is probably citing “off-topic” as his justification. But it’s the same poster, and the same topic. It’s hardly off-topic.
Hosannah in the Hiace
nowhere near as bad as deliberately twisting CR’s words to imply he’s a paedo
hypocritical crerpsy
Hosannah in the Hiace
* creeps
Kieran NYC
Sure who needs facts when you’re enjoying your witch-hunt?!
Keith Richards and Sir Cliff Richard
Is Cliff rocking a Marilyn Monroe number in that picture?
http://www.sfae.com/index.php?pg=303825
He’s got some (halter)neck.
I will not click your link thank you. Your words were enough.
To be fair, I can’t imagine Keef will pursue them for damages, given the general ‘It was the 60’s, maaaaaaaaan’ attitude regarding sexy times.
my favourite Keefism, and there are quite a few, was his reponse to the question as to whether he’d ever slept with Mick Jagger. I’m paraphrasing slightly, but the ‘sliocht’ from the magazine (Q, if i recall correctly) went along the lines of
“he grins slyly and says ‘what, well, yeah, I mean, we’d have all kipped in the back of a van in the early days…but no, not like what you’re thinking I suppose. …second hole from the back of the neck is the one you want, man….*wheezey cough/cackle”
That’s odd now.
Broadsheet put up a post yesterday twisting Cliff Richards’ words from a 20-year old interview to make him sound like a monster. I posted a comment here criticising their approach to this story and it has now been deleted.
The hypocrisy of these punters is unbelievable.
I had a comment deleted on the ‘No Molesten’ post where I criticised Lars Biscuits’s kack handed paedo posts. In fairness I probably went too far in my description of him but still – consider yourself called out for hypocrsy Broadsheet. And take Biscuits off the paedo desk. Which you shouldn’t even have in the first place ffs. MOAR CAT VIDEOS!!111!!
I saw those comments. Disgraceful that they’re being deleted.
Lars is probably citing “off-topic” as his justification. But it’s the same poster, and the same topic. It’s hardly off-topic.
nowhere near as bad as deliberately twisting CR’s words to imply he’s a paedo
hypocritical crerpsy
* creeps
Sure who needs facts when you’re enjoying your witch-hunt?!
We going to accuse Denise Richards next?