Bryan Wall: Sing Me A Song


From top: Netta Barzilai after winning the 2018 Eurovision Song Contest securing Israel the right to host this year’s competition; Ireland’s entrant Sarah McTernan; Bryan Wall

It’s hard to imagine that the Eurovision song contest would become a political issue. Of course, there is the phrase of George Orwell’s that “All issues are political issues”. But the Eurovision contest?

How seriously it is usually taken varies from country to country. Ireland’s record on it is mixed. All in all though, we usually treat it as something anodyne; a harmless distraction that comes around for one night, once a year. This time it’s different. This year the contest is being held in Israel.

For Israel, the Eurovision is an opportunity to whitewash itself as it is so often found of doing. It can present itself to the world as a liberal, western nation that likes the same things we do.

Given the reality of the situation, hosting Eurovision is a propaganda coup of exceptional proportions. And as a result, there have been calls to boycott the competition.

Charlie McGettigan, a former Irish winner of the competition, has also added their name to the list of those opposed it being held in Israel. As has Mike Murphy. RTÉ and others have decided any controversy about this can be ignored.

The result is the claim that calls for a boycott are unfair to both viewers and Ireland’s representative this year. We are given to believe that it is simply a bunch of ne’er-do-wells being difficult.

So what’s the problem?

Israel is a state unlike many others. Its status is exceptional. Its boundaries are variable depending on military necessity. It is not a state of its citizens, making it an extreme outlier compared to the rest of the world. Instead, it is the state of the Jewish people, a not so subtle or unimportant distinction.

The religious right hold a substantial amount of power both politically and socially. But probably most importantly, the state is highly militarised. And this reaches right down through all the layers of Israeli society. It is a military society par excellence.

Netta Barzilai, Israel’s entry for Eurovision last year and who won the competition is herself a military veteran. As are the majority of Israelis. This is because military service is mandatory.

But not only are the Israelis that Sarah McTernan is expected to perform for either currently in the military or former members, the majority of them believe in an Israeli-Jewish ascendency.

Most Israelis believe “crucial decisions on security matters should only be made by a Jewish majority vote”.  A majority also believe “a Jewish majority vote is essential for decisions pertaining to economy or society”.

At the same time, and unsurprisingly, the Israeli military is the most trusted institution in Israeli society. It is a modern Sparta.

This is hardly surprising given the militarisation of the state. And all of this is without taking into account the treatment of the Palestinians.

This is why Eurovision will be such a propaganda victory for Israel if the competition goes ahead. And it is also why calls for McTernan to pull out of the competition should be taken seriously.

She, along with all of the other performers, will be used to present a veneer of respectability over gross human rights violations and a state whose politics skew heavily to the right.

It’s an old tactic used by the state’s supporters. They encourage people without a deep understanding to look at how liberal and progressive Israel is compared to other countries.

It means ignoring the razing of Palestinians lands and homes, not to mention the history of their ethnic cleansing at the hands of the Israel’s founders less than 100 years ago. It means ignoring the apartheid system there.

A system that ensures that citizenship and equal rights are premised on the idea that one is not a Palestinian. And this is just the Palestinians who live within the internationally recognised borders of Israel. This doesn’t include the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

Palestinian suffering at the hands of the Israeli state and society is therefore not something that should be cast aside in the name of artistic freedom or neutrality. To claim be neutral in a situation such as this is to be complicit. Justice demands, at a bare minimum, our solidarity with victims of injustice.

The Palestinian cause is deserving of our solidarity. Right now this means calling for a boycott of the Eurovision contest on these grounds.

Many Irish artists have already pledged to boycott Israel so the request of McTernan is nothing unique. Nor is it bullying, despite what others like to claim. It should be seen as part of a wider movement by which to pressure Israel into accepting the idea that Palestinians are entitled to basic fundamental rights.

The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement does just this. Israel will continue to flout the rights of Palestinians so long as their Occupation and persecution is cost-free. A boycott costs the Israelis, both economically and socially. And it is working.

How else can you explain the sheer effort that the Israeli government has put in to countering the boycott? It does everything from smearing advocates of BDS to employing legions of people to promote the Israeli viewpoint online.

This Hasbara as it is known is the biggest indication that BDS terrifies the Israeli government. On top of this is also the evidence that the Israeli government has lobbied the Irish government to block the Occupied Territories Bill.

A letter, obtained via a freedom of information request, was sent from the Chair of the Jewish Agency for Israel, Isaac Herzog, to Simon Coveney, the minister for foreign affairs. Herzog called the bill, which if enacted would outlaw trade with Israeli settlements, anti-Semitic.

He also went so far as to say there are some “who would interpret it as an official encouragement to more hostility, and indeed more hostilities” in the region.What’s more, he said that he was “offering my help to try and prevent it” from becoming law. In closing, he told Coveney “We need to join efforts to block this Bill”.

Although the bill is unlikely to become law it already represents a victory of sorts. It shows Palestinians that people do care about them and their future, as well as their past. And it shows the Israeli government that brutality and occupation comes with a price.

For these reasons the Eurovision this year is anything but normal. It is a chance to damage the Israeli propaganda machine that tries to convince the world that the Palestinians are a free people, if they even exist at all.

We can play our part in that if we care about human dignity and rights. And so can Sarah McTernan.

Bryan Wall is an independent journalist based in Cork. His column usually appears here every Monday but owing to the Bank Holiday… Read more of Bryan’s work here and follow on twitter:  @Bryan_Wall

Previously: EU May Like This

Pics: Getty/The Irish Sun

Sponsored Link

22 thoughts on “Bryan Wall: Sing Me A Song

        1. bisted

          …hah…when they are faced with battle hardened Hezbollah or Syrian fighters we’ll see how how tough they are…great lads when they are machine gunning kids playing football on a beach or dropping phospherous on schools…

  1. Termagant

    “It’s hard to imagine that the Eurovision song contest would become a political issue. ”

    I agree with the general thrust of the article but it’s hard to take something that starts with a sentence like this seriously.

    1. dan

      Maybe because when you illegally occupy a group of people and treat them like animals, they tend to, you know, fight back.

  2. Ian-O

    Why are Israel and Australia in it anyway?

    Might as well call it the Eurovision and some first world countries we like song contest?

    Actually scrap the above, I really do not give a flying fupp one way or the other….

  3. Ian-O

    Why are Israel and Australia in it anyway?

    Might as well call it the Eurovision and some first world countries we like song contest?

  4. bisted

    …unfortunately, Bryan has fallen for the ploy of equating zionism with jewishness…some of the most outspoken critics of the failing zionist project and their pariah state are jewish. The zionists try constantly to conflate any criticism of their regime with anti-semitism…

  5. Iwerzon

    RTÉ are guilty of normalising an apartheid state. If you don’t think Israel is an apartheid state here are just a few examples – you decide. Non-Jews in Israel (never mind Gaza or the West Bank), cannot buy property in the vast majority of the country, and can be barred by an admissions committee from living in a small, community town if not deemed “socially or culturally suitable”. Non-Jews are unable to study Palestinian history at a state school because it is not taught, Israelis are taught that Arabs are immigrants in their own lands. Theatres are at risk of losing state funding if they promote a play describing Israel’s independence as a Nakba, or catastrophe, for the Palestinian people. If a non-Jew wished to marry a Palestinian from the occupied territories, they cannot bestow residency or citizenship on their spouse so they can live with them and raise a family inside Israel; any Jew in the world, however, can fly into Ben Gurion airport and become a citizen.

  6. Dub Spot

    Ireland’s missed an opportunity here – we could have sent a direct provision group of asylum seekers or new citizens to represent us, doing a mashup of Siouxsie’s Israel and Pink Floyd’s Another Brick in the Wall.

    Or Bryan McFadden.

  7. Truth in the News

    When did Israel shift and move into Europe, incidentally the European Broadcasting Union
    needs abolishing as all it ever was a European Quango of State Broadcasters using every
    trick in the book to hold on to their state broadcasting monoplies and keep everyone else off
    the air, How did the last DG of RTE get his new position as DG of EBU……….?

  8. curmudgeon

    “It’s hard to imagine that the Eurovision song contest would become a political issue…”

    Bryan did you come down in the last shower or what?

    Nul Points: Eurovision’s History of Political Voting:

    Here’s an excerpt: Liverpool duo Jemini famously achieved “nul points” (no points) after their performance of Cry Baby in 2003.The Eurovision humiliation was blamed, among other things, on the UK’s involvement in the invasion of Iraq.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link