I’m actually surprised by how completely kack handed this is, it’s quite rare that I’ve sen such a pile of garbage. Looking through the ‘research’ it is littered with bad practice and general rubbish.
They imply that they’ve done an analysis using reading frames; this is an acceptable if somewhat dated way of analysing spoken/written word, but to understand what the outputs mean you really need to understand the inputs that were used, and there’s almost no detail. An absolute giveaway that this document was put together by an incompetent is the expression of the analysis in % values (to TWO decimal places, absolute facepalm).
Refers frequently to ‘eradication’ when it means ‘elimination’
there’s a donut graph in there with more than 30 categories. I mean really, donut graphs have no place in analysis, but 30 categories?
The document is branded as Uplift, which appears to be an organisation largely funded by individual private donations, but this study was financially supported by Rethink Ireland, which is a corporate and government sponsored funder.
Total mumbo jumbo vaguely masquerading as science, honestly, I’m disgusted.
Janet, dreams of an alternate universe
no further comment necessary really
Trolly Mac Troll face
But …..science.?
It’s great to see that people can now see how all of these messages appearing on their bottybooks, twitters etc. are developed. By well meaning fools powered by a big money Government funded sponsor.
It’s all about the feels….actually it’s all about MANIPULATION.
Remember how saying the virus originated in a Bio weapons lab in Wuhan was wascist and the bots and algorithms shut down anyone who said that. Not looking so clever now.
Allow people to freely discuss matters openly without MANIPULATION boardering on COERCION and they will make the right choices for them, their families and their communities.
I’m actually surprised by how completely kack handed this is, it’s quite rare that I’ve sen such a pile of garbage. Looking through the ‘research’ it is littered with bad practice and general rubbish.
They imply that they’ve done an analysis using reading frames; this is an acceptable if somewhat dated way of analysing spoken/written word, but to understand what the outputs mean you really need to understand the inputs that were used, and there’s almost no detail. An absolute giveaway that this document was put together by an incompetent is the expression of the analysis in % values (to TWO decimal places, absolute facepalm).
Refers frequently to ‘eradication’ when it means ‘elimination’
there’s a donut graph in there with more than 30 categories. I mean really, donut graphs have no place in analysis, but 30 categories?
The document is branded as Uplift, which appears to be an organisation largely funded by individual private donations, but this study was financially supported by Rethink Ireland, which is a corporate and government sponsored funder.
Total mumbo jumbo vaguely masquerading as science, honestly, I’m disgusted.
no further comment necessary really
But …..science.?
It’s great to see that people can now see how all of these messages appearing on their bottybooks, twitters etc. are developed. By well meaning fools powered by a big money Government funded sponsor.
It’s all about the feels….actually it’s all about MANIPULATION.
Remember how saying the virus originated in a Bio weapons lab in Wuhan was wascist and the bots and algorithms shut down anyone who said that. Not looking so clever now.
Allow people to freely discuss matters openly without MANIPULATION boardering on COERCION and they will make the right choices for them, their families and their communities.