Tag Archives: Michelle Mulherin

00119740

 

The youth organisation SpunOut.ie has defended itself after a Fine Gael TD accused it of publishing inappropriate sex education content on its website.

Fine Gael TD Michelle Mulherin was quoted by a Sunday newspaper [Sunday Independent] criticising the organisation, which receives €124,000 in State funding a year, for publishing tips on threesomes. She said this was “incredibly regressive” and would raise it with Minister for Health James Reilly, according to the Sunday Independent.

In a statement, the charity said: “Young people are having sex whether the Sunday Independent or Deputy Michelle Mulherin like it or not. Some of them are having sex with more than one person, and sometimes with more than one person at the one time.”

Well, Holy God.

Previously: She So Forni

The Michelle Mulherin Saturday Night Show Transcript

Youth website defends sex advice (Ruadhan Mac Cormaic, Irish Times)

(Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland)

Mayo Fine Gael TD Michelle Mulherin (top) went on Newstalk’s lunchtime show with Jonathan Healy yesterday to discuss with Dearbhail McDonald (above) – the implications following the death of Savita Halappanavar.

And…

…the need for clarity

Jonathan Healy: “It has given rise to the question again about legislation and there is a lack of legislation in this country. We’ve had a number of doctors on our station today, and they’ve been speaking on other stations aswell, saying that they need clarity in relation to this. The Tánaiste said they’re going to bring swift legal clarity to this. How quickly do you think that can be done?

Michelle Mulherin: Ok. Well, just seeing as you started off the story talking about the case of Savita and her loss, the loss of her life in circumstances we don’t fully know and even if we know some facts and we need, I suppose, a medical interpretation of how events preceded. I think we have to begin at a point here that, and it seems to be accepted across the board that this country is one of the safest places in the world to have a baby and therefore one of the safest places in the world to be a mother giving birth and delivering a baby. So we have a case now where a woman has lost her life. Now, well we have to think that, for the most part, we have a system that’s actually working and until we would…

Healy: “Michelle…”

Mulherin: “If I could, if I can just say…”

Healy: “I just want to bring in a point and I’m presuming you’ve heard. We had Peter Boylan on this programme earlier on. We had the Master of the Holles Street Maternity Hospital this morning saying to us, very explicitly, that they need legislation so they know that they are operating within the law. They are saying that legal action, sorry, that legislation is needed and that it is the likes of yourself and others in Leinster House that need to take the leadership on this.”

Mulherin: “OK.. And I won’t disagree, that there has to be leadership and there has to be clarity but it also has to be said that at the moment that, as regards the law, the Irish law, and as regards medical ethics that, when there are life-threatening complications to a mother and they are identified, it’s not a case of ‘well, the doctor might of mightn’t whatever their personal view is on the situation’, they are obliged to act to preserve the life of the mother. And that means that we know there is an equal right to life: the mother and the unborn. But, where the life of the mother, where there’s a real and substantial risk, from what the X case tells us, that means they have to act, they have to intervene and if, as a result of an intervention to save that woman’s life, the baby is lost, well then that is lawful in our, within our country…”

Healy: “So you’re telling us we don’t need legislation?”

Mulherin: “We have to start at that point and really put it in context. And really, in this situation, that that standard of care and level of care was not meted out, well then, which will be revealed by an inquiry, in relation to the tragic case that we’re talking about, well then necessary action has to be taken. In relation to the clarity, I would agree. And, what I would agree here is, at the end of the day, it’s a medical decision. So we go to doctors and we say to doctors, is this a real and substantial risk to the life of the mother? So, it bats back to the doctor so what we’re really here asking this expert group is we’re not going into the area of abortion on demand. We’re saying that, in the case of a real and substantial risk to the life of the mother, which I presume, as medical science progresses, that the view can be different on this, so it’s not something that’s cast in stone. So what we’re asking doctors, in a way, in conjunction with lawyers, on this expert group, to report back to us the public, who are not the experts, and say that these are the circumstances…”

Healy: “Can I just bring in Dearbhail McDonald, who is the legal affairs correspondent with the Irish Independent, who’s been listening to Michelle Mulherin there, Dearbhail?”

McDonald: “Listening and shaking my head and speaking in a personal capacity, it’s that kind of response from one of the few female legislators that we have that makes me despair as a woman, as a sister, as a daughter, as someone who hopes to be a mother one day, that there is simply that level of denial on the Fine Gael backbenches of the need for legislation. Whether you are pro-choice, whether you are anti-choice/pro-life, whatever label you pick to choose, there is a need for clarity. The constitutional…”

Mulherin: “I, I…I’ve said that, what are you talking about…”

McDonald: “Excuse me..but you’re not taking it that step further…”

Mulherin: “You’re taking it to a personal level…”

McDonald: “Michelle, you were given a great run there, if you’d let me just, if you’d let me just finish. What worries me about Fine Gael, in particular, is that the Constitutional position, and not everyone is happy with it, is that, as Michelle has said, is that if there’s a real and substantial risk to the life of the mother, as distinct from a health risk, that includes suicide, there should be, that abortions are allowed in those circumstances, what the Supreme Court said, back in 1992, the late Niall McCarthy, when he said look we are not judges, it’s not our job to program society. The failure of the legislature, of the body politic, to legislate in this area is in excusable. Here we are in 20 years later. Twenty years later. And there’s a risk, if Michelle’s kind of reluctance to admit the need for legislation that would assist, like you heard Jonathan this morning, on your news station, and on others, doctors, you know, speaking about what the European Court of Human Rights recognised in Strasbourg, as the chilling effect of criminalisation, in conjunction with the lack of clarity in our laws. So our politicians, you know, and again, we don’t know the circumstances of Savita’s death. But what her death has done, has catapulted this issue back and here we are. We need laws, for wherever on the spectrum you lie, we need laws that give our doctors confidence to make the decisions that they do in distressing situations and we need confidence for women. And, of course, Ireland is one of the safest places for women to give birth but I can assure you that there are women out there today just wondering, ‘well if that was me, and in that situation, would my doctor be afraid to act because of these laws criminalised’. Our body politic of which Michelle is an active and prominent member, must do that now, they must legislate, they must execute their political duty and serve everybody well in this situation. And what worries me is that there’s a contingency within Fine Gael that seems reluctant to go that extra step and legislate.”

Healy: “Michelle Muherin.”

Mulherin: “No, sorry. Look, look. That, that. What’s happening here is and unfortunately I saw on this poor woman’s story, there’s an extreme of one side and we’ve an extreme on another side. We are acting in a very responsible way, in accordance with the Programme for Government. We have put an expert group in place. It is not my job to pre-empt what they have to say…”
Talk over each other
McDonald: “Do you support legislation, Michelle? Do you support legislation?”

Mulherin: “Sorry now, Dearbhail, excuse me, excuse me. I’m a very, I’ve a great appetite for straight talking…”

McDonald: “Well do you support legislation?”Continue reading →

Also: lovely.

Mayo’s only female TD, Michelle Mulherin [FG], has wished the best of luck to Mayo Rose, Dervla Kenny [Enda’s niece], and Perth Rose, Knockmore native, Lorna Gallagher, in this year’s Rose of Tralee Festival – an event which Deputy Mulherin says is “rooted in the family and Irish culture

“It is more than a beauty contest. It is rooted in the family and Irish culture, and in every little girl’s dream: to be appreciated, chosen and ultimately loved.

 

Roses Will Do Us Proud, Says Mulherin (MayoToday)

Previously: She So Forni

Thanks David M

Michelle Mulherin TD interviewed by Brendan O’Connor on last night’s Saturday Night Show on RTE 1.

Brendan O’Connor: ‘Michelle, were you surprised at the reaction to the use of the word ‘fornication?”

Michelle Mulherin: “I have to say I was, and the reason I was is that in the context in which it was used it made sense. The context in which it was used was a religion context. Basically what I was saying in relation to the word, in using the word was, abortion is murder is sin from a religious perspective but then so is hate, greed and fornication but they’re not crimes. So some things that are perceived from a religious perspective as sin  are not necessarily things we want to criminalise and so on. Why I said that is I just wanted us to take a step back in relation to the whole issue of abortion because it’s twenty years since the X case and it’s a hot topic, it’s a hot topic in the sense that nobody in the middle ground really wants to talk about it. So really it’s controlled by extreme liberals who maybe want abortion ‘on demand’ or whatever or someone who is really religious and has extremely religious views about it. But it’s not a straightforward issue. What I did on the day in question, when this bill was put before the Dail, I just opened up the argument and I also looked at the whole issue of maybe how we have developed in our society. Say, 30 years ago you couldn’t access contraception, a married couple couldn’t get contraception without going to their GP. We had to have a court case over that. Homosexuality was illegal, we know up until quite recently divorce was illegal. All of those things were on religious grounds. We have come forward over a period of time and the world hasn’t ended. Now, it’s not as simple as that either. Because I have my own personal views. I don’t agree with abortion, right.”

O’Connor: “In any case?”

Mulherin: “I accept the X case in the sense that it decided that in a situation where the mother’s life was at risk then in that limited circumstance there could be a termination.

O’Connor: “And only in that limited circumstance?”

Mulherin: “Yes.”

O’Connor: “Can I ask you what you thought, so, of the women we saw in the Irish Times this week and on the Late Late Show last night when they were in a situation where, what’s the term they used, had children that had conditions which were incompatible with life. I didn’t want to get straight down to…I wanted to discuss other issues around it. Do you think the women should have had to travel? It clearly added to their pain a lot at what was obviously a very difficult time for them.”

Mulherin: “Look, I mean that’s an awful hard question to answer. It’s a very, very tough, it is a very, very sensitive issue because there’s hardly anyone who doesn’t have a view on it. But just maybe take a little step back from it and say first of all, in general, when we make laws, it’s hard to make a good law on ‘hard cases’. It generally is hard to legislate for it.”

O’Connor: “Can I just say though, we’re not going to re-run the abortion debate here. This law; there’s lot of hard cases around abortion isn’t there? Do we have to make a law around hard cases in this situation?”

Mulherin: “Well, can you tell me what that law is?”

O’Connor: “I can’t.”

Mulherin: “Pardon? Because I did an interview with somebody else on the radio and at the top of the interview they said that I don’t agree with abortion on demand, OK?  And then later on in the interview the interviewer said ‘well, why should women have to put up with that situation?’ so that’s when I posed the question to him, ‘Where is the middle ground on this? Who gets to decide and in what circumstances?’ Can I just bring it to something else.”

O’Connor: “Is that not what we rely on legislators for? To deal with incredibly sensitive issues like this. To look at the situation of those women say last night and possibly say maybe we’re adding a lot to their pain by forcing them to travel in this situation.’ Is that not what government is about? Finding ways around kind of things that are nuanced and that are difficult?”

Mulherin: “Well, the government to me, when we’re passing laws, we have to talk to people, we have to dialogue, there’s no magic wand in relation to abortion. In fact, you could say that one could never win with the subject. What I’m particularly focused on, let’s have a conversation about, yeah we’ve developed as a society, but there are still a lot of very immature attitudes towards sex.”

O’Connor: “And this is where fornication comes into it then. What did you mean specifically? I know you used the word carefully, for a reason, you didn’t use it casually. What did you mean by fornication when you said it?”

Mulherin: “Well, I meant what the word means. The word means ‘consensual sex between adults who are not married to each other’. That’s what I meant.”

O’Connor: “And do you think fornication is wrong?”

Mulherin: “Do I think fornication is wrong? I don’t think it’s a crime. From a scriptural point of view it is wrong. There is no doubt about it. Whether we like it or not, whether it’s cool or not, fashionable or not’.”

O’Connor: “You, personally, would be against sex outside of marriage, would you?”

Mulherin: “As an ideal I would, but we fall short on ideal cause we’re human, OK? There’s lots of ideals there. This is my point. we have great aspirations as human beings to go for all sorts of ideals. Unfortunately lots of times we don’t make the mark. Now, to talk about practical living and maybe even parking religion, em, in instances, let’s say there are 4,500- 5,000 women who feel that they need to go to Britain for a termination of their pregnancy, now in some of those cases, at least, we can say that there is obviously unprotected sex involved, perhaps casual encounters etc. Now, I’m not a prude, Brendan, or anything like that but, as a woman, you have an awful lot to lose, and getting pregnant could be one of the best things that could happen you. You could get AIDS, you could get some other sexually transmitted disease that you’ll be dealing with for the rest of your life.”

O’Connor: “OK, well I think that’s a separate issue than what we’re talking about here. So the point that you’re making is that you think this is a debate aswel about people being careful when they have sex, yes?”

Mulherin: “Well, well I think that it’s about acknowledging that in some instances, abortion is being used as birth control.”

O’Connor: “You think that people are using abortion as birth control?”

Mulherin: “I think that some people are using it as birth control, yes.”

O’Connor: “From what I know, it seems to be a hugely traumatic thing for a woman to have an abortion and it’s something that affects them for the rest of their life. And I’m not questioning you, but you think that they use it quite casually as a form of birth control?”

Mulherin: “I’m not saying it’s casual, what I’m saying about immaturity towards our own bodily integrity, like, at the end of the day you’ve an awful lot to lose. Why, in this day and age, when we all know so much, it’s not so much that in this day and age we don’t know about the birds and the bees, we don’t know about contraception, we don’t know about condoms etc. We know all of these things. So why other than [when] someone is drunk or they’re getting out of their mind at a particular point in time, why get yourself in that situation in the first place? To me it’s a question of valuing oneself, and actually it’s not like I’m being cruel to other girls. I’m saying to girls and to girlfriends, friends I have here with me, that you know, at the end of the day, the whole push towards abortion and contraception etc. as part of the agenda for feminism, well hold on, it’s the woman who ends up holding the baby, so like if you’re out there and of course you’re going to have sex, you’re going to end up carrying the can, is that really the best you want to hope for for yourself?

O’Connor: “Which is why I suppose that people would say that women should be allowed to make these decisions about the consequences and their own bodies and everything.”

Mulherin: “OK, can I just make one point? I do agree that as we are growing as a society, we get to make choices in relation to our own sexual activity, behaviour and our own sexuality, but, I’m losing my train of thought now.. sorry..’

O’Connor: “From what I’ve been reading about you, if I’m right, what you were going to say is that we’ve got all these choices we can now make about our sexuality, rights etc. You’re very strong on that people should all have responsibilities that go with that, isn’t that right?”

Mulherin: “That’s right, yeah.”

O’Connor: “In a way you feel that society has become a bit permissive, possibly.”

Mulherin: “Well, this is what I think; I think that because maybe for a long time we’ve had excessive religiousness controlling that aspect which is a very personal thing, in a person, that we’ve now, and even now many people think ‘I don’t practice, I’m not Catholic, I’m not whatever, we’re still in the aftermath of it. I believe that entire reasoning in Ireland, it’s part of our legacy, is fundamentally tied up with religion. Therefore, people have gone the flipside. What I’m saying is that, this is here my own faith and my own beliefs come in is…”

O’Connor: “I think it would be only fair to say to people what your beliefs are.”

Mulherin: “OK, as I said to you from the outset, I’m not a ‘Holy Joe’, I’m not a fanatic, I’m a Catholic, I don’t go to mass religiously every Sunday, I go to funerals, funeral masses, things like that, etc.”

O’Connor: “You have to with your job I suppose.”

Mulherin: “You know a lot more people and it’s respect for the circumstances of people. I have had the opportunity to study scripture in an ecumenical situation, involved with Catholics, Presbyterians, and Church of Ireland, where people go together. We’re all traditions in Christianity, so there’s a Catholic tradition and so on, but what I’m saying is this that for me, I’m searching the same as other people, right, and I believe we have a spiritual dimension, and no more than we feed our bodies, we need to feed our souls. We don’t have to, that’s totally our choice, but I think the way that society has gone, we very much tend to value what we see and there is very little beyond that. There’s a cynicism. For me, what I believe and I take great comfort in, we have an inherent value in ourselves, each and every person is individual and each and every person is unique, and I’m not just talking about the unborn child here, I’m talking about the woman who’s perhaps potentially destroying her own life, her family’s life and so on, and even in a situation where we, we now have a high level of suicide in this country. We are not ‘human doings’ we are ‘human beings’ so I’m saying ‘let’s come at it from that point of view and mature as a nation in relation to our attitudes to sex. It’s not extremely one way or extremely another way. But we do respect, I respect, peoples’ sexual behaviour, fornication, call it what you want, that’s peoples’ choice, you know, it may not always be the best thing for them, it may not be the best thing for them to be doing but that’s the nature of Christianity, there’s that freedom, it’s not forcing something upon people.”

O’Connor: “Michelle, we could talk about this all night and I know that there’s going to be a lot more conversations like this over the next while. I think that your position is possibly more nuanced that people might have imagined, and I also think that you’re very brave to come out as you have done, and said some things that are unpopular and not trendy and that people are not going to agree with.’

Mulherin: “Can I say, am I allowed [to say one more thing]?”

O’Connor: “Very quickly.”

Mulherin: “I just want to say that you mentioned about the reaction and was I surprised, I read a lot of articles in papers arising out of my statement and one thing that struck me was that people hadn’t actually read my speech whatsoever, people were reacting emotionally to a word and my view point would be that there is a real liberal agenda there that is a bit upset now because they haven’t got politicians like myself shutting up on account of the clap trap of political correctness. We have to have straight talking, that’s my view.’

O’Connor: ‘OK, well that was certainly some straight talking. Ladies and gentlemen, Michelle Mulherin TD.”

Watch here.

Previously: She So Forni

 

 

 

 

 

Watch here

“I am against abortion in any form myself. The grace of God is so liberating and provides so many options to get the best out of life despite our fall in nature, and we all have that. Having said that it is an ideal to aim for. In an ideal world there would be no unwanted pregnancies and no unwanted babies. But we are far from living in an ideal world. An honest and a scriptural view is that things are getting harder for people, so what then for the weak in our society?
Abortion as murder, therefore sin, which is the religious argument, is no more sinful, from a scriptural point of view, than all other sins we don’t legislate against, like greed, hate and fornication. The latter, being fornication, I would say, is probably the single most likely cause of unwanted pregnancies in this country.”

Michelle Mulherin, Fine Gael TD (Mayo) during the X Case bill debate this morning.

That’s why she’s on the big money.

Fine Gael TD: Fornication The Main Cause Of Unwanted Pregnancies (Newstalk)

Meanwhile: Private Members’ Bill On Abortion Legislation Defeated

Fornication?

6.50pm UPDATE: Michelle Mulherin’s (pretty astonishing) Interview with Matt Cooper on Today FM’s Last Word here.

(Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland)