Glad someone finally saw sense and removed the photo of the lad at the urinal.
It’s hard to believe that some sneering pr!ck thought it would be a good idea to photograph, and even harder to believe that BS uploaded it.
Maro
+1, although, considering the clientelle of the Tory Top, it may have been for safety reasons too!!
Frilly Keane
And yet, none is as big’a ünt than the sad prick who took the photo
I’m only sorry another member of the Tory Tops’ clientele didn’t smash the phone inta Pol O’hPervertigh’s face
Sinabhfuil
Other than people who use ‘than’ to qualify an ‘as’ statement (shudders delicately).
(Checks own values and finds them wanting. Yeah, certainly whoever stands behind a urinal taking photos is… strange. Never mind sending it to a public website. Pretty strange the person running the website who said “Oooh *yeah*, we’ll use this one” too.)
Maro
Yeah and I am guessing, by virtue of the fact that they were actually in the pub to take the photo, the person who sent in the photo could reasonably be described as clientelle of same pub.
Frilly Keane
And this was the slot chosen to improve my grammar and show off?
Seriously?
Yep. Get off my tits and find sum’ting better to do on tinternet ShinnyFill.
If I need corrections, I’ll ask for them.
Sinabhfuil
Not a correction, a flinch.
Jdawg
Absolutely. Just was so ignorant and trashy to put that post up. And that idiot Pol for taking it.
ahyeah
Wow, Chompsky, that’s some snappy deleting of comments going on here… Denis O’Brien working the Saturday shift? There was nothing offensive or libelous in any of the deleted comments – just critical of BS, and rightly so.
Jdawg
Yeh, why was my comment deleted. I just said it was a good idea to take it down. A stupid idea to put it up. And then censored. This site actually is getting crap. Sorry.
Frilly Keane
I’d actually like to know why mine we deleted.
If Draxxes
“The attention seekers then wailed over reactionary Cries saying it was a child” is the line they’re upholding then they should say so.
Their gaff
Their rules
So it would be nice to know whether to be arsed commenting when it happens again.
ahyeah
Me too. And the suggestions that it might have been a minor are irrelevant anyway. Adult or minor, it was still very, very inappropriate. Suggest BS might be better served nipping this in the bud with an explanation. Or, as said above, keep your mouth shut on all cases of strong-handed editorial control elsewhere.
It was a photo in poor taste of a man taking a whizz with his jocks down
The attention seekers then wailed over reactionary cries saying it was a child. It was obviously not. Pathetic what some will do for attention.
Spaghetti Hoop
Was there a flying cat in the pic?
ahyeah
He had a slightly furry undercarriage. Nothing remarkable. It did not look like a flying cat.
Apart from the kittens though, I very much doubt they got that high by themselves. But they look happy enough.
Frilly Keane
You know lads
If yere not prepared to stand over yere editorial decisions and proceed to delete users comments that contradict and question ye, Broadsheet really have no place critising the Irish Times and Indo group on any of theirs.
Just saying.
Jdawg
I agree.
Mani
Gaze at the hypnokittens! Forget!!
Frilly Keane
You know I ücking hate cats
Now, if t’was puss cat roadkill that looks like ….
I’d be glued to ’em
ahyeah
nail on the head there
Custo
it’s an outrage. I’m outraged.
Frilly Keane
Good t’have ya with us
We should get t-shirts printed
The Old Boy
Furore aside, I am really enjoying how out of place comments about the cats seem in this thread.
Glad someone finally saw sense and removed the photo of the lad at the urinal.
It’s hard to believe that some sneering pr!ck thought it would be a good idea to photograph, and even harder to believe that BS uploaded it.
+1, although, considering the clientelle of the Tory Top, it may have been for safety reasons too!!
And yet, none is as big’a ünt than the sad prick who took the photo
I’m only sorry another member of the Tory Tops’ clientele didn’t smash the phone inta Pol O’hPervertigh’s face
Other than people who use ‘than’ to qualify an ‘as’ statement (shudders delicately).
(Checks own values and finds them wanting. Yeah, certainly whoever stands behind a urinal taking photos is… strange. Never mind sending it to a public website. Pretty strange the person running the website who said “Oooh *yeah*, we’ll use this one” too.)
Yeah and I am guessing, by virtue of the fact that they were actually in the pub to take the photo, the person who sent in the photo could reasonably be described as clientelle of same pub.
And this was the slot chosen to improve my grammar and show off?
Seriously?
Yep. Get off my tits and find sum’ting better to do on tinternet ShinnyFill.
If I need corrections, I’ll ask for them.
Not a correction, a flinch.
Absolutely. Just was so ignorant and trashy to put that post up. And that idiot Pol for taking it.
Wow, Chompsky, that’s some snappy deleting of comments going on here… Denis O’Brien working the Saturday shift? There was nothing offensive or libelous in any of the deleted comments – just critical of BS, and rightly so.
Yeh, why was my comment deleted. I just said it was a good idea to take it down. A stupid idea to put it up. And then censored. This site actually is getting crap. Sorry.
I’d actually like to know why mine we deleted.
If Draxxes
“The attention seekers then wailed over reactionary Cries saying it was a child” is the line they’re upholding then they should say so.
Their gaff
Their rules
So it would be nice to know whether to be arsed commenting when it happens again.
Me too. And the suggestions that it might have been a minor are irrelevant anyway. Adult or minor, it was still very, very inappropriate. Suggest BS might be better served nipping this in the bud with an explanation. Or, as said above, keep your mouth shut on all cases of strong-handed editorial control elsewhere.
What did the picture of the urinal show then?
It was a photo in poor taste of a man taking a whizz with his jocks down
The attention seekers then wailed over reactionary cries saying it was a child. It was obviously not. Pathetic what some will do for attention.
Was there a flying cat in the pic?
He had a slightly furry undercarriage. Nothing remarkable. It did not look like a flying cat.
There were no pussy in the pic, flying or otherwise.
They’re brilliant, my first laugh of the day :)
My only laugh so far this decade
+1
Haha! It’s the “poo in the urinal” fiasco all over again.
Yay, jumping cats.
Apart from the kittens though, I very much doubt they got that high by themselves. But they look happy enough.
You know lads
If yere not prepared to stand over yere editorial decisions and proceed to delete users comments that contradict and question ye, Broadsheet really have no place critising the Irish Times and Indo group on any of theirs.
Just saying.
I agree.
Gaze at the hypnokittens! Forget!!
You know I ücking hate cats
Now, if t’was puss cat roadkill that looks like ….
I’d be glued to ’em
nail on the head there
it’s an outrage. I’m outraged.
Good t’have ya with us
We should get t-shirts printed
Furore aside, I am really enjoying how out of place comments about the cats seem in this thread.
Deleted comment.