Michael Taft: Putting Money Into People’s Pockets

at

From top: Taoiseach Leo Varadkar and Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe; Michael Taft

The Taoiseach, in discussing a tax package for the upcoming budget, recently said:

‘ . . . there were lots of different ways to put money back in people’s pockets.’

Too true.

So let’s look at some of the ways Budget 2020 could put money into people’s pockets.

Cost Rental Housing

Build housing that would be rented at cost. Rents are going through the roof – even the Minister for Housing admits levels of rents are unsustainable. Cost rental housing could reduce rents by hundreds of Euros a year, driving down rents to levels that exist in other European capitals (that is, cutting rents in half). This would, however, take time to roll-out.

So in the short-term the Government should pass emergency legislation to freeze rents for three years with increases confined to inflation increases (no doubt, this would end up in courts). Further, new units coming into the market would be priced to the average of similar units in the locality.

Affordable Childcare

Childcare is treated as a market commodity. No wonder it costs twice as much as in other EU countries. However, affordability won’t be easy with over 4,000 early years’ providers. The first step would be for the Government to admit the current system is incapable of being reformed.

A new, public service model will be required – substantial public investment in the sector combined with some sort of fees cap. Or the Government could start to roll out local authority providers as exist in other countries. It should set out a road-map and start walking it with this budget.

Public Transport

We will need significantly increased investment in accessible public transport – for climate reasons, for productivity (reduce congestion). The budget could start that, coupled with a 50 percent reduction in fares.

Security against Unemployment

We know there will be job losses due to Brexit and the transition to a renewable energy regime. So let’s help households, shore up consumer spending (which protects jobs in other sectors) and build some resilience in the economy – introduce pay-related unemployment benefit at between 50 percent to two-thirds of the previous wage. This is the standard approach throughout the EU.

* * * *

There are other examples but what all these amount to is a ‘tax’ on living standards; or a social tax burden. By and large, these tax burdens can only be alleviated by the state. But, unlike income tax cuts, they can realise substantial savings even with slight alleviations. For instance:

* Reducing childcare from €184 to €120 – which would still see Irish childcare costs as one of the highest in the EU – could save households over €2,500 a year.

* Reducing rents by 10 percent through cost-rental housing could save Dublin tenants €2,000 on average

* A 50 percent reduction in Dublin public transport could save commuters over €800 per year on a monthly pass

* A pay-related unemployment benefit of a modest 50 percent of previous wage, for an average full-time employee (€45,000), would see their benefit rise by over €200 per week.

Even these slight alleviations would create considerable savings for people – far higher than any tax cut. And the costs are not as high as one might think.

For instance, increasing the universal childcare subsidy to a level that would reduce childcare fees to €120 would cost €66 million (though there is still the issue of ensuring that savings are passed on).

Cutting public transport fares by half would cost €300 million.

A programme of building cost-rentals in urban areas could be financed out of the NAMA surplus.

And introducing a pay-related unemployment benefit could be financed by a fractional increase in employers’ social insurance (0.2 to 0.3 percent) – and if there is understandable nervousness about increasing this if the economy goes south, there is still enough of a surplus in the Social Insurance Fund to temporarily fund this.

And it’s not like this money disappears.

The increased income will, for the most part, be spent in the productive economy which could make for an excellent counter-cyclical policy.

The Taoiseach is right. There are many ways to put money in people’s pockets.

There are cost efficient, socially equitable, economically effective and environmentally friendly ways – such as reducing the social tax burden.

Michael Taft is a researcher for SIPTU and author of the political economy blog, Notes on the Front. His column appears here every Tuesday.

Rollingnews

Sponsored Link

12 thoughts on “Michael Taft: Putting Money Into People’s Pockets

  1. Curious Georgina

    Where does the energy come from to power electric cars?

    Still waiting on an answer…

    1. Treasa

      It comes from power plants, it’s better that it’s all done at one location, outside of the most populated parts of the country. That goes some way to helping air quality, then the other side of it is to have as many people as possible use public transport, preferably electric public transport. So rather than 60 individual cars pumping a quantity of carbon monoxide into the immediate environment, there is one vehicle doing it, at a vast remove. Does that make sense to you?

    2. liam

      Simple from the grid

      Also just like rapid broadband the infrastructure has to be provided

      We are talking about a major problem and pie in the sky

      Judging by the farce of broadband and 7 years or longer to provide it in reality this will take twice that time

      Then the points of re charging
      Where will they be how will they ensure people will not injure themselves tripping over wires

      How will they recoup the massive tax loss that once came from fossil fuels

      How will they increase the power needed to power these cars

      Imagine the pressure on the grid

      Maybe when the devil in the detail emerges the simple answer is Ireland is incapable of delivery

      1. Jake38

        The only funding mentioned is for the extra unemployment benefit by an increase in tax on employers. There is no funding mentioned for the following….

        “Build housing that would be rented at cost…”

        Childcare. “A new, public service model will be required – substantial public investment in the sector combined with some sort of fees cap..”

        “We will need significantly increased investment in accessible public transport….” and “a 50 percent reduction in fares”.

        So yes, I did read the article, and no, it does not say exactly how these will be funded. But, I’m sure we can all guess……….

        1. Treasa

          Read it again, or even just read your own answers there, the answer is in there somewhere if you can take off the right-wing ideological blinkers long enough to find it.

        2. Donal

          The extra money in peoples pockets will be spent in the economy generating vat and excise and income tax receipts, which will pay for the initiatives

  2. scottser

    i’ll say it again. every domestic tenancy should be leased through the local authority and anyone who wants to rent should have their needs assessed no matter how much they earn – it would go a long way to building a mechanism that could control rents.

    1. Rob_G

      Why just tenancy agreements – why not homeowners too?

      You surely won’t mind if the government said: “a three-bedroom house it too big for a couple – scottser, you are going to have to take it two lodgers”.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link
Broadsheet.ie