56 thoughts on “Google Property

  1. Wayne.F

    Came through Dublin airport today one customs officer on duty, but was too busy being interviewed by a camera crew to bother actually working

    1. Newsjustin

      So as the video shows, the security guy claims the footprint of the building is Google property, not the actual public street.

      1. Dónal O'Flynn

        What do you mean by “the footprint” of the building? The footpath is just as public as the roadway. The fact that the upper storeys of the building overhang the footpath doesn’t make it any less public.

          1. Jimi

            Yep, its completely possible that google actually own the property right up to the curb, the public would then have right of access over the footpath but google could retain all other rights,

            Alot of residential houses have a similar situation, the deed actually extends right to the road side, but there a walkway in front of the garden, it was one of the arguments being used against water meter installation, still didn’t work though

          2. Dónal O'Flynn

            Barrow Street must have had a footpath before Google moved in. They don’t own that footpath anymore than I own the footpath outside my house. The walls, windows, doors and the space they enclose belong to Google. The road and footpath belong to Dublin.

          3. Evil Al

            Actually the footpaths on that side were pretty much nonexistent before the building went in. A lot of that was a CIE yard. Can’t tell for sure for the video.

          4. Dónal O'Flynn

            That’s interesting Jimi. Perhaps I stand corrected. Must take a look at the deeds of my own house.

          5. Wayne.F

            Donal we own the footpath right to the curb outside our house. Probably as a result of the reverse of what happened with Google. Council CPO land around our property to build a road they built a footpath as part of the deal but it is exclusively for our property despite looking like a public area & frequently being used by the public. I am guessing Google probably purchased a large footprint property right up to the road, from the council and designed the building to facilitate rights of way

          6. Newsjustin

            You’re just assuming that Donal. From the video there appears to be a tiny plaza type area in front of the building. The security guy says it’s google’s. They all seem to agree that even though that part is, taking a few steps back solves the problem.

            You’d be surprised what people do and do not own Donal. Even if it seems like common sense.

          7. munkifisht

            Wait until the next big snow and walk around outside the Google offices, have yourself nice slip and crack yer crown. Then see if they still claim it’s Googles property.

      2. Digs

        +1. Literalist doesn’t allow for the fact that security guards first language isn’t english. It’s obvious he’s objecting to them filming google from their entrance. I’d imagine he’s paid to do things like that.

      3. benny

        Check out folio DN165483F on landdirect.ie. They own everything up to the public road.

      1. CoxswainLovalot

        Actually you do need permission from DCC. Also, it may well be quite possible that although the area is “public” it is owned by google who have every right to stop people filming. There is lots of “public space” in Dublin that is actually owned and managed by corporations, the IFSC and Dublin Docklands/Grand Canal dock being two examples.

        1. Drogg

          You do not need permission from the DCC to film you can legally film in any public space. Dublin docklands and the ifsc are not public spaces barrow St is a public street and the can not stop you filming no matter what they say.

          1. Drogg

            You can not include a crowd as crew unless it is part of a film shoot which that is the wrong type of camera for and you need a lot more clearance and insurance but if it is just an ENG crew with a camera and sound guy you don’t need permission.

    1. Neil

      There is nothing in Irish law that prohibits the filming or recording of buildings. The EU want to change this though.

    2. Delacaravanio

      Yes, the people who brought us street view can’t seriously object to people on a public road filming buildings.

  2. Truth in the News

    Google go round the world and video everyones else’s houses and property
    and object to their own being video’d from a public place, will the next thing be
    that Dennis O’Briens name can’t be mentioned along with Micheal Lowry, Siteserv
    INM and so on, ah “great little country to do business in”.
    Yes check it out on Google Earth….or will it be redacted pronto.

    1. sp

      “Google go round the world and video everyones else’s houses and property and object to their own being video’d from a public place”

      Seriously. Even if they have full legal rights to that piece of ground and air, the fact that they’re engaged in a project to collect an insane amount of data about the world including pictures of everyone else’s property should be enough reason for them not to Be Evil in this case.

    2. Rob_G

      I knew that there would be some one gobsh*te who would manage to link this to water meters – well done.

    1. Sammyq

      When you google “It’s Google property” + Barrow Street , you get no referral to this video . Surprise !?

  3. SusanTheSilent

    @DonalFlynn Yes indeed there were footpaths on Barrow Street a very long time before Google arrived. There was a CIE train station, an abattoir, a shop and houses as well as warehouses and Boland’s Mill. All before Google. Barrow Street is part of the village of Ringsend and part of the South Lotts reclaimed from swab lands and connecting Ringsend more directly to the city.

  4. rotide

    Wish I’d seen this sooner

    Google own barrow street. At least certain parts of it. Pretty sure they literally bought it from DCC a couple of years back. I could be completely wrong but this is what I’ve been told

    1. Joe the Lion

      It doesn’t really matter whether they do or not

      The question is whether any offended parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy on a street that is a public thoroughfare. The answer to that is clearly not. Google have used this argument themselves in defence of their bots trolling through all our emails and also in defiant rejection of criticisms of their Google earth tabloid photos

      1. Paolo

        It’s not about privacy, it is about filming on private property. Nobody has the right to film on private property without the owner’s consent, unless it is in the execution of a court order or an investigation.

        If google own that part of the footpath (big IF) then Google is entirely within its rights to ask people not to film there. The crew can simply move a couple of paces on to public property and film from there.

  5. Soft like

    Must stop recording people in the Google gym each morning on the dart. It’s my favourite thing to do. I love watching Google employees sweat.

  6. JOhn

    ….from the people who brought you ‘Street View’ comes…………’some of the Street View, but not the bit We’re on, thanks’

    I’d have thought a couple of thousand selfies or pics taken on phones and shared to their fb page, or emailed into them would be kind of making the point of ‘Do as I say, not do as I do…” :)

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie