25 thoughts on “On Second Thoughts

  1. martco

    perhaps it was just the kind of thing you’d tend to say during an election….or something

    1. Vote Rep #1

      If people didn’t care back in 1994 that he may or may not be gay, why would his sexuality be an issue now?

          1. Vote Rep #1

            Oh ok, apologies. So anyone that has visited a sex worker is a sexual predator? That’s a pretty loaded term tbf.

        1. ahjayzis

          Furry Glen is a cruising spot, there’s a greater chance that guy was just looking for a good time pre-Grindr than out to pay the rent.

    2. gorugeen

      @fluffy I sincerely hope you get plague style plops from your sandwich for that link.

    1. classter

      He accepts that in his response – he merely notes that it would have been good manners to tell him.

      Is he wrong on the substantive points?

        1. Rowsdower

          Because if he knew people were going to hear what he was going to say, he would have said something different.

      1. Kieran NYC

        I think medieval knievel meant that she should publish the emails she sent him too.

  2. ABM's Bloodied Underwear

    Politician caught speaking out both sides of his mouth.
    Hopefully the new media can help stamp down some of this carry on.

  3. rotide

    did she get his permission to publish this one like he asked for in the first one?

    As has been said, it’s pretty off to just send in his side of the conversation without hers.

Comments are closed.