26 thoughts on “De Monday Papers

      1. badatmemes

        No Catherine, it’s cack.

        I’d say ‘Don’t Give Up’, but you’d think of Kate Bush and Peter Gabriel,
        and that would also be cack.

        Just face it.


        You’ve admitted defeat.
        You want justification.


    1. badatmemes

      I don’t know what you’re talking about, Jiminny Rustle In The Hedgegrow, but I like the jist of your jab.

      Is it just me or does the word ‘TRUMP’ not suggest a very strong DOWNWARDS movement to you too.
      ie: to TRUMP someone…

      I’m not confused. I just don’t understand it.

        1. badatmemes

          You’re the expert.
          – Consider yourself unchallenged.

          (You can’t win me back that easily, Ya Beauty. Try again.)

          I swear…

          1. badatmemes

            Hey, sorry if that came across as slightly aggressive. That WAS NOT my intention, not at all.
            I just wanted you* to feel stupid, uncaring and insular.
            – You’re obviously happy with that already.

            No harm intended.

            *Catering Von Cornhollio. Alles Uber boo boo, etc.

  1. Sheik Yahbouti

    Fair enough. ;-) In the meanwhile, give it up for the great bunch of lads and lasses of the Dept of Social ‘Protection’ doing great work on our behalf (see Examiner). Panama/Paradise papers anyone.

    1. badatmemes

      Seriously Shakey…
      The Examiner is the ONLY Newspaper I can read without a cup of tea to calm me down.

      They do formidable work.
      Long Live The Examiner.

      I mean it.

      What’s goin’ on behind the Green Door? You never said…

  2. Gimme Shelter

    A drunk on the net told me how to ‘get’ tunes
    I was glad we weren’t going to ever meet

  3. Otis Blue

    First the liberalisation of abortion. Now taxing farmers on GHG emissions.

    Hmm. I don’t think this is what the political masters expected from the Citizen’s Assembly.

    1. Zuppy International

      Au contraire: The Citizen’s Assembly is operating exactly as it was designed to by appearing to give citizens’ pre-approval to government policy.

      The discussions on Climate, for example, were skewed towards the Climate Alarmists’ propaganda, and the abortion discussion was controlled by the fake medical hysterics.

      This is the gerrymandering of public opinion by deceit, deception and fraud. You are been conned.

        1. Zuppy International

          What would you call people who predict (vague) future catastrophe will be caused by today’s cow farts?

      1. Nigel

        The bitter snarls of the side losing the debates but whose losing opinions are bolstered by entrenched anti-democratic multinational corporate interests and the legacy of backwards conservative misogynistic power structures.

      2. Otis Blue

        Eh, no.

        You really think that such recommendations chime with FG/FF political imperatives?

        Neither party has shown any willingness to effect change on either issue.

Comments are closed.