The recent cricket game is a good metaphor
Plucky Ireland put it up to a weak Maybot, drunk on the notion of world conquering power in the first innings
But Britain wipes it’s balls, has a nice cup of tea and bowls a few googlies in the first over of the second innings. Sticky wicket for Leo but it’s all over now.
Dav
Don’t forget to tug your furlock
B9Com From No
tank you sorr
I’ve learned the lessons of history dav
Deep down these FG types are Tory blue aspirants to their underpants
You know it
millie st murderlark
Careful now darling.
Ron
Is no one else concerned that at the most pivotal time of our countries history that we have the most inept incompetent team that was ever assembled to negotiate on our behalf. is no one else concerned by that? do you all just think your angry face emojis on Facebook are doing the trick? it’s why the Irish are the laughing stock of the world
scottser
You’ll probably find that people are laughing more at the state of the UK. except for maybe the Palestinians, or the Syrians or the Venezuelans. I don’t think they have much to laugh about.
Charger Salmons
For Irish people, weaned on a diet of anti-English propaganda from the establishment attack dogs at RTE and the Irish Times, who don’t understand how someone like Boris became Prime Minister I commend this article for consumption.
Unlike the Donnybrook drones and Tara Street hacks it considers all aspects of his personality, good and bad, and places his arrival at the top job in a literary and historical context.
You’ll either be fascinated or appalled.
Which is how real journalism and not the confected and turgid indignation of Fintan O’Foole should work. https://quillette.com/2019/07/23/cometh-the-hour-cometh-the-man-a-profile-of-boris-johnson/
Brother Barnabas
toby young
heh x3
Charger Salmons
“O beware, my lord, of jealousy; it is the green-ey’d monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.”
Brother Barnabas
are you suggesting I’m the othello to your iago, charger?
Charger Salmons
Talking of the Irish Times it’s lamentable that letters written by the public often do a far better job at capturing the real mood in Ireland than it’s highly-paid journalists.
Sir, – What will a disastrous Brexit mean for the Irish economy? Will we still be a society where it is impossible to buy or rent a home or be housed, socially, even though you are both working? Will it mean having to outsource your parenthood to a business model based on profiteering while you both work? Will it still mean that you are fleeced by Irish insurance companies on behalf of Irish shareholders, ie your fellow “citizens”? Does it mean that you will continue to languish in public A&Es at the mercy of drug addicts and drunks while you expire listening to their ranting? Or perhaps the waiting list will accommodate you.
Is that the “successful economy” we want to preserve at all costs?
It is no use being fully employed if the rest of your life is empty. All we are short of is building favelas on the Dublin mountains. – Yours, etc,
EUGENE TANNAM,
Firhouse,
Dublin 24.
Batty Brennan
“…its highly paid journalists.”
You are most welcome.
eoin
The Guardian, 50% increase in reported rapes, but prosecutions fall from 15% to 1.5%.
In Ireland, we’ve also had significant increases in reported rapes. I wonder what has happened to decisions to prosecute?
eoin
Anything good in this week’s issue of Private Eye about the editor of the Irish Daily Mail [Sebastian Hamilton who is seeking Irish citizenship even after his conviction for the crime of contempt of court at the criminal courts in Dublin earlier this month]?
Oh yes!
Private Eye says that the “workshy” Hamilton sent a memo to staff in the wake of his criminal conviction inviting those left after the 25% cull of staff earlier this year, to meet with him to discuss the matter, but not immediately as “I’m off today and tomorrow as my brother and his family are over visiting from Australia”. Workshy, indeed.
If you’re unfamiliar with Sebastian Hamilton, you’ll catch him every fortnight or so on the Virgin Tonight show which is becoming Ireland’s premier reputation laundering service. For a less polished insight, you might consult the Charleton Tribunal report last October which concluded there was a strained relationship at the Mail between senior management and the truth and public duty.
GiggidyGoo
Leo and his soundbites eh?.
“The Taoiseach that brought the border back to Ireland”. That’s the headline he and FG are afraid will be in the history books.
eoin
“But once you start talking about checks anywhere near the Border, people will start delving into that and all of a sudden we’ll be the Government that reintroduced a physical border on the island of Ireland”
Simon Coveney to Shane Ross, 15 January 2019, inadvertently picked up on reporters microphone
BTBarnham
Ha ! FG don’t give a crap about legacy …eh look at their legacy
GiggidyGoo
True. As long as their, and their owners pockets can be filled when it’s their turn to be in government, and lined well, they don’t give a monkeys.
eoin
“Sports stars, television presenters, actors and business leaders face having to pay the taxman a combined total of £500 million after HM Revenue & Customs won a High Court case yesterday over a tax avoidance scheme.
Ingenious Media, a financing company that funded more than 60 films including Avatar and Brooklyn, was accused of persuading David Beckham, Guy Ritchie, Sacha Baron Cohen and others to put money into an investment scheme that used artificial losses to generate tax relief.”
reports the London Times.
I wonder will Revenue take a peek at s481 funding here?
V
TBF
Using artificial losses is going to get you hammered anyway
No matter the vehicle or the taxable subject
Or the jurisdiction
Good “nuff on them
eoin
Sure didn’t Riggs himself blow the whistle on alleged film tax malarkey here.
I wonder are the Revenue scared at what they might find and that it might bring the whole s481 dodge crashing down altogether.
V
Nah
Revenue aren’t scared of anyone
Or anything
The most trustworthy, unbiased and functioning institution we have in the State
As well as being innovative and years ahead of its International peers
ie ROS CAB both implemented years ahead of other bigger jurisdictions
My guess –
They’re saving it for a special occasion
Or are dealing with it on a case by case
Taxable subject by taxable subject basis
Revenue cogs might grind slow
(in some regards)
Nonetheless, they grind finely
A bit of a whinge tho’
This artists exemption is taking the p155 a bit
A cook book and or an autobiography – ye know who ye are
Are not works of creative merit
Under the criteria for an Autobiography to be considered a work of Creative merit – then an Affidavit or a historical FK column would meet the same rule
Even a textbook
What are the chances
eoin
I wouldn’t have recognised Rosanna Davison on the front of the Sun, without the accompanying text.
Good luck to her with the surrogacy.
Also, the Indo is really slipping, this should have been their story.
GiggidyGoo
More mileage in King Kenny’s woes. He will have plebs living close to him shortly. Might even wake up to all-foil containers of half-eaten curries in his trees or gardens on a Sunday morning.
eoin
Ah, what’s Pat moaning about now. He refused the developer next door brief access to his grounds for a survey, so the developer got perrmission from the aviation authority for a drone survey.Pat says that the drone may have recorded the location of security cameras and vehicle registration numbers, and he’s gone to the guards. The big baby nimby (72).
GiggidyGoo
I wonder did he do similar with google maps
martco
hmmmm. stall the ball a sec.
i wouldn’t be a fan whatsoever BUT I think his approach is valid & nimby anything has nowt to do with it
overflight of a neighbour’s property is a fairly misunderstood topic & this will make a very interesting case if it ends up in the courts.
the aviation part is set out in SI563. Ireland is fairly liberal compared to other jurisdictions but there’s rules. assuming that developer either directly (or whomever they hired for the job) was licenced to operate in fact the only reason they’d have needed to seek permission at all in PK’s specific case is because, perchance, his gaff falls in an area designated as needing what’s known as a SOP (specific operating permission) from the IAA…it’s merely because Dalkey falls into a Dublin Airport flight path that the operator needed a permission…but that’s safety orientated operational permission we’re talking here (Air Traffic Control is the concerned party)
SO if say his gaff was out Bray direction or anywhere not marked as Class C airspace on that map, you, I or anyone could just fire ahead & overfly the gaff all day long within SI563…Gardai could only seek to stop you & confiscate the drone IF they can be convinced you are operating it in a reckless manner & breaking SI563. even worse still if the drone in question was a little one < 1KG e.g. a DJI SPARK (unlikely survey candidate but good enough for basic cam work) it's exempt!!
if it was me in his shoes I'd minimum want to know if all that jazz checked out
BUT the murky nub of this I suspect is the GDPR (assuming the drone is cammed up)
the drone pilot should ensure they have the consent of any individuals whose personal data is captured, that they only record the personal data required to achieve the purposes intended and for which consent has been obtained….so (1) we know that clearly consent didn’t happen. also the operator responsible should employ a mechanism to ensure that any unintended capture of personal data is removed before processing occurs..(2) did that happen??? also if you’re a commercial operator you’re supposed to have that procedure stated in your ops manual, usage policy (3) do they and did they follow their ops????
personal data = house numbers, car regs, peoples faces, security cams etc.
SO it’s surely the GDPR angle PK is chasing after here & I would say he has a very solid case, given PK didn’t give the operator any explicit permission to handle or make use of his data I’d be after 1,2,3 above there, on advice, I would goto the High Court myself over it
martco
hmmmm. stall the ball a sec @eoin
I wouldn’t be a PK fan whatsoever BUT I think his approach is fair enough & nimby anything has nowt to do with it….
drone overflight of a neighbour’s property is a fairly misunderstood topic & this will make a very interesting case if it ends up in the courts
the aviation part is set out in SI563. Ireland is fairly liberal compared to other jurisdictions. assuming that developer either directly (or whomever they hired for the job) was licenced to operate in fact the only reason they’d have needed to seek permission at all in PK’s specific case is because, perchance, his gaff falls in an area designated as needing what’s known as a SOP (specific operating permission) from the IAA…so it’s merely because Dalkey falls into a Dublin Airport flight path that the operator needed a permission…it’s only orientated operational permission we’re talking here (Air Traffic Control is the concerned party)
SO if say his gaff was out Bray direction or anywhere not marked as no-fly airspace on that map, you, I or anyone could just fire ahead & overfly the gaff all day long within SI563 rules without talking to anyone…Gardai could only seek to stop & confiscate the drone IF they can be convinced you are operating it in a reckless manner & breaking SI563. even worse still if the drone in question was a little one < 1KG e.g. a DJI SPARK (unlikely survey candidate but good enough for basic cam work) it's exempt from any interference!!
but if it was me in his shoes I'd minimum want to know if all that jazz checked out
BUT the murky nub of this I suspect is the GDPR (assuming the drone is cammed up)
the drone pilot should ensure they have the consent of any individuals whose personal data is captured, that they only record the personal data required to achieve the purposes intended and for which consent has been obtained….so (1) we know that clearly consent didn’t happen. also the operator responsible should employ a mechanism to ensure that any unintended capture of personal data is removed before processing occurs..(2) did that happen??? also if you’re a commercial operator you’re supposed to have that procedure stated in your ops manual, usage policy (3) do they and did they follow their ops????
personal data = house numbers, car regs, peoples faces, security cams etc.
SO it’s surely the GDPR angle PK is chasing after here & I would say he has a very solid case, given PK didn’t give the operator any explicit permission to handle or make use of his data I’d be after 1,2,3 above there, on advice, I would goto the High Court myself over it
eoin
Kenny’s a big cry baby nimby. The developer couldn’t give two hoots about his personal data, he was trying to ensure there wouldn’t be environmental issues for neighbouring properties with the development of much-needed housing. If there is a GDPR issue, then it’s a matter for the Data Protection Commissioner, not the Gardai to whom Pat went running after he spotted the drone after he previously denied the courtesy request for a drone flight and now he wants the Gardai to waste their time investigating his hurt feelings.
martco
all I’m sayin’ @eoin is he’s right to pursue it. imho. and its natural enough to expect if it’s adversarial.
if it was myself & I was aware that you were flying a camera equipped drone over & around my property without my permission I’d challenge you over the stuff you recorded & if you refused to divulge it I’d call the Guards on you. If I was lucky enough to live in Dalkey I’d also find out if you had permission to fly & if you didn’t I’d pursue you for that too
re. “hurt feelings” & “courtesy request” to be clear: the person piloting that drone had to do more than make a “courtesy” request of PK…he/she had 1) IAA paperwork to do to make the flight 2) PK has every right to pursue the GDPR given the obvious situation that he refused access to his property.
on the GDPR…do you not see the issue here? e.g. would you be happy enough to let some no-mark work away with the DJI + 4k Hasselblad over your gaff when, say, your kids might be out in the back garden playing in the inflatable pool you got them up in Lidl specials a few weeks back? or whatever other host of things that are possible? see what I mean?
Steph Pinker
martco: I’ve read your comments regarding PK, which seem fair enough to be arguable; however, what are your views on someone [illegally] using a drone to video property/ machinery/ livestock on private land ostensibly with the intention of invading/ stealing from said private land?
The reality is, It’s rife in rural Ireland, to the point whereby electric gates and security cameras serve no purpose anymore when it comes to trying to keep undesirables out and protect property because these same individuals have the latest in drone technology to survey, and they also have the ability to disable cameras/ gates should they covet someone else’s property.
GDPR isn’t just for the more well known members of society who can afford legal battles, it should apply equally to all. Actually, PK doesn’t realise how lucky he is if that’s his only complaint.
eoin
It’s champerty Jim, but not as we know it.
The Indo reports today about Maria Bailey’s dodgy compo claim
“Legal sources have said that – based on figures from recent cases provided by legal cost accountants – fees of between €11,000 and €11,500 are allowable in fully fought Circuit Court cases where damages of up to €60,000 are awarded.”
And the Indo also gives a timeline of the sorry compo claim, concluding
“July 25: The Cabinet meets in Donegal. Ms Madigan ignored journalists as she arrived.”
V
Wha’
No wheelie bag lycra pants shoulders back pose for the boys ?!?!
Humanity has being crossed
Is there to be no end to this girl’s torment
eoin
Are you mixing up the two V? One of them is the chancer with at least two personal injury claims coming before the courts using the usual form of her maiden and married names, and who exaggerated the extent of her injuries in her most recent claim, withdrew the claim after she was found out and has been demoted by the party leader by being fired from the role of chair of a committee. She retains the Fine Gael whip as FG tries to maintain a straight face to claim it’s dealing with business-destroying insurance premiums.
The other one was merely the facilitator of the dodgy compo claim, at least in the early stages of the claim and is now saying nuhin. I wonder did Josepha agree to a no-win, no-fee type of arrangement with Maria?
V
Opps
Still in the leaba here
I suppose ye’ll have the full suite of arrivals papped for the Sindo tomorrow
I’m guessing Leo went the full Tommy Bahama
Flip flops n’all
I read that, and yes it was sad. A salutary lesson for dogged journalists I suppose – to tread carefully when not sure if tall tales motivated by self-advancement or by mental fragility. Would they have pursued the crooked head of a bank with such determination, one wonders.
eoin
“Even though we held back the story, it was soon doing the rounds in Dublin. The website of Russian propaganda broadcaster RT had run a piece and TCD student publications had gotten hold of the story. “ Yeah, right, Derek Scally. Did the Irish Times hold it back out of concern for Sophie Hingst’s feelings or because there were legal issues, with Sophie intimating a legal response to the claims she fabricated Nazi Holocaust relatives?
And RT is a “Russian propaganda broadcaster” declares the Irish Times? Fair enough, it probably is, but it does a decent job of offering valid contrarian angles on many issues. And given RTE slavishly follows a pro-Washington line to its reporting, giving a platform to issues prioritised by the USA and adopting a pro-USA stance in conflicts involving the USA, is RTE a “USA propaganda broadcaster”. And of course, who could argue with the proposition Irish Times/MyHome.ie is a “homes and property propaganda paper”?
some old quare
Europa Belfast is charging €500 for one night @ Belfast Pride? I could have a bomb terrorist for that sort of cash- or six Derry rent boys- same thing these days.
Definitely same hotel.
Seriously?
some old quare
No accurate timed edit function so.
Broadshee.ie- would you like please state which platform you pay to publish this website on?
Genuine- just say it.
millie st murderlark
Soq, what is the issue you have with the platform? Why not just state it plainly? Because I don’t get your issue with it other than it doesn’t update quickly enough??
bisted
…not enough leather gear stuff…
some old quare
The only one who sees that is a burly Protestant farmer from Monaghan- sorry.
That is exactly it- comments not appearing for between 5 minutes and two hours- not just from app.
Now if the problem was web coding then it would be consistent but this is random which means the underlying refresh processes are being ran at times which suits the platform host. First thing in the morning for example- and it is definitely not browser related.
Even M$ are playing this game on Azure. Either that or certain commentators on Broadsheet get prioritised- which I doubt.
None of that relates to the content of your posts Same’Oh
Your snakey and snide jibes
Your vulgar name calling
Your false insinuations
Your porno links
And your spiteful doxing
And here you are again whinging
Get a life
And in the meantime
If you’re not satisfied with the set up on Broadsheet
Nobody is stopping you going
millie st murderlark
Thanks for explaining queenie
some old quare
Maybe you know someone I know Vanessa but to my knowledge, I have never met you. Quite happy to do daytime coffee or
later double digit gins then box the ears of each other?
Unless we somehow get to know each other in which case just have a bit of craic and then arrange to meet up again.
I’m thinking no.2- you?
V
Don’t go all crybaby now Same’Oh
I still have the screenshots of you doxing myself
And they’re over a year old
And a few others
And I saw what you posted here last night
Not to mention some of the filthy names and expressions you have pasted here onto me
Likewise with some of your encounters with men
Who I’m sure thought they were entitled to some privacy
What I don’t know yet is who teed you up to come after me
Either the KillFrill cabal or the crowd you’re running like a rat out’ve a burning shed to get away from
Instead of cribbing about the Broadsheet infrastructure
How about you thank them for deleting your worst moments aka your true self
And for not Deplatforming you altogether
some old quare
My reason for raising the platform issue is that I recently spent a year battling with similar- and the usual response is to upgrade the subscription- meaning more money- its a game the hosts play. If there is a problem, which IMO there is, then it is good faith that I raise it and I expect Broadsheet want to know.
What I don’t know yet is who teed you up to come after me
I have no idea what this means- I couldn’t care less about this frlll character- apart from the fact you were forced to admit that it was you. As for running away from ‘the crowd’- that really is news to me, whoever ‘the crowd’ is.
I made an offer to meet you in person and have a craic because not hiding behind a keyboard is the real me. I’ll mail John directly and if he wants me to stop posting here then that is fine- no big deal.
The recent cricket game is a good metaphor
Plucky Ireland put it up to a weak Maybot, drunk on the notion of world conquering power in the first innings
But Britain wipes it’s balls, has a nice cup of tea and bowls a few googlies in the first over of the second innings. Sticky wicket for Leo but it’s all over now.
Don’t forget to tug your furlock
tank you sorr
I’ve learned the lessons of history dav
Deep down these FG types are Tory blue aspirants to their underpants
You know it
Careful now darling.
Is no one else concerned that at the most pivotal time of our countries history that we have the most inept incompetent team that was ever assembled to negotiate on our behalf. is no one else concerned by that? do you all just think your angry face emojis on Facebook are doing the trick? it’s why the Irish are the laughing stock of the world
You’ll probably find that people are laughing more at the state of the UK. except for maybe the Palestinians, or the Syrians or the Venezuelans. I don’t think they have much to laugh about.
For Irish people, weaned on a diet of anti-English propaganda from the establishment attack dogs at RTE and the Irish Times, who don’t understand how someone like Boris became Prime Minister I commend this article for consumption.
Unlike the Donnybrook drones and Tara Street hacks it considers all aspects of his personality, good and bad, and places his arrival at the top job in a literary and historical context.
You’ll either be fascinated or appalled.
Which is how real journalism and not the confected and turgid indignation of Fintan O’Foole should work.
https://quillette.com/2019/07/23/cometh-the-hour-cometh-the-man-a-profile-of-boris-johnson/
toby young
heh x3
“O beware, my lord, of jealousy; it is the green-ey’d monster which doth mock the meat it feeds on.”
are you suggesting I’m the othello to your iago, charger?
Talking of the Irish Times it’s lamentable that letters written by the public often do a far better job at capturing the real mood in Ireland than it’s highly-paid journalists.
Sir, – What will a disastrous Brexit mean for the Irish economy? Will we still be a society where it is impossible to buy or rent a home or be housed, socially, even though you are both working? Will it mean having to outsource your parenthood to a business model based on profiteering while you both work? Will it still mean that you are fleeced by Irish insurance companies on behalf of Irish shareholders, ie your fellow “citizens”? Does it mean that you will continue to languish in public A&Es at the mercy of drug addicts and drunks while you expire listening to their ranting? Or perhaps the waiting list will accommodate you.
Is that the “successful economy” we want to preserve at all costs?
It is no use being fully employed if the rest of your life is empty. All we are short of is building favelas on the Dublin mountains. – Yours, etc,
EUGENE TANNAM,
Firhouse,
Dublin 24.
“…its highly paid journalists.”
You are most welcome.
The Guardian, 50% increase in reported rapes, but prosecutions fall from 15% to 1.5%.
In Ireland, we’ve also had significant increases in reported rapes. I wonder what has happened to decisions to prosecute?
Anything good in this week’s issue of Private Eye about the editor of the Irish Daily Mail [Sebastian Hamilton who is seeking Irish citizenship even after his conviction for the crime of contempt of court at the criminal courts in Dublin earlier this month]?
Oh yes!
Private Eye says that the “workshy” Hamilton sent a memo to staff in the wake of his criminal conviction inviting those left after the 25% cull of staff earlier this year, to meet with him to discuss the matter, but not immediately as “I’m off today and tomorrow as my brother and his family are over visiting from Australia”. Workshy, indeed.
If you’re unfamiliar with Sebastian Hamilton, you’ll catch him every fortnight or so on the Virgin Tonight show which is becoming Ireland’s premier reputation laundering service. For a less polished insight, you might consult the Charleton Tribunal report last October which concluded there was a strained relationship at the Mail between senior management and the truth and public duty.
Leo and his soundbites eh?.
“The Taoiseach that brought the border back to Ireland”. That’s the headline he and FG are afraid will be in the history books.
“But once you start talking about checks anywhere near the Border, people will start delving into that and all of a sudden we’ll be the Government that reintroduced a physical border on the island of Ireland”
Simon Coveney to Shane Ross, 15 January 2019, inadvertently picked up on reporters microphone
Ha ! FG don’t give a crap about legacy …eh look at their legacy
True. As long as their, and their owners pockets can be filled when it’s their turn to be in government, and lined well, they don’t give a monkeys.
“Sports stars, television presenters, actors and business leaders face having to pay the taxman a combined total of £500 million after HM Revenue & Customs won a High Court case yesterday over a tax avoidance scheme.
Ingenious Media, a financing company that funded more than 60 films including Avatar and Brooklyn, was accused of persuading David Beckham, Guy Ritchie, Sacha Baron Cohen and others to put money into an investment scheme that used artificial losses to generate tax relief.”
reports the London Times.
I wonder will Revenue take a peek at s481 funding here?
TBF
Using artificial losses is going to get you hammered anyway
No matter the vehicle or the taxable subject
Or the jurisdiction
Good “nuff on them
Sure didn’t Riggs himself blow the whistle on alleged film tax malarkey here.
https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/professor-and-the-madman-ireland-tax-fraud-1202872102/
I wonder are the Revenue scared at what they might find and that it might bring the whole s481 dodge crashing down altogether.
Nah
Revenue aren’t scared of anyone
Or anything
The most trustworthy, unbiased and functioning institution we have in the State
As well as being innovative and years ahead of its International peers
ie ROS CAB both implemented years ahead of other bigger jurisdictions
My guess –
They’re saving it for a special occasion
Or are dealing with it on a case by case
Taxable subject by taxable subject basis
Revenue cogs might grind slow
(in some regards)
Nonetheless, they grind finely
A bit of a whinge tho’
This artists exemption is taking the p155 a bit
A cook book and or an autobiography – ye know who ye are
Are not works of creative merit
Under the criteria for an Autobiography to be considered a work of Creative merit – then an Affidavit or a historical FK column would meet the same rule
Even a textbook
What are the chances
I wouldn’t have recognised Rosanna Davison on the front of the Sun, without the accompanying text.
Good luck to her with the surrogacy.
Also, the Indo is really slipping, this should have been their story.
More mileage in King Kenny’s woes. He will have plebs living close to him shortly. Might even wake up to all-foil containers of half-eaten curries in his trees or gardens on a Sunday morning.
Ah, what’s Pat moaning about now. He refused the developer next door brief access to his grounds for a survey, so the developer got perrmission from the aviation authority for a drone survey.Pat says that the drone may have recorded the location of security cameras and vehicle registration numbers, and he’s gone to the guards. The big baby nimby (72).
I wonder did he do similar with google maps
hmmmm. stall the ball a sec.
i wouldn’t be a fan whatsoever BUT I think his approach is valid & nimby anything has nowt to do with it
overflight of a neighbour’s property is a fairly misunderstood topic & this will make a very interesting case if it ends up in the courts.
the aviation part is set out in SI563. Ireland is fairly liberal compared to other jurisdictions but there’s rules. assuming that developer either directly (or whomever they hired for the job) was licenced to operate in fact the only reason they’d have needed to seek permission at all in PK’s specific case is because, perchance, his gaff falls in an area designated as needing what’s known as a SOP (specific operating permission) from the IAA…it’s merely because Dalkey falls into a Dublin Airport flight path that the operator needed a permission…but that’s safety orientated operational permission we’re talking here (Air Traffic Control is the concerned party)
useful map tool to check out:
http://airspace.flyryte.ml/
SO if say his gaff was out Bray direction or anywhere not marked as Class C airspace on that map, you, I or anyone could just fire ahead & overfly the gaff all day long within SI563…Gardai could only seek to stop you & confiscate the drone IF they can be convinced you are operating it in a reckless manner & breaking SI563. even worse still if the drone in question was a little one < 1KG e.g. a DJI SPARK (unlikely survey candidate but good enough for basic cam work) it's exempt!!
if it was me in his shoes I'd minimum want to know if all that jazz checked out
BUT the murky nub of this I suspect is the GDPR (assuming the drone is cammed up)
the drone pilot should ensure they have the consent of any individuals whose personal data is captured, that they only record the personal data required to achieve the purposes intended and for which consent has been obtained….so (1) we know that clearly consent didn’t happen. also the operator responsible should employ a mechanism to ensure that any unintended capture of personal data is removed before processing occurs..(2) did that happen??? also if you’re a commercial operator you’re supposed to have that procedure stated in your ops manual, usage policy (3) do they and did they follow their ops????
personal data = house numbers, car regs, peoples faces, security cams etc.
SO it’s surely the GDPR angle PK is chasing after here & I would say he has a very solid case, given PK didn’t give the operator any explicit permission to handle or make use of his data I’d be after 1,2,3 above there, on advice, I would goto the High Court myself over it
hmmmm. stall the ball a sec @eoin
I wouldn’t be a PK fan whatsoever BUT I think his approach is fair enough & nimby anything has nowt to do with it….
drone overflight of a neighbour’s property is a fairly misunderstood topic & this will make a very interesting case if it ends up in the courts
the aviation part is set out in SI563. Ireland is fairly liberal compared to other jurisdictions. assuming that developer either directly (or whomever they hired for the job) was licenced to operate in fact the only reason they’d have needed to seek permission at all in PK’s specific case is because, perchance, his gaff falls in an area designated as needing what’s known as a SOP (specific operating permission) from the IAA…so it’s merely because Dalkey falls into a Dublin Airport flight path that the operator needed a permission…it’s only orientated operational permission we’re talking here (Air Traffic Control is the concerned party)
useful map tool to check out:
http://airspace.flyryte.ml/
SO if say his gaff was out Bray direction or anywhere not marked as no-fly airspace on that map, you, I or anyone could just fire ahead & overfly the gaff all day long within SI563 rules without talking to anyone…Gardai could only seek to stop & confiscate the drone IF they can be convinced you are operating it in a reckless manner & breaking SI563. even worse still if the drone in question was a little one < 1KG e.g. a DJI SPARK (unlikely survey candidate but good enough for basic cam work) it's exempt from any interference!!
but if it was me in his shoes I'd minimum want to know if all that jazz checked out
BUT the murky nub of this I suspect is the GDPR (assuming the drone is cammed up)
the drone pilot should ensure they have the consent of any individuals whose personal data is captured, that they only record the personal data required to achieve the purposes intended and for which consent has been obtained….so (1) we know that clearly consent didn’t happen. also the operator responsible should employ a mechanism to ensure that any unintended capture of personal data is removed before processing occurs..(2) did that happen??? also if you’re a commercial operator you’re supposed to have that procedure stated in your ops manual, usage policy (3) do they and did they follow their ops????
personal data = house numbers, car regs, peoples faces, security cams etc.
SO it’s surely the GDPR angle PK is chasing after here & I would say he has a very solid case, given PK didn’t give the operator any explicit permission to handle or make use of his data I’d be after 1,2,3 above there, on advice, I would goto the High Court myself over it
Kenny’s a big cry baby nimby. The developer couldn’t give two hoots about his personal data, he was trying to ensure there wouldn’t be environmental issues for neighbouring properties with the development of much-needed housing. If there is a GDPR issue, then it’s a matter for the Data Protection Commissioner, not the Gardai to whom Pat went running after he spotted the drone after he previously denied the courtesy request for a drone flight and now he wants the Gardai to waste their time investigating his hurt feelings.
all I’m sayin’ @eoin is he’s right to pursue it. imho. and its natural enough to expect if it’s adversarial.
if it was myself & I was aware that you were flying a camera equipped drone over & around my property without my permission I’d challenge you over the stuff you recorded & if you refused to divulge it I’d call the Guards on you. If I was lucky enough to live in Dalkey I’d also find out if you had permission to fly & if you didn’t I’d pursue you for that too
re. “hurt feelings” & “courtesy request” to be clear: the person piloting that drone had to do more than make a “courtesy” request of PK…he/she had 1) IAA paperwork to do to make the flight 2) PK has every right to pursue the GDPR given the obvious situation that he refused access to his property.
on the GDPR…do you not see the issue here? e.g. would you be happy enough to let some no-mark work away with the DJI + 4k Hasselblad over your gaff when, say, your kids might be out in the back garden playing in the inflatable pool you got them up in Lidl specials a few weeks back? or whatever other host of things that are possible? see what I mean?
martco: I’ve read your comments regarding PK, which seem fair enough to be arguable; however, what are your views on someone [illegally] using a drone to video property/ machinery/ livestock on private land ostensibly with the intention of invading/ stealing from said private land?
The reality is, It’s rife in rural Ireland, to the point whereby electric gates and security cameras serve no purpose anymore when it comes to trying to keep undesirables out and protect property because these same individuals have the latest in drone technology to survey, and they also have the ability to disable cameras/ gates should they covet someone else’s property.
GDPR isn’t just for the more well known members of society who can afford legal battles, it should apply equally to all. Actually, PK doesn’t realise how lucky he is if that’s his only complaint.
It’s champerty Jim, but not as we know it.
The Indo reports today about Maria Bailey’s dodgy compo claim
“Legal sources have said that – based on figures from recent cases provided by legal cost accountants – fees of between €11,000 and €11,500 are allowable in fully fought Circuit Court cases where damages of up to €60,000 are awarded.”
And the Indo also gives a timeline of the sorry compo claim, concluding
“July 25: The Cabinet meets in Donegal. Ms Madigan ignored journalists as she arrived.”
Wha’
No wheelie bag lycra pants shoulders back pose for the boys ?!?!
Humanity has being crossed
Is there to be no end to this girl’s torment
Are you mixing up the two V? One of them is the chancer with at least two personal injury claims coming before the courts using the usual form of her maiden and married names, and who exaggerated the extent of her injuries in her most recent claim, withdrew the claim after she was found out and has been demoted by the party leader by being fired from the role of chair of a committee. She retains the Fine Gael whip as FG tries to maintain a straight face to claim it’s dealing with business-destroying insurance premiums.
The other one was merely the facilitator of the dodgy compo claim, at least in the early stages of the claim and is now saying nuhin. I wonder did Josepha agree to a no-win, no-fee type of arrangement with Maria?
Opps
Still in the leaba here
I suppose ye’ll have the full suite of arrivals papped for the Sindo tomorrow
I’m guessing Leo went the full Tommy Bahama
Flip flops n’all
Meanwhile.
https://www.tramppress.com/announcing-our-2020-list/
https://youtu.be/gVe1ylys-gw
That Sophie Hingst story in the Irish Times is desperately tragic and sad.
The original UT article is here:
Former Trinity Researcher Stripped of Blog Award for Inventing Holocaust Victims
http://www.universitytimes.ie/2019/06/former-trinity-researcher-stripped-of-blog-award-for-inventing-holocaust-victims/
I read that, and yes it was sad. A salutary lesson for dogged journalists I suppose – to tread carefully when not sure if tall tales motivated by self-advancement or by mental fragility. Would they have pursued the crooked head of a bank with such determination, one wonders.
“Even though we held back the story, it was soon doing the rounds in Dublin. The website of Russian propaganda broadcaster RT had run a piece and TCD student publications had gotten hold of the story. “ Yeah, right, Derek Scally. Did the Irish Times hold it back out of concern for Sophie Hingst’s feelings or because there were legal issues, with Sophie intimating a legal response to the claims she fabricated Nazi Holocaust relatives?
And RT is a “Russian propaganda broadcaster” declares the Irish Times? Fair enough, it probably is, but it does a decent job of offering valid contrarian angles on many issues. And given RTE slavishly follows a pro-Washington line to its reporting, giving a platform to issues prioritised by the USA and adopting a pro-USA stance in conflicts involving the USA, is RTE a “USA propaganda broadcaster”. And of course, who could argue with the proposition Irish Times/MyHome.ie is a “homes and property propaganda paper”?
Europa Belfast is charging €500 for one night @ Belfast Pride? I could have a bomb terrorist for that sort of cash- or six Derry rent boys- same thing these days.
Definitely same hotel.
Seriously?
No accurate timed edit function so.
Broadshee.ie- would you like please state which platform you pay to publish this website on?
Genuine- just say it.
Soq, what is the issue you have with the platform? Why not just state it plainly? Because I don’t get your issue with it other than it doesn’t update quickly enough??
…not enough leather gear stuff…
The only one who sees that is a burly Protestant farmer from Monaghan- sorry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7jxz6LcciQ
Single obvs- I don’t do husbands.
That is exactly it- comments not appearing for between 5 minutes and two hours- not just from app.
Now if the problem was web coding then it would be consistent but this is random which means the underlying refresh processes are being ran at times which suits the platform host. First thing in the morning for example- and it is definitely not browser related.
Even M$ are playing this game on Azure. Either that or certain commentators on Broadsheet get prioritised- which I doubt.
i can confirm that my comments are prioritised
and that’s correct, imo
Sorry I’m Late
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOYjCxGf-K0
None of that relates to the content of your posts Same’Oh
Your snakey and snide jibes
Your vulgar name calling
Your false insinuations
Your porno links
And your spiteful doxing
And here you are again whinging
Get a life
And in the meantime
If you’re not satisfied with the set up on Broadsheet
Nobody is stopping you going
Thanks for explaining queenie
Maybe you know someone I know Vanessa but to my knowledge, I have never met you. Quite happy to do daytime coffee or
later double digit gins then box the ears of each other?
Unless we somehow get to know each other in which case just have a bit of craic and then arrange to meet up again.
I’m thinking no.2- you?
Don’t go all crybaby now Same’Oh
I still have the screenshots of you doxing myself
And they’re over a year old
And a few others
And I saw what you posted here last night
Not to mention some of the filthy names and expressions you have pasted here onto me
Likewise with some of your encounters with men
Who I’m sure thought they were entitled to some privacy
What I don’t know yet is who teed you up to come after me
Either the KillFrill cabal or the crowd you’re running like a rat out’ve a burning shed to get away from
Instead of cribbing about the Broadsheet infrastructure
How about you thank them for deleting your worst moments aka your true self
And for not Deplatforming you altogether
My reason for raising the platform issue is that I recently spent a year battling with similar- and the usual response is to upgrade the subscription- meaning more money- its a game the hosts play. If there is a problem, which IMO there is, then it is good faith that I raise it and I expect Broadsheet want to know.
What I don’t know yet is who teed you up to come after me
I have no idea what this means- I couldn’t care less about this frlll character- apart from the fact you were forced to admit that it was you. As for running away from ‘the crowd’- that really is news to me, whoever ‘the crowd’ is.
I made an offer to meet you in person and have a craic because not hiding behind a keyboard is the real me. I’ll mail John directly and if he wants me to stop posting here then that is fine- no big deal.
TrouserPress.