One They Made Earlier

at

The Pandemrix vaccine was distributed to GPs by the HSE during the 2009 swine flu pandemic

Yesterday.

The High Court, Dublin.

Via BreakingNews:

A 16-year-old boy who sued claiming he developed a rare sleep disorder after receiving a swine flu jab has settled his High Court action for €900,000.

The teenager who cannot be named by order of the court was five years of age when he received the Pandemrix vaccine in November 2009.

The boy’s counsel Jonathan Kilfeather SC told the High Court the boy suffered sleep disturbance and loss of concentration and in August 2016 a diagnosis of narcolepsy was made.

The latest settlement follows on the case of another 16-year-old boy who settled his action in November last year. That groundbreaking settlement paved the way for the resolution of 80 cases over the Pandemrix vaccine.

It was agreed under the terms of that settlement that 50 per cent of the settlement figure would be paid out. Mr Kilfeather told the High Court today the €900,000 settlement in the latest case represented 50 per cent of the full value of the case.

Teenager who sued over swine flu jab settles for €900,000 (Breaking News)

‘Anon’ writes:

‘As someone who developed an incurable autoimmune disease after taking this Pandemrix “swine flu” vaccine, I feel for this poor lad. When I was offered this jab at work, no one mentioned anything about the possible side effects.

It’s unconscionable that this was allowed to happen. In a normal functioning society this case should ring alarm bells all over the media.

Yet it has made no impact. Instead the authorities are in a mad rush to vaccinate the whole country with an untested experimental gene therapy whose clinical trials don’t end till 2023 – and to re-organise society into a de facto medical apartheid, with the unvaccinated reduced to the status of second-class citizens.

The campaign to demonise those who believe in bodily sovereignty as a pariah to be shunned by “polite society” chills me to the bone. We are moving into very dangerous territory.’

RollingNews

Sponsored Link

39 thoughts on “One They Made Earlier

    1. E'Matty

      Tests have been carried out but trials continue and will not complete until 2023. Nobody knows what medium to long term adverse effects these vaccines may result in. It’s simply not possible. Also, if testing has been so comprehensive, as you appear to believe, why did nobody pick up on the blood clots issue, a very short term adverse reaction that should surely have manifested in the initial testing? They couldn’t identify even an obvious short term adverse reaction yet you believe they can assert their medium and long term safety. Ridiculous gullibility.

      1. Nilbert

        “why did nobody pick up on the blood clots issue”

        Because its extraordinarily rare, but you knew that already. People have explained that on here countless times to you.

        1. E'Matty

          Missing the point. They could not identify a short term adverse reaction like that, yet people like believe they can assure us of the medium to long term safety of these vaccines.

    1. GiggidyGoo

      Written by a Bruce Y Lee, who tells us about himself:

      ‘Bruce Y. Lee, MD, MBA has over two decades experience in industry and academia developing mathematical and computational models to assist a wide range of decision makers in health and public health.’

      Just like Ivor Cummins is doing then.

  1. E'Matty

    It should also be noted, and I have posted this before, that none other than Holohan was on national media encouraging all parents in Ireland to vaccinate their kids. He did this despite there being warnings raised around the world about concerns that Pandemrix was causing narcolepsy in teenagers and children. So, he was either negligent in not being aware of this risk, or was aware and still recommended we all vaccinate our kids. Either way, he should have been removed from his position. Instead he is selling the same snake oil in the same manner and the public are told to just trust him. Indeed, anyone questioning this clown is them selves attacked and vilified. How dare we question such an “expert”.

  2. Shitferbrains

    Hi there Anon, know any people living in an iron lung ? No ? Maybe the polio jab works.

    1. K. Cavan

      The Poliomyelitis vaccine was an actual vaccine, innoculation with either an inactivated virus by injection or a weakened virus orally, very similar to every vaccine in history. mRNA injections are entirely different, an attempt to imitate a side-effect of infection with a Coronavirus, unfortunately, the spike protein has turned out to be a toxic side-effect of such infection.
      Normally, a raw death count of 50 individuals would cause immediate withdrawal of any consumer or prescription drug in the US, they passed that some time ago with mRNA therapy but anything declared “a vaccine” operates under minimal regulation & this is the first “vaccine” that is not a simple innoculation.

      1. K. Cavan

        What’s not true, Mo? Buying & reading a book is not going to ”explain it all to [me]” I quoted what I believe to be actual, verifiable facts, which are incorrect?

  3. Ragamuffin

    There are risks to being vaccinated AND there are risks to being unvaccinated. I developed a life changing and incurable auto-immune disease following glandular fever (epstein-barr virus) in my mid-30s. If I could travel back in time and take a vaccine to prevent my illness, I would.

    The two important issues with vaccine hesitancy should be: a) a transparent expert-led critical review of the risks in taking and not taking it, and b) informing the individual of the facts on these two competing risks.

    1. phil

      Same as me, normal flu that developed into throat infection, didnt bother going to GP when it got bad, auto inflammatory disease now. I would also love a time machine .

    2. Micko

      This all seems fair and reasonable.

      Let people decide for themselves when they’re fully informed of risks on both sides…

      And sorry to hear that happened to you guys. That sucks.

      1. E'Matty

        Exactly. It should remain a personal choice where everybody assesses the risk themselves based on proper independent and verified safety analysis. If you want to get a vaccine, it should be made available to you. If you don’t, you should be entitled to this choice and not demonised and vilified. There should not be different freedoms for one group vis a vis another.

        1. Oro

          Nobody is forcing anyone to take it. However there are consequences to decisions, especially when it comes to public health and access to private businesses. It’s just the reality of the situation when faced with an airborne disease (I rly don’t wanna get into a back and forth over particulars of covid as a disease either rn). We’re talking about consequences from choices. Think of it like donating blood and intravenous blood use. You can’t force yourself into blood donation because of your personal choices.

          1. Janet, dreams of an alternate universe

            How can an unvaccinated person be a danger to the vacinated, doesn’t the vacine protect them ?

          2. Oro

            Im not sure what the relevance is to what I said. I think your scenario (if I’ve gleaned correctly what you’re getting at b/c you didn’t explain what you mean) would require one solitary unvaccinated person and then fail once a second was introduced? FWIW I believe behaviours must change once vaccinated.

          3. K. Cavan

            People are clearly being coerced into taking it, you can’t possibly deny that. Propaganda is designed to force people to think a certain way, any decision they make after that does not involve the exercise of free will & if you don’t have free will, you are being subjected to force.
            When people are FORCED out of society, work, education, healthcare, locked up in prison camps, that’s force. Or do you think it’s only force if they’re being physically held down & injected against their will? There are many types of force, violence is merely the most crude.

          4. MoRhustyDilis

            Coercion is being used. Same same.
            Also as the jab doesn’t stop you catching or spreading why would business care who’s jabbed or not and what are these consequences you mention?

          5. Oro

            It’s not the same. Nobody is forced to take it, it’s voluntary, sorry that’s just reality, much as it doesn’t suit you. If you don’t want to take it don’t – but as I said there are consequences to decisions, when did everyone decide it was fine to abdicate personal responsibility?

            Jab effectively stops virus developing in you and much lowers the likelihood you will pass it on. Not 100% but let’s say 90%+ for sake of argument. Again, I know this doesn’t suit you but is a reality.

          6. E'Matty

            @Oro. I don’t think you actually understand the science behind the vaccines. Looking at the Delta variant alone, here’s some interesting stats from the UK and BBC.
            https://www.bbc.com/news/health-57525891

            Of 806 people infected with the Delta variant who ended up hospital in England between 1 February and 14 June 2021:

            527 (65%) people were unvaccinated. (Implying 35% were vaccinated at least once)

            135 (17%) were more than 21 days after their first dose of vaccine

            84 (10%) were more than 14 days after their second dose

            As of 14 June, there have been 73 deaths in England of people who were confirmed as having the Delta variant and who died within 28 days of a positive test, and of these:

            34 (47%) were unvaccinated (Implying a whopping 53% were vaccinated at least once).

            10 (14%) were more than 21 days after their first dose of vaccine

            26 (36%) were more than 14 days after their second dose.

            All of these cases can be transmitters of the virus. Why is it deemed safe for them to eat in a restaurant and not a healthy, unvaccinated person? Are they so radically different from the threat supposedly posed by an unvaccinated person?

          7. Oro

            You’re not ‘vaccinated’ until you’ve done the full course I.e. both injections (+2 weeks) so my 90% was correct based on your numbers? The UK gamble of vaccinating a bunch of people with one and long wait times seems to have lost with the variant.

          8. Oro

            It was nice to see my family – I wouldn’t have been able to travel otherwise – thanks for asking. Where I live we don’t have to wear masks anymore unless requested by the premises or on public transport – so it’s been fun getting back into the swing of things. In terms of the actual vaccination I felt a little unwell for a couple of days after the first and didn’t feel a thing after the second :)

          9. Steph Pinker

            Oro, thanks for your sincere reply; with an open and honest personality such as yours I’d say your angels are clambering for attention – you’ll be ok ;)

          10. Oro

            Regardless of whether that was said in jest or not, that’s a lot of pretty words in one sentence so I’ll keep it in my back pocket with the other spare compliments ;)

          11. Steph Pinker

            Oro, I recognise sincerity regardless of medium, personality or circumstance – have more faith in yourself and others? There are many genuine, good, decent people knocking around, and we all have angels.

        2. alickdouglas

          I agree with you in principle and on almost all the points, but I have trouble with

          “based on proper independent and verified safety analysis”.

          What independent group could be competent to do that, and who would pay? A trial in 40k people costs about 50 million ish dollars to run and analyse, but still wasn’t big enough to catch the thromboembolic events signal. Not to mention how you would staff it, and allocate the staffing resources. Until we figure out how to do that, we are stuck with pharma companies doing the design, operations and reporting of the studies, and the distrust that that engenders.

    3. K. Cavan

      Unfortunately, there are no such critical reviews available & there won’t be, until the trials are complete, in 2023, so you make your decision with no accurate information but while being bombarded with fake science and false data from the Media, which basically functions as a propaganda dissemination system for Neo-Liberal Capitalism, these days.
      An hour spent looking at the mortality figures on the CSO site reveals that, despite the claim of something like 2,000 Covid deaths in 2020, the mortality figures were only 631 higher than 2019 (oddly enough the increase between 2017 and 2018 was 632).
      One conclusion to take from this is that there is something seriously wrong with the statistics for Covid deaths that have been promulgated by the Government & Media and if that, alone, doesn’t at least give you pause for thought, all the information in the world is of no use to you.

    4. K. Cavan

      There are also risks in taking ANY drug, medicine or treatment. I lost most of 2013, along with 20% of my body weight, to a tablet I took for a mostly cosmetic health problem. I spent most of that year in hell, culminating in waiting for overnight blood tests to determine the extent of my liver damage. My GP rang me at 8.30, next morning, to announce very mild damage.
      Those tablets are still available, on prescription. Only 1 in 10,000 will suffer what I did but they will all have identical symptoms to me, I just hadn’t read the leaflet that came with the pills & continued taking them, even after I’d started to react to them.
      Please, folks, always read the leaflet, I bet some people reading this have taken or are currently taking a medicine even though they haven’t read the safety leaflet, especially the list of contraindications.

  4. K. Cavan

    While the State managed to get all but about 4 of the 100 or so claims against it under the umbrella of the first court case, at just shy of 2 million per claim, plus legal-eagle fees, etc, I would estimate the State, therefore the taxpayer, will have little change out of a quarter of a billion for the Swine Flu vaccine debacle & that was a rushed, but normal, inoculation, not dissimilar from the annual flu vaccines.
    Even as it stands, if we were to administer no more mRNA injections, we’re already facing a multiple of that because of the damage we now know is caused directly by the spike protein, which is entirely due to the mRNA injections.
    Of course, this will just lead us into The Great Reset & debt forgiveness in return for the surrender of all citizens’ rights to own private property. Even now, the government is proposing changes to Article 43, which guarantees the right to ownership of private property, inserting a ”counterbalancing” right to adequate housing, according to Sen. Mary Fitzpatrick, FF. How are these two ”rights” connected?
    Join the dots…

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie