This afternoon
The Seanad sitting in Dail Eireann, Leinster House, Dublin 2.
Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly addresses Senators in his native doublespeak on measures that will deny access to pubs and restaurants for the unvaxxed and in language.
Meanwhile..
UPDATE:
Senators have passed the measures 29 to 7 (with 24 Senators absent) and the bill will now be signed into law by President Higgins.
Or will he?
Yes, it’s definitely happening.
Or is it?
Stop that?
Watch Live here
Sponsored Link









Nice phrasing Bodge but I’d have gone for –
“ Oh Noes!
The Righteous Cleanchildren is being Hitlerated!!11!”
They’re his words, Tony.
Did Donnelly REALLY say “deny access to pubs and restaurants for the unvaxxed”
Wow. I stand corrected so
https://www.broadsheet.ie/contact/
And they just keep going…. Shameful carry-on.
He used to be a Social Democrat too eh? Imagine that !
If you don’t want to be differentiated because you’re not vaxxed, we’d better get back into complete lockdown until you are, I suppose. Which is what might happen if Higgins doesn’t sign it. So, yay?
How about you allow for people who test negative and dont have the virus to have equal rights to those vaccinated?
Yknow, like they do in the rest of Europe.
Or is common sense too common for you Nigel?
Nigel only has middle-class sense
Me? Oh, very well: I, Nigel, hereby declare that people who test negative and don’t have the virus to have equal rights to those vaccinated.
Now print that out and get Pres Higgins to sign it and we’re sorted.
Why should we be denied access to anywhere?
I think you’ll find that there are quite a few places where you cannot wander at will, for instance yourself and a few mates cannot meet on private property without the consent of the owner.
It might be a private residence and you’d be trespassing. It might be a place of work where you have no business. It might have an entry fee you can’t or won’t pay. It might be a hospital outside visiting hours. The reasons why you might be denied access to places are potentially endless.
There is a percentage of the population that cannot take the vaccine. What are the provision for this?
None. So far.
I have a family member in this situation. They’ve contacted their local FF TD and have been told that he’s going to contact Donnelly on their behalf.
So I wouldn’t hold my breath… :(
My nephew only has 1 kidney, he’s not able to take a vaccine either. This policy will further alienate him from children his own age and the community in general.
That’s so sad. Poor little dude.
My wife only has 1 kidney and is fully vaxxed. What does the kidney have to do with it? Is it not more to do with his age?
Partly on the behalf of people who cannot take vaccines we have embarked on a programme of mass vaccination in order to achieve herd immunity across the whole population, thereby reducing the risk for those individuals. People who can’t get vaccinated might be more worried about the potentially disastrous effects of a premature reopening than of being excluded from certain activities during a partial reopening, but who knows?
Someone whos tested negative within the previous 24 hours is statistically less likely to spread the virus than someone whos been vaccinated and is untested. Thats why the rest of Europe lets people with negative tests access venues.
Lets not get facts get in the way of Irish politicians decision making though I guess…
Splitting hairs seems to be at the mandatory but not compulsory phase at the moment.
or “splidding hairs” as the tool from McKinsey might put it
This is it and has been since the start. I’m half vacced and have nothing against them but, like most, got it simply because there are too many threatened barriers in the way of those who aren’t.
We’re Not Discriminating, We’re Differentiating- either way, back of the bus?
They’re doing vaccines at the back of the bus?
no, antigen tests
You’d think the front of the bus would be the smarter place to do ’em….
logic is not allowed on this Island
It is up north Janet? Whatever about their squabbles among themselves, that one would just not fly with either side.
am I allowed to say Nordies are more pragmatic
You are allowed to say they see through this bullpoo- for sure.
suspicion is in the DNA
It makes all the difference in the world to know one is being differentiated against, not discriminated against…
As was pointed out the other day, since Micheal Martin took power, there have been five amendments been made that give the government extraordinary “temporary” powers over the population.
Each of these havs a sunset clause, and every time the sunset clause has been due to expire they have been extended.
Does anyone actually think for one second that this new law is only for three months and won’t be extended?
And will other places such as supermarkets be added to the list – as we’ve seen in France.
Covid is such a drag.
Lets just kill another 3000 grannies so we can go for a pint!
Jesus – this old chestnut – Again!!
Are grannies vaccinated or not?
Are they safe now or not? Do the vaccines work or not?
Will you muppets make up your elfin minds!
Or we could just stay as we are so you can continue to work from home Cian?
You said that you’d swap 2000 deaths a year so you could go back to normal.
I hope you are on double-time after 5 Cian?
eh Cian? What was that you said earlier? https://www.broadsheet.ie/2021/07/16/an-incredible-set-of-events/#comment-2331535
“respond to what I said, not what you wanted me to have said.“
Sauce for the goose.
I didn’t see what you’ve just quoted, in Mickos post above yours. Distract/Divert and Dive
No, I said be happy to take around to that number of deaths so WE can go back to normal Cian.
WE! Not me – WE.
Our society is in the toilet.
And I think that we have to grow up, put our big boy and girl pants on and accept that a certain number of people will die from Covid.
Just as the US have.
Ye know – Just like we do with the flu… ;)
Also Cian
What are you, 8 years old?
“You said this…. You said that.. teacher teacher! Micko said he’s kill all the grannies”
Grow up dude
Take it as a badge of honour Micko. You’re clearly under his skin.
I note a few Travellers online are basically saying “oh now discriminating against a group is bad.”
Well you would now wouldn’t you?
Travellers can’t change their ethnic status where as the unvaccinated can change their status to allow access quite easily.
Yes dear.
https://www.broadsheet.ie/contact/
Daisy, you hit the nail on the head.
Post at 5:35 – overtime?
haha; you’re so funny
Everything looks like a nail, when all you have is a hammer…
Everything must be a conspiracy when all you have is paranoid delusions.
Is Donnelly changing his name by deed poll to Doherty?. Looks like it with that kind of ‘Mandatory but not compulsory’ phrasing.
Always worth revisiting this one. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5sDfewdiWS8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_Q3xRITxII&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXayhUzWnl0
#1 was good – he spoke well
Folks I am deeply saddened that the word discriminatory is purely seen as a negative.
Sadly it would appear as though no know bothers to think about what words actually mean anymore.
To be a discriminating person simply meant you had standards.
“Unfair discrimination” is the term you should be using e.g you can and should discriminate against candidates based on qualifications & ability, but not on ethnicity or sex.
Donnelly has to use doublespeak in this case because smooth brains automatically think discrimination = bad
The new rules are unworkable boopy doopers however.
Hey. Thanks for the education curmudgeon.
Ye know what though, the term “Smooth Brains” is pretty offensive to people with a disability.
Lissencephaly it’s called – happens in the womb.
Very sad stuff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lissencephaly
But hey, now you know and you are educated and you know what THAT word means – I’m sure you’ll never use it again. ;-)
Right?
You always have a smart answer, don’t you Micko? Always the last word.
So does Nigel, but hey..
I am a master debater ;)
“Smooth Brains is pretty offensive to people with a disability.”
Yes but its also offensive to those without one, who should know better. In a similar fashion being called a girl is not in itself an offensive statement, unless you aren’t one.
Sometimes people don’t mean to offend. This wasn’t one of those times.
Sure…
Some flawless logic there