27 thoughts on “They Have Gone About The World Like Wind”
Paolo
Pylons should go underground if it is feasible but we should have more wind turbines.
Drogg
This is exactly what I was thinking.
andrew
Underground pylons? That’d be a first. It’d be some engineering achievement though.
PaddyIrishMan
It’s technically feasible but costs an absolute fortune to build and maintain. Are we willing to pay for it? (I’m not)
andrew
Why would anyone want to build a steel structure underground?
JustSayin'
Underground HVDC cablling can take up to six weeks to find and fix faults on the line and personally I’d rather not wait that long but hey maybe that’s me liking my creature comforts too much…
miko
You realise they need to create a road over the underground cable always accessible for heavy machinery needed to gig it up in case of a fault. This has more of an impact on the environment and landscape then pylons do.
Serv
But they’re happy for us to pump out energy from coal and peat stations. Guess none of them live near one.
Rob_G
+1, the pearl-clutching surrounding both wind turbines and electrical pylons in this country is astonishing
munkifisht
NIMBY clowns. Mightn’t want it in your backyard, but wonder how they feel about floods in their livingrooms?
CousinJack
Om land wind turbines the most cost-effective of all renewable energies and now on a par with gas (CCGT) on cost per unit. The future is massive wind turbines.
BTW cost of undergrounding if 5 to 10 times that of overgrounding, but if landowners and there neighbours are willing to pay the diffrence then I’m sure eirgrid will be ok with it
The Old Boy
The future is tidal energy, but the massive capital outlay and objections to the loss of coastal amenity or spoiling the sea view will keep it down until the brown stuff really hits the fan. It’s the only large-scale renewable that is predictable enough to actually run the country, with the aid of pumped storage schemes based on the twice-daily surges.
PaddyIrishMan
It is certainly a predictable source of energy but has it ever be done successfully on a large scale? There’s no way we are going to be first as we wouldn’t have the expertise to do it.
CousinJack
There aren’t enough sites to make tidal variable, and there are no scaled commercial wave machines. Wind and solar are the current options, and with the advances been made in battery technology (aluminium batteries particularly) intermittency is become much less of an issue. At times wind contributes almost 50% of Irelands energy demand, and solar has contributed more than 40% of Germany’s energy demand. Plus solar and wind are now comparable to gas in cost per kw/hr without subsidy
The Old Boy
Thanks for the info, Jack. I wasn’t aware that battery technology was advanced enough to be useful for grid supply; I was still under the impression that pumped storage was the only viable way.
rotide
Hasn’t Elon Musk changed everything with the tesla storage system?
Disasta
Can the pylons by made less horrible? Maybe less wires?
andrew
There probably could be nicer designs but it would probably cost a fortune to get some famous architect or whatever to come up with a design that wouldn’t be horrible to look at.
As for the wire, no they’re all needed so the number couldn’t be reduced.
Riight… Because that’s an accurate representation of Irish wind energy policy.
Let’s all listen to people like Tom McGuirk, who says that ‘Deformed cattle are being because of pylons!!’ Ignoring the thousands of existing pylons, of course, and Ireland’s thriving agricultural industry.
The answer to future energy demand ain’t the wind, wheres the supply
going to come from when theres no wind, has a cost benfit analysis
being done of 400kV power lines that will be used intermittely, what will
the back up to tte West of Ireland wind park in Mayo cost, the initial proposal
is 600Mega Watts yet the proposed 400kV line has a projected capacity of
almost 1800 MW in dry conditions and around 1600 in wet, has a costing
being carried out, if not, its about time, or it end up like the bank debt.
In reality back up would need the construction of at least of a new 1000MW
thermal power station…..has any of the current proposals being thought out
at all, or was it Eamon Ryans brainchild.
CousinJack
Improved battery technology, makes all that wind highly viable
Truth in the News
Really, a battery that can store up to 1600 MW and deliver a load
for a couple days……into miracles….loafes and fishes …eh.
The best that can be got is 10’s of MW and load capaciry of several minutes
Even a flywheel with 500 MW has only a standby of milliseconds
Pumped water storage is limited to load peaking, how many days
can Thurlough Hill (288MW) sustain a load for….its only hours.
JustSayin'
I don’t think many people in the wind industry would say that wind is the “silver bullet” to our furture energy problems but it most certainly is part of it. And I would imagine that Eirgrid have an abundance of reports regarding the upgrade of the transmission system.
Truth in the News
Yes, the ESB and Eirgrid have an extensive library of documentation
However they seem to have not read it, if they had they would have
develeloped a radically different power programme, indeed its time that
all the documentation held in their library stock was made available to
the public rather to than to the exclusie few in house.
Pylons should go underground if it is feasible but we should have more wind turbines.
This is exactly what I was thinking.
Underground pylons? That’d be a first. It’d be some engineering achievement though.
It’s technically feasible but costs an absolute fortune to build and maintain. Are we willing to pay for it? (I’m not)
Why would anyone want to build a steel structure underground?
Underground HVDC cablling can take up to six weeks to find and fix faults on the line and personally I’d rather not wait that long but hey maybe that’s me liking my creature comforts too much…
You realise they need to create a road over the underground cable always accessible for heavy machinery needed to gig it up in case of a fault. This has more of an impact on the environment and landscape then pylons do.
But they’re happy for us to pump out energy from coal and peat stations. Guess none of them live near one.
+1, the pearl-clutching surrounding both wind turbines and electrical pylons in this country is astonishing
NIMBY clowns. Mightn’t want it in your backyard, but wonder how they feel about floods in their livingrooms?
Om land wind turbines the most cost-effective of all renewable energies and now on a par with gas (CCGT) on cost per unit. The future is massive wind turbines.
BTW cost of undergrounding if 5 to 10 times that of overgrounding, but if landowners and there neighbours are willing to pay the diffrence then I’m sure eirgrid will be ok with it
The future is tidal energy, but the massive capital outlay and objections to the loss of coastal amenity or spoiling the sea view will keep it down until the brown stuff really hits the fan. It’s the only large-scale renewable that is predictable enough to actually run the country, with the aid of pumped storage schemes based on the twice-daily surges.
It is certainly a predictable source of energy but has it ever be done successfully on a large scale? There’s no way we are going to be first as we wouldn’t have the expertise to do it.
There aren’t enough sites to make tidal variable, and there are no scaled commercial wave machines. Wind and solar are the current options, and with the advances been made in battery technology (aluminium batteries particularly) intermittency is become much less of an issue. At times wind contributes almost 50% of Irelands energy demand, and solar has contributed more than 40% of Germany’s energy demand. Plus solar and wind are now comparable to gas in cost per kw/hr without subsidy
Thanks for the info, Jack. I wasn’t aware that battery technology was advanced enough to be useful for grid supply; I was still under the impression that pumped storage was the only viable way.
Hasn’t Elon Musk changed everything with the tesla storage system?
Can the pylons by made less horrible? Maybe less wires?
There probably could be nicer designs but it would probably cost a fortune to get some famous architect or whatever to come up with a design that wouldn’t be horrible to look at.
As for the wire, no they’re all needed so the number couldn’t be reduced.
Already being tested in the UK apparently
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32225276
Ye they look a big better
Riight… Because that’s an accurate representation of Irish wind energy policy.
Let’s all listen to people like Tom McGuirk, who says that ‘Deformed cattle are being because of pylons!!’ Ignoring the thousands of existing pylons, of course, and Ireland’s thriving agricultural industry.
Dylithium crystals.
That’s what we need
*looks skyward*
The answer to future energy demand ain’t the wind, wheres the supply
going to come from when theres no wind, has a cost benfit analysis
being done of 400kV power lines that will be used intermittely, what will
the back up to tte West of Ireland wind park in Mayo cost, the initial proposal
is 600Mega Watts yet the proposed 400kV line has a projected capacity of
almost 1800 MW in dry conditions and around 1600 in wet, has a costing
being carried out, if not, its about time, or it end up like the bank debt.
In reality back up would need the construction of at least of a new 1000MW
thermal power station…..has any of the current proposals being thought out
at all, or was it Eamon Ryans brainchild.
Improved battery technology, makes all that wind highly viable
Really, a battery that can store up to 1600 MW and deliver a load
for a couple days……into miracles….loafes and fishes …eh.
The best that can be got is 10’s of MW and load capaciry of several minutes
Even a flywheel with 500 MW has only a standby of milliseconds
Pumped water storage is limited to load peaking, how many days
can Thurlough Hill (288MW) sustain a load for….its only hours.
I don’t think many people in the wind industry would say that wind is the “silver bullet” to our furture energy problems but it most certainly is part of it. And I would imagine that Eirgrid have an abundance of reports regarding the upgrade of the transmission system.
Yes, the ESB and Eirgrid have an extensive library of documentation
However they seem to have not read it, if they had they would have
develeloped a radically different power programme, indeed its time that
all the documentation held in their library stock was made available to
the public rather to than to the exclusie few in house.