Tag Archives: Paschal Donohoe

90410964

Paschal Donohoe

Fine Gael TD and acting Transport, Tourism and Sport Minister Paschal Donohoe spoke to Richard Crowley on RTÉ One’s News At One earlier about the prolonged Government formation talks brouhaha.

A quick tay.

Richard Crowley: “Are you then, as this stage, prepared to flesh it out in more detail, give us more detail of what exactly is on offer. For instance, and this hasn’t been answered satisfactorily, are you talking about a rotating Taoiseach?

Paschal Donohoe: “The reason it hasn’t been answered is this is something that hasn’t been discussed by either party.”

Crowley: “But are you proposing it? That was my question.”

Donohoe: “No, it is not something that the party is proposing but what we want to do is discuss what a partnership arrangement, a three-way partnership arrangement, would look like with Fianna Fáil and the Independents…”

Crowley: “Are you open, are you open to the idea of a rotating Taoiseach?

Donohoe: “What we are open to is having discussions with Fianna Fáil in relation to how stable…”

Crowley: “Ok you want to keep that a secret, you want to keep that a secret for now and what…”

Donohoe: “No, excuse me, let me come in there. This isn’t about keeping matters secret or not.”

Crowley: “Well, I’ve asked you the question are you open to discussing…you didn’t answer it.”

Talk over each other

Donohoe: “Richard, again, Richard again – if you’ll allow me to finish the point – what we are looking to do is put together a stable Government for the benefit of our country and want to have discussions in that spirit with all parties…”

Crowley: “But you won’t, you won’t tell me whether or not that involves Fine Gael being open to the idea of a rotating Taoiseach?”

Donohoe: “Because at this point what we are putting on the table is the principle of  a partnership government and the fact that that principle has now been rejected is why it’s so important that we make clear to Fianna Fáil but, beyond that, to the country, what this is all about…to the right thing for the country.”

Crowley: “I know, I know, everybody knows that, with respect minister, you’re just insulting the intelligence of the listeners by telling them how important this is. They know that and that’s why they’re waiting for the detail of this deal. But you’re not in a position to give it, for instance where or what would be the role of the Independents in this partnership plan you’re proposing?”

Donohoe: “Well, with respect to you, Richard, I think it’s up to your listeners themselves to make an evaluation on the answers that I’m attempting to put to them and there’s few people who’ve greater respect for your listeners, and for the electorate, than somebody who’s trying to get elected on their behalf…”

Crowley:Then tell them what’s on offer.”

Donohoe: “Richard, again, for the third time, I’d like to answer your question you’re putting to me. What we’re saying here is in relation to the further point that you brought to me there is in terms of what the arrangement would like with the Independents. We had a discussion with the Independents, all of the Independents earlier on in the week, which, they were all present, in which we made clear to them that we wanted to put this broad arrangement on the table to Fianna Fáil. And based on the response that we had back from them, we then offered further opportunity to see what would be the policy platform upon which we could jointly govern…”

Crowley: “By the way, by the way, minister. The Independents also say that they didn’t know that what was on the agenda yesterday for that meeting between Micheal Martin and Enda Kenny was the notion of this grand partnership that would include a role for them. They weren’t aware that that was on the agenda either. Why not?”

Donohoe: “Actually Richard, it’s my understanding that Deputy Michael Healy Rae earlier on today, on one of your other shows, said that they were aware that we were going to be putting such proposals to Fianna Fáil.”

Crowley: “So you told formally that this was going to be discussed. And as for their role in this, are you, have you laid out specific roles in terms of number of seats at Cabinet [inaudible].”

Donohoe: “Ah no Richard, sure, of course we can’t get to that point yet. What we have to do and what we’re looking to do is respect the decisions that the Independents themselves may make and I respect that, I respect the situation they find themselves in. And sure nobody can get to a point of discussing something like that until we’re finally clear on who wants to play a role in Government. And that is the decision, now, that each of us, all of us, need to make now in the coming week.”

Crowley: “So the offer, just to clarify, very quickly, as I know you’re in a rush to go…”

Donohoe: “Ah no Richard, I’m delighted to be on with you, I’m happy to spend as much time with you as you’d like to have me on for.”

Listen back in full here

Rollingnews

CUz-OwmWoAAGXDn

This morning.

Fine Gael Transport Minister Paschal Donohoe (left) and unidentified friends in Stephen’s Green, Dublin.

Gavan Reilly tweetz:

“Caption competition.”

If you insist…

Update:

90401288 90401330

 

Contortionist and aerialist Maria Combarros with Paschal Donohoe and Failte Ireland marketing director Noel John Mcloughlin  launching Failte Ireland and Dublin City Council’s programme of events for NYF [New Year Festival] Dublin.

(Sam Boal/Rollingnews,.ie)

 

90381991Transport Minister Paschal Donohue

How sound is the Aer Lingus IAG deal regarding jobs and slots?

Some lack of clarity via a plane crash encounter between Paschal Donohue and Gavin Jennings of RTÉ Radio One’s Morning Ireland earlier.

Please place all loose items in the container provided.

Gavin Jennings: “Once Aer Lingus is sold, how can we be certain that all of the promises on Heathrow slots will be kept?”

Paschal Donohue: “Well, they fall into two different areas in relation to connectivity and we have secured a set of guarantees that the State does not have at the moment, we’ll now move to the situation where we ill be the only people, the only stakeholder that will have a role in the disposal of slots and we will also oversee a seven year guarantee in relation to slot usage that does not exist at the moment. These guarantees will be enshrined into the Articles of Association of the company, therefore giving them legal robustness in relation to job growth, 635 new jobs by 2020, 150 new jobs next year, we have looked at the plans that are there for 4 new transatlantic services and to grow different airports, we’re confident that we can deliver those…”

Jennings: “Do those guarantees hold if IAG is sold or taken over?”

Donohue: “Well, we’re dealing with the future here of Aer Lingus and the guarantees that I have secured will be written into the articles of association of the company.”

Jennings: “If IAG is taken over and if more shares are being bought by other different companies, if it’s sold or taken over in the next 7 years do your guarantees hold?

Donohue: “Yes they do.

Jennings: “How?”

Donohue: “Because they’re written into the Articles of Association of Aer Lingus.”

Jennings: “So you have a veto, yes?”

Donohue: “To be very clear we have a guarantee in relation to the indefinite sale of the existing slots.”

Jennings: “But not the use, the use of them is only in place for 7 years.”

Donohue: “And that is a guarantee which we do not have at all at the moment, so it’s a 7 year guarantee in relation to the use of slots which is not in place now, it will begin when the transaction is complete and the use of slots is defined by the summer and winter schedules, so specifically, Gavin, we’re looking at the current frequency of use that will be maintained across the seven year period.”

Jennings:This veto or guarantee, are you sure that EU laws allow you to exercise that?

Donohue: “We have had contact already over a period time with the European Commission in relation to the legal mechanisms.”

Jennings: “Do they say it’s legit?”

Donohue: “We have indications that they will not oppose those guarantees.”

Jennings: “Have they said it’s legitimate?”

Donohue: “Well, Gavin, we would not be going ahead or asking for the support of Cabinet for this if I wasn’t sure that these guarantees were robust, and furthermore the fact that all of the airports that are involved in the operation of these slots, all of them, have now come out and welcomed this deal is an indication of the confidence that the airports themselves have in the operation of a guarantee which does not exist at the moment.”

Jennings: “The letter that was sent to you yesterday by Stephen Kavanagh, the CEO of Aer Lingus where he says we do not foresee a likelihood of either a compulsory redundancy or a indirect employment, we spoke to Patricia King from SIPTU earlier on, will it be written into this register of employment agreements that are also mentioned in the letter, will it be written into this that there will be no outsourcing no indirect employment and no compulsory redundancies?”

Donohue: “That is a matter for contact between the unions and the representatives of Aer Lingus but I would draw everyone’s attention to one line that is included in the letter that we received, where Mr Kavanagh said they would look at the scope of REAs and they would also look at extending the registered employment agreements to govern more employees.”

Jennings: “Will those Registered Employment Agreements rule out outsourcing and compulsory redundancies?”

Donohue: “Gavin, you’re asking me a question that Aer Lingus themselves will be able to answer, we have secured the…”

Jennings: “These are two questions that the union wanted assurances on, I’m just asking you, can you give me those assurances.”

Donohue: “And I’m directly answering your question, we have a commitment here to expanding the scope of REAs and expanding the number of employees that will be covered and we’re also dealing with a company that has managed to respond to huge challenges in recent years with the consent of employees…”

Jennings: “Minister, I’m sorry to harp on the point, but will extending the scope mean that it would include outruling, outsourcing and compulsory redundancies?”

Donohue: “And you’re asking me to make a prediction in relation to discussions that will happen.”

Jennings: “You don’t know, then.”

Donohue: “And what I’m doing, I’m emphasising that we have received a commitment from Stephen Kavanagh and from Aer Lingus that they do not foresee the use of compulsory redundancies or indirect employment..”

Jennings: “I’m not a worker at Aer Lingus and neither are you. ‘Do not foresee’ would not fill me with much assurance, would it?”

Donohue: “And indeed, and what I would point out in relation to those who are concerned by it are the commitments we have received in relation to the maintenance of jobs we also have a commitment in relation to the creation of new jobs we have commitments here in relation to the creation of 613 new jobs…”

Jennings: “A target, yes.”

Donohue: “We’re doing all this more broadly because the government believes this the best prospect for the long term growth of Aer Lingus.”

Jennings: “Do you expect there will be job losses in the short term?”

Donohue: “Well, Willie Walsh in the initial stage of this bid said that next year he believed there could be approximately 50 people affected…”

Listen back here

(Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland)

 

90368574 90368583 90368586 90368590

Last night.

Deferred Irish Airlines Superannuation Scheme [IASS] pensioners protest  at the Minister for Transport Pascal Donohoe’s home in Dublin.

The pensioners are part of the scheme affected by the row over a ‘pensions clawback’ at Aer Lingus (ahead of a possible takeover by British Airways IAG) and the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA).

Paschal Donohoe says protests outside his home ‘unacceptable’ (Irish Times)

IASS – Why We Are Protesting

(Sasko Lazarov/Photocall Ireland)

Update:

B8WVLNiCAAAvGdi

A IASS circular to Mr Donohoe’s neighbours.

Via Mark Malone