‘Nothing Has Changed’

at

Screen Shot 2016-05-18 at 11.35.48

Last night in the Dáil, during the Adjournment Debate, Independents 4 Change TDs Clare Daly and Mick Wallace addressed Tánaiste and Justice Minister Frances Fitzgerald.

They were speaking about Garda Commissioner Nóirín O’Sullivan’s representation at the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation in respect of Sgt Maurice McCabe.

Ms Daly and Mr Wallace spoke in the Dáil before transcripts of Ms O’Sullivan’s legal counsel Colm Smyth SC speaking before Judge O’Higgins were revealed on RTÉ’s Prime Time last night.

The transcripts revealed that Mr Smyth initially told Mr O’Higgins: “My instructions are to challenge the integrity of Sgt McCabe and his motivation.”

The two men then had the following exchange:

O’Higgins: “…An attack on somebody’s credibility and his motivation or integrity is something that really doesn’t form part of this inquiry. It would be necessary for you to go further and say that the complaints and the actions of Sgt McCabe were motivated by… that is motivation was dishonest or wrong…In other words that he made these allegations not in good faith but because he was motivated by malice, by some such motive and that impinges on his integrity. If those are your instructions from the Commissioner, so be it.”

Smyth:So be it. That is the position judge.”

O’Higgins: “Those are your…”

Smyth: “Yes. As the evidence will demonstrate judge…[later] this isn’t something I’m pulling out of the sky, judge, I mean I can only act on instructions.”

Later, in November – after Sgt McCabe produced a transcript of his meeting in Mullingar with two gardaí – Mr Smyth told Justice O’Higgins that, in fact, he, on behalf of Ms O’Sullivan, was not challenging Sgt McCabe’s integrity but just his credibility and motivation.

Mr Smyth said he erred earlier when he said ‘integrity’.

Further to this…

Clare Daly: “I listened to the Tánaiste during Leaders’ Questions with a mixture of disbelief and awe. Does she really believe that the questions about the conduct of the Garda Commissioner are going to go away? Does she really believe that, by saying that the Commissioner made it clear that she supported Maurice McCabe, it is the end of the matter?”

“What the Commissioner’s statement actually said was that she had never regarded Maurice McCabe as malicious. Fair play to her, that is very nice, but it is not the issue at hand. The issue in front of the public is that the Garda Commissioner’s legal team, allegedly on her instruction, attempted to mislead the commission deliberately by entering false information in order to challenge the motivation and credibility of Maurice McCabe.”

The fact that legal counsel has stated that the attempt to challenge his integrity was its idea and not the Commissioner’s does not make any difference. It is reminiscent of the former Minister, Alan Shatter, throwing Oliver Connolly under the bus.”

“The commission was told that two senior gardaí would give direct evidence to the effect that Maurice McCabe was present at a meeting and stated that he operated under malice. It was only when irrefutable evidence was presented showing it to be false that the allegation was withdrawn.”

“If the Tánaiste does not have a problem with this, we are in even bigger trouble than I believed. There is an immediate crisis of trust and confidence in the Commissioner. Public statements uttered by her in support of whistleblowers have been contradicted by her actions behind the scenes.”

“The Tánaiste should not be surprised about that because we are not. Eighteen times since the Tánaiste became Minister, Deputy Wallace and I have tabled the issue of Commissioner O’Sullivan’s treatment of the whistleblowers Mr. Keith Harrison and Mr. Nick Kehoe.”

The Tánaiste has done nothing. Will she launch a full investigation into the Commissioner’s actions in accordance with the Garda Síochána (Policing Authority and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, under which she can investigate and remove the Commissioner for actions that discredit her office?”

“Will she commission the Garda Síochána Ombudsman Office, GSOC, to launch an investigation? If not, why not?

I am reminded of a memorable contribution by Deputy Wallace in the Dáil when he told the former Minister that it was time for the latter to go and to take the then Commissioner with him. It is obvious that it is time for the current Commissioner to go. Unless the Tánaiste acts, the Commissioner will take her with her.”

Mick Wallace: “If Maurice McCabe had not made a recording, the judge would have been compelled to believe the two officers and Maurice McCabe would have been destroyed. This development was not even mentioned in the O’Higgins report. Surely, that undermines the report’s integrity.”

“We still do not know whether Ms Nóirín O’Sullivan’s legal team, under her direction, handed documents to the commission that contained a false statement. That is supposedly a criminal offence. This is a serious matter.”

I find it difficult to believe that, when there is so much discussion about doing things differently in all aspects of politics, Fianna Fáil does not want to know about this situation. It just wants the issue to go away as well. This is shocking.”

“What the Commissioner says in public is different to what is happening on the ground. Keith Harrison and Nick Kehoe have been treated abysmally for two years. Both are out sick now. One gets less than €300 per week and the other gets nothing. Every effort has been made to hound them out of their jobs.”

It is two years since Mr. Harrison tried to get a proper hearing and he has only had one proper meeting with GSOC. GSOC requested Mr. Kehoe’s file after a poor internal Garda investigation. The Garda was given 30 days to deliver it but still has not done so.

“Ms Nóirín O’Sullivan asserts that dissent is not disloyalty, but that is not true. Now it is being claimed that the question of integrity was not raised and the senior counsel is being thrown under the bus or is taking one for the team.”

“The Commissioner is not even rowing back on how she questioned Maurice McCabe’s motivation. She has not rowed back on the fact that she was questioning his character. Who in God’s name would be a whistleblower? She is not fit to be the Commissioner.”

“Nothing has changed. It is as it was. We will not improve or change how we do policing in Ireland until we change the hierarchy and start from scratch.”

Transcript via Oireachtas.ie

Sponsored Link

20 thoughts on “‘Nothing Has Changed’

  1. Jake38

    All this brouhaha about who attacked whose motives does is obscure the fact that no-one has been held accountable for the incompetence that led to a woman being murdered.

  2. phil

    How about from this point on we investigate reported wrongdoing first, before we investigate the reporter.

    If the wrongdoing is found to be false, then investigate the reporters motives …

  3. Shayna

    Looks like there’ll be a couple of job vacancies pretty soon. Doing nothing is clearly not the answer. “Fianna Fáil does not want to know about this situation. It just wants the issue to go away as well.”
    If it weren’t for independent TDs like Mick Wallace pushing for a proper report and proper answers, then the issue would go away.

  4. Lordblessusandsaveus

    How soon will have some Fine Gael shill along to to mention Wallaces’s VAT bill (which he is paying off) while ignoring Regina O’Doherty’s company loan issues.

  5. Lordblessusandsaveus

    The Garda Siochana’s true role is protecting the establishment and spying on anyone in politics who has a leftist view of how a republic should be run. It was corrupted long long ago.

    It is a severely damaged police force which isn’t really a police force at all. It’s a secret police most of the time with a few public order vans and traffic cars pretending to look like a normal police force.

    Disband, gut, turn inside and out.

  6. Truth in the News

    The O’Higgins report cited in the first paragraphs the issue of miissing files
    connected with Balieborough, they were not were not provided at once to
    the Tribunal and were eventually discovered in Balieborough, this occurance
    delayed and frustrated the work of the Tribunal
    Will Kenny be sending the Secretary of the Dept of Justice out to the Coomissioners house late in the evening similar to the Callinan episode in the
    next few days

  7. ahjayzis

    Wasn’t this foreseeable?

    We got rid of one commissioner and replaced him with his closest henchwoman. And we expected culture to change? I think if you want to change culture you need fresh blood – there are dozens of police forces in Britain for instance, recruit one of their deputy commissioners (Maybe not from South Yorkshire…). Separate out the sensitive bits of national security if you need to.

  8. Anne

    Noirin O’Sullivan needs to go..

    The two officers who fabricated evidence need to be interviewed and criminal charges brought against them.

    Saying they cannot comment on this criminality is appalling.

    They cannot have carte blanche to operate in this corrupt fashion.

    1. Clampers Outside!

      “Saying they cannot comment on this criminality is appalling.”

      It (the 2 officers) is being investigated isn’t it? So, comment is restricted because of that… yeah?

      1. Lordblessusandsaveus

        Clampers being protective of the police again. Stop being so afraid Clamps.

      2. ahjayzis

        There’s been no suggestion that anyone is being investigated.

        The justice minister has been clear – any Garda action against any errant Gardaí is a matter for the Garda Commissioner. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be.

  9. Eoin

    She needs to go and the mechanisms that put her in place need to be seriously reviewed and dismantled. And that goes for a lot of the institutions running the show here. Incompetence or/and corruption are almost like prerequisites for high office. They say you can judge a society on how it treats it’s most vulnerable. The same goes for whistleblowers.

  10. SB

    So when Mr Smyth mentioned integrity, he was either lying or incompetent – those are the only two options aren’t they? Should he be made swear which it was?

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link