Milo Yiannopoulos

Provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos has resigned as an editor at Breitbart News

The star of the trendy far right
Gave his fan base a bit of a fright
When his speech on the joys
Of molesting young boys
Went viral at the speed of light.

John Moynes

Pic: CNN

190 thoughts on “A Limerick A Day

  1. And Social Justice For All

    There’s a great piece in rolling stone on this.
    Really puts the Clampers of the world who have been pasting this guy’s links here into stark light

        1. And Social Justice For All

          “You know what?” he shouted. “I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”

          1. Nigel

            Guilt by association? That’s not what this is. Credibility, good judgement, self-awareness, and any regard or respect for regard for people hurt by him? Completely down the tubes, such as they were. As I said below, there was never any reason to not know what this guy is like, unless you chose to ignore it. Funnily enough, I had been about to comment that I didn’t think you had ever linked to MY, you weren’t THAT bad. I was wrong.

          2. And Social Justice For All

            Lol at troll who whines about labelling and name calling then refers to other respondents as loons

          3. Clampers Outside

            “there was never any reason to not know what this guy is like”

            What is he capable of Nigel, you have your mind made up, and speak with an informed authoritative manner on who exactly this guy is, and what he’s “like”. What is he like Nigel?

          4. Clampers Outside

            ” Funnily enough, I had been about to comment that I didn’t think you had ever linked to MY, you weren’t THAT bad. I was wrong. ”

            This will be a true classic. It’s got mockery, self assured thoroughness, judgemental ego, a certain… oh… not suave, but a confident strut to it, and of course… the faux crumbling drama of the Smugglypuff like admission at the end.

            Genius. True work of genus Nigel.

        2. Clampers Outside!

          Ah yes… more accusations….. “alt-right über-victim troll?”

          Alt-right – explain how you came to this, thanks.

          ‘Victim’ – I have numerously rallied against ‘victimhood’ culture as propagated by feminism, thanks. I have voiced my problems when faced with the feminist Duluth Model of DV intervention. I have never asked for sympathy, only ever stated my case as a reference point.
          But I would like to here your explanation of your assertion. It should at least show where you’re coming from, thanks.

          ‘Troll’ – explain

          1. Starina

            you don’t have to declare yourself alt-right to be alt-right. ideologies and actions speak loudly enough.

            I wouldn’t really say you’re a troll as your convictions are obviously sincerely held and you don’t seem to argue for fun.

            to my mind, you often utilise your own victimhood to put down the concerns of others, eg feminist issues. please see the bingo chart from earlier today.

          2. And Social Justice For All

            Can’t you read?

            A favored tactic is to direct his audiences toward some overemotional sap who has made the mistake of calling for him to be banned, at which point he triumphantly declares himself a champion of liberty, and his enemies censors and authoritarians.

            One of his main affectations is a flaunting of duplicity as a revolutionary virtue. For instance, it was predictable that this longtime critic of “victimhood culture” would cling to his own victimhood in a crisis.

            “I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim,” he wrote, cloaking himself in multiple layers of the very identity politics he claims to despise.

            Sound familiar folks? Anyone?

          3. jusayinlike

            Alt-right, a term coined by Hillary Clinton and regurgitated daily by snot nosed teary eyed bomb loving lefties worldwide..

          4. Clampers Outside!

            “ideologies and actions”

            My “ideology” makes me alt-right?
            I don’t have an ideology, I tend to be fighting against one though.

            My “actions” make me alt-right?
            What actions Starina? thanks.

            All i see in your comment is you making an effort to ‘label’ someone because you want them silenced, and you know that your intolerant cohorts, and intolerant self, will not accept opinions of someone you have labeled as such….. and on and on it goes with the collective regressive mind set.

            – – – – –

            I particularly liked the inclusion of a link to a thread where I included a link to Milo explaining alt-right. A good link that, he explained it better than anyone could at the time.

            But…. you and Nigel practically jumping up and down and using CAPS to exclaim… ‘Look at Clampers, he’s a pedo supporting alt right something something…..’ which encourages the other regressives in your cohort of deludeds to exclaim this… ” alt-right über-victim troll ”

            You engage in labeling to silence others. Whatever you do, I just hope that from today you will remember that you engage in those tactics, not others, you do it.

            You look like a bunch of labeling loons in fairness.
            Keep it up!

          5. Starina

            all i did was link to a post where milo was discussed in-depth. i didn’t say anything about you with the link.

          6. Nigel

            The term ‘alternative right’ coined by Richard Spencer. Currently serving in the Whit House. Alternative facts courtesy of jusayinlike’s snot-nosed regurgitation .

          7. Nigel

            ‘I just hope that from today you will remember that you engage in those tactics, not others, you do it.’

            I’ll certainly remember that this is how you respond to criticism, and to criticism of the people you link to.

          8. Clampers Outside!

            Yes Star… that’s why you posted the link in the thread of the guy having a go at myself… sure you did it nonchalantly.
            I’m sure everyone would believe that, everyone…………. in the collective.

          9. Clampers Outside!

            ” I’ll certainly remember that this is how you respond to criticism, and to criticism of the people you link to.”

            Where was the criticism Nigel… there was only name calling, assertions of guilt by association, and labeling…. among other petty minded stuff.

            Plse. point to the criticism and I will gladly respond, thanks.

          10. Nigel

            I criticised you for linking to MY. I called you no names. I made no guilt-by-association claims, but I assert it undermines any credibility you might have when you use a source like MY. I’ll leave it at that unless you have some substantive response. Everyone’s sick and tired of these exchanges.

          11. Clampers Outside!

            ” I criticised you for linking to MY ”

            No you didn’t, you said – “Huh. Clamps DID link to MY. I’d forgotten that.”

            Your next comment is a rambling accusation without criticism of me linking to MY.

            Please if you have a crtiicism, please make it. But don’t say “I criticised you” when you did nothing of the sort…. yu wrote this…

            ” Guilt by association? That’s not what this is. Credibility, good judgement, self-awareness, and any regard or respect for regard for people hurt by him? Completely down the tubes, such as they were. As I said below, there was never any reason to not know what this guy is like, unless you chose to ignore it. Funnily enough, I had been about to comment that I didn’t think you had ever linked to MY, you weren’t THAT bad. I was wrong. ”

            This is not a criticism, it’s a list of assertions and ridiculous ‘I told you so’ like statements. Is this what passes for criticism…. seriously?

            Please show me the “crtiicism” you said you made in this thread, thank you.

          12. LW

            It’s like arguing with a siren. Not one trying to entice you to wreck your ship on their island, one that goes off every night at 3am

  2. Starina

    Interesting (and under two minutes) vid on the horror of everything Milo’s already said before condoning pederasty which conservatives thought was perfectly ok:

    https://twitter.com/ajplus/status/834252634211053568

    CPAC don’t care about women, POC, or the LGBTQ community, only about male children – the only category of human whose humanity they don’t call into question.

    Not sure I have the energy to deal with the responses I’m going to get to this today, but anyway. Go forth into the world, little comment.

  3. ivan

    I’m sure Julian Assange/wikileaks/Ben Swann/Bodger will be along shortly with oh-so-compelling evidence that we’re being lied to and it’s all a conspiracy and something something something about pizza

  4. De Kloot

    Oh it’s an old road traveled this. Not tacking account of the $h!t you say may actually have consequences….

    1. Nigel

      None of this was secret or hidden. The guy hitched himself to Gamergate which was wall-to-wall death threats, rape threats, bomb threats, doxxing and accusing people of being paedophiles, and parlayed that into becoming an alt-right spokesperson who downplayed their white nationalism but celebrated their misogyny, transpobia and quite stunning hatred of illegal immigrants. The mainstream right toelrating or turning a blind eye to this becuz librals is the main reasion Trump and Bannon (who hired MY to write for his news website) are in the White House. After a riot in a Berkely college dreailed an MY speaking engagement, Trump threatened to defund the college and CPAC invited him to speak as a free speech martyr and then… All of this was known, well known. He’s been getting away with it for years – must have been a bit of a shock when Republicans suddenly noticed that there was one aspect of his schtick too loathesome even for them.

  5. De Kloot

    Oh, it’s also an astonishing indictment of the world today that an absolute cuckwomble like this cuckwomble find the oxygen to claim global notoriety.

  6. bisted

    …some sage old senator should have instructed this young man on the political perils of promoting pedastry…

    1. ivan

      That was the first thing I thought of – that he’s Norrised himself.

      there’s an Urban Dictionary definition in this…

    2. And Social Justice For All

      There always some sage-flavoured ( I can’t believe it not sage) old ex Labour fart/bore ready to back- bite one of the truly brave and great parliamentary figures of our time.

          1. jusayinlike

            I don’t have to convince anyone, the guy is a gaffe riddled fool, and your sponsorship of him tells me all I need to know about you..

  7. Junkface

    He doesn’t stand for anything but himself. All he craves is attention, and he will say anything to get it. I saw Bill Maher interviewing him last week, as I’ve never watched this guy before, but my God, he’s just a waffling controversial idiot, he has nothing really to discuss or debate. Pretty soon he just starts attacking individuals to the point where Bill asks him to stop. Thats all that Milo does, slags off people and says horrible controversial things. Hopefully he fade away like Sarah Palin did, although he’s not nearly as impossible dim and wacky as her. If the TV shows/media made an effort to ignore him, he wouldn’t be around too much longer.

    1. Anomanomanom

      I agree with your saying, but if you’ve actually read or watched anything about Palin you’d know she’s not how the media portrayed her. Out of her depth yes, idiot most certainly not.

      1. Junkface

        You must be joking. Did you see the press conference she did to endorse Trump a while back? She came across as completely thick, rambling and a quite senile. She would be out of her depth debating a 3 year old.

        1. Anomanomanom

          I actually didnt see that, so wont comment. But just an example of the media portrayal, the comment about seeing Russia from the USA was jumped all over for it. Yet she is right. You can directly look across and see Russia.

  8. Daisy Chainsaw

    “Do you know what it’s like to be in a room full of people who are laughing at you as if you’re some sort of perverted freak?”

    I bet you do now, Milo!

  9. Sheik Yahbouti

    The internet is the most wonderful resource. The upside is the sharing of important knowledge, free of charge, as envisaged by Tim Berners Lee and his colleagues, but oh, the downside! It provides a platform for every hoor such as this Breitbart trash – and every pedlar of nonsense and trash – such as Kardashians, our own ‘model/social influencer ‘ bloggers, the anti vaxers, the list is endless – and I haven’t even mentioned the appalling criminality. Truly, there is no invention so beneficial that it cannot be subverted by sh!tehawks.

  10. Clampers Outside!

    I see SALON removed its’ pro-peado Nickerson articles and videos so that it can be free to attack Milo……

    * slow clap *

    ( The following is a disclaimer for the idiots who don’t understand – this comment is not supporting Milo’s comments, it is pointing at the hypocrisy of a regressive “news” site, SALON )

        1. And Social Justice For All

          It’s cute how Father Clampers has his own choirboys in this echo chamber. But what enquiring minds want to know is- does Father Clampers teach how to give good head as well?

          1. Clampers Outside!

            Apparently, I’m an alt-right misogynistic homophobic anti-LGBTQIA Islamophobic hyper-capitalist anti-the entire left xenophobic racialist… wanna be in the gang? We crochet swastikas on Fridays.

          2. jusayinlike

            Clampers, you are every nasty pejorative possible under the sun to try and abnormalise you from society and detract from your logical point of view..

        1. And Social Justice For All

          You’ve met and been trolled by Labelling Loon!!! Now here comes Following Billy …

          1. And Social Justice For All

            You’re enabling Labelling Loon. Just look at the thread. He’s desperate for anyone to defend his rampant misandry.

    1. Nigel

      Oh God why do I even. Just as an exercise I made a quick google search and:

      ‘Salon.com removes PRO-PEDOPHILIA articles written by Todd Nickerson from its Website’

      is a headline now appearing on websites all over the alt-right, the same sorts of places that really, really loved MY. Hey, I wonder if their characterisation of those articles is accurate? Can the sorts of people who link to MY be trusted? Tough, tough question.

      Christ, the comments.

        1. jusayinlike

          Alt-right, a term coined by Hillary Clinton and adopted by confused bomb-loving muppets worldwide..

      1. Clampers Outside!

        Sorry…. what is the point of what appear to be near hysterics in this comment Nigel, I’m intrigued. Do elaborate on these two questions, please… “I wonder if their characterisation of those articles is accurate? Can the sorts of people who link to MY be trusted?”

        1. Deluded

          “And over on sister regressive left site Salon, they like to promote paedophilia”
          https://www.broadsheet.ie/2017/01/11/a-limerick-a-day-1023/#comment-1730026

          (google)

          The subject of the Salon article, Todd Nickerson wants treatment (ref thejournal.ie link above).
          Salon are anti-paedophilia, unlike Milo.
          They have many articles where they interview doctors and psychologists and explain the harm espoused by Milo.

          Milo and Salon are not “the same”.
          Why are you so desperate to grasp at these false equivalences?

          1. And Social Justice For All

            Top Trending Answer: he hates himself and in particular he hates other men. Hence necessary to paint men as victims in every scenario. That way a line can be drawn under personal responsibility and real fault ascribed to a bogeyman/devil I.e. Women

          2. Clampers Outside!

            Stop making sh** up that I didn’t say Deluded. And trying to make out that that is what I said is laughable.

            I did not say Milo and Salon were the same ya knob.

            This is an accusation wrapped in a question intended to make up some bullpoo stance I did not take.

            – – –
            Regarding the quote you have there, that has nothing to do with this particular situation. That SALON promoted paedophilia is my opinion. You are welcome to have your own opinion that agrees with SALON editors handling of the Nickerson pieces. It is my opinion that the piece was normalising, in how the subject was handled.
            I still maintain that opinion of what SALON editors did. And I’m glad the pieces are removed. You can side with the editors of SALON if you wish, I don’t. Nickerson’s story did not to be handled and published as it was, no need at all.

            Remember too that SALON is a far-left propaganda site that has on many occasion displayed its double standards in its pieces just like any tabloid. And it is a tabloid and proud of it, ask its owner (google it) …it’s The Sun for the far left liberals and is capable of the double standard (or double speak) of any far left liberal, or any far left liberal publication.

            But for you to say over and over that I have equated the two is your supposition, nothing more. A pathetic attempt at smearing by the looks of it Deluded. What other reason would you have for insisting…..

            Who the fupp knows…

            – – – – – –
            I see Taanentless The Ineffective / Social Justice For All likes to join in too…

            ” Top Trending Answer: he hates himself and in particular he hates other men. Hence necessary to paint men as victims in every scenario. That way a line can be drawn under personal responsibility and real fault ascribed to a bogeyman/devil I.e. Women ”

            So, I hate men now Ted, and that’s my reason for hating women Ted….
            Well, the simple answer is…. LOL you are an trolling idiot Taanentless. A snipey sad little individual. Why do you think it necessary Taanentless The Ineffective to paint men as victims in every scenario? Clearly you are projecting. I hope you take time to meditate on your condition and maybe get that seen to pet.

        2. Deluded

          The outrage, from what I can gather, was over a Salon writer saying that they would live next door to a paedophile
          who is
          receiving treatment.

          The writer even said they would break bread with them and support them in their struggle.
          This is the opposite of promoting paedophilia.

          Milo promotes paedophilia.
          Salon promotes treatment.
          Why would you equate the two?

          1. Nigel

            ‘Weaposinisng’ paedophilia as a smear against opponents and targets is one of the more disgusting and vile things to come out of the 4Chan/Gamergate alt right culture, and one which is incredibly damaging to any efforts to deal with the issue seriously – to say nothing of steamrolling over actual abuse victims. Characterising that Salon article as ‘pro-paesdophilia’ is merely one example, the Pizzagate thing is another. More than that, though, MY is by his own account an abuse victim. The attitudes he expresses in that video, under the ugly outrageousness, could be the results of someone struggling with the effects of that abuse. The alt-right will defend him or attack him or use him to attack others with little regard for this possibility. It’s hard to feel sorry for a guy who has built his career on harassment and abuse of others, but there you go.

            MY’s supporters enjoyed his transgressiveness, a gay man fronting a wildly homophobic culture. Both indiscriminately smearing people as paedophiles AND applauding the idea of reducing the age of consent break different kinds of social taboos. That’s the kind of nasty chaos at the heart of this.

          2. Clampers Outside!

            Fupp off. I didn’t equate the two. Please stop…. Christ Deluded…. you are my very own ‘Fake News’ story. Someone chasing me around the comments insisting i said something I didnt.

            Responding to your comments…

            “I reckon that Salon took down the article because of the hysteria.” – you have an opinion too. Fine.

            “The ignorance you promote poses a real threat to the professionals involved.”
            What ignorance have I promoted? I believe the Nickerson articles are not the way to handle this subject. That is it.

            To say that that means I promote something is an assertion from what you wish to believe and nothing more.

            I never expected to say this of you Deluded, but you are acting like a regressive lefty in practice.
            If you were responding to what I said, and not making up stuff in your suppositions about my motives or the position I have taken, then there’d be something to converse on. But you insist on insinuation and whatnot insisting I argue from a point of view I have not held…. that’s a smear mate.

            So I’m done here, thanks.

            – – –

            To Nigel, you are such a creepy little guy really you are.

            Of course Milo is dealing with his abuse. None of you watched his press conference in which he said all that.

            Shut up Nigel. Rather than projecting, you could actually watch the press conference.

            This is amazing…. “MY’s supporters enjoyed his transgressiveness, a gay man fronting a wildly homophobic culture. Both indiscriminately smearing people as paedophiles AND applauding the idea of reducing the age of consent break different kinds of social taboos. That’s the kind of nasty chaos at the heart of this.”

            Where and when did Milo smear people as paedos? And there will need to be a minimum of two people smeared in giving examples.
            No examples, simply means you’ve made this up and you are the one on a witch hunt.

            “applauding the idea of reducing the age of consent” – again, you are watching edited footage and you haven’t watched his conference. Have you evidence of this ‘applauding’ … No, you don’t. Is there evidence counter to this, yes, watch the conference. Did you watch it, clearly not if you are writing that.

            Milo, imo, is dealing with his own abuse. And he found a way of dealing with it through a very extrovert personality.
            I don’t approve of how he goes about it, nor how he spoke in the two interviews in circulation – See Jeff Holiday on youtube for a detailed look at Milo’s Rogan interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5MvRkO4WWc – but I do not believe as you assert Nigel that he is “applauding the idea of reducing the age of consent” – you need to evidence that accusation fella… and I don’t believe there is any.

            Yeah Milo has issues. No I don’t approve what he said. Is he a paedo himself? There is no evidence of that, but I see some have made that jump already…. wtf?

            Watch the Jeff Holiday vid.

            And before the labels come out…. no, this does not mean I support Milo.

          3. Nigel

            I don’t particularly want to engage with you anymore – but you are either deliberately or accidentally misreading me, something that has become too tiresome to deal with. My comment here is in reference to the broader context of the alt right culture, and I was not suggesting that Milo himself smeared anyone as a paedophile, though in fact he was pushing the Pizzagate story on Breibart (Steve Bannon, ed, how’s that for witch hunting?) that smeared Clinton and others as part of a paedophile ring, but that it was and is a practice within that culture, as was the age of consent thing (that may or may not be only a particularly murky corner, but then it’s full of murky corners.) MY thinks older man/young boy pairings should be allowed. That”s pure NAMBLA.

            As you launch more poorly formulated attacks on me, bear in mind that this is THE RIGHT turning on MY, not the left, who already had ample reasons to spurn him, and point out how awful he is, but people like you were all too quick to tell the to shut up.

          4. Clampers Outside!

            Nigel writes this – “Both indiscriminately smearing people as paedophiles”

            Gets asked for clarification.

            Then writes this – “I was not suggesting that Milo himself smeared anyone as a paedophile”

            * LOLS abound and the blatant lies * – No, you didn’t suggest it, you stated it.
            As requested, please provide evidence of your assertion, not denials you said it when its clear that you did say it, and is evidenced clearly.

            – – – – –

            Nigel believes and asserts this as truth – “MY thinks older man/young boy pairings should be allowed.” No he doesn’t and explicitly says so in the press conference.
            Call this, whatever you are doing Nigel, what you will, I call it a smear because it is clear that is your intention as evidenced in your insistence that that is his position on the matter, even though he explicitly has stated otherwise.

            – – – – –

            You have spent months painting the guy as a monster, now you feel you have been given what you always wanted, a reason to believe that he is…..

            You’re a bit sad.

            – – – – –

            “I don’t particularly want to engage with you anymore” – good for you Nigel, you should look after yourself.

          5. Nigel

            Oh my God. This is real, isn’t it? You’re actually doing this? My comments are right there for everyone to see, and you’re saying this stuff? I’ll let my comments stand and refer you to my 11.24 comment of yesterday for elaboration. If anyone’s interested (unlikely) every time you assert I said something, they can refer back to those comments and decide for themselves if you are acting in good faith, as they can decide for themselves if what MY says in the press conference jibes with his earlier statements, and they can wonder how, in quoting me and calling for evidence, Clampers managed to blink and miss my very next sentence.

            If anyone who who isn’t Clampers thinks I’ve said something wrong or that Clampers is being accurate in what I regard as misrepresentations and and, frankly, lies, please chime in and say so, with specifics. Clampers, you just go ahead and bluster and LOL and defend MY and attack his critics with the ferocity and passion that would be better served in defence of MY’s victims if you had an ounce of the principles you lay claim to.

            I’d quite like to debate and discuss these things, but they always devolve into stupid slagging matches. I’m as guilty as anyone of letting things go down that road. Jusayinlike will chime in with a personal attack now in a second. Peace out.

          6. Clampers Outside!

            ” what MY says in the press conference jibes with his earlier statements ”

            Every commenter even those that have hung him, at least that I’ve read, have acknowledged there is a difference between a two three hour online radio show riffing ‘chat’ with a few alcoholic drinks, and an actual ‘statement’.
            What I believe you call the “jibes” between them, are explained in the press conference.

            – – – – –
            You refer to your 11.24 comment, so here it is. I had avoided it yesterday because it’s rambling. Here’s why…..

            ” None of this was secret or hidden. The guy hitched himself to Gamergate which was wall-to-wall death threats, rape threats, bomb threats, doxxing and accusing people of being paedophiles, and parlayed that into becoming an alt-right spokesperson who downplayed their white nationalism but celebrated their misogyny, transpobia and quite stunning hatred of illegal immigrants.”

            OK, so that was Gamergate – and much of what you state is not true and is hyperbolic to say the least when you make no effort to show where Milo falls into any of this, or his role in any of it, but expect the reader to assume Milo had a role in all of what you stated.
            That’s called a smear mate. – Evidence this, or stop it yeah?

            Anyway, what’s Gamergate got to do with the issue being discussed – that he is a paedo and promotes paedophilia, as you have said Nigel? Plse show the connection in the stories, thanks.

            – – – – –
            ” The mainstream right toelrating or turning a blind eye to this becuz librals is the main reasion Trump and Bannon (who hired MY to write for his news website) are in the White House. ”
            Were you drooling on the keyboard at this point… kinda hard to discern what exactly your point is. Please elaborate, thanks.

            – – – – –
            I’ll have to dissect this block of text to discern a bit better what you are on about…
            ” After a riot in a Berkely college dreailed an MY speaking engagement, Trump threatened to defund the college and CPAC invited him to speak as a free speech martyr and then… All of this was known, well known. He’s been getting away with it for years – must have been a bit of a shock when Republicans suddenly noticed that there was one aspect of his schtick too loathesome even for them. ”

            What the fupp does any of this, the following, mean Nigel?
            ” All of this was known, well known. ” – What is “this” Nigel? You trail off mid sentence with “and then….” and follow that sentence with….. “All of this was known…”
            “This”?
            What is this “this” Nigel? All of “this” that was known…. Plse explain.

            – – – – –

            Without explaining it, you assert that “All of this was known, well known. He’s been getting away with it for years ”
            Getting away with what Nigel? What is “it”?

            – – – – –
            And the calm at the end… is another assumption. But at least its’ coherent.
            “…must have been a bit of a shock when Republicans suddenly noticed that there was one aspect of his schtick too loathesome even for them. ”

            – – – – –

            Maybe you’ll clarify, maybe you won’t.
            Do I care if you do?
            No not really, if at all.

            Thanks

          7. Clampers Outside!

            This is just lovely – “and defend MY and attack his critics with the ferocity and passion that would be better served in defence of MY’s victims if you had an ounce of the principles you lay claim to.”

            ” with the ferocity and passion that would be better served in defence of MY’s victims ” – I should be defending his victims? Who are they, you seem to know, as you have asserted they exist and require defending. Please elaborate, thanks.

            ” I’d quite like to debate and discuss these things, but they always devolve into stupid slagging matches. I’m as guilty as anyone of letting things go down that road. Jusayinlike will chime in with a personal attack now in a second. Peace out. ” – says the guy who dragged it in that direction in the first place. Considering your first comment was to Starina at 11.08 was more of an opening salvo, a clearing of the throat – “He is quite the piece of work.” – before the diatribe at 11.24. Yeah, suuuure you wanted to debate, and not a lynching?

            It’s been fun Nigel.

            do you know what ‘self awareness’ is Nigel?

          8. Nigel

            I’m going to keep going with this because at this point absolutely nobody else will still be reading.

            ‘and much of what you state is not true and is hyperbolic to say the least’

            What I say is absolutely the truth about Gamergate and oh my God you’re a Gamergate apologist too?

            ‘Plse show the connection in the stories, thanks.’

            You want to know what the connection is between MY being part of Gamergate and MY’s pedophile comments? The connection? Between those two things? The common factor? What links them together? Are you taking the mickey? You have to be.

            ‘What I believe you call the “jibes” between them, are explained in the press conference’

            You can’t even accurately determine the usage of the word ‘jibes’ in a sentence right in front of your eyes, but I’m to defer to your judgement to trust MY as he desperately tries to salvage his career? Tell it to CPAC and Simon & Schuster.

            ‘kinda hard to discern what exactly your point is’

            Actually it’s not hard at all.

            ‘What is this “this” Nigel? All of “this” that was known…. Plse explain.’

            You cannot be this stupid. This has to be a put-up. ‘This’ refers to MY’s personality and behaviour. The ellipses that give you so much trouble refer to MY’s fall from grace.

            ‘Who are they,’

            Anyone attacked by Gamergate. Trans people singled out for abuse in his talks. Students he names as being illegal or undocumented. The owner and staff of the pizza place that got shot up and the people smeared as pedophiles in the pizzagate mess which he promoted. To name but a few. That’s who you’re defending. You either don’t know this, in which case why haven’t you bothered to find out, or you do know this, and you’re feigning ignorance because that’s how the alt-right likes to ‘debate’ things,

            The slagging match was in reference to these fun little go-rounds you and I engage in, not to my characterisation of MY, which I stand by. Again, this should have been obvious in context, but you’re a reliably sloppy reader. I guess at this point you say: of course you’re slagging MY that’s what this is all about! To which I say: my remark was about us slagging each other not me slagging MY. Now you say: oh, I see, fair enough. Or: LOL you’re drooling on the keyboard! Whichever.

            In the dark bleak future that will come to pass if I go against my better judgement and engage with you outside this thread, please do me the courtesy of reading what I write and responding to that, not to lazy half-accurate misrepresentations, stupid misunderstandings or outright lies. Offered more in hope than expectation..

            What you are doing now is literally defending MY. I don’t think there’s any other way to describe it. My understanding is that ‘self awareness’ is some river or other in Egypt.

          9. sǝɯǝɯʇɐpɐq

            …nobody else will still be reading..

            That’s what you think.

            (Only messing. I didn’t read past the beginning.)

  11. ReproBertie

    Just so I’m clear, the alt-right were condemning Clinton over the imaginary pizza gate paedophilia scandal while an alt-right personality was promoting paedophilia?

      1. ReproBertie

        Sure it is and there was a terrorist outrage in Sweden the other night and Trump won the biggest electoral college vote since Reagan.

          1. ReproBertie

            Oh will we? Like we’ll see your earth shattering revelation against Clinton that you promised just before the election?

        1. Clampers Outside!

          Trump never said anything about terrorism. You’re just spreading the nonsense the media put out.

          It is clear to anyone who made an effort to look into what he was on about, is the constant rioting in Sweden.
          The night in question being the riots in Rinkeby, Stockholm Sweden.

          The Swedish politicians, the entire Swedish govt, who threw their hands up and said ‘we don’t know what he’s on about’ are complete self-deluding liars.

          Here’s the BBC take on it – http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39047455

          Also worth a look at this local woman’s perspective on what’s happening to her country – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Yncgh1vGI&index=6
          Careful now though… some on here would probably class this woman as a racist just for speaking up. And you wouldn’t want to be guilty by association with her…. like I am, apparently.

          1. ReproBertie

            On Saturday Trump said “Look what’s happening last night in Sweden.Sweden. Who would believe this?”

            The Rinkeby riot, which followed a drugs arrest, was on the following Monday.

            But the Swedish politicians who didn’t know that a riot was going to happen in the next couple of days are the self-deluding liars.

          2. ReproBertie

            The report on Fox news that was exposed as full of holes, errors and exaggerations?
            http://www.independent.ie/world-news/north-america/president-trump/donald-trump-admits-sweden-attack-comments-were-based-on-debunked-fox-news-report-35465239.html

            No go zones?
            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-01-14/debunking-the-muslim-nogo-zone-myth

            Clampers how you can continually post alt-right propaganda and then question why people say you are alt-right is beyond me. You are what you do every day.

          3. ReproBertie

            That you are even citing Fox news is a sign of how much alt-right kool aid you’ve been drinking. Where’s your self respect?

          4. jusayinlike

            Alt-right, a term coined by Hillary Clinton and reused mindlessly by liberal bomb-loving goons worldwide

          5. Clampers Outside

            @ReproBertie LOL…. in providing what Dump was referencing, I should have given something he hadn’t said he was watching… eh?
            How else is one to say what he was referencing without giving the name / link of Fox…. you probably had a McFly moment.
            The later debunking has no bearing on Dumps naming Fox. It’s what he was referring to is under question.

            Regarding the Bloomberg report. I too believed that to be the case. But that report is two years old and i believe the situation is immigrant related today.
            I had read or viewed this info recently… I will look for it… jury is out on that presently is how i’d put it…
            I will with gladly if the Bloomberg report holds true today, throw my hands in the air with delight.

            – – – – –
            ” Clampers how you can continually post alt-right propaganda ” …:) Defo need evidence for this.
            “Continually” means there are lots so you should have no problem finding examples …. and no, the Fox one above doesn’t count, nor the Milo one, that’d be cheating…
            I should ask…. do you consider Fox News alt-right? Am I right in thinking you have implied that?
            Thanks

          6. Clampers Outside

            Some reasons why i remain skeptical of Bloomberg… come from the two police officers who have become whistleblowers in Sweden with regard to immigrant crime….
            One police officer facebook posted his grievance (i believe one of them has already been labeled a racist) Anyway, best vid I could find this… start at 1.14 for a reading of what the police officer had to say… as he blew his whistle like..
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7A0BKM7HLpk

          7. Clampers Outside

            I’d add another reason to be skeptical…. Sweden has a law that results in prosecution for criticizing the countries immigration policy.

            Think on that.

            On the ‘no go zones’…. I see the Bloomberg story falls short of actually discussing Sweden at all. It’s about some idiot in the UK, and stories from France and only with a passing reference to Sweden… from the Gatestone Institute guy who says there are ‘no go zones’.

            *scratches head*

            Anyway, it does not prove that Sweden doesn’t have 50+ areas or whatever they are being called.
            But the NRK, the Swedish police, say they have a “blacklist” according to this report from the most ‘traditional’ or mainstream of news sources i could find ….
            http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/713032/Sweden-chaos-no-go-zones-increased-police-lose-control

            OK… not a no go, but a blacklisted area. I concede, the 50+ areas are blacklisted areas and are not called no go zones :)

          8. ReproBertie

            Clampers for evidence of your alt-right propaganda just go to any thread about a protest over Trump or his alt-right cronies and see who’s the guy playing whatabouttery and attacking the protest. Like I said, you are what you do every day.

      2. Junkface

        Pizzagate!!??
        What are you on about? Have you been brainwashed by Alex Jones?
        Don’t you remember what happened? A pro Trump gun nut went to the Pizza place in question and found no kids being kept there, and no basement in the building, thats where they were supposed to be kept prisoner. The whole thing was a lie made up by the mentally ill

        1. Bodger

          Junkface, I would humbly suggest you do more research and stop relying on BBC/CNN/RTÉ/Irish Times to give you the complete picture.

          1. ReproBertie

            If you have a source that provides evidence then post it instead of just listing news sources that have dismissed it.

          2. ivan

            In fairness, Bodger, the standard of ‘proof’ required of you is higher than that. You’re tainting Broadsheet’s credibility with that standard of answer.

            You were quite capable of spelling out *exactly* what was amiss in your splendid McCabe timeline from a few days ago. Genuine buladh bos/gold star from Ivan to you on that score.

            However, “do more research” doesn’t cut it in this instance. Show your workings. You’ve proven you’re well capable.

          3. ReproBertie

            What a comeback jusayinlike. You’ve totally shown me up in your defence of the paedophilia promoter.

            No doubt you had plenty of experience defending the clergy so these ad-hominem posts are second nature to you.

          4. Clampers Outside!

            ” You’ve totally shown me up in your defence of the paedophilia promoter. ”

            Where did he defend anyone, never mind the “paedophilia promoter” as you put it?

            * crickets and tumbleweed *

          5. ReproBertie

            Well Clampers, in telling me to stick to MMA (and isn’t he very clever the way he can remember me commenting on something else months ago?) he’s telling me to stay out of discussing the hypocrisy of the alt-right when it comes to child abuse. Why would he want me to avoid discussing that unless it was because I was showing up said hypocrisy? Therefore, telling me to stay out of it is telling me to stop exposing the alt-right’s hypocrisy and, as such, is defending that hypocrisy illustrated in this case by their poster boy promoting paedophilia.

          6. jusayinlike

            No Bertie it’s difficult for people to take you seriously and consider you an adult because you watch trumped up wrestling and boast about it..

          7. ivan

            @bodger. Fair play. I’ll still probably disagree blah blah blah but I look forward to reading it with (as close as i can muster to) an open mind. Genuinely.

          8. ReproBertie

            Given that you clearly take me seriously enough to follow me round posting about MMA….

            “What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.”

          9. jusayinlike

            Eh no Bertie I just have a good memory for ridiculous codswhallop, kinda like the plagiarised poo your coming out with right now..

          10. Yep

            To be fair, I have asked Bodger for links before and he produced them. I spent a fair bit of time working from one link that leads to days worth of reading and videos.

            Once you hit the third “but you already knew that” and you don’t ..well that leads to you thinking “well maybe I could visit Haiti” …not really a road I personally want to go down.

            Nothing seems “verifiable” anymore and most things we discount tend to be because it goes against our already strongly held beliefs.

            Work tomorrow, match with friends the weekend, thinking where to book for summer…back is at me, half my life is over…not selfish or uncommon to just stay WOKE enough to keep on, keepin on.

      3. Stumpy

        Bodger – you’re dragged both yourself & this website into the sewer with your 4chan-lite nonsense. Pizzagate thoroughly debunked.

    1. And Social Justice For All

      “I’m not a racist, but ..

      .”I’m not a racist, but ….”.”

      “I’m not a racist, but ….”

      “I’m not a racist, but ….”

      “I’m not a racist, but ….”

      And so on to infinity

      1. Clampers Outside!

        So you are labelin’ me a racist, etc without evidence…. oh well.

        I think I preferred you as Taanentless the Ineffectual. But, I guess the constant name change keeps it novel…. carry on…

        1. And Social Justice For All

          Actually it was a simile or figure of speech.

          Hence why it was in quotes.

          Quite the little snowflake aren’t we? Perceiving every single contrary or dissenting voice as an attack, paraphrasing similes and metaphors into verbal assaults, and my favourite one, making assumptions on the authenticity of the interlocutor in a vain attempt at gaining sympathy and deflection.

          1. Starina

            It’s not long before Clampers starts taking personal offense at CNN news reports about Trump. “CNN is calling me names!”

        2. Sheik Yahbouti

          This reminds me of that fine old movie “Morgan, a suitable case for treatment” – except for there was nothing wrong with Morgan.

  12. newsjustin

    Anyone remember when Sen David Norris had similar musings about paedophilia, gay men and young boys? 2002 I think.

    1. Daisy Chainsaw

      Who knew such a nasty peice of excrement who’s flung that excrement every which way for shizzles and giggles was such a whiny snowflake, ready to play the type of victim that he’s mercilessly mocked for most of his career.

      https://psmag.com/on-the-milo-bus-with-the-lost-boys-of-americas-new-right-629a77e87986
      I have never in my life seen someone so obviously and emphatically asking for a smack in the mouth, and the only reason he doesn’t deserve it is that he wants it too much.

      1. Shayna

        The gay man far right thing isn’t something I was aware of. This guy is off-the-scales. Paedophila is something that I’ll never want to understand – it shouldn’t be a thing – but of course it clearly exists. Maybe I’ve had a more 50 years of sheltered life than most?

      2. Clampers Outside!

        How is he “a whiny snowflake” …where has he whined at all? Is he not allowed speak without being said to be whining… where is he whining?

        “ready to play the type of victim that he’s mercilessly mocked for most of his career.” …Oh, a prediction? Is this the course Milo will now take… playing a victim? Have you evidenced this already, if so, can you point this out?

        I’m not a defender of Milo’s but if things are said of a person, it is good to see the evidence of the things being said, thanks.

        By the way, in the article you posted, the author says, “I’ve been following Yiannopoulos’ tour for months, and I can absolutely confirm that he means almost nothing he says, that he will say almost anything for attention” ….yet he is being hung for what he said. Think on that.

        Quite a laughable, and at times droll and tedious piece, in fairness :) Was linking to it supposed to add something, as I dont believe it added anything, just more lefty hyperbole – “not the flint-eyed skinheads that many anti-fascists are used to fighting”… LOLS…lots of them “used to fighting”…fuppin’ hilarious! – and finger pointing and gossip from within PS’s own echo chamber.

        lastly, and again for the foolish (not you) who might jump to conclusions… no, I do not support the Milo fella, nor what he said.

  13. Shayna

    @ clampers outside – Jesus, I just want to give you a hug. I’ve noticed your prolific comments on BS over the years – always insightful and nicely crafted comments – but today? – You kinda went into one? Bodger lost it at one stage – it’s okay, he kinda knows me. Would you not consider an appearance on “On The Telly”? It’d be great to see a face and voice that match the keyboard strokes.

  14. Frankly

    Wow, that’s some thread. Humanity has a bight future. There are nearby planets which may well be able to support life. We will soon be aided by powerful machines that can think more clearly than we can. For millennia we have sought to refine our understanding of ourselves and our surroundings. Progress has been made.That we are temporarily hampered by this unforeseen lurch to the violent right is indeed unfortunate. We are being forced to cover old ground. We already know the answers. Let us spend as little time on this as possible. Milo tells us that he is happy to have been forced to suck Fr Michaels cock at an early age and that it is to this he now owes his prowess as a giver of head. This is not a conversation that the entire world needs to be in on. It is a conversation for Milo and his therapist or Milo and the authorities or Milo and Father Michael.and the authorities. End of story.

Comments are closed.