From top: Millfield Manor, Newbridge, County Kildare; Fingal councillor Cian O’Callaghan
A report into fire which destroyed 6 houses in 25 minutes at Millford Manor in Newbridge in County Kildare in 2015 was published on Friday.
However, the ‘Framework for Enchancing Fire Safety in Dwellings Where Concerns Arise”, was published with references to the Newbridge fire redacted.
Cian O’Callaghan writes:
Have any lessons been learned from the Millfield Manor fire?
In March 2015 fire spread within minutes through six terraced houses at Millfield Manor, a timber frame estate in Newbridge. The fire stopping measures required by the building regulations were partially missing, allowing fire to spread rapidly between homes.
It was the latest of several fires in timber frame estates that brought to light fire safety structural defects.
In response, the government commissioned a review in July 2015 to include a case study of Millfield Manor.
Last Friday, more than two years later, the review was finally published – with the case study from Millfield Manor was omitted.
Over the weekend residents of Millfield were given an unpublished copy of the case study into their estate – the review categorises the risks associated with fire safety defects in Millfield as moderate or medium despite the destruction of six homes in March 2015.
So what are the key learnings from the fire?
And what is the plan for dealing with structural fire safety defects?
Is there a specific plan to deal with the issue of fire safety defects in timber frame estates that were not constructed in compliance with the building regulations?
It appears that there aren’t any key learnings taken from the fire at Millfield Manor or the other fires that have spread rapidly in timber frame estates.
In fact, the government’s review does not even mention the word timber frame; there are no proposals about how to tackle fire safety defects; and responsibility for remedying defects is put firmly on the shoulders of residents and homeowners.
There is no mention in the review of the failure of local authorities to use their enforcement powers against developers to ensure remediation of homes that are structurally non-compliant with the fire safety building regulations.
There is no attempt to hold those responsible to account.
Facing up to the problem of fire safety defects and offering practical assistance and solutions for residents will be challenging – however the alternative minimalist approach to fire safety concerns, favoured up until recently by the authorities in London, is simply not worth contemplating.
Cian O’Callaghan is a Social Democrats councillor on Fingal County Council. Follow Cian on Twitter: @ocallaghancian
Fire safety issues ‘whitewashed’ in long awaited review (Michael Clifford, Irish Examiner)
Rollingnews
We all know someone is being protected and looked after.
can’t go upsetting the Developer & Builder circus now can we?
if they’d built those gaffs out of zip firelighters nothing substantial would have come of it
“However, the ‘Framework for Enchancing Fire Safety in Dwellings Where Concerns Arise”, was published with references to the Newbridge fire redacted.”
How does this even happen? Genuine question.. ???
Heartening to see a Social Democrat pol bring this extremely serious issue to the fore. Far better than broadsheet subjecting us to Gary Gannon whining about wolf whistling.
…Anne-Marie McNally light…
Agree with curmudgeon
Bodger: “councilloe Cian O’Callaghan”
Thanks Holden, fixed now. Sorry.
Lads what if both Gary Gannon and Cian O’Callaghan propose to me at the same time? What will I do?
How come Holden gets to go ‘swit swoo’ and I don’t?
And people demand to build high rise residential properties in Dublin??
Can you imagine the death toll of a fire in a high rise built by irish builders and property developers to the unenforced fire safety standards that Ireland allows??
about the same numbers as Grenfell Tower with its kingspan shellsuit I’d imagine
Grenfell wasn’t Kingspan
was indeed along with the Celotex – Kingspan Kooltherm
But there’s nothing inherently wrong with high-rise; the problem is with a lack of enforcement of standards.
That’s actually fixable. The other end of the scale – 500 acres of semi-D houses isn’t a good idea either.