From top: Michael McDowell, Sgt McCabe’s senior counsel; Former Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan

Former Garda Commissioner Noirin O’Sullivan has been giving evidence to the Disclosures Tribunal for the past two days.

As of 10am this morning, when she returns to give evidence, she will have given around eight hours of testimony.

Her exact knowledge at certain points in time and on certain matters remains a little unclear.

Especially in terms of the Ms D allegation.

Readers will recall how a Ms D made a retrospective ‘humping’ complaint in December 2006, 11 months after her father, a guard, Mr D “lost his position and was reverted to other duties” after Sgt McCabe “caused the institution of serious disciplinary procedure against” Mr D in January 2006.

After the DPP investigated Ms D’s complaint, its directions included the line:

“Even if there wasn’t a doubt over her credibility, the incident that she describes does not constitute a sexual assault or indeed an assault… there is no basis for prosecution.”

Ms D’s 2006 allegation resurfaced during a counselling session seven years later in the summer 2013, in Cavan, with RIAN counsellor Laura Brophy.

An erroneous allegation of rape against Sgt McCabe ended up being attributed to Ms D when Ms Brophy sent a botched referral to Tusla in August 2013.

On April 30, 2014, Tusla social worker Laura Connolly allegedly plucked Sgt McCabe’s file randomly from a cabinet which contained unallocated cases and sent a notification of Sgt McCabe’s file to the gardai even though she said she was aware the 2006 allegation had already been sent to the gardai and DPP had ordered for no charges to be brought.

Ms Connolly combined both the 2006 allegation, which was found to have no foundation by the DPP, and the 2013 allegation of rape pertaining to a Ms Y which had nothing to do with Ms D but was wrongly recorded by counsellor Laura Brophy as an allegation Ms D was making against Sgt McCabe.

Further to this…


Ms O’Sullivan was asked by Kathleen Leader BL, for the tribunal, if she had “prior knowledge” of the Ms D allegation at the time some gardai – including Supt Noel Cunningham and Chief Supt Colm Rooney – were holding consultations with their, and her, legal counsel ahead of the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation on May 12 and May 13, 2015.

The tribunal has heard it been claimed by several witnesses – including Ms O’Sullivan’s liaison officer Chief Supt Fergus Healy and solicitor Annemarie Ryan, of the Chief State Solicitor’s office – that these consultations largely gave rise to the contents of Chief State Solicitor’s letter which was produced to the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation on May 18, 2015.

The purpose of this letter was to outline to the commission and Sgt McCabe’s legal team what was going to be put to Sgt McCabe at the commission.

The tribunal has also heard that this letter outlined several occurrences which actually never occurred.

In particular, one specific claim that at a meeting in August 2008 Sgt McCabe conveyed he wanted to “force the hand” – in a blackmail-like scenario – of a superintendent to give the DPP’s directions to the Ms D family., after Sgt McCabe was publicly confronted by Ms D and Mrs D in October 2007.

This was proven false by a tape recording of this meeting with two gardai including Supt Noel Cunningham.

The tribunal has not heard oral evidence from Supt Cunningham, retired Chief Supt Rooney or any of the members of Ms O’Sullivan’s counsel at the commission about the sequence of events yet.

Yesterday, Ms O’Sullivan called the incorrect claims in the CSS letter ‘factual inaccuracies’, while Michael McDowell SC, for Sgt McCabe, called them ‘gross falsehoods’.

But returning to the Ms D allegation…

And Ms Leader’s question about her knowledge of the Ms D allegation in May 2015.

Ms O’Sullivan said:

Yes, my understanding would have been limited to — I mentioned in my opening that back in 2008/2009 I was an assistant commissioner in Human Resource Management. At that time, these incidents actually, the allegations in relation to the malpractice in Bailieboro, had already started, and I was presented on my, I think my first day back in Human Resources, with a minute from Mr. Costello — or, sorry, a minute to go back responding to a minute from Mr. Costello in relation to those matters.

And to apprise myself of what I was dealing with, I sought and obtained a report from Chief Superintendent Terry McGinn, who had been dealing with a number of the issues raised by Sergeant McCabe, and contained in that document is a reference to the Ms. D allegation. “

“It’s, I think, from my memory it’s about a seven- or eight-page document and the reference is probably about two paragraphs…. No, Chairman [when asked if she would have looked at the investigation file at any time] and I would have no need to or no reason to…I knew who — not who Mr D was, but I knew that it was relating to a colleague, a colleague’s daughter, and I also knew that the DPP had directed upon it and that there was no basis for a prosecution.”

Ms O’Sullivan, in her response to Ms Leader, makes no reference to a rape allegation.

But Ms O’Sullivan also acknowledged to Michael McDowell SC, for Sgt McCabe, that she knows she got a referral about Ms D and Sgt McCabe from then Assistant Commissioner Kieran Kenny in May 2014.

However, she has “no memory of reading it”.

The tribunal has already heard Mr Kenny sent this to Ms O’Sullivan on May 16, 2014.

This is significant as the referral was incorrect and wrongly claimed that Sgt McCabe had been referred for the digital, anal and vaginal rape of Ms D.

The tribunal has also previously heard that Mr Kenny, after receiving a corrected referral, never sent this on to Ms O’Sullivan.

Yesterday, Mr McDowell specifically asked Ms O’Sullivan if she was ever told this referral was incorrect.

She said: “No, Chairman, I was not.”

Mr McDowell then put it to Ms O’Sullivan:

“So if you had seen the allegations of anal and digital — anal and vaginal and digital rape, you wouldn’t have known whether they were the original allegations being rehashed or new and mistaken allegations?”

She replied: “That would be correct, Chairman, yes.”

So was her knowledge of matters – in May 2015 – that Sgt McCabe stood accused of raping a child?

If this is correct, would this not have been something that would have been on her mind before the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation and something that she should have flagged with her counsel?

And if this is incorrect, and she in fact knew, at that point, that the accusation of rape against Sgt McCabe had been an error, in the interest of doing what she wanted – which she has repeatedly stated was to put all matters of interactions between Sgt McCabe and senior gardai in Cavan/Monaghan before O’Higgins – would this have been something that she should have flagged with her counsel?

The tribunal has heard that Asst Comm Kenny and Ms O’Sullivan held a meeting with Sgt McCabe and his solicitor in August 2015 about his welfare and workplace issues.

And yet.

Sgt McCabe was told nothing of this false rape allegation.

Sgt McCabe didn’t learn of this false rape allegation until Tusla sent him a letter – incorrectly claiming they were investigating him for rape – on December 29, 2015.

The tribunal has also already heard that on May 16, 2014, Ms O’Sullivan’s then private secretary Supt Frank Walsh, on receipt of this incorrect rape referral, replied to then Asst Comm Kenny, saying:

“I am directed by the Commissioner to refer to email correspondence from your office of the 16th May 2014, the content of which has been noted by the Commissioner. It is noted that you are considering this matter and that you would keep the Commissioner informed of developments.”

The tribunal has also already heard that on June 17, 2014, Supt Walsh wrote again to Asst Comm Kenny, saying:

”I am directed by the Commissioner to refer to previous correspondence from your office of 16th May 2014 in the above and to inquire on the current status of the matter.”

So it would appear there was an active effort on the part of Ms O’Sullivan, via Supt Walsh, to keep informed of what was happening in regards to this incorrect allegation of rape – something Ms O’Sullivan seemingly believed was a true allegation.

In the summer, the tribunal heard there was no further correspondence about the matter and the false rape allegation remained on file in the Garda Commissioner’s office until early 2017.


Readers may wish to also note…

The tribunal has previously heard in evidence given by the Head of Legal Affairs at An Garda Siochana Ken Ruane that the Attorney General’s Office was involved in appointing Kieran Mulvey as an external mediator to help with Sgt McCabe’s workplace issues in March 2015.

The tribunal has also heard Chief Supt Fergus Healy, who was the liaison officer for Ms O’Sullivan at the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation, say he told Ms O’Sullivan on the evening of May 15, 2015 that “the Attorney’s office were keeping a watching brief, from a
distance, on this”.

He elaborated: That is, in a nutshell, what I had kind of said to her. I had told her that there was a watching brief being kept on this, from a distance, by the Attorney’s office, words to that effect.”

Asked how he knew this, Chief Supt Healy said: “I was inside in the Commission and I think Ms Ryan had mentioned it to me…”

Much has been made of the seemingly conflict between Ms O’Sullivan’s public stance of support for Sgt McCabe versus the legal instructions taken on her behalf towards Sgt McCabe at the O’Higgins Commission of Investigation.

But does the Attorney General’s office also have questions to answer?

Olga Cronin will be tweeting from the tribunal today. You can follow Olga here

Previously: Disclosures Tribunal on Broadsheet


Sponsored Link

7 thoughts on “Memory Full

  1. LeopoldGloom

    How could she do her job then, and her current job now if she can’t recall so much information.

  2. Otis Blue

    And as is consistently proven, our ‘betters’ are liars, spoofers and amnesiacs. Every fuppin time.

    And the whole sordid show just trundles on. And on…

  3. anne

    Ms D and her mother had some cheek confronting McCabe in public. Why haven’t charges been brought against Ms D? Was her father drink driving on the job or did he get a lift to the incident that he showed up drunk to? Anyone else gets put off the road for drink driving.

    Is Ms D and whatever discussions she had with her father ever going to be looked at? Why is Ms D’s identify protected? McCabe gets wrongly accused by her, but she’s protected?

    It’s all one sordid state of affairs. Lie after lie trying to hide the cluster fupp of trying to frame a man.

    What sort of banana republic are we living in, that false allegations of rape can be conjured up to try frame an innocent man? And the commissioner at the time saying she cant recall the file on it, in the middle of a commission of investigation. It’s just not credible.

    For all her smiles, she might as well be giving us all the 2 fingers for the lack of credible answers she’s giving.

  4. Kolmo

    How much of our taxes are being wasted on these people in trying to unravel their obvious lies? I’d have a lot more respect for them if they just admitted that there was a campaign to discredit Mr. McCabe and by proxy his observations of criminality and major flaws in the policing system, the waste of our income taxes on these (wholly correct) tribunals is fupping criminal..

  5. Catherine costelloe

    I am not one bit surprised that Mr John Barratt has stated relationships with new acting Commissioner has greatly improved since she left.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link