23 thoughts on “De Wednesday Papers

  1. petey

    the Morning Star as usual focussing on the lives of w/c people.
    where is the Irish equivalent? why is it not here?

    1. The Old Boy

      Because the Morning Star, in a country of 65 million people, has the same circulation as the Dundalk Argus.

    2. Taunton

      They don’t give a crap about working class people, it is just rabble rousing in they hope that some day, they too can get their snouts in the trough.

      1. anne

        One of um texted don’t bring the phone with u when going in for questioning.. idiots. Don’t you love when technology catches the likes of these muppets.

        You also have a taxi driver who’s testifying to how upset she was, on the way home… coz it musta been so much fun n all.

        They haven’t a hope. Hope the book is thrown at them.

    1. Taunton

      Quiet you, she’s a hero don’t ya know.

      I suppose she’s been driving for these past 25 years.

  2. GiggidyGoo

    FG hah! Philip Lane has been one of the steadfast people behind limiting people over stretching themselves as regards mortgages. He has kept Noonan in line, and Donohue. So much so, that Donohue now wants him away so that FG can overheat the market once again for their buddies.

  3. Clampers Outside!

    BBC pay review shows no gender bias.

    But there are some pay gaps, and the biggest shows women senior correspondents earning 23% more than men…. imagine that.

    It must’ve been the “matriarchal hegemony”, yeah?
    Get Tony Groves on the case stat!

    ….and as it turns out, more men than women are due a raise now.
    Is that what’s called a backfire?

    When idealogues insist something exists, like a gender bias in pay favouring men because… muh.. patriarchal hegemony?
    And they get slapped in the face with it.



    I’d highly recommend Jo Williams’ (from the tweet above) book, Women v Feminism, a v good read.

        1. ahjayzis

          He’s a misandrist too. He’s condemning the push that lead to a review that resulted in a payrise for underpaid men. Because it was initiated by uppity vaginaholders, I presume.

          Such a cuck trololololol

          1. Clampers Outside!

            Wow…. look at you two, personal insults to beat the band and nothing else at all to say :)

            That there’s no sexism in difference of pay has been proven here. Simple as. I’m laughing at the result which anyone but an ideologue knew to be the case.

            And some how you two come to those conclusions that you have.

            Fine by me, fine. Whatever.

            Truth is truth.

            – – – –

            This though… ” He’s condemning the push that lead to a review that resulted in a payrise for underpaid men. ” HAHAHAHAHA ! The review looked for ‘gender bias’. That is, differences of pay due to gender.
            None were found, as expected, that’s what’s so funny :)

Comments are closed.