Free tomorrow?
Yes, but how free?
Via Peaceful Assembly for Truth, Transparency & Free Speech:
We will be projecting the BANNED Iconoclast interview with Melissa Ciummei (which was removed from YouTube after being viewed 450K times in 6 days) onto a building near Facebook/Meta HQ, Dublin 2.
After the screening of the interview, we will take the 10 minute walk to YouTube’s office (located at Google HQ) to deliver a letter outlining our concerns.
Thanks KN
Sponsored Link
Who exactly ‘banned’ this interview?
The video on bitchute is accessible from an Irish IP address, so how are they suggesting that it has been ‘banned’?
YouTube.
Surely it’s up to YouTube what content to host on their own site – the same as you deciding what articles or comments appear on your own website
But we can get sued. Under American law, YouTube is protected from liability for content created by their users only if they do not act as publishers. They wouldn’t have a business if they lost this privilege.
No, Rob G, that’s an assinine argument you heard somewhere else that you’re just repeating. Think about it, Free Speech is a cornerstone of our democracy & we should expect everyone to respect it. You think it’s ok that maybe just the Civil Service is committed to Free Speech but not private businesses? We allow private enterprise to co-exist in our society & make profit from it, there’s responsibilities alongside those rights. If Youtube announced it was ok with Rape or Slavery, would they be entitled to disregard our societal & legal norms in such a way? Of course not, so they shouldn’t be allowed to adopt & promote Censorship, either, it’s the same rules for everyone. You wouldn’t allow pornographic adverts on kids TV just because it’s a private company’s advert, would you?
Free speech is a cornerstone of democracy, but not commerce, which is the basis on which social media operates. If you want government regulation of private social media in order to protect free speech on those platforms, then you’d have to trust governments, which, I gather, you do not.
True
What a pickle.
As if to underline the point, the quote above mentions the government, the logos are all of private multinational tech corporations. Which is doing the censorship? Who is being appealed to here? And for what solution?
You don’t understand what ‘free speech’ means.
The makers of that video have not been arrested by the secret police, they are free to upload the video on their own server, or indeed on any server that will have them.
Their freedom of speech does not extend to YouTube (or anyone else) being obliged to provide a platform for their ramblings.
Stop that, Nigel! You’ll upset the children.
Ah it’s a hard one.
Yes, Youtube avail of that sneaky law in the US that exempts them from being sued as they are not publishers, but then should they be taking stuff down just because it is against a certain political belief? Is that not what a publisher does?
And then of course the same company controls most of our search results.
I mean, simply typing “Melissa Ciummei” into Google and then repeating the process with DuckDuckGo give vastly different results. Have a go there yourself.
So yeah none of this is technically censorship as you can go and find the info on other sites. and use other search engines.
But 99% of people won’t bother and Alphabet knows this…
It was a really bad idea for all of us to tie our presence online into individual businesses, that could withdraw and censor our content at anytime.
Speaking of which – a pal of mine was booted off Revolut. No wanting, nothing. No comeback, they won’t talk to him at all.
Anyone ever heard of similar?
No he’s a councillor – work with folks with emotion issues etc
Although he was using it to get paid off clients , and I think he charges 50 quid a pop, so maybe he was flagged for that. All those €50 from different people going in to his account ;)
It’s more the fact that they won’t even talk to him – like at all.
@Micko
did he have a personal or business Revolut account?
I’m not sure Cian. I didn’t even know there was a difference.
Would they block you for using a personal one for business? That could be it
Youtube, Facebook, Twitter and other, similar sites are 100% publishers and it’s a nonsense that they get to claim otherwise.
It’s a good interview. She understands the bigger picture and what covid is being used to bring in.
i.e. Digital IDs with CBDCs and a social credit score system of control.
It is quite funny how those who scream ‘conspiracy theorist’ cannot explain the lack of empirical evidence behind the introduction of Vaccine Passports.
They shout about science like they have reviewed all expert opinions, but conveniently ignore the stark fact that by any yardstick, Vaccine Passports do not and will not reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
So why?
Constantly repeating your false claim that vaccine Passports do not and will not reduce the spread of Covid does not make it true.
Just saying something is false does not make it so- where is your evidence?
Michael McNarma was met with a deafening silence when he asked this question in the Dáil and up north it is apparently ‘confidential’- so feel free.
They aren’t even updated with the latest booster info, and there is currently no plan to do this, they are of no real use if the info is incorrect, at best they are a tool to encourage vaccination through coercion, which in itself is going to push more people who disagree with them towards not engaging with them or the booster program.
Since injected people can catch & transmit any infection, Vaccine/Climate Change Passports do not exclude or reduce the possibility of infection. Given the tiny number of people who’ve actually been killed by Sars02 anyway, no such measures, impinging on Civil Liberties & even Human Rights, are justified, unless you’re basically a fascist, in which case you should go live in a dictatorship, not try to impose one on people in a democratic system. These “passports” are bio-medical fascism in action, if you support them, you’re choosing to ignore UN-mandated Human Rights declarations & are basically a fascist.
@K.Cavan
I’d safely this triple jabbed person has a “health pass”.
Hamburg…
Corona alarm in the hospital: Boosted clinic employee infected eight patients
https://m.focus.de/regional/hamburg/viele-erkrankte-groesserer-corona-ausbruch-in-hamburger-krankenhaus_id_24993369.html
@SOQ
You keep being presented with evidence and you keep ignoring it.
Cut the BS Cian- what is your empirical evidence that Vaccine Passports reduce or prevent transmission?
A backgrounder on the Kinzen story that you also won’t read in the traditional Irish media.
* Alt-right,facist,abortion,Ganley,blah-blah*
https://gript.ie/kinzen-and-the-consequences-of-irelands-chummy-media/
Yes it is interesting how even on Broadsheet certain commentators are so knowledgeable of the minute details and actions of the handful of far right people in Ireland- people who the rest of us haven’t even heard of.
Do they realise they are opposing in the main controlled opposition?
Yes I think they do. You can’t have a ‘reds under the bed’ scenario- albeit inverted- if no one knows who the “reds” are.
Do you realise that calling something a ‘controlled opposition’ because you need to distance yourselves from them despite a large overlap in your beliefs about the pandemic does not make it a ‘controlled opposition,’ whatever that is actually supposed to mean.
The bulk of these people are not taken seriously by anyone but they get hyped by you guys to portray the unjabbed as unhinged. Good money in it, I gather.
I’ve never hyped any of them, though if its okay for you to go nut-picking on twitter for outrageous statements by nobodies aimed at the unvaccinated, then you can hardly criticise others for noticing these guys’ antics. But then again, none of you guys get taken very seriously any more, either.
Ooooh, slipped that nasty little lie about your critics in there at the end, good one.
Bodger is quite correct
Even though I quite agree with you on some points Nigel, in the main you are a hopelessly naive, idealistic, coruscatingly arrogant, uninformed and a belligerent fool.
Well, you can’t please everyone.
You’re actually a great guy Nigel. Such a strong crusader for what is just and right.
Bodger, you’ve been hyping these groups and their rallies since day one. Are you a shill for “controlled opposition” too?
When you say ‘good money’, Bodger, is the suggestion that the particularly idiotic anti-vaxxers (Dee Wall, for example) are being paid to act the gobshite or that people who point out that they exist are coining it in ?
Is there proof of either being on anyone’s payroll ?
Or maybe I’m taking that statement too literally ?
It’s a genuine question, thanks in advance if you have the time to answer.
ANO, I mean some are agents of the state specifically tasked with disrupting and embarrassing any proper grassroots unjabbed movement. It’s a pretty old tactic and many on here will argue it would actually be remiss of the guards to not seek to control the opposition. It takes a certain kind of person to do this kind of work, usually those who have comprised themselves with the fuzz in the past.
‘many on here will argue it would actually be remiss of the guards to not seek to control the opposition’
Literally nobody on here will argue this.
I had you in mind actually.
Really? Wrong again.
Anyway, these controlled people are the ones we see in the press usually under the by-lines of the crime correspondents aka the fellas who would be guards but failed the height test at the time. They could always feature regular, non-screechy jabless, but don’t. It’s all good though.
Thanks Bodger.
I haven’t seen any evidence that suggests the types in question are agents of the state but I appreciate you explaining your belief that this is the case.
I think they’re just clowns and disingenuous grifters, when this blows over they’ll be onto anti-5G and chemtrails nonsense.
If the powers that be sought to disrupt a particular organisation then I think they’d be more subtle about it. Imagine having to rely on some of those absolute head-the-balls to keep a conspiracy secret!
ANO, I agree about the quality of asset here. They are slicker and more credible in the UK and the US. I guess it’s budgets. My rule of thumb is if they are ill-mannered and sweary (or just plain mean) and go out their way to do things that damage the particular cause they are supposed to be supporting, I run.
‘I agree about the quality of asset here.’
Not sure whether I should feel insulted or not.
The necks on the pair of yee!
No gardai are paying me!
Minus respect x 2
‘Sold I to the merchant ships!’
have you two a christmas party I can go to? buy a few pints? Id say it’d be gold
hope you didnt miss that ryanair flight this morning with your mate
This was all agreed by the heads of the G7 Central Banks, in a meeting at Jackson Hole in 2019. It’s being marketed by the WEF as The Great Reset but they called it The Going Direct Reset, with the Central Banks taking direct control of both Fiscal & Monetary policy & the surrender of all rights to Private Property, so everyone’s private property can be used as Assets to balance against the debt Liabilities of nations.
“You’ll own nothing & you’ll be happy…”
Very true but the Covidians are blind to such machinations. Watch as they bankrupt every State and central banks “rides to the rescue” with strings attached.
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/global-debt-surges-to-record-226-trillion-in-biggest-jump-since-second-world-war-1.4756163
They will labour us all and our nation States with debt, collapse the economy and use the debt to imprison us all.
The biggest heist in history. Literal theft & subjugation of the citizenry – Slavery 2.0. ‘Immunisation status’ being a core precept of this digital id, refusal of a ‘shot’ will see you locked out. As for what these ‘shots’ may contain for the disobedient?
Not only that, I was turned into a newt.
You are taking a reactive approach – as in reserving judgement until events unfold. People need to take a proactive stance – inform themselves of what is slated & being implemented.
That’s the very reason I wear a tin-foil hat.
Your pithy comment ignores the empirical reality that we exist it. Sucks for you.
Have you ever read Chicken Licken? That’s you that is.
These days I tend toward reading policy, you know – to gain a foreknowledge of proceedings. You see, while ignorance maybe bliss – it can be very short-lived. But stick with your fairy-tales, if its all you can comprehend.
I don’t know, surely there would be huge civil unrest if 50% of what she says was true.
Well, this knowledge doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s been documented & released by those that want it enforced – World Economic Forum, BIS etc. The major issue is, it isn’t being discussed by politicians & the media. It’s undoubtedly the biggest historical shift in the social contract – and being presented in a way that is non-negotiable. We are hostages to this process, that includes most politicians.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/brandon-report-hse-apologses-over-response-to-repulsive-abuse-1.4757018
Let’s Go Brandon