Last night.

BBC Question Time.

Fascist.

DOXX HER!

Somebody destroy that woman, for pity’s sake.

Sponsored Link

Related posts:

The Hold Outs Junior Cohort [Updated] Booster Shots Meanwhile, In Taiwan

43 thoughts on “About Time”

  5. James

    Congratulations to her for being smarter than a doctor, but many with her same attitude are too dead to spread this rubbish about knowing her body better than a doctor. I hope she doesn’t fix her own boiler as well.

    1. Trustin Judeau

      smarter than which doctors?
      There are plenty of doctors who share her views.

      Trust the science – no not those scientists, MY scientists.

      1. $hifty

        Science is all about consensus.

        The consensus is that getting vaccinated far outweighs the risks of not doing so.

        End of.

        Trying to claim that there is a sizeable cohort of medical professionals saying not to get vaccinated is retarded, when the cohort telling you to do it outweighs them by a factor of 9:1 or more

        1. SOQ

          I have yet to head of one doctor who advises everyone to decline, but plenty to who argue that it is not necessary for those who have a low probability of serious CoVid-19.

          It is a risk / benefit analysis and at the moment, the known risks appear to be fast growing, while the benefits are clearly diminishing- and possibly doing more harm than good.

        2. Chris

          ‘Science is all about consensus’ No, science is all about empirical evidence. The ‘follow the science’ lemmings don’t even appear to understand what they’re supposed to be following, the ‘consensus’ was whatever the propaganda said to reach its objectives.

        3. Micko

          Ah $hifty, I think both you and Chris are right.

          Science is a consensus AND it is based on imperial evidence.

          But what we have here is the Politicisation of Science. Where two things can be true depending on who you listen to. Dangerous waters to be in.

          A perfect example is when Kamala Harris was asked if she’d take the Covid vaccine.

          If Fauci told her to – she would

          If Trump told her to – she wouldn’t

          Clip here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40eZeXPyJ0g

          Now how can (she) someone who says they are “following the science” have those two situations in their head about the SAME vaccine, which works when one person says it does and not when another person says so.

          Politicisation of Science – that’s how.

    2. Cui Bono?

      @James
      Do you not realise that there’s 1000s upon 1000s of doctors all over the world who don’t recommend these particular set of vaccines for people who are not vulnerable to covid and especially for people who have already had it?

      She only got a headache and a sore back when she had it so she clearly doesn’t need a vaccine for it. This is just basic stuff and should be obvious to everyone.

      1. $hifty

        And for every one of them, there are another 10,000 urging you to get vaccinated.

        Trying to claim that there is a consensus among medical professionals or that the sheer weight of numbers of those advocating against getting vaccinated means they’re somehow correct is a completely stupid way of presenting your argument when 90%+ are a) vaccinated themselves and b) advising others to do the same.

        1. Chris

          If they don’t they get struck off, so it’s quite the incentive to be on the side of the narrative. Let’s not forget GP’s (general practitioners) are no experts in vaccines. They merely go on official recommendations.

          Those recommendations have proven to be questionable – the trial data was deeply flawed as evidenced by the BMJ. And they’re still trying to hide the trial data for 75 years.

          That for the first time in history, so many medical scientists and practitioners have come out with their concerns, points to the whole charade as deeply suspect.

          1. SOQ

            The fact that the FDA wants to hide the data for 75 years should have everyone asking why- do people not have a right to know what is being injected into their bodies?

            What is it they are trying to hide?

        2. Cui Bono?

          Do you not think the majority are capable of being wrong?

          There’s many examples in history where the majority got it wrong.

          All you have to do is look at the data and see that the overwhelming majority are at no risk from covid. The vaccines are also not stopping transmission or even slowing it. Therefore, there’s no logical reason for most of us to take it. These vaccines are still on clinical trials until 2023 don’t forget.

          1. Broadbag

            Do you not think the minority are equally if not more capable of being wrong?

            Why have you abandoned critical thinking in blind pursuit of bending everything to fit your own agenda?

          2. Cui Bono?

            Everyone is capable of being wrong.

            I don’t have an agenda and I haven’t abandoned critical thinking.

            I am looking at the data that shows that most of us are at no risk from covid and the vaccines don’t stop transmission so we don’t need a vaccine for it. This is critical thinking.

            Taking a new, still on trial, vaccine for something that is of no risk to me and will not stop transmission would be a silly thing to do. Following what everyone else is doing, in spite of the data and logic, would definitely not be critical thinking. It would be stupid or some sort of mass hysteria.

          3. Broadbag

            Ok, thanks for the reply.

            I think people should take it even if it doesn’t reduce transmission, to avoid hospitalisation, the data would appear to back that stance. But I accept everyone has a right to decide for themselves and mandates are a bad idea.

          4. Chris

            Of course a minority could be wrong, why in this case they’re not is because of the real world data that keeps confirming their concerns. Remember ‘100% effective at preventing hospitalisation and death’ – that didn’t age well did it? If fact, if you were paying attention & looking for contradictions – you would have found that ‘the science’ being peddled, was wrong at every turn.

            ‘Trust the science’ – ‘The science is clear’ – ‘The science has changed’ – “I AM The Science” – Dr Fauci.

            No, you weren’t ‘following the science’ – you were following a cult, with a separate high priest in every country. Dr Hoolihan’s previous track record obviously didn’t preclude him for this role – and yet many didn’t ask why.

          5. Cui Bono?

            @Broadbag
            but the data doesn’t back up your stance.

            Most of us are at no risk of hospitalisation from covid.

            Check your risk of hospitalisation here with the NHS risk calculator https://qcovid.org/

            Covid is mild for most of us who get it and even a bad dose doesn’t put healthy people in hospital. The risks are incredibly low and this is why so many of us think there’s a conspiracy happening or just an innocent case of mass hysteria – most likely both.

    3. gallantman

      If a Doctor prescibes medication you should immediately suspend all your critical faculties turn and just take it for as long as they deem necessary. No questions asked. Many parents in Kerry will vouch for this.

    4. K.Cavan

      How many are dead, James? You’ve no idea, do you, because anyone who actually investigated the data reached the inevitable conclusion. There was no Pandemic, the percentage of the world’s population who died in 2020 was exactly the same as 2019 & 2018, at 0.76%.
      Those who’s approach is all based on the feeling of Fear that the MSM generated, well, their feelings don’t care about facts or science or truth & so I don’t give a toss about their feelings.

      1. Jibjob

        You don’t provide a source for your assertion that the global mortality rate was 0.76% in both 2019 and 2020.

        I have data for England and Wales. In 2019, mortality rates for both males and females significantly decreased in comparison with the previous year. In 2020, the age-standardised mortality rates, for both males and females, significantly increased. There were 1,236.7 deaths per 100,000 males (14.6% higher than in 2019) and 894.2 deaths per 100,000 females (11.9% higher than in 2019). Source:
        https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregistrationsummarytables/2020

      1. K.Cavan

        There is no vaccine against Sars02, George. There is no vaccine against any Coronavirus. RNA viruses mutate too much for vaccines to ever be effective against them.
        Sorry guys, Science says “No”, even if RTE say yes.

        1. GiggidyGoo

          Likewise you show where the woman in the article works for BBC2.
          By the way, you should look up the definition of ‘gaslighting’ as you don’t seem to know what it means.
          You might also look up the definition of libel, after your (now removed) post a couple of days ago about someone you know and named here.
          Here. – i’ll save you the effort.
          “ defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.

    1. K.Cavan

      in active, you know what Question Time & the BBC are for & discussing the problems of native British people is not featured on their agenda. That’s why they’re doomed, people are not going to financially support a media outlet that hates them.
      Defund The BBC!
      Defund RTE!

Comments are closed.

Broadsheet.ie