Yearly Archives: 2014
John O’Donovan, top, following an incident at a water meter protest at Ashbrook Heights, Lehenaghmore in Togher, Cork this morning.
Earlier, resident Suzanne O’Flynn spoke to Neil Prendeville on Red FM about tensions between the Irish Water contractors and her neighbours this morning.
Suzanne O’Flynn: “They went to drive straight into the estate. Two of the residents were standing there. And the van, literally, a centimetre away from them.”
Neil Prendeville: “Are you saying that the truck drove at them intentionally?”
O’Flynn: “Yes, I am.”
Prendeville: “And they jumped out of the way?”
O’Flynn: “No, they didn’t move. The truck stopped, I’d say they thought they were going to move but they didn’t, they stood.”
Witness claims Irish Water truck drove at protesters in Cork (Newstalk)
Previously: Stopcock Blockers
Video by Dan Linehan

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I81eJEOKJWY
One of a series of videos by Japanese Youtuber tokioFN wherein he brushes his teeth with the assistance of Airsoft weapons.
Here we observe the gingivitis-thwarting power of the SCAR-L MK 13 assault rifle.
[Sinead Ryan – Irish Independent and Sinead O’Carroll of thejournal.ie]
Minister of State Séan Sherlock in a late night tweet to journalist Sinead Ryan.
As seen on last night’s ‘Tonight with Vincent Browne’, Irish Independent journalist Sinead Ryan quoted from the Irish Examiner.
Seán Sherlock’s quotes came from his appearance on yesterday’s Six One News.
Anyone?
Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland
Bubblin’
at[A graph, released by the Central Statistics Office this morning, showing the rise in residential property prices in Ireland between March 2013 and March 2014. Click to enlarge]
At a national level, property prices increased by 7.8%.
In Dublin, house prices rose by 14.3%, while the cost of an apartment in Dublin was 16.6% higher in March 2014, than in March 2013.
Gulp.
[Willie McAteer leaves the Central Criminal Court, Dublin yesterday following sentencing in the Anglo trial]
Dave writes:
“Now that the Anglo trial, such as it was, is concluded, can I ask about a point that seemed significant to me, but was largley ignored by the media. My understanding of the chain of event relating to the directive to find Fitzpatrick and Whelan not guilty in relation to the letters sent out to the Maple 10 is this:
Pretrial: Prosecution brings a number of charges in relation to the nature and the alteration of the letters/agreements, based on evidence allowable.
Trial: Judge directs prosecution to drop the charges and instead submit a charge directed (dictated) by himself. Following this, he then rules that the charges he has directed the prosecution to bring will not hold up in court, due to the phrasing of it – not because there is no evidence of wrongdoing, but because of the specific wording of the charge. He then tells prosecution that he will not allow them to bring another charge.
I’m just wondering if there is any legal precedent for this chain of events?; and does this mean that neither party can now be tried for any of the original charges the prosecution had brought, or do they just have indemnity for the single specific charge that they were found not guilty of? I’ve asked a few friends with various degrees of legal knowledge, and none of them seem quite sure of the answers – or the precedents this sets.”
(Legal Coffee Drinker has been alerted.)
Meanwhile, anyone?
Earlier: A Bystander In A Car Crash
Who Created Light Touch Regulation?
(Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland)
Niall C writes:
This month in Noho we mostly spent our time ‘creatively solving’ the new backgrounds for the RTÉ newsroom. Here’s a short video on how they were made.
Noho
Previously: ‘Music Less Thunderous’
Have A Luke
atThat already famous Star Wars VII (2015) cast photo.
Now with names.
Gwan the ‘nall.
Previously: In This Just
FINGERS CROSSED: An Open Letter To JJ Abrams
Thanks Rapscallion
[Former Secretary General of the Department of Finance, and current member of the European Court of Auditors, Kevin Cardiff]
This morning, RTÉ’s Today with Seán O’Rourke show discussed further the sentencing of two former Anglo Irish Bank executives Willie McAteer and Pat Whelan.
On the show was Dearbhail McDonald, associate and legal editor at the Irish Independent, Finbarr McCauley, Professor of European Criminal Justice at UCD and Pat Leahy, political editor of the Sunday Business Post.
During their discussion, Ms McDonald brought up something Kevin Cardiff said during cross examination in the absence of the jury.
Dearbhail McDonald: “You know what, there wasn’t much politics in the Anglo trial but there was a little sliver and it was very, very revealing. And that was when Kevin Cardiff, who’s a former Secretary General of the Department of Finance was brought in briefly and we were very, very excited because we thought, at least we’re going to get an insight into the Government’s thinking at the time and we didn’t.
He was there for less than 22 minutes. But under cross examination, in the absence of the jury, he was asked about a statement he had made. At an earlier stage, before the trial, he was one of a number of witnesses who gave evidence at a deposition and he was cross examined by Michael O’Higgins, senior counsel, who was representing Seán FitzPatrick who, as we know, was acquitted on all counts. And he was asked, you know: ‘Well what was your role?’. And he confirmed that the Government felt, certainly in respect of the attempts to unwind Seán Quinn’s stake in Anglo, that they were bystanders in a car crash.
And I think my heart sank, you know, at that point in time. Now we didn’t because we can’t legally report what happened in the depositions but he did reveal that much. You know. And I remember thinking ‘oh my god, well if this is going to be the height of it’, you know, in an inquiry, where they’re kind of saying ‘you know, well look, it wasn’t us, you know, there was nothing really that we could have done’.
And I wonder, like I mean I, earlier I was thinking, just reflecting on the Anglo trial. I think the saddest thing about it is is that that public are so tired, they’re so overburdened and perhaps they don’t really care. And what Pat [Leahy] has talked about, about the corrosiveness of public trust, you know, I think the saddest, the most dangerous thing is that we’ve come to expect that nothing really happens. There were some you know shining lights in the Anglo trial, not least that we did get a trial, we did get convictions. And, also, the only winners are the, the only people to emerge with their reputation intact is the jury system.”
Previously: ‘Who Created And Tolerated Light-Touch Regulation?’
Listen back here
(Photocall Ireland)















