Yikes.
The latest edition of Village Magazine, in shops now.
Via Village Magazine
Meanwhile…
Taoiseach says if he were to meet Trump he would “certainly” be happy to relay his previous concerns about ‘racist and dangerous’ comments
— Gavan Reilly (@gavreilly) June 10, 2016
Previously: ‘The People Of Doonbeg Have No Objection To Trump’s Visit’
Sponsored Link
this is not clever nor funny nor in good taste.
broadsheet is not on the dock here
I was talking about Village.
suuuuuuure
It’s in TERRIBLE taste. It’s genuinely awful But it is kinda funny.
Much like anything else Trump’s face is on, in fairness.
Unavoidable, really.
I’d like to see a picture of Trumps contorted face by this artist:
https://youtu.be/mHUMbgZhc0s
Where was everyone when the Chinese were here. They actually do all the things Trump spouts about. Or the Emiratis? Or the Saudis? Yet we bang on about how they should be teaching Mandarin instead of Gaeilge. Bunch of Middle class hypocrites.
I didn’t hear anything about the Chinese being here. Maybe they didn’t either and aren’t hypocrites, but merely uninformed as to everyone who visits?
Ignorance is not an excuse in the SJW code. Do you think there should be protests if the Chinese visited again? I mean the actual leadership, not the candidates who own legitimate businesses here.
Yeah Tony but that would require more than a hashtag friendly, blck and white morality campaign, with a little nuanced understanding of how power works.
Ah Master Burtenshaw, da finesse nuance of a whiskey drunk sledgehammer.
Who is Burtenshaw anyway?
The Alf Garnet is strong in his one..
Alf was a dirty Brit
?
Whoosh!
So tedious and dreary
What was dear?
Everything you post here Toby. I’d rather lick santorum off a rabbit than read your dull retorts
A) Which things does they do that he spouts on about? I ain’t heard Xi Jinping suggest that Chinese people with varied roots are not Chinese, nor abuse women, nor dismiss climate change.
B) The US, like it or not, is very close to our heart. There are many citizens of each country with some involvement (living, working, have friends, family) in the other. Culturally & economically, we are part of a US-led western world. We consume American media, art & literature voraciously.
C) Trump’s opinions would constitute a retrograde step in America’s development. Actually Xi Jinping (veneration of Mao, concentration of portfolios, etc) may turn out also to have been a backward step for China but the jury is still out.
I am closer to Berlin than Boston.
You are answering the wrong question, J.
This thread is about Trump v China so the question is about whether you are closer to Boston or Beiijing.
The Western world I mentioned above includes Berlin btw.
I wasn’t answering any question, Classter .Did you pose one? Just decided to make a flippant remark on a Friday afternoon. Thank you for pointing out to me that the Western world includes Berlin. My BS doctorate in Geography is almost complete.
China is a great abuser of human rights, has been and we only have indications that it’s going to continue that way. Maybe you approve?
So we should protest on economic grounds not human ones. A bit greasy til for me.
Your opinion is that trump is retrograde, millions of Americans think otherwise and would thank you to stay out of their business and stop allowing their companies to avoid taxes.
Now the Saudis? The Emiratis? Oooh horses
Hypocrisy and double standards. Some others like ms Kenny would call it virtue signalling.
‘ we bang on about how they should be teaching Mandarin instead of Gaeilge’
Not that many of us propose this. As evidenced by the fact that this is not happening & has no chance of happening any time soon.
It’s used so often it’s a cliche
If you lot read the smaller print, it looks like Village do a piece on “Chinese Propaganda” in current issue.
I wouldn’t say he’s a fascist; more a buffoon, but a cynical one. I doubt he even believes half the the things he says – he just said them to get the nomination.
(I’d say that he finds it hard he’s actually got so far on his makey-uppy platform himself)
Black kid is the only one without a moustache.
Ha…
…the real warmonger is Clinton…the first group she engaged with at the start of her campaign were the zionists…she has promised to support their campaign in Gaza even if they kill 200000 Palestinians on the next bombardment.
Obama has killed way more than trump as well.
Yeah, give him a chance, see what sort of body count he racks up.
Really? What did she say she will do if they kill 200,001, are all bets are off then?
…the zionists don’t care about one more Palestinian life …I doubt if she will either..
Your figure just seems very specific; pray tell where did you learn of this exchange – would there be a link?
‘the first group she engaged with at the start of her campaign were the zionists’
Could you provide a source for this odd assertion?
http://www.themideastbeast.com/clinton-to-donor-in-next-war-i-will-let-israel-kill-200000-not-just-2000-gazans/
“…Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton has penned a controversial letter to a major Jewish donor vowing to offer Israel “total” support in its next war with the Gaza Strip’s Islamist rulers.
The leaked letter, sent last week to an Israeli-American media mogul, promises to allow Israel carte blanche in any future war with Hamas, including a presidential green light to kill nearly 10% of the enclave’s population.
“Quite frankly, Israel didn’t teach Hamas a harsh enough lesson last year,” reads the letter, obtained by The Mideast Beast. “As president, I will give the Jewish state all the necessary military,diplomatic, economic and moral support it needs to truly vanquish Hamas – and if that means killing 200,000 Gazans, then so be it.”
Very good yah.
She’s horrible. Truly horrible. But the alternative is Trump.
Leaked nothing: there is no such letter.
Guys, its a satirical website…
How does that prove that the ‘Zionists’ were the ‘first group she engaged with at the start of her campaign’
Ding! Tangent closed. Confirmation bias uses satirical site as evidence fearing ker-ay-zeee jus ad bellum. Move on now, now. But before then, back here:
http://www.themideastbeast.com/iran-boycott-hajj-mass-orgy-fears/
I’m concerned.
And Trump wouldn’t support Israel?
No US president would ever not support Israel. if Bernie Sanders got in, no matter what his rhetoric, US foreign policy would still support Israel, and US drones would still strike at Isis. Presidents can do a lot for better or worse, but simply aren’t powerful enough to bring about that kind of sea-change.
Exactly
They are powerful enough to begin turning the tanker, as Obama recently described the process of change in a large democracy.
Obama has helped begin a reappraisal (or a renegation) of the alliance with Israel. Sanders would likely have continued on this path but of course this is not a binary decision, support or not support.
Clinton seems unlikely to be anything other than fully supportive (more AIPAC than J Street). Trump too has been falling over himself to prove that he will be at least as supportive as Clinton
That’s bullpoo wrapped in satire
The late President of Iraq Sadaam Hussein stated Iraq would “flow with blood”. He was spot on.
Was that from all the gassing and murders he did?
No. It was from the illegal invasion and subsequent occupation by allied forces led by Britain and US.
Saddam was hardly an angel now
No he wasn’t an angel, and no one said he was. but the two Bushes, Clinton, Obama have all killed way more than him and Hilary supported them all. I dont see many on here condemning them. But they will march to condemn a man who has killed no-one. I thin their hypocrisy should at least be addressed, dont you?
I don’t think it’s hypocrisy when you know that if he makes it to President he will do exactly the same thing.
How do you “know”??? Thats total hypothetical hypocrisy. Would you condemn Clinton and Obama for hundreds of thousands of deaths they have over seen? Is what they have done worse than what Trump has done? Im almost yawning with boredom at the predictability that you will avoid the question as usual. Have a great weekend.
*Tony stomps his feet and stamps off into the distance*
And somewhere, a little Don waits….
And he checks back in to see if it was answered. Nope. why would anyone admit to hypocrisy I guess.
It sounds a little to mean like you’re, you know, virtue signalling here Tony. Wouldn’t that be HI-LAR-I-ASS?
How to damage Trump, simple, remove his balls.
Golf balls that is.
No golf balls allowed.
Read this in The Guardian today. Of some relevance.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jun/09/seagull-turns-orange-after-falling-into-vat-of-chicken-tikka-masala
FAKE tan, fake tan, it be all over the place.
Even the fecking seagulls.
Ridicule – the best thing to stone a bully with.
Make it as outrageous as he is.
And if it is divorced from fact?
Then it’s all the more Trumpian
My Surkovian beats Burtenshaws Trumpian.
I see Michael Moore is throwing the same stone, saying over in London that he hopes ‘satire brings Trump down.’
Saw this cover up close in the newsagents the other day.
I’ve bought village many times in the past, but I couldn’t buy the magazine with that cover.
It made me consider why I buy the magazine in the first place. Not a good sign.