Betrayed Again


Yesterday, The Minister for Children and Youth Affairs Katherine Zappone announced that she ‘had secured Government approval’ to draft amendments to revise the privacy provisions in the Adoption (Information and Tracing) Bill 2016.

The Bill as published requires applicants for birth information to…

‘..sign an undertaking, in certain circumstances, that they will not contact the birth parent. It also allows birth parents to invoke compelling reasons as to why their information should not be released, where such release would be likely to endanger their lives’.

The revised bill will:

‘Include the undertaking, and will provides for contact with all birth parents to ascertain whether they have any objection to the birth information being released.

Where the parent does not consent to the release of the information, there will be an opportunity for both parties to make their case before the Adoption Authority of Ireland.

The Authority will make a determination in the case, against a range of criteria by reference to Supreme Court jurisprudence. There will be an appeal from the decision to the Circuit Court.’

Dr Zappoone said:

The provisions in the Bill in relation to release of birth information are very serious and complex. We must balance the competing rights to identity with the right to privacy, in certain circumstances. I believe that people have the right to know of their true origins but we are also required to protect vulnerable birth parents.

I believe the scheme for which I got approval today is a reasonable compromise in all the circumstances, and I hope all stakeholders will support the proposal, so this legislation can be enacted as quickly as possible.”

Minister Zappone said she had listened to “Members of the Oireachtas, stakeholders and lobby groups ” and engaged again with the Office of the Attorney General “to revisit the privacy provisions and strengthen the right to identity”.

Paul Redmond, of The Coalition of Mother And Baby home Survivors (CMABS), writes:

Zappone’s new amendment makes this a “mother dearest” Bill, meaning that adoptee’s have been stripped of all rights to their original birth certificates and their files including their medical records: meanwhile natural mothers have been given all the rights as they must be asked for their permission before anything can be released to an adoptee.

This is not what our community was promised nor anything close to it. It is a backwards step and a gross betrayal of a vulnerable and aging community who have already suffered enough without having to endure the nightmare of having Minister Zappone inflicted on us.

While the old version of the Bill was not perfect by any means, and any Bill at all would have split our community in some way as there are always small splinter groups, at least the old Bill gave adopted people actual rights for the first time in the history of Ireland.

Now Minister Zappone has torn even the possibility of rights away from us.

That this treachery is dressed up as something positive is yet another act of bad faith and dishonesty by Katherine Zappone who needs to resign at once and allow a competent person without a personal agenda to do the job she refuses to do.

Zappone’s story about fighting with the Attorney General has a very hollow and suspicious ring about it and CMABS calls on the Minister to publish the legal advice from the Attorney General forthwith.

The practical aspects of this new Bill are a recipe for an expensive, wasteful, bureaucratic mess. Before an adoptee’s mother can even be asked for her permission, she must be tracked down. There are currently waiting lists for tracing of up to two years and this is going to be far worse.

This betrayal must be reversed by Minister Zappone at once.”

Coalition of Mother and Baby Home Survivors

Statement by Dr Katherine Zappone, Minister for Children and Youth Affairs

7 thoughts on “Betrayed Again

  1. Leopold Gloom

    Wow, she really is a terrible minister. Whereas there ought to be a fair degree of privacy given to those giving up children for adoption, their needs to be a process in place for which adoptive parents and their children can know any and all RELEVANT medical history.

    Given that there are so many congenital/inherited medical conditions, this would seem a massive oversight, unless this is of course accounted for.

    1. Dr.Fart MD

      ah zappone, who una mullaly cozies up to regularly. mullaly is great for tearing people to shreds for very little, and then cozying up to the likes of zappone because she’s doin somethin for her. hypocrite.

      1. Clampers Outside!

        What’s she doing for her?

        Also, if you know, as I don’t…. any idea what “agenda” Zappone is said to be working to, as per the last part of the BS post, thanks in advance.

        1. Dr.Fart MD

          they do like gay events together n stuff. mullaly tweets about her the odd time in relation to ’em. saying she’s great, and she’s doing loads for the gay community. and in the same breath almost, lambasting people for saying ‘female’ instead of woman or whatever. Yet Zappone regularly does horrible things as a minister, and mullaly doesnt say anything.

  2. SOQ

    If the balance of rights is between a child (now adult) who wants to know where they come from and a mother whom for whatever reason gives up her child AND then lies to her now partner and possibly other children- I am most definitely with the child.

    There is a distinct aroma of church influence in all of this. Daddy? No, Father.

  3. H

    Glad I picked up a copy of my original birth certificate when I was home in September so…. bunch of ladyparts

Comments are closed.