Redress And ‘Impossible Criteria’

at | 1 Reply

Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan in the Dáil last night extended redress for those who worked in the Magdalene Laundries but were not residents

Last night in the Dáil, Minister for Justice Charlie Flanagan presented the Redress for Women Resident in Certain Institutions (Amendment) Bill 2019.

He explained that the purpose of the bill was to amend the Redress for Women Resident in Certain Institutions Act 2015 – to ensure women who would have worked at Magdalene Laundries but lived in adjoining institutions, as opposed to the laundries themselves, can receive compensation via the Magdalene Restorative Justice ex gratia scheme which was set up in 2013.

The bill is also designed to ensure that awards received by the women won’t be taken into account when assessments are made for their nursing home supports.

The move follows Ombudsman Peter Tyndall who published a report in November 2017 called Opportunity Lost – An Investigation by the Ombudsman into the administration of the Magdalene Restorative Justice Scheme, in which he criticised the Department of Justice for its administration of the scheme and it’s exclusion of the women who worked at the laundries.

Mr Flanagan told the Dáil:

“The purpose of this amending Bill, which is short and technical in nature, is to apply these same health benefits to those women who qualify under the November 2018 addendum to the Magdalene redress scheme.”

However, he also said:

“There were three other recommendations of the Ombudsman. These relate, first, to assistance to applicants who lack capacity to accept an award and second, to a review of those cases where there is a dispute in respect of length of stay in a Magdalen institution.

A senior counsel was appointed to carry out both these tasks.

“All but one of the capacity cases have now been resolved and the review in relation to the length of stay issue is ongoing.

“The third recommendation by the Ombudsman was that guidance should be provided for future redress schemes.

A working group led by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform is examining this issue.

“Officials in my Department have kept the Ombudsman informed of progress in relation to the implementation of his recommendations and last month I met the Ombudsman, who acknowledged the progress that has been made, to date, in implementing his recommendations.”

Following the Dáil debate, human rights lecturer and co-founder of the Clann Project Dr Maeve O’Rourke, tweeted her thoughts…

In addition, Marie O’Connor, chair of the Survivors of Symphysiotomy, also tweeted her thoughts…

Yesterday: Who Came Up With The ‘Prior Complaint’ Requirement?

Previously:  Magdalene Laundries on Broadsheet

UPDATE:

Last month, Conall Ó Fátharta, in the Irish Examiner, reported that barrister Mary O’Toole is carrying out the review mentioned by Mr Flanagan above and that just eight women who had been in dispute with the Department of Justice over the length of time they worked in a Magdalene laundry have so far received redress payments.

Mr Ó Fátharta also reported that Ms O’Toole had identified a total of 214 cases for review.

Eight redress payments made to Magdalene survivors (Conall Ó Fátharta, The Irish Examiner, June 17, 2019)

 

 

 

One thought on “Redress And ‘Impossible Criteria’

  1. Mr.Fart

    a day after that judge ruled that the government didnt pay people they shouldve paid because they ignored a rule. wonder if its to do wtih that? when they cut back on things a few years ago i knew hands were probs tied coz post-recession, but they bang on about having a strong economy, and how we’re doing really well, but still try cut back everywhere. they never give back, or raise anything. just cuts. and usually cuts on the people who need/deserve it most. i want to know their motives, why do they do this?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *