Derek Mooney: It’s A Virus, Not A Political Tool. Call It By its Name


From top: US President Donald Trump (centre) during a Coronavirus Task Force news conference in the White House; Corona is replaced by ‘Chinese’ in President Trump’s script;  Derek Mooney

According to the haggard old proverb: “even a stopped clock is right twice a day.”

The current US President can only dream of attaining even this level of accidental consistency.

After months of denying the threat posed by Coronavirus, even to the point of putting the blame for its arrival in the U.S. on “the Democrat policy of open borders” (See this NYTimes timeline of Trump’s statements) the current U.S. President seems, finally, to have had the realisation imposed upon him that Coronavirus is a real and present danger.

Not that something as hazardous or deadly serious as the worst global pandemic in a century is going to stop Trump from scoring political points.

Along with changing his messaging, Trump has also changed his language. Up to two weeks ago – when he was still denying the seriousness of the situation – he was content to call the threat by its proper name: Coronavirus or Covid19.

No longer. Now that the public spotlight has turned on to the weeks and months of his administration’s negligence and indifference Trump has found a new name for the disease: the Chinese Virus.

Trump now stubbornly refuses to call it Coronavirus, using the phrase Chinese virus instead. Indeed, during last Thursday’s daily coronavirus task force briefing, the Washington Post’s photographer Jabin Botsford snapped this image of President Donald Trump’s speaking notes.

They show the word ”Corona” crossed out from the official typed script and the word ”Chinese” put in its place, in what looks like Trump’s trademark sharpie handwriting.

When challenged by reporters about his repeated use of the phrase and asked if he thought this was racist, Trump said:

“It’s not racist at all, no, not at all. It comes from China, that’s why. I want to be accurate. …I have great love for all of the people from our country, but as you know China tried to say at one point … that it was caused by American soldiers… It comes from China.”

Though he probably does not know it, Trump is resurrecting an age-old trope. One with origins in a sexually transmitted infection!

Back in the 16th and 17th centuries, countries hit with a syphilis infection blamed enemy countries for the outbreak. Italians, Germans and English called it ‘the French disease’.

The French named it ‘the Neapolitan disease’. The Russians called it the ‘Polish disease’, so the Poles called it ‘the German disease’. The Danish, the Portuguese and Northern Africans named it ‘the Spanish/Castilian disease’ while the Turks spread the blame wider calling it ‘Christian disease’.

Whatever the etymology, you don’t need a masters’ degree in political science to work out Trump’s intention. He wants… no, in this election year… he needs, to distract from the glaring inadequacy of his failed response by shamelessly and recklessly scapegoating an entire race.

He does not care one jot that his crass politicking is fuelling and licensing racism and xenophobia, all he cares about is getting the focus off him.

It is his standard operational response where he feels politically threatened or in electoral danger. He finds a target, preferably a minority group or race, on which he can pin blame, no matter how ludicrous. The fact that racism is his first go-to-response in these situations tells us as much about the state of race relations in the US as it does about Trump.

The problem in this case is not that he is right, he clearly isn’t, but that his crude politicking is deflecting from a valid point, namely that the negligence and indifference of the Chinese State authorities, and that means the Chinese Communist Party, made this situation worse.

A regional infection quickly became a global pandemic as a consequence of their two-step strategy of blanket denial and blame avoidance.

Beijing’s initial response was no less crass or ignorant than Trump’s. When the late Dr Li Wenliang posted warnings, on a medical group-chat in December 2019, of a virus hitting Wuhan which he thought resembled Sars; he was told by police to “stop making false comments” and reprimanded for “spreading rumours”.

Dr Li’s death of Covid-19 in early February sparked public outrage in China. The volume of online posts blaming the Chinese Communist Party was so great that China’s internet censors were overwhelmed. The Communist leadership saw that blank denial was not working. They switched tack and launched an anti-corruption agency investigation …into the problems reported by the public concerning Doctor Li Wenliang” .

The investigators published their report late last week. A classic …on the one hand, but on the other… whitewash. They found Dr Li was a professional who fought bravely and made sacrifices.

They withdrew the reprimand but said his findings were “not consistent with the actual situation at the time”. The only action recommended was to name and shame the police who reprimanded Dr Li for not following correct procedures.

Needless to add the report is being met with as much anger as the news of Dr Li’s death. Meanwhile, and this is where the Trump stopped clock comes into play, official Chinese government spokespeople, notably Lijian Zhao, Deputy Director General of China’s Information Department, have been busy doing to the United States what Trump is doing to China.

Zhao is the official cited by Trump as saying that US troops were responsible for the Coronavirus outbreak.

Zhao’s Twitter timeline is so crammed with disinformation, lies and propaganda it would make a Shinnerbot blush.

Included are links to #FakeNews sources claiming US military participation in the World military games in Wuhan was behind Coronavirus. One says:

At the 7th Military World Games (October 18-27, 2019) held in Wuhan, why did the U.S. team (369 members) win ZERO gold medal? Did that even look like a reasonable record for the world’s leading military power?Did your government do it on purpose? Was anyone among the 369 participants ever (mis)diagnosed with influenza? Was it possible they were carriers of the novel coronavirus? The best thing for the U.S. now is to stop burying its head in the sand and give the 369 people PCT tests to see if they are infected.

China is not the only authoritarian regime more driven by avoiding public panic and retaining their own authority, than with public health and safety.

Neither is it the only one engaged in a propaganda battle to cover its own negligence. Russian political activist Garry Kasparov castigated CNN on Saturday for unquestioningly accepting Putin’s propaganda that Russia’s infection numbers are low, saying:

“the Russian numbers are “low” because they are lying. They are always lying until proven otherwise. They don’t take down misinformation, they take down the truth. I’m furious”.

In terms of both intent and effect there is no difference between what either Trump, Xi or Putin have done.

Though it is clear Coronavirus started in China and is not some conspiratorial plot, when it comes to those impacted it does not matter where Coronavirus originated.

Trump, Xi Putin… and others have jeopardised the health of their own people and, in this era of globalisation, that means they have risked ours too.

Derek Mooney is a communications and public affairs consultant. He previously served as a Ministerial Adviser to the Fianna Fáil-led government 2004 – 2010.  His column appears here every Monday.Follow Derek on Twitter: @dsmooney



Sponsored Link

31 thoughts on “Derek Mooney: It’s A Virus, Not A Political Tool. Call It By its Name

  1. :-Joe

    Ok, so full name and title : “Derek Mooney – F-f/g establishment pr spin merchant”.

    Boost your immune system, Derek, take plenty of fresh fruit and veg – Vitamins A / D / C + Iodine
    – I’m still holding out in hope that you’ll spill the beans one day and expose all the corruption you’re already well aware of for the benefit of true journalism and the public good of every citizen whose future depends on it.


  2. broadbag

    It’s not to be used as a political tool unless you’re scoring (political) points off Trump, Putin and Xi…

          1. Pat Mustard

            He’ll be flawless in getting senile Joe to tap out.

            In fairness, it wouldn’t be difficult considering Biden can’t string a single coherent sentence together.

        1. Nigel

          Maybe, I hope not, but if ‘senile’ Joe is that bad and Bernie lost to him, what chance would he have against Trump?

        2. :-Joe

          Trump is 91-95% to get re-elected at the moment…

          Tthe only thing that was likely to change that was if the economy tanked and/or he accidentally launched a nuke directly at himself while sitting on his custom goldenen jewel encrusted throne toilet while munching on a quarter-pounder with lots of cheeeeeeeese…

          Biden is a corrupted establishment failure who has never won any race in anything, nevermind the senility.

          Bernie has already won as much as he could ever have hoped for.

          A failing empire run by a surveillance state Oligarchy vs Social Democracy was never gonna get anwhere as a battle at this time…

          Athough, thanks to Bernie’s common sense policies a new movement is growing from it… it’s a big win, more than people realise now. A bit like Corbyn forcing the tories to move a little notch to the centre and invest in public infrastructure for a change and to help get, but more importantly, stay comfortably elected.


        3. Nigel

          91-95%? Not sure where that’ figure comes from. Comparing Bernie to the colossal disaster that is Corbyn isn’t exactly… flattering. Someone who forces the Tories to stay comfortably elected isn’t really what you should be looking for in a Labour leader. Again, ‘failure’ ‘senile’ Biden beat (or is beating, at any rate) Bernie. Not the outcome I would have preferred, but there you go.

        4. :-Joe

          I kinda f***ed up the edit there…timer ran out..

          Corbyn lost embarassingly on the surface but actually in reality he never really had a chance. Everybody, including the tory leadership had no idea how successful cummings and the voter targeting and psychological profiling geeks would be. Nobody and we can’t get at the records to prove it, yet but people know they are there in facederp etc. but it could take a few years to figure it out.

          Anyway it’s a win for Corbyn in forcing new ideas through into the mainstream and ultimately by making the tories promise to invest properly for once in public infrastructure to guarantee bojo the clown’s stability when elected it’s actually more than he should have achieved at all. It was impossible odds and factors against him from the start although not many realised how bad his chances really were hence the shock landslide even to the tories. So it’s been rigged basically.

          Biden is establishment Bernie and Trump are outsiders.

          Bernie would easily win the nomination if he wasn’t a democratic socialist or socialist / commie in the minds of the ignorant and brainwashed by fear and propaganda.

          If Bernie was a 100% corrupt establishment democrat like the rest who pledge allegience to wall st. bankers corporations lobbyists lawyers etc.. before people then he would replace Biden easily but he still wouldn’t have much of a chance to win the election.

          The reason for that is because of the way the system was built, manipulated and how it evolved over time. A whole load of statistics and data modelling have figured a lot of this out and after the primaries the elections are relatively easy to predict from historical data.

          Look at the primary model website by Helmut Northup that’s one of the two most reliable ones that have yet to fail in any prediction going back to the 60’s

          It’s not democracy you see anywhere, the whole thing is a f***ing sick joke….


        5. :-Joe

          It’s not that they can’t win elections… Corbyn won the party election and Bernie technically won the party nomination in 2016 before clinton had him shafted.. by the establishment DNC.

          You’ll never see them win a an election in such massively RIGGED and CORRUPTED systems….

          All you are really seeing is how corrupt and rigged the system really is… most people think they are looking at winners and losers… good and bad candidates.. good at this bad at that.. shoud’ve done this done that etc. etc.

          America is not a democracy and neither is the UK…

          Ireland is barely even democratic at all… it’s rigged in a similar but less overt way..

          Look up Alan Lichtman

          – I gotta go, remind me about this again some other time cheerio

        6. Nigel

          Bernie did not ‘technically’ win. If he wasn’t able to handle the penny-ha’penny ‘tricks’ of the DNC, the real election would have eaten him alive. These people are supposed to be politicians, not saints mourning from the sidelines that the game was too dirty for their precious white robes.

  3. kerryview

    I should be noted that the so-called ‘Spanish Flu’ which ravaged the world in 1918 did not start in Russia. Research shows that the flu started in the US (Kansas) and was spread by the movements of troops to Europe, where the British army caught it in a big way.
    Not wanting to be blamed for the outbreak, the Spanish were blamed.
    A plague on all their houses.

    1. Cian

      To maintain morale, World War I censors minimized early reports of illness and mortality in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the United States. Papers were free to report the epidemic’s effects in neutral Spain and these stories created a false impression of Spain as especially hard hit. This gave rise to the pandemic’s nickname, “Spanish flu”. Historical and epidemiological data are inadequate to identify with certainty the pandemic’s geographic origin, with varying views as to the origin.

      1. :-Joe

        Ye, Cian you might want to be careful relying on Wikipedia for unbiased non-‘murica-centric historical accuracy. Also, random people are constantly editing and messing with it for various reasons.

        As per comments by @Kerryview and @Truth In The News … Donal Fallon from hidden history was also talking about this specifically the other day saying the same.
        – He’s a reliable source, in as much as you can be about history and he makes good content and knows how to tell a good story.


        1. Cian

          I realise that. Which is why I linked to the Wikipedia article – which, in turn, has links to primary sources. People can use their own judgement on how much faith they have in it.

          Neither @Kerryview nor @Truth In The News provided anything more that hearsay (you at least named a source).

      1. Truth in the News

        Its proper name should be the “Kansas Flu”, the only reason its described
        as of Spanish origin is that Spain was neutral in WW1 and accurately reported
        the flu effects on its population, unlike the protagonists in WW1 who concealed
        true mortality rate with strict censorship, indeed the flu was spread by the Military
        perhaps when we have those that want to commemorate Irish WW1 dead of
        over 50 odd thousand, might it not be time to remember the at least 25 thousand
        Irish flu victims

  4. A Person

    Ah Derek, your big mistake was to refer to shinnerbots. It doesn’t matter about any content in your articles, but mention shinners and you will be attacked. Mind you there are less of them around these days. Where did all the “winners” of the election go? Don’t expect any answers to any questions posed.

      1. A Person

        And you like all shinners can’t answer a question. Where are the so-called winners of the election? Why are you not helping out?

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link