“Is There A Magic Number For Schools, Pubs Or Anywhere Else? There Isn’t”


Last night.

RTÉ One’s Prime TIme.

Minister for Health Stephen Donnelly interviewed by Mark Coughlan (top right) attempted to explain the logic behind the the new Covid measures.

Stephen Donnelly: “If you look around Europe and if you look at the amount of cases per population, we’re exactly mid-table. Unfortunately we have one of the highest growth rates of the virus anywhere in Europe. And so what we’re doing is we’re saying ‘let’s act now…let’s act before we’re closer to the top of that table and before we need to make much more serious restrictions’.”

Mark Coughlan: “So what’s gone wrong? How did we get here?”

Donnelly: “I don’t think it’s a question of what’s gone wrong. We’re dealing with a vicious, deadly and highly contagious virus. And what’s happening here is happening all over the world. In Europe but further afield, we’re seeing it in South Korea, in New Zealand and in other places. The broad pattern is: there was a surge here and other places, very harsh and restrictive measures were used, they worked…”

Coughlan: “They were supposed to give us time to implement a system that would allow us to control the virus…”

Donnelly: “Yeah, I think that’s fair…”

Coughlan: “And we had that time, did we not?”

Donnelly: “Yeah, yes, and I think this is that. So controlling the virus is rapid testing and tracing. We had about 52,000 tests last week. We’ve a massive upswing in testing now so we’re doing testing right around the country for meat processing plants, for direct provision, for nursing homes. I’m meeting the HSE tomorrow to see how we can get quicker and quicker. We’re increasing enforcement powers. The Minister for Justice and myself are working on that.

“And what we’re doing now is that we’re going to take very targeted measures, not the broad and very severe measures that were taken in the past, we’ve learnt about this. We’re moving quickly. In order to make sure we get the schools up, in order to make sure we get health services open. In order to save lives and in order to protect jobs because we all know that if we end up in a second serious national lockdown then the consequences, personally, for our communities and for our economy would be very, very serious.”

Coughlan: “You spoke about testing and tracing now. Why are we still trying to speed that process up? Surely that should have been properly in place by now?”

Donnelly: “Well, I don’t think we’ll ever stop trying to speed it up. Our testing…”

Coughlan: “But we were talking about 24-hour turnarounds back in, I think, May and we’re still looking at 72/three-day turnaround times. Why aren’t we at a 24-turnaround?”

Donnelly: “So we are, from test, from someone getting a swab to getting a result. Has there been something of a lag when we saw an awful lot of cases appear very quickly, there has and the HSE has been working very hard on that.”

Coughlan: “That was supposed to be the capacity?”

Donnelly: “The capacity is there, the capacity is there for 100,000.”

Coughlan: “Yet we saw a slowdown.”

Donnelly: “We did, so the capacity is there for 100,000 – that’s what means we can respond and say ‘we’re doing all meat processing plants’, ‘all direct provision’, ‘all nursing homes’. What we did see was a very low level for about a month, about 20 cases a day. In a matter of days, that shot up to many, many times that. We didn’t have the resources in place to instantly respond to that. It did take two or three days longer.”

Coughlan: “But you knew factories were a risk at the time? For the last few months, we’ve known factories were at risk. The whole system was supposed to be agile and robust to respond to incidents like this. And yet, you just said yourself, it didn’t.”

Donnelly: “Well it did, the system is agile, the system is robust.”

Coughlan: “But it slowed down.”

Donnelly: “It did slow down and we’re looking at making sure that doesn’t happen. But if you compare us to some other countries. Take New Zealand, New Zealand is held up as a paragon of success in all of this. New Zealand’s target time is five days. Our target time is three days and we’re looking at reducing that. The HSE has done amazing work. One of the things that happened was with a very quick upswing. There weren’t some of the clinicians in place to make the calls as quickly as we would have liked. Why? Because they’re clinicians who were pulled from their own frontline work. They were rightly redeployed. However, the HSE is working on a more permanent system that doesn’t require pulling other clinicians in.”

Coughlan: “When will that be in place?

Donnelly: “We’re working on it right now. I’m meeting them tomorrow and they’re already making improvements to it so…”

Coughlan: “So if there’s another surge in the next week, will it be ready? Or is it a month-long thing or?”

Donnelly: “No it’s happening already. So there’s a whole team in UCD has been stepped up. There’s a team in UCC who’s being stepped up at the moment so that capacity is being put in place very quickly. Would we have loved to have seen no lags when we saw the outbreaks in some of the Midlands? Sure. But as with every other country, we are learning as we go. And I think the HSE made a very reasonable decision to redeploy clinicians to their day jobs when the cases were low and they pulled them back in quite quickly when the cases shot up.”

Later (in relation to new powers being provided to the gardai and after Mr Donnelly said he had been working with the Minister for Justice Helen McEntee on these new powers)

Donnelly: “What we want to do is we want to say, look, it’s clearly no longer enough to say ‘we need everyone to follow the guidelines’. We all know that there are more and more house parties happening. And unfortunately nobody wants to be the guy that says ‘stop the house parties’ but unfortunately, the data that the public health doctors have is unambiguous and that it is causing a spread.

And whilst maybe the people at these parties are not at risk themselves, although they could well be, it’s entirely possible that they’re then carrying the virus to people who are at risk. So the decision we’ve taken is to say in cases like this or in cases where we have bars that are clearly just not obeying the same guidelines that the vast majority of the country obey, we are moving from recommendation and guidelines to enforcement powers and I think that’s the right thing to do and I think the public want to see that. Because we are asking everybody to make sacrifices again and again and again. We can’t have a situation where a very small group of people say ‘you know what…'”

Coughlan: “So that’s going to take legislation is it not? That’s going to take legislation which, as I understand it, won’t be enacted until the Dail returns which is September the 15th and yet these measures will be finished by September the 13th, no?”

Donnelly: “We will take a look. Primary legislation obviously takes a bit of time and we will be looking for the co-operation obviously across the political spectrum. The timing on that hasn’t been worked out but the message we’re sending out is this: is that while the vast majority of people are complying which is why we’re still mid-table in Europe and not in a worse situation, we can’t have situation where a small number of people essentially thumb their nose at everybody else. And we’re saying, ‘look, from now on, we are, as quickly as we can, we’re gonna bring in enforcement powers and that does require primary legislation’.”

Coughlan: “So all this is to try and bring the incidence rate down essentially, isn’t it, in the country? So it takes a while for all the cases to process through the system, several weeks. Yet in two weeks time we’re sending everybody back to school or to college. Is there not a contrast there or a difficulty in all that?”

Donnelly: “No, I think this is exactly why we’re acting now. So the measures that we, the State, take now, and that we, the people, take now are to reduce community transmission and the single best protection for the schools, by going back, which is still on track and a core government priority is reduced community transmission. That also, by the way, is the best protection for people in nursing homes, for people who may have underlying health conditions who are living at home. This is all about reducing community transmission and the prevalence in the community as low as possible.”

Coughlan: “And that’s what the local lockdowns in Laois, Kildare and Offaly were supposed to do too and seeing as we are where we are today, that obviously didn’t have the effect you were hoping it would have. Is there any situation in two weeks’ time, you’ll reconsider opening the schools?”

Donnelly: “Well, first of all…”

Coughlan: “Is there an incidence rate, is there a kind of a high bar or anything like that, that the Government has even discussed or considered or is it schools will reopen, whatever happens?”

Donnelly: “So, first of all, just on the three counties, it is not the case that the measures haven’t had the desired effect. The measures are having the desired effect thanks to the work that the people in those three counties are doing. So, a bit like the measures we brought in now, had we not acted when we did with those three counties, the situation would be much worse. If we didn’t act now in terms of the measures we’re bringing in today the situation in two weeks or two months would be much worse and we would be looking at a national lockdown.

In terms of, is there a magic number for schools or for pubs or for anything else, there isn’t. So the public health team, they look at a lot of different things, they look at the cases, they look at whether the cases are going up or down, they look at where the clusters are, they look at how much community transmission is going on and a lot of other factors so that’s why we have the public health emergency team and the expert advisory group so they can look at a lot of really complex information and then come up with the recommendations.”

Coughlan: “Briefly, there was a lot of discussion earlier today about over 70s and new measures to be brought in, from my reading of it, the new measures are essentially, you know, limit your contacts, stay indoors as much as possible, is there anything that’s actually new in it that they should be thinking about or considering?”

Donnelly: “Yeah, there was reporting today which was simply incorrect and scared a lot of people. A lot of elderly people, I was talking to colleagues, Oireachtas colleagues, they said, they were getting a lot of phone calls from a lot of very worried and very angry people over the age of 70 saying ‘are we about to be locked into our homes?’, that is absolutely not the case, it was not the recommendation from NPHET and it was not considered by government.

“Let me try and paraphrase the Chief Medical Officer when he was asked exactly this because what you’re asking is public health advice. Essentially, what he was saying is people who are vulnerable to this virus, be it based on age or an underlying condition need to exercise very careful judgment over the next 26 days. The prevalence rate is higher than we want. We had it down to about 3 per 100,000. It’s now up, I think, at 26 per 100,000. That is a rate that causes serious risk for people. It is in the community more than it was and so the advice to people over 70, the advice to people who are more vulnerable to this is: exercise caution.

“So, for example, if you are planning on going on a holiday, on a staycation and you’re over 70 with an underlying condition, there’s no issue with that whatsoever so long as you’re limiting your social interactions…and to be honest, everything I have seen shows that those who are more vulnerable to this have been very seriously following the guidelines. Really, it’s a reiteration of that: to be very, very careful while the rate is where it is.”

Watch back here

Earlier: A Limerick A Day

Sponsored Link

31 thoughts on ““Is There A Magic Number For Schools, Pubs Or Anywhere Else? There Isn’t”

  1. John Davis

    If only there was a common factor between meat processing plants, direct provision and nursing homes…

    1. frank

      Look John, they have found the culprit. It’s the chap on the bar pouring drinks into revellers mouths. It’s all people talk about, it was on the cover of every paper. There is simply no need to go and look how the poor immigrant slave class live all around us in houses of 10, 20, 30. Then off to work as care assistants and Deliveroo drivers.
      Case closed.

  2. Broadbag

    I had largely been backing and defending the government(s) and the measures…up until yesterday.

    They’ve made a balls of it with a raft of contradictory announcements, the logic is gone along with my belief that they have a handle on it. They have had time to get their ducks in a row and be ready for this moment and instead they’ve fiddled while Covid burned through the meat plants and Direct Provision, testing and tracing STILL isn’t up to scratch and people coming into the country are subject to the square root of F-all in terms of safeguarding the populace. They’ve screwed the pooch and chaos awaits.

  3. SOQ

    And not a single word about the margin of error of the PCR test or the fact that it cannot differentiate between a live virus and a previous infection.

  4. dan

    My admiration for Donnelly has totally vanished over the last few weeks. This interview reinforces my opinion that he’s an idiot

    1. GiggidyGoo

      Donnelly fooled quite a few people when he arrived on the scene. Gung ho. Was going to change the world. Quite a few younger folk were taken in by it. Jumped ship pretty quick from the Social democrats, went Independent, still mouthy, got into FF – and where is he now? Simon Harris’ understudy in waffle.
      As (Johnny, I think) made the point a couple of days ago – Donnelly should now look back over his Dail questions to Harris, and answer them himself now.

        1. GiggidyGoo

          “Utterly careerist & utterly Shameless”
          “You could become the next Shane Ross”

          “I Led the charge for the tax loopholes for the Vuture Funds to be closed down – that will save the State €15bn”

          Some boyo alright

  5. rominick

    @SOQ Correct, If everyone in the country was tested and the test picked up a previous infection we would probably have greater than half a million cases.
    In my opinion the government ramps up testing when they need to justify these excessive measures.
    Imagine what draconian measure that would justify if everyone got tested!!!!

  6. The Old Boy

    The root of this shambles, together with egregious ineptitude in government, seems to be that trying to get epidemiologists and public health experts to agree an acceptable level of virus transmission is like trying to get oncologists to agree a safe level of smoking. The word is that several members of NPHET are advocates for a return to “phase 0” lockdown, because anything else is “less safe” and they won’t put their names to “less safe” advice.

    The inevitable consequence is that the extent of measures imposed becomes a political decision which must be simultaneously based on the expert advice and contradictory to it. That the result is such an all-round cock-up is hardly surprising.

      1. Pip

        +1. Safety the new religion. Reminds me of the time the garda traffic chap said there is no margin, no discretion when it comes to speeding.

        1. SOQ

          Not often I agree with David Quin but this thing has thrown up some very strange bedfellows- on both sides.

          David Quinn @DavQuinn- “Deciding what level of risk we want to live with as a society isn’t a medical question mainly, it’s a political and social one, which is why doctors should not be given the last word.”

    1. Johnnythree

      Great comment. We are always going to have this to some extent. If they just owned up to that and said ”look, we made mistakes, we are doing our best, we are going to fix testing, look at meat plants etc BUT THERE WILL BE MORE CASES AND THATS OK’ then most of us would be alright with that. It’s the nature of an outbreak, you just try and keep a lid on it by doing the things that matter most. Last nights TV and announcement was an absolute circus. Donnelly so far from competent its not funny.

      So all broadsheet commentators what happens from here on? What do you think will happen? Interested to hear thoughts.

  7. wearnicehats

    Was speaking to friend yesterday. They have had one – one – correspondence from the school in August. Know what that was? The term 1 fees invoice. They ain’t going back next week. No way. Gangs of kids waiting at bus stops to use public transport that everyone has been advised not to use until 13th September. Really? Interestingly the pre-term rugby training is still going ahead as usual apparently

    1. Johnnythree

      Interesting. My kids are going back. Risks – yes. But I also think we can’t live in fear.
      Others sending kids back?

      1. wearnicehats

        Going back or supposed to be going back? This guy will be sending his kids to school ok but only if it’s open!

  8. f_lawless

    When our health minister is using circular reasoning to justify policy, you know you’re in trouble. He tells us the reason we know the local lockdowns are having the desired effect is because “the situation would be much worse” if they weren’t in place. Instead of pointing to any evidence, he’s using the assumed outcome of the policy to claim causality

    The whole thing is like watching a car crash happen in slow motion. The public is in the passenger seat and the government is at the wheel.

    1. Johnnythree

      f_lawless I love your posts. Seriously. I wish I was smart as you. Not taking the piss. Great handle on it tbf.

Comments are closed.

Sponsored Link